Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert A Linsenmeier, Northwestern University; Jennifer L. Cole, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

casestudy, as explained next. Our sessions were attended voluntarily by about 10 experienced (mostwith 5+ years of teaching) tenure-line and instructional faculty, all of whom were members ofour usual audience of faculty who are interested in evidence-based teaching.First session on faculty ethics: an exploration of ethical guidelines in higher educationIn the first session we discussed briefly what it means to be a member of a profession, rather thanbeing a practitioner of a craft or just having a job. A profession is a group that is “organized toearn a living by openly serving a certain moral ideal in a morally permissible way beyond whatlaw, market, and morality would otherwise require.”[1] Some of the elements of a profession arethat it

Conference Session

Educating Graduates in Engineering For A Flat World

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Williams, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Owe Petersen, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

International

the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He is a former Member of Technical Staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories and received his Ph.D. degrees from the University of Pennsylvania in 1971. His technical work covers the topics of Optical Data Links, Integrated Circuit Technology, RF semiconductor components, and semiconductor component reliable. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and an ABET EAC program evaluator in Electrical Engineering. Page 12.1142.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Panel Session – International Division “Educating Graduates

Conference Session

First-Generation Track - Technical Session IV

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Jennifer Blue, Miami University; Brielle Johnson, Miami University; Amy Summerville, Miami University; Brian P. Kirkmeyer, Miami University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, First Generation

in PHY 191 duringthe past 2 weeks? Please give your best estimate of how many times you've done each of thesethings. (Each item had a 7-point scale, with the points “Haven’t done”, “1 day”, to “More than 5days”.) ● Read the textbook● Reviewed slides or handouts from class● Reviewed your own notes from class● Attended class● Met with the professor outside class (e.g. office hours)● Met with the TA outside class (e.g. office hours)● Gone to a tutoring session for this course● Asked a question during class● Gone to a general study skills workshop● Had a study group with classmates● Done the homework for class● Done additional practice problems● Taken notes

Conference Session

First-Generation Track - Technical Session IV

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Dina Verdín, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Geoff Potvin, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, First Generation

support grit development in first-generationcollege students.Introduction First-generation college students face numerous unique challenges within higher educationthat offer particular opportunities for research and interventions to improve their enrollment andretention. This population has potential to add to the field of engineering as they bring with themunique lived experiences. First-generation college students have been described as invisibleinnovators [1]. Smith and Lucena [1] argue if first-generation college students’ funds of knowledgeare equally valued knowledge as that of the dominant engineering culture, these students’ can belegitimate creators of knowledge and contribute to innovative solutions in the engineeringenterprise

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Michael C. Loui, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #8098Interactive Session: Including Ethical Discussions in your Technical ClassesDr. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range and Twin Cities Engineering programs. She was a 2011-12 AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow at the National Science Foundation.Prof

Conference Session

Academic Standards and Academic Issues

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Tarek A. Shraibati; Ahmad Sarfaraz

Session 2407 Improving Technical Literacy in the General Student Population Tarek A. Shraibati, Ahmad R. Sarfaraz California State University, NorthridgeAbstractThis paper addresses some of the challenges of teaching engineering courses to non-engineeringmajors at California State University, Northridge. One of these courses is Introduction toComputer-Aided Graphics Tools offered by Manufacturing Systems Engineering andManagement department (MSEM). This course was designed to enable computer illiteratestudents to achieve success in the use of a CAD

Conference Session

Special Session: Next Generation Problem-Solving

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Larry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Brian Self, California Polytechnic State University; Ronald Miller, Colorado School of Mines; Tamara Moore, University of Minnesota; John Christ; Eric Hamilton, Pepperdine University; Barbara Olds, Colorado School of Mines; Heidi Diefes-Dux

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2010-1756: SPECIAL SESSION: NEXT GENERATION PROBLEM-SOLVING:RESULTS TO DATE - MODELS AND MODELING USING MEASLarry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academics and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former senior editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Dr. Shuman is the founding editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in the engineering education literature, and is co-author

Conference Session

CoED General Technical Session I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James E. Lewis, University of Louisville; Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

technologies. Thispaper discusses the authors’ experiences in identifying and understanding the deficiencies andtheir work to address these deficiencies in the required freshman Introductions to Engineeringcourse. This course has many components, including software and tablet PC use, and these Page 25.1265.3components make it ideal for addressing the technical literacy of the students.2. Background InformationGumport and Chun give three general areas of higher education that are potentially impacted bytechnology: the nature of knowledge, the process of teaching and learning, and the socialorganization of teaching and learning. 1 They accurately point

