Innovations: Stanford School of Engineering Katharine KuOffice of Technology Licensing March 30, 2016Industry relations President VP, Development Provost SchoolIndustry Development Dean of ResearchRelations Officers OTL Industrial Sponsored Contracts office projects office Industrial AffiliatesHow we see the world……..(licensing and sponsored research) Physical Sciences
InnovationEvolutionMichael Idelchik“I find out what the world needs,then I proceed to invent it.”-Thomas Edison 2 © 2013 General Electric Company - All rights reservedA history of innovation … 1879 1895 1920 1921 1941 Carbon World’s Portable The Entering Filament Largest X-Ray Magnetron the Jet Age Incandescent
A P P L I E D I N N O V A T I O NVISIONOrange County will become a national andglobal leader in scalable innovation. StartupsMISSIONUCI will be the UCIcatalyst forinnovation & Economyentrepreneurship in JobsOrange County. UCI3 Main Focus Areas INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UCI ENTREPRENEURSHIP OC STARTUP ECOSYSTEM THE COVE POWERED BY UCI Opened in July 2015, The Cove is
the IEEE Education Society. He was the 200206 President of Tau Beta Pi. Page 25.551.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012ENGINEERING INNOVATIVENESSAbstractThis paper explores engineering innovativeness. The data is drawn from a set of 8 interviews ofexperienced engineers and engineering educators. The research question is: “What set of intrinsicabilities, when combined with extrinsic factors, enable engineers to create innovations thatbenefit society? The six most important innovative behavior attributes of engineers suggested bythe interviewees were: domain knowledge, opportunity
3155 Implementing Innovation Ronald J. Bennett, Ph.D. Engineering and Technology Management University of St. Thomas St. Paul, MinnesotaABSTRACTIn 2002, a paper was presented at the ASEE Annual Conference titled “Selling Innovation.”(Bennett) The content related to a course taught to working adult graduate students in the Masterdegree programs in Engineering and Technology Management at the University of St. Thomas.These students are employed in a wide range of innovative
AC 2010-1951: INSPIRING INNOVATIONSinead Mac Namara, SYRACUSE UNIVERSITYClare Olsen, Syracuse UniversityLaura Steinberg, Syracuse UniversitySamuel Clemence, Syracuse University Page 15.746.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Inspiring Innovation1. IntroductionThis paper describes a course at Syracuse University that brings together architecture andstructural engineering students for a joint architecture and engineering design seminar.This course forms part of a larger NSF funded project aimed at increasing innovation andcreativity in engineering curricula. The principal aim of the overall project is to findstrategies to foster and reward
Session 2155 Selling Innovation Ronald J. Bennett, Ph.D. Engineering and Technology Management University of St. Thomas St. Paul, MinnesotaMISSIONWe provide a practical, values-based learning experience that produces well-rounded,entrepreneurial engineers and technology leaders who have the technical skills, passion andcourage to make a difference.IntroductionAs a fresh PhD in engineering at my first full-time job in industry I developed a new approach toa current problem
Entrepreneurship and Innovation Sponsored by SCRA Lead Organizers: Tom Byers, Stanford University Rich Brown, University of Utah EDI 2015 Themes The NAE’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program, which has five components: research experience, interdisciplinary curriculum, entrepreneurship, global dimension, and service learning. Improving diversity, including strategies for recruitment, retention, mentoring, and graduation. 2 AgendaA. Venture Creation • Rich Brown (Dean, University of Utah) and Paul Slusser (Utah alum and co-founder, Power Practical, Inc.) • Phil Weilerstein (CEO, VentureWell) and Riley Cernica (I-Corp
Building an Innovation Ecosystem Thomas W. Peterson NSF Assistant Director for Engineering twpeters@nsf.govDirectorate for Engineering 1 Creating an Innovation EcosystemDirectorate for Engineering 2 Innovation for GrowthDirectorate for Engineering 3 Three layers in the Innovation Triangle Basic Research (the foundation) Entrepreneurship (translational research) Responding to National Priorities
Innovation for Economic Growth Chris Greer Assistant Director for Information Technology R&D White House Office of Science & Technology Policy Aneesh Chopra U.S. Chief Technology OfficerI am focused on harnessing the power and potential of technology and innovation to execute on the President’s vision for a 21st Century economy – one where jobs are more plentiful, American firms more competitive, communications more affordable, broadband more abundant, families more connected, and Americans more safe and secure. Early Evidence of a Technology Recovery National Priorities – Health IT, Clean Energy – Among Growth Areas
