AC 2012-3129: A NOVEL APPROACH IN TEACHING STEM SUBJECTSTHROUGH CROSS-DEPARTMENTAL COLLABORATION IN CAPSTONECOURSESDr. Iem H. Heng, New York City College of Technology Iem Heng earned his bachelor’s degree from Providence College (Providence, R.I.) with double majors in the pre-engineering program and mathematics. In addition, he earned another bachelor’s degree from Columbia University (New York, N.Y.) in mechanical engineering, master’s in applied mathematics from Western Michigan University (Kalamazoo, Mich.), and his Ph.D. in computational and applied mathe- matics from Old Dominion University (Norfolk, Va.). Before joining the EMT/CET Department at City Tech in fall of 2007, he was a faculty member and Chair of
the field of algorithm visualization, which explores technology and pedagogical approaches that enhance human understanding of computer algorithms. He is also one of the leaders of a national effort, funded by the National Science Foundation CPATH and CCLI programs, to adapt studio-based instructional methods for undergraduate computing education and chemical engineering education.Mr. Adam Scott Carter, Washington State University Page 23.1298.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Use of Studio-based Learning in a Material/Energy Balance ClassFor more than a century
the early 1990’s andresponded most notably through Boeing’s list of “Desired Attributes of an Engineer” 1. ABETresponded to the needs of industry and, in 1996, the Engineering Accreditation Commissionapproved the student learning outcomes for the Engineering Criteria 2000. The eleven studentoutcomes, commonly referred to as “a thru k”, are comprised of six technical skills and fiveprofessional skills 2. The National Academy of Engineering developed a similar list of attributesfor engineers that included additional skills such as leadership and creativity3. Thus, the 21stcentury engineer should be someone with a sound understanding of engineering fundamentals,have a systems approach to engineering design and problem solving, a natural
that requires significant developmentefforts. The effectiveness of this approach is typically a function of the problem domain,curriculum and the technology. In order to determine its effectiveness in distance education,careful assessment studies need to be performed in various engineering disciplines 2.Remote laboratories or remote-access labs are often characterized by use of automation andinformation system technologies to provide remote-access to laboratory instruments andequipment. In terms of the physical laboratory equipment requirements, the remote labs are verysimilar to hands-on labs. What makes them different from real labs is the distance between theexperiment and the experimenter. In real-labs, the equipment might be mediated
with the biological and Engineering, Biology, and Computer Science medical sciences to achieve a more detailed Bioengineering understanding of biological phenomena and to develop new techniques and devices. The computer scientist and engineer's quantitative and analytical Engineering approach; traditional competence in the processing Biology and control of information, sensors, and materials; and ability to design and analyze systems are powerful tools when applied to biology, medicine, Computer Science and
introduce different specialization areas in electrical and computer engineering. The need forsuch a course came about as a result of a new ECE curriculum, which emphasized junior andsenior level elective courses to achieve depth in at least one of the ECE specialization areas. Thenew course was intended as a catalyst encouraging the students to consider their interests indifferent ECE specializations as early as possible to help them in choosing their elective courses.At the time, the ECE faculty participating in the development effort for this course was stronglyagainst creating just a survey course, which would most likely lack the rigor of a typicalintroductory course. A consensus was reached to create a course with a strong hardwarelaboratory
often involves simple solutions tosolve problems related to basic needs (i.e. clean water, air, sanitation, heat, shelter etc.). As such,training for one who participates in humanitarian engineering incorporates history, politics,economics, sociology, language, as well as rigorous engineering basics. The nature of humanitarian engineering projects offer a unique opportunity to teach studentsthrough an approach that integrates theory with a practical hands-on experience. By creating alearning environment through helping marginalized communities, students are challenged withproblems that enhance their critical thinking ability and help them acquire new technical skills.Moreover, the service learning aspect of these projects contribute to
. She earned a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Polytechnic University (now NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering), an SM in Chemical Engineering Practice from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a BS in Chemistry from the University at Albany of the State University of New York. Dr. Brown is a registered professional engineer in New York State. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Incorporating Undergraduate Research Experiences in an Engineering Technology Curriculum Benito Mendoza, Manuel Sairitupa, and Pamela Brown New York City College of Technology {bmendoza
