. ABET’s Criterion 3 student outcomes were noted for each lecture module. ABET criteriacontains 6 subsequent criterions that are used as the standard by which engineering programs areaccredited. Criterion 3 focuses on student outcomes that should be attained prior to graduation.Each engineering program develops its own strategy for how its curriculum addresses theseoutcomes and properly prepares students for professional careers. The model course proposed inthis work, using Criterion 3 as a basis for evaluation, seems to do an adequate job of exposingstudents to many of the student outcomes; some are explored in depth as is discussed in thefollowing paragraphs.A consistent theme in this work has been the importance of multiple channels of
. Page 25.228.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Assessment of Student Knowledge in an Introductory Thermodynamics CourseAbstractThe first course in thermodynamics builds the foundation for the thermal science courses in anundergraduate mechanical engineering curriculum. Students who master the fundamentalconcepts typically do well in the follow up thermal science courses. Therefore, assessment ofstudent knowledge in this course is essential for student success in the follow up courses.Assessment of student knowledge is usually achieved through homework assignments, one ortwo mid-semester exams, and a final examination. The difficulty is that only simple
Binghamton, NY Kevin P. Pintong Douglas H. Summerville Kyle J. Temkin Page 25.1376.2AbstractLab-based courses are generally not available in an online format because of the need forexpensive lab equipment, time consuming technical assistance, and troubleshooting. The recentincrease in demand for online instruction extends past current pedagogical methods and is mademore problematic with the addition of a lab component. In our previous paper, "Transitioning alab-based course to an online format"1, we presented the development of our pedagogicalframework. This framework is based on our 2010 online course and previous studies in onlineeducation. In this
throughtutoring; connecting Scholars with faculty and peer mentors; developing community-buildingactivities (e.g., puzzle hunts, documentary viewings); and providing career developmentactivities (e.g., tours of local computing, engineering, and technology businesses). Furthermore,the project has supported efforts to improve curriculum. As an example, a group of projectleaders across the partner institutions developed two introductory computer science courses andhas worked to establish community college pathways into computing at the university partner(one such pathway has been approved).As of Fall 2023, the project has supported 143 Scholars. Each Scholar was consideredlow-income by their institution. Approximately 74% of all Scholars were part of the
mentorship, research, and teaching.Alexandra Coso Strong (Assistant Professor) Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Strong completed her doctorate in aerospace engineering at Georgia Tech in spring, 2014. While a doctoral student, Strong was a National Science Foundation graduate research fellow and a member of the Cognitive Engineering Center. The goal of her doctorate research was to improve students’ abilities to think more broadly about complex systems design and to take into account stakeholder-related considerations within their design projects. Prior to attending Georgia Tech, Strong received a bachelor’s degree in
agree that students should not have access to the problem solutions.Homework helps students prepare for engineering employment and practice where they areexpected to solve new problems on their own. As students spend time and struggle throughsolving new problems they develop a deeper understanding of the subject matter. Page 22.512.2Students have always been interested in gaining access to the solutions of their homeworkassignments. Copies of solutions to homework assignments and exam were collected andhanded out to students planning to take the same course in the future.A decade or more before, all solution manuals were in a hard copy format
Paper ID #9851The Distribution of Family Friendly Benefits Policies across Higher Educa-tion Institutions: A Cluster AnalysisMr. Corey T Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Schimpf is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education. His research interests include examining how cyberlearning and informal learning environments can be brought into the engineering curriculum, how educational policies affect academic pathways for faculty and students and design research. His dissertation explores how a gaming platform can be used to facilitate early college engineering students skills development.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue
answering the questions that will be asked (from students oradministrators) of any instructor who implements a T-shaped course. Section 1: Practical BarriersCreating a T-shaped course comes with many practical hurdles; there is pressure frompost-graduate needs, ABET requirements, departmental and institutional requirements,and even the politics of faculty load allocation. But, in the spirit of engineering design,constraints are always present and can in fact aid in the development of a T-shapedcourse. As examples, I will provide details on two courses that were offered in atBucknell University in Fall 2012: a required signals and systems course, driven by thedesign of biomusical instruments; and a technical elective co