Influencing Innovation in Education Samir El-Ghazaly Division DirectorElectrical, Communications and Cyber Systems (ECCS) Division Engineering Directorate National Science Foundation Arlington, VA NSF’s Origin, Mission, and Structure Independent federal agency established by Congress in the NSF Act of 1950 › “To Promote Progress of Science,” and “Advance National Health, Prosperity, and Welfare,” and “Secure the National Defense” Supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering Sponsors research primarily through grant mechanism, but operates no
Grant Legal& Compliance FundingAnineffectiveinnovationformula Good Idea + Individual Heroism + Serendipity = Breakthrough 10Extremesontheinnovationspectrum Ad Hoc Large Innovation Innovation Efforts Factories 11Regionalinnovationecosystems Networks Talent
Session CIEC 421 SUNY-Wide Innovation Dr. Lisa A. Stephens, University at Buffalo and Kim Scalzo, Executive Director of Academic Technology and Information Systems (SUNY Office of the Provost)Innovative Instruction Technology Grants Start Up funds entering their 8th round to all SUNY-wide (64 campuses) faculty and staff that are seeding a number of highly successful SUNY-wide initiatives including OER Services and Open Textbooks. Funds are targeted to individual faculty/staff innovations “technology in service of pedagogy”.SUNY Performance
AC 2009-1702: INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING OUTREACHJ. Shelley, United States Air ForceMickey Bowen, United States Air Force Page 14.737.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Innovation in Engineering Outreach:Engineering 11 as a tool for recruiting minority students to Engineering Page 14.737.2Abstract: A unique opportunity for recruiting engineering students has developed in theAntelope Valley of Southern California (AV). While the AV refers to itself as the“Aerospace Valley”, with a high percentage of the workforce employed by Edwards AirForce Base and the major Aerospace Prime
Session 3657 Curriculum Innovation and Renewal Donald E. Beasley, D. Jack Elzinga, Michael S. Leonard Clemson University / University of Florida / Clemson University Engineering as a discipline has been taught for centuries. Over the years, a standard engineeringcurriculum (with many variations) has evolved. However, engineering curriculum development has notfollowed a structured approach. While accreditation agencies have provided general guidelines, courses wereoften created and taught by the instructor most interested in the subject area. The result
Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Innovative Embedded Systems ProjectAbstractThe goal of an Embedded Design course is to teach programming, embedded circuits and softwarealgorithms. There are also related goals, such as learning to use development tools, lab equipmentand proper debugging techniques. There are tangential goals such as working in teams andpreparation for senior/capstone projects. And while there are a variety of approaches to teaching,the common theme is that you want the students to be successful and understand the material asthoroughly as possible.Each year, there are new peripherals, new processors and most engineering departments do not takea static approach to education and try to include more
What is Innovation?Moderator: Dr. Robert H. BishopPanelists:Dr. Utkan DemirciDr. Neil GershenfeldSylvia MartinezDr. John Morrell 2016 Engineering Deans Institute Annual Conference InterContinental San Francisco, CA March 30, 2016
Engineering, Innovation and DesignASEE - EDI March 30, 2016 What is Innovation? John Morrell Engineering Innovation Depth Purpose Breadth DesignASEE - EDI March 30, 2016 What is Innovation? John Morrell Engineering Innovation How can Will it make we do it? an impact
AC 2008-306: INNOVATION VERSUS ANALYSISMichael Roller, Purdue University Calumet Assistant Professor of Computer Graphics Technology.James Higley, Purdue University, Calumet Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology, Purdue University Calumet. Page 13.746.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Innovation versus Analysis A Case Study in Improving Technology CoursesAbstractBut a few years ago educators were dealing with the implementation of outcomes basedaccreditation. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) started thisprocess with the TC2k criterion in 2000
AC 2010-1650: IMPROVISATION FOR ENGINEERING INNOVATIONPeter Ludovice, Georgia Institute of Technology Pete Ludovice is an Associate Prof. of Chemical and and Biomolecular Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the University of Illinois and M.I.T. respectively. Pete carries out research on the molecular modeling of synthetic and biological macromolecules, and the use of humor and improvisation to improve technical innovation, communication and education. He works as a stand-up comedian in front of technical & non-technical audiences internationally. Pete hosts a weekly radio show entitled INSIDE THE BLACK BOX
Session 1309 Educational Innovation in Physiology: Capillary Filtration Heather E. Gunter1,2, Mark A. D’Avila2, Safa Sadeghpour2,3, Ragu Vijaykumar4, Joseph V. Bonventre2 1 Division of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Harvard University / 2 Harvard – MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology / 3 Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, MIT / 4 Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, MITAbstractThe concepts underlying capillary