approach we have taken has beencalled person-centered ethnography (Hollan and Wellenkamp, 1993; LeVine, 1982, Stevens,O’Connor, & Garrison, 2005). This term highlights both our interest in how people becomeengineers and that context shapes this becoming.Data from this work come from a large ethnographic study of the school-to-work transition ofearly career engineers. In total we observed and interviewed 20 new engineers (15 were bothobserved and interviewed and 5 were interviewed only) within their first two years in theworkforce (including both undergraduate co-ops/interns and newly graduated engineers) from 10engineering companies as they worked over several months. Data sources included: • Direct observations in the workplace, supported
design as opposed to anengineering approach to design. Although engineering programs continue to teach the technicalcompetencies necessary for this exercise, many new engineers lack the mental discipline toperform a thoughtful evaluation of their proposed solution, or a careful interpretation of thecustomer’s needs, some of which may not be clearly defined. We believe that there is a need tointroduce this skill as early as possible into an engineering program, and provide a vehicle for itsdeployment in a cornerstone class.The ability to build confidence in engineering “thinking” should not be overlooked in thefreshman year. One definition of engineering thinking published in 2014 by the Royal Academyof Engineering11 is described as Engineering
development of a module onsustainable engineering. The student engagement and interest in this module was measured, andthese results have led to the design of a full semester long course titled Engineering for SustainableDevelopment for undergraduate students of all majors. The course took a modular approach in itsdevelopment with each topical module having clearly defined and measurable outcomes with someindependence. Responding to those demands for a more sustainable engineering practice, thecourse involves sustainable circular designs as core promoters of a circular economy. Thisinnovative design thinking will create a new mentality in engineering students. In this paper, theauthors present the process followed for the design, implementation and
-disciplinary engineering program was initiatedat the Polytechnic campus of Arizona State University. A key feature of this program is theemphasis on a Problem Based Learning (PBL) approach to engineering education. Under thispedagogy, students are assigned engineering projects that are carefully planned by the faculty sothat their completion requires mastery of specific sets of traditional engineering topics.Whenever possible, needed topics are presented by faculty members on a “just in time” basisthroughout the curriculum, so that students immediately apply theoretical knowledge to realworld engineering problems. This paper presents an example of the implementation of thispedagogy in a course designed to involve students in an ongoing research
. in computer and information science from the University of Oregon in 1993 and 1999. Having previously served both as a Postdoc and Assistant Professor at the University of Hawaii, Manoa, Hundhausen is presently an Associate Professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University, where he directs the Human-centered Environments for Learning and Programming (HELP) Lab (http://helplab.org/). Recipient of more than $2 million in funding from the National Science Foundation, including a CAREER Award, Hundhausen applies the methods of human-computer interaction to the design and empirical evaluation of software environments and pedagogical approaches to improve learning and
during her freshman year she earned the basketball Rookie of the Year award for her conference. Page 26.112.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Student-Led Approach to Promoting Teamwork in an Introductory Engineering PresentationAt the Polytechnic School of Engineering of New York University, formerly known asPolytechnic University, a first-year required course, Introduction to Engineering and Design, hasbeen a core part of the curriculum for many years. As part of this course, student teams areexpected to solve one of eight independent
Educationformal methods a viable part of an undergraduate software engineering program that is for themost part intended to prepare practitioners rather than researchers. We have been fortunate tohave colleagues with a strong desire to learn and teach new things and to expand their expertiseacross a number of curricular areas, including formal methods. Nevertheless, significantopportunities for increased collaboration remain, among undergraduate SE educators and withformal methods researchers and tool developers.ConclusionIn spite of all the difficulties of incorporating the practical application of formal methods into anundergraduate software engineering curriculum, the authors believe that there is value in doingso. In the short term, study of formal