University of Kentucky in Lexington, KY, USA. She obtained a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from University of Central Florida, Masters and PhD degrees in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and spent two years at the University of Pennsylvania as a Postdoctoral Fellow before beginning her faculty appointment. Beyond Dr. Grady’s primary research in experimental mechanics, she enjoys developing hands-on activities for courses early in the engineering curriculum. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Six Statics Activities in a Shoebox KitAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to widely disseminate the
Paper ID #46127Student Performance Improvement in a Circuit Analysis Course when InteractiveWeb-Native Textbook Activities are Assigned for PointsMs. Jenny Welter, Wiley Jennifer ”Jenny” Welter has been a publishing professional for more than two decades, specifically focused on engineering publications and courseware during the majority of her tenure. She is passionate about supporting engineering education, specifically focused on content and assessment development for more effective student learning. She earned her BA in English from The University of Iowa.Yasaman Adibi, zyBooks Yasaman Adibi is an Engineering Content
Paper ID #37386Case Study: International Summer Research Programming ExperiencesSponsored by TAMUS LSAMPDr. Michael D. Preuss, Exquiri Consulting, LLC Michael Preuss, EdD, is the Co-founder and Lead Consultant for Exquiri Consulting, LLC. His primary focus is providing assistance to grant project teams in planning and development, through external evalu- ation, and as publication support. Most of his work involves STEM education and advancement projects and is completed for Minority-Serving Institutions. He also conducts research regarding higher education focused on the needs and interests of underserved populations and
Engineering from Tufts University. Her research interests are focused on in- terdisciplinary curriculum development in engineering education and the political, economic, and societal dimensions of curricular change. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Critic as Designer:How Metacognition Makes Transdisciplinarity Possible The Critic as Designer: How Metacognition Makes Transdisciplinarity Possible AbstractFor students to learn how to address complex problems spanning domains, they need practice intransdisciplinary teamwork. However, practice alone is not
teaching in the Republic of Korea (South Korea). Isubmitted my curriculum vitae and proposed course syllabus to Kyungpook NationalUniversity’s Office of International Affairs, doubtful that a technical-writing course would bewelcomed by KNU’s engineering program. Instead, the course was well received by KNU’sDepartment of English Language and Literature. By June 2006, I was teaching and livingabroad—only my second time ever to travel overseas and my first time to travel internationallyalone.Teaching and living abroad, even if only for one summer, was one of my most professionallychallenging and personally rewarding experiences. Not only has the experience expanded myteaching repertoire, but it has also informed and improved my interactions with
Targeting Middle School Girls and Their Parents (Research-to-Practice)BackgroundScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) are at the forefront of our nation'sagenda. Both national and global advancement and sustainability are contingent upon fosteringdiscovery and development in the STEM disciplines. Porter and Stern[1] point to the importanceof scientific and technical talent to the national economic performance. However, “there is aquiet crisis building in the United States” reports Jackson[2], who asserts that the increasing gapbetween the nation’s need for scientists, engineers, and other technically-skilled workers, and itsproduction of them, could jeopardize the nation’s technical pre-eminence and
education. It will enumerate the rewards that accrue to both facultyand students through an international exchange and the components that must necessarily beincluded in the program if it is to be successful and live a long and prosperous life. It willinclude such things as: making the initial contact, evaluating the proposed site, developing abudget, generating support, documenting the responsibilities of each institution, planning for thetrip, emergency contingency plans, orientation meetings with the students, language difficulties,academic credit, recruiting, technical projects, and final evaluation.The paper will conclude by reviewing two different exchange programs, one in Europe, which iswell established and has been operating for many years
Paper ID #48524The Role of Predictive and Generative AI in Shaping Modern Education:Current Applications and OpportunitiesMadison Melton, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Madison Melton is a third-year PhD student at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Her research focuses on computer science education in K12, generative AI, and broadening participation in computing. In Fall 2024, she completed her qualifying exam, which examined how predictive AI and generative AI are shaping modern education. She is currently developing her dissertation proposal on using generative AI to create K12 teaching materials