Session 2149 Innovative Student Research Projects Alok K. Verma Old Dominion UniversityI. IntroductionSenior or Capstone project courses are part of majority of the Engineering TechnologyCurriculum. This is partly because of the faculty’s desire to assess student’s ability to apply theknowledge acquired and, partly because of the mandate by the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET). A number of papers have been published on the topic ofsenior projects and the necessity for providing realistic engineering experience 1,2,3
Dartmouth’s Ph.D. Innovation Program Joseph J. Helble, Carolyn E. Fraser, and Eric R. Fossum 1Abstract – Dartmouth’s Ph.D. Innovation Program is described. The rationale and structure of the four-year oldprogram is discussed. Significant success in its objectives to contribute to the Nation’s technological and economicleadership has already been achieved by the program despite its youth and small size.Keywords: Innovation, Enterprise, Entrepreneur, Ph.D., Dartmouth INTRODUCTIONIn 2005, “Innovate America”, a report from the National Innovation Summit, was released by the Council onCompetitiveness [1]. This report, authored by individuals drawn from the
Paper ID #11561Organized Innovation: A Framework for Effectively Managing InnovationDr. Sara Jansen Perry, Baylor University Sara Jansen Perry is an assistant professor of management in the Hankamer School of Business at Baylor University. She teaches organizational behavior and human resource management courses, including ne- gotiation and principles of management. She earned her PhD in 2009 from the University of Houston in Industrial-Organizational Psychology, also earning the Meredith P. Crawford fellowship in I-O Psychol- ogy from HumRRO that year. In the 2013-14 academic year, she held the Professional Land
Paper ID #10437Measuring Innovative Thinking Skills in Innovation Challenge ActivitiesDr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech Dr. Amelink is Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering, Virginia Tech.Ms. Christina Nocon Seimetz, Virginia Tech Christina Seimetz is a PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She also serves as program support staff for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity where she is involved with recruitment, outreach, and retention programs specifically targeted towards females interested in engineering. Ms. Seimetz earned
AC 2011-1370: ALL INNOVATION IS INNOVATION OF SYSTEMS: ANINTEGRATED 3-D MODEL OF INNOVATION COMPETENCIESWilliam D. Schindel, ICTT System Sciences William D. Schindel is president of ICTT System Sciences, a systems engineering company, and devel- oper of the Systematica Methodology for model and pattern-based systems engineering. His 40-year engineering career began in mil/aero systems with IBM Federal Systems, Owego, NY, included ser- vice as a faculty member of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and founding of three commercial systems-based enterprises. He has consulted on improvement of engineering processes within automotive, medical/health care, manufacturing, telecommunications, aerospace, and consumer
Paper ID #40494Fostering Innovation Mindset through Student Innovation Competitions andProgramsDr. Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Sadan Kulturel-Konak is a Professor of Management Information Systems and the Director of Flemming Creativity, Entrepreneurship and Economic Development (CEED) Center at Penn State Berks. Dr. Kul- turel also has a courtesy appointment at Penn State Harold and Inge Marcus Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Auburn University. Dr. Kulturel’s research focuses on modeling and
industrial, military, medical, and automotive applications. Ryan is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. He previously earned his MS in Systems Engineering from the University of Saint Thomas and his BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Minnesota.Ellen M. Swartz, North Dakota State University Ellen Swartz is currently pursuing a M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering at North Dakota State Univer- sity. Her research interests include STEM education, innovation-based learning, and agent-based mod- eling of complex adaptive systems. She previously received her B.S. degree from North Dakota State University in Electrical and Computer Engineering.Mr
Paper ID #18444Entrepreneurship, Engineering, Innovation, and Libraries: Empowering In-novators with InformationMr. Daniel Christe, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Daniel Christe has research interests at the nexus of mechanical engineering, materials science, and man- ufacturing centering on predictive design for functional fabrics that ”see, communicate, sense, and adapt”. Daniel is currently a research assistant in the Theoretical & Applied Mechanics Group and Drexel Uni- versity’s Center for Functional Fabrics at Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA. He also holds a research appointment at the