policies and procedures, diverse student populations, preparing for the first classsessions, and essential communication skills for the classroom. The day ended with a networkingsession and a resource fair. Second, an engineering specific half-day orientation followed oneweek later. This session included GTAs from chemical engineering, bioengineering,environmental engineering, civil engineering, and construction engineering management. Thegoal of this session was to have GTAs value their role in instruction and understand how theirresponsibilities fit into the educational approach to facilitate student learning. The group ofapproximately 40 GTAs was divided into four subgroups that rotated around interactive sessionsled by faculty with assistance
Paper ID #11512Changing the Approach of How to Teach Computational Methods for Engi-neeringDr. Luz Adriana Amaya-Bower, Central State Connecticut University Dr. Luz Amaya-Bower joined CCSU’s Department of Engineering as an Assistant Professor in August 2012. Before joining CCSU, she was an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at New York City College of Technology. Her PhD was granted by the Graduate Center, CUNY for her work on dynamic behavior of multiphase flows in microchannels. Dr. Amaya-Bower earned her undergraduate and master’s degrees from City College, CUNY. Her teaching and research interests
signed the spring of 2007 between OldDominion University and the New College Institute. A search was performed and a programcoordinator was hired in the summer of 2007, who is now on site in Martinsville. These first fewmonths the coordinator has been working with the ODU Department of Engineering Technologychair, the Dean of Applied Science and Engineering Technology at Patrick Henry CommunityCollege and the director of the New College Institute on establishing an office at PHCC and inestablishing a strategic marketing plan to advertise the program and recruit students for coursesbeginning in the Spring 2008 semester. The curriculum and articulation with PHCC are beingmore finely tuned, as well as articulation with other associate degree
failures? • What tools and fixtures are required to prevent failures, and reduce the risk? • What education is needed for line management and operators to reduce, or prevent failures?, and • Others.Our generic approach follows the logic, that in industry different failure risks, and/ormodes, and their effects are typically analyzed by a team of engineers working with someobjective, cross functional teams, representing "fresh eyes", new fields of expertise, andnew ideas. In our specific case, for the purpose of this paper, the DFRA Team focuses ondisassembly processes of electro-mechanical devices, including PCs.In order to support the industry-wide rule-based risk rating standardization process for
AC 2007-1284: A NOVEL LABWORK APPROACH FOR TEACHING AMECHATRONICS COURSEIoana Voiculescu, City College of the City University of New York Professor Ioana Voiculescu received a Ph. D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Politehnica University, Timisoara, Romania, in 1997 in the field of Precision Mechanics. She finished her second doctorate in 2005, also in Mechanical Engineering, but with the emphasis in MEMS. She has worked for five years at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, in Washington, DC in the area of MEMS gas sensors and gas preconcentrators. Currently, she is developing a MEMS laboratory in the Mechanical Engineering Department at City College of New York. She is an IEEE
courses on lasers and optoelectronic device physics at Penn State University and created an optoelectronics training curriculum for Agere employees. He received an MS in Chemical Physics from Indiana University and a PhD in Physics from Stevens Institute of Technology. He has 16 publications and 6 patents on optical devices.Himanshu Jain, Lehigh University Himanshu Jain is currently the T.L. Diamond Distinguished Chair in Engineering and Applied Science, a Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, and Director of NSF’s International Materials Institute for New Functionality in Glass at Lehigh University. Previously, he conducted research at Argonne and Brookhaven National
Session 3142 Graduate Student Practice of Technology Management: The Cohort Approach to Structuring Graduate Programs Ken Vickers, Greg Salamo, Ronna Turner University of ArkansasBackgroundMany conferences have been held to discuss the skills needed by engineering and technologyprogram graduates to be successful in technology based careers. These conferences strive tounderstand the full spectrum of job requirements by typically including representatives ofacademe, government, and industry. A common result of these conferences 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 has beenlists of