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division (EMD) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard (Rick) Warren Blank, Johns Hopkins Engineering for Professionals; Stanislaw Tarchalski, The Johns Hopkins University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management Division (EMD)

(Practice Paper Category)AbstractTo meet the challenges and opportunities of educating new generations of engineering leadersfor jobs of the future, Engineering Management programs must evolve with a strategy thatintegrates academic education with workplace application. That strategy must address thechanging demographics of technical industries and their workforces. We can meet that challengeby unifying technical leadership fundamentals into an applied experience, internalizingengineering management coursework with a real-life technical leadership scenario that isapplicable across industries.Education research[1] shows that working professional students learn best through case studies,active learning, and project-based activity. This paper

Conference Session

Poster Sessions for Unit Operations Lab Bazaar and Tenure-Track Faculty

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donald P. Visco, Tennessee Technological University; Jason M. Keith, Michigan Technological University; Jeffrey A. Nason, Oregon State University; Roger C. Lo, Department of Chemical Engineering, California State University, Long Beach; James P. Abulencia, Manhattan College; Sergio Mendez, California State University, Long Beach

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

AC 2011-1921: POSTER SESSION FOR TENURE TRACK FACULTYDonald P. Visco, Tennessee Technological UniversityJason M. Keith, Michigan Technological University Jason Keith is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Technological University.Dr. Jeffrey A Nason, Oregon State UniversityRoger C. Lo, Department of Chemical Engineering, California State University, Long Beach Roger C. Lo is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at California State University, Long Beach. He received his PhD from Texas A&M University in May 2008. Roger teaches undergraduate and grad- uate required courses (fluids, math, and transport phenomena) and also numerical analysis using Excel and MATLAB for chemical

Conference Session

Manufacturing Education Program Innovation

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Waldorf, Cal Poly State University; Sema Alptekin, Cal Poly State University; Robert Bjurman, General Motors Global Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, the process involved the following steps: 1) Define Goals: Broad objectives of the session were specified. 2) Collect Ideas: During this phase, the participants were asked to come up with ideas while deferring judgment. 3) Group Ideas: Ideas were grouped according to the objectives that they addressed. 4) Rank Ideas: Participants were asked to review and rank ideas according to perceived value and to vote for the best ideas in each topic area.Ideas addressing the future of manufacturing education generated from this process aresummarized and categorized in the following sections of this paper.MethodsSessions at the SME/CIRP international conference in San Luis Obispo were designed topromote discussion and idea-generation

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Hanson Mui, University of Waterloo; Soo Jung Woo, University of Waterloo; Spencer Arbuckle, University of Waterloo; Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo; Scott Walbridge P.E., University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering

activities: design, build, and test; which employ the following pedagogicaltechniques: inductive, experiential, and reflective learning respectively (Figure 1). Theseactivities each achieve one or more of the learning objectives: The design activity servesLearning Objectives 2 and 4 by splitting students’ time between two sets of design sketching andfeedback sessions. The build activity facilitates Learning Objective 3. The test activity servesLearning Objectives 4 and 5 through its presentation, load testing, and instructor feedbackcomponents. All activities engage Learning Objective 1 because this is a group work project, andrequires efficient teamwork in order to complete in the modest two-day timeframe. [Figure 1] Three

Conference Session

Special Session: Building Intentional Community Partnerships

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julia D Thompson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines; Marybeth Lima, Louisiana State University; Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

community engagement programs. Participants will leavethe session with a practical action plan to implement the types of partnerships they wish to buildwith their community.1. IntroductionIn the last decade, there has been a significant increase of the number of community engagementprograms and a growth in research on these programs. As a result of this upsurge, newpublication venues have also been established, including the International Journal of ServiceLearning in Engineering (IJSLE) founded in 20041, and the new ASEE Community Engagementdivision founded in 2013.2 Related research has primarily focused on students, with particularemphasis on knowledge and skills; attitudes and identities; recruitment, retention, and diversity;and professional

Conference Session

CoNECD Session : Day 1 Slot 1 Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 CoNECD

Authors

Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

Paper ID #28172Welcoming Student Veterans to Engineering: An Interactive Session forFaculty and AdministratorsDr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education, computer science education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former

Conference Session

Special Session: Impacts of Service in Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kurt Paterson, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

transcribed by the student later). Typical journal entries take thirty minuteseach. Content analysis for journal entries and reports is facilitated through the use of softwaretools, from simple (Text Tag Cloud Generator, Wordle) to sophisticated (Metafy). Table 1. Frequency of in-country journaling by student participants in international service programs within Michigan Tech’s D80 Center In-country duration Reporting frequency 2 weeks daily 2 months weekly 2 years quarterlyWhile the journals can provide

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

David Myszka

Session 3248 A Single Session, Laboratory Primer On Taguchi Methods David Myszka University of DaytonAbstractOver the past decade, Taguchi Methods have become an extremely popular approach toimproving the quality of products. These techniques provide a systematic approach forthe application of experiments to improve the product design and production process.However, outside of quality engineering courses, there is a lack of instruction on thesemethods in many technical programs. All technical professionals should have anunderstanding of Taguchi Methods. The reason for the

Conference Session

Veterans Track - Technical Session I

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Veterans

like me like me like me like me like meA person who feels finding an answer to a newengineering problem is thrilling.Not at all Not A little Somewhat Very much Like me like me like me like me like me like me Not at all Not Like Very muchA person who.. like me like me me like meThinks it’s valuable to findways to apply the world’s 4 123scientific knowledge 1 2Feels finding an answer toa new engineering problem 3 4is thrillingThinks engineersdiscussing

Conference Session

CoNECD Session : Day 4 Slot 1 Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 CoNECD

Authors

Kristina Rigden, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

professionals, and female undergraduateengineering students.Key TermsPresented below is a list of key terms that will be used in this presentation.1. Mentee: Female lowerclassman defined as freshman and sophomore studentsmajoring in engineering2. Peer Mentor: Female upperclassman defined as junior and senior studentsmajoring in engineering acting as mentors for the mentee students3. Industry Mentor: Engineering professions and/or alumnae of Cal Poly PomonaCollege of Engineering acting as mentors for mentees and peer mentors during groupmentoring sessions4. Engineering Faculty Mentor: Female engineering faculty at Cal Poly PomonaCollege of Engineering acting as mentors for mentees and peer mentors during groupmentoring sessions

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 9

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University; Gregory Mason, P.E., zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

: Connectedness. A fifth dimension for explaining the space of teaming prompts issomething we have called connectedness to capture the various ways in which a prompt can beconnected up to something larger. For example, prompt 3 (with the focus on attendance) andprompt 4 (with the focus on grading) were constructed based on ideas that came up in previousteaming sessions. The prompts about being back on campus (prompt 1), back in the classroom(prompt 2), and back to normal (prompt 6) were constructed to create continuity with worldevents and the general context. The prompts about something you'd like students to know aboutyou (prompt 8) and a situation where you felt cared for (prompt 9) were connected to broaderdepartmental goals.These dimensions are by

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Denise M. Driscoll, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Maeve Drummond Oakes, CISTAR, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Paper ID #34970Creating a Diverse Next Generation of Technically- and Community-MindedSTEM Professionals (Experience)Dr. Denise M. Driscoll, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Denise M. Driscoll, Purdue University Dr. Driscoll is an experimental social psychologist with ex- pertise in stereotyping and prejudice, attitude and persuasion, diversity and inclusion, and managerial and intercultural business communication. Her experiences as an academic, diversity consultant, and admin- istrator over the last 30 years have helped her integrate broadening participation and inclusion practices across research

Conference Session

Capstone Design in ECE

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina Howe, University of Evansville; Dick Blandford, University of Evansville; Deborah J. Hwang, University of Evansville

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

departments. Lunch isthen provided followed by the afternoon session consisting of the oral presentations. All areinvited to this session as well, but it is generally attended by other senior students, faculty, andloved ones of the students.Poster SessionDuring the poster session each student or team is given an appropriate space to allow for a demoof their project and an easel for the poster. The length of the poster session is dependent uponthe number of capstone projects, but enough time is allotted so that the judges may spend at least20 minutes with each project. Students are expected to stay next to their poster the entire postersession and provide a demonstration and answer questions to anyone who visits their area.Typically there are three

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: S-STEM 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sura Alqudah, Western Washington University ; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Joseph Arthur Brobst, Old Dominion University; Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; Andrew G. Klein, Western Washington University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

hypothesize that an early project experience is a significant contributorrecruitment and retention of Scholars based on the supporting literature [20] and our ownexperience with past successful undergraduate project advising. Indeed, early exposure to projectsinvolving engineering problem solving with direct and clear benefits to society and the localcommunity have been shown to be especially beneficial to women and underrepresented minoritystudents [20, 21], and highly useful as retention tools. These projects are taken for a variablenumber of credits (1 to 3), and generally consist of teams of 3–4 students across all threeengineering disciplines, and fit within the existing project advising framework at the engineeringdepartment in one of three

Conference Session

Technical Sessions 1

Collection

2024 Fall ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Zhou Zhang, SUNY Farmingdale State College; Yizhe Chang, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Professional Papers