, however,that ecological engineering can offer a unique approach to each (see Bergen et al., 1997a formore detail).Proposed CurriculumOur vision for an ecological engineering degree program is not to teach engineers a little ecology,nor ecologists some engineering design skills. Rather we believe a curriculum that has strongecology, engineering fundamentals and design components is required. The objectives of thecurriculum are to: 1. Provide a broad education, including a strong liberal arts background emphasizing critical thinking and life-long learning, which will enable students to be informed, responsible, and effective professionals in society. 2. Develop students' written and oral communications skills so that they can organize
Session 1602 Bringing Research and New Technology into the Undergraduate Curriculum: A Course in Computational Fluid Dynamics Homayun K. Navaz, Brenda S. Henderson, and Ravi G. Mukkilmarudhur Kettering UniversityAbstractAs technology advances in the industries which graduating engineers wish to enter, technology inthe undergraduate curriculum must also advance. A course in computational fluid dynamics wasrecently developed which meets the challenge of bringing advanced topics to undergraduatestudents. This paper addresses techniques used to enable undergraduates to enter the work forcewith the ability to solve and
; empowering faculty through educational collaborative action research. He holds a B.S.I.E. in Industrial Engineering and a M.Ed. specializing in mathematics education. Cole has worked as an engineer in the manufacturing industry, a pastor in full-time ministry, and a high school math teacher. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Approaches for coaching students in design reviewsAbstract: Design reviews offer a unique window into understanding how design teachers help their studentsdevelop as designers. They are a prevalent practice for helping students develop design thinking expertise,although their structure and content may vary across disciplines. Understanding the teaching
administer their database system. For this reason, we decided that it might be bestto add a new area of specialization to our Computer Science program called DatabaseEngineering.Recently, we have been evaluating the content of our Database Engineering curriculum to makesure that we are covering enough materials in this track. In this process, we consulted with ouradvisory board members, industry experts and academic professionals in this field. Thisconsultation has concluded that our Database Engineering curriculum does not address DataMining / Data Warehousing areas. To remedy this issue, our Database Engineering curriculumhas been extended by addition of a new data mining course. This course will be a core course forour Database Engineering area
Paper ID #22653A Gamification Approach for Experiential Education of Inventory ControlDr. Gokhan Egilmez, University of New Haven Gokhan Egilmez is as assistant professor in the Industrial and Systems Engineering program at University of New Haven. He previously worked as assistant professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at North Dakota State University and postdoctoral research associate in the department of Civil, Environ- mental and Construction Engineering at University of Central Florida. Gokhan has Ph.D. in Mechanical and Systems Engineering, M.S. degrees in Industrial & Systems Engineering, and
Paper ID #5711Development of a New Power Electronics Curriculum Relevant to Tomor-row’s Power Engineering ChallengesMr. Nicholas David, Iowa State University Nicholas David received his B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Wisconsin–Platteville in 2009. He has worked in the wind power industry and is currently a graduate student in electrical engi- neering at Iowa State University. He has interests in power electronics and machine drives for renewable energy applications.Mr. Suman Debnath, Purdue University Suman Debnath was born in Thiruvananthapuram, India in 1988. He received his bachelor’s and
Paper ID #13727Developing a New Generation of Leadership at the University of CalgaryCase Study on the Maier Student Leadership ProgramDr. Lynne Cowe Falls, University of Calgary Lynne Cowe Falls, PhD, P. Eng., FCAE, FCSCE, is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering at the Schulich School of Engineering, the University of Calgary. She is a co-author of over 30 technical papers and several books in the area of pavement and infrastructure management and most recently of Current Pavement Management. With over 20 years in industry prior to joining the University of Calgary, she is a Vice-President and Board Member of the
AC 2012-5442: A REVISED APPROACH FOR BETTER IMPLEMENTA-TION OF CAPSTONE SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTSDr. Manish Paliwal, College of New Jersey Manish Paliwal is an Associate Professor of mechanical engineering at The College of New Jersey. His teaching and research interest areas include solid mechanics, biomechanics, vibration analysis, and de- sign/analysis of mechanical systems. He is the Chair of the MIIS Technical Committee of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division.Prof. Bijan Sepahpour, College of New Jersey Bijan Sepahpour is a registered Professional Engineer and professor of mechanical engineering at TCNJ. He is currently serving as the Chairman of the ME Department. He is actively involved in the