) 1 has emerged as a revolutionary force, reshaping industriesand societies across the globe. At its core, Generative AI refers to a class of AI algorithms capableof generating new content, ideas, or solutions autonomously, often mimicking human creativityand ingenuity 2. This transformative technology has found applications in a myriad of sectors,including entertainment, healthcare, finance, and education 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 refer to Figure 1., Beyondthese examples, Generative AI continues to permeate various other sectors, from manufacturingand agriculture to transportation. Its ability to generate realistic simulations, optimize complexprocesses, and augment human capabilities holds immense promise for the future of work andsociety at large

Conference Session

ELD Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Kiem-Dung Ta; Helen Clements; Kevin Drees

Creating a Library Instruction Session for a Technical Writing Course Composed of Engineering and Non-Engineering Students Kevin P. Drees, Kiem-Dung Ta, and Helen Peeler Clements Oklahoma State UniversityAbstractThis paper provides a framework of ideas for librarians and technical writing instructorsinterested in developing library instruction programs to enhance students’ performance intechnical writing courses. A new library instruction program for ENGL 3323: Technical Writingaddresses a concern of engineering faculty that engineering students, the largest studentpopulation enrolled in this course, are not locating the high quality resources needed to round outthe

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 13: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Randy Brooks, Texas A&M University

material. “Most [high school] graduates enter college without the properknowledge, skills and fundamentals needed to succeed [1].” The high school “experiences, alongwith the lack of independence, confidence and expertise that is necessary for higher education,ultimately leave students unprepared for what lies ahead [1].”Summer or winter bridge courses are common applications of this concept [2][3][4]. Whenpaired with a pre-course survey [5], the instructor may then use the gathered wealth of data tocustomize course delivery and content to the particular student population in their classroom.The case detailed in this paper is student feedback analysis regarding a virtual 8-hours-over-2-days pre-course college preparatory session developed during

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Stephanie Cupp; Paolo Moore; Norman Fortenberry

Engineering Undergraduates?"1998 Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings. Session 3257. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education, 1998. “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering"19. Benefield, Larry D., Landa L. Trentham, Karen Khododadi, and William F. Walker. "Quality Improvement in a College Engineering Instructional Program." Journal of Engineering Education. vol. 86, no. 1, (1997): pages 57-64.20. Mastracchio, Robert. "Assessment of Professional Performance Expectations and Measures." National Conference on Outcomes Assessment. General

Conference Session

Engineering Librarians Boot Camp

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott Curtis, Linda Hall Library

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

of problems that crop up in looking for thesepapers in a database. Any general conclusions drawn to assess quantitatively the completeness oraccuracy of the database would therefore be specious. Of the ten papers selected, seven returnedbibliographic records corresponding to the paper in Compendex. Those records located werefound under serial titles like “American Society of Mechanical Engineers – Advance paper,”“ASME – Paper,” or “American Society of Mechanical Engineers – Papers.” While these titlesare suggestive, and fairly consistent, they do not lead unambiguously to the determination thatthe record is a miscellaneous technical paper publication. Of the three papers that Compendexfailed to return a correct bibliographic match for, one

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Angie Hill Price

Session 1648 Recommendations for Establishing Small Scale K, 1 Outreach Angie Hill Price Texas A&M UniversityAbstractThe need for general K-12 outreach has been the focus of many organizations on a broad scaleapproach. While that is certainly admirable and desirable, it is possible to initiate programs on avery small scale. Outreach is a viable plank in the platform for tenure as a service component.New and established faculty would profit from the opportunity to hone and refine teaching skillsand submit their own

Conference Session

Web Based Laboratories and Classes

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Helen Grady

Session Number 2158 Teaching Well Online: Part, I, Instructional Design Helen M. Grady, Ed.D. Mercer UniversityTeaching online is not as simple as placing your lecture notes on the web—you must design thewhole educational experience differently. This two-part presentation focuses on the need forinstructional design, and also for interactive teaching and learning. Part I focuses on how toapply the principles of instructional design to online training materials or courses.Systematic instructional design enables a course developer to answer three basic questions:(1) Where

Conference Session

General Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shanshan Li, Purdue University; Yang Chen, Purdue University; David M. Whittinghill, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

bydigital means 1. However the potential of AR as a motivation-stimulated factor in languagelearning and vocabulary learning remains unexplored. The purpose of this study was to explorehow AR might affect student motivation for vocabulary learning.An exploratory pilot study of a freely available augmented reality English vocabulary learningapplication was conducted to assess AR’s influence on students’ learning motivation. Semi-structured interviews were used for gathering assessment data. By analyzing the gatheredqualitative data within the framework of the ARCS Model, our results suggest that AR may helpwith student motivation toward the beginning of the application session, but tended to decreasetoward the end of the session. Several potential