Introductory Structural Engineering CourseAbstractA new introductory structural engineering course has been developed at The University of Wis-consin-Platteville (UW-Platteville). The course follows Mechanics of Materials in the structurescurriculum, where a traditional curriculum would typically provide a structural analysis course.While this course introduces methods of structural analysis, it does so in the context of structuralmaterials (steel, reinforced concrete, masonry and timber) and design so as to remove the unnatu-ral distinction between analysis and design.In addition to the innovative design of the course, the grading of the course is also of note.Grades are not determined based on a typical “points” system. Instead, an outcomes-based
department.1. Related Works1.1. Retention Rates & Computing Demographics It is well documented that developing a sense of belonging is essential for student re-tention in STEM fields [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Recent work highlights how students from underrepre-sented groups, in general, have less of a sense of belonging than white men in the same field [9].And perhaps more salient, recent work documented how even after 10 years of focusing on inclu-sivity 62% of computer science students at the University of Illinois, a large R1 school, felt thatthey were not “real” computer scientists [1].1.2. Culture of Computing The importance of culture (department or college level) with respect to sense of be-longing is of
Paper ID #34812Private Platform for Teaching Blockchain at the Undergraduate LevelDr. Emil H Salib, James Madison University Professor in the College of Integrated Science and Engineering at James Madison University. Current Teaching - Networking & Security, Introductory Programming and Cross Platform Mobile Application Development. Current Research - Private Cloud Computing, Private Cellular Networking & Security, Mobile IPv6 and Design for Motivation Curriculum. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Private Platform for
Building Engineering and Science Talent(BEST)1 report, the U.S. is not developing an appropriate scientific and technical workforce forthe future and calls for greater efforts to increase the representation of women and minorities.This shortage isn’t limited to the United States. Hersh2, in longitudinal research conducted at130 institutions in 55 countries on the changing position of women engineers worldwide, foundthat while conditions for women in engineering are improving, “there are still so few womenengineers as to make them seem unusual or even abnormal” (p. 357). Attracting qualified womeninto engineering programs is only the beginning; it is also essential to retain the women in thepipeline through completion and successful entry into the
processors: 1) asingle-issue pipelined DLX44; 2) a version with exceptions and branch prediction; and 3) a dual-issue superscalar DLX. The last project was motivated by commercial dual-issue superscalar pro-cessors, such as the Intel Pentium45, the Alpha 2106446, the IDT RISCore500047, the PowerPC440 Core48, the Motorola MC 6806049, the Motorola MPC 856049, and the MIPS III used in theEmotion Engine chip of the Sony Playstation 244. The integration of formal verification into an existing computer architecture course was madepossible by a recently developed tool flow, consisting of the term-level symbolic simulatorTLSim50, the decision procedure EVC50–53, and an efficient Boolean Satisfiability (SAT)checker, such as Chaff54, 55 or BerkMin56. The
surveying prior research as well as recent and historical incidents, the primaryobjective of this work is to aid in the prevention of exposure to catastrophic vessel conditions.As a secondary objective, the paper discusses the pedagogical benefits of incorporating thesetypes of case studies in an undergraduate curriculum.1.0 IntroductionThroughout history, natural disasters have taken their toll on both human lives and the economy.For ships at sea, these disasters loom as a threat to passengers, crew and cargo, as well as to theships themselves. While the disasters themselves cannot be prevented, measures can be taken tolessen the toll they take on the shipping industry.In 2004 alone, economic losses attributed to natural disasters exceeded 115
my sister were little he would just take like real life problems and then show us how math was related to it and that got me interested in it at an early age. And so then by the time I got to high school I was, it had already developed on its own. And then it just kept going (c) it was like a snowball effect I guess. Interviewer: So your interest pretty much like came from your dad and then it just kind of. HISP male: Yeah it just kind of snowballed.Transitional Type Transfer Credit -Twenty-six of 127 students received credit for classes taken for college credit at a community orjunior college or vocational-technical school between HS graduation and initial enrollment at ourreceiving institution, including
link element for a landing gearmechanism that provides a real-world application to what students learn in an otherwisetraditionally taught Statics and Mechanics of Materials I course. In the upcoming sections, wewill discuss the technical details of the design project, along with the different approaches that weeach take to present, conduct, and assess the project. We will conclude this work by presentingdetailed student and instructor feedback on the effectiveness of the project in meeting the learningobjectives for the course.Some Context on the Institution, Curriculum, and CourseThe authors of this work all teach in the Department of Mechanical Engineering (ME) ofRose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a small private institution located in
learning,and independence in research activities. While in many respects the twolaboratories are similar, the presence and role of a leader-mentor in daily activitiesis what set them apart. In this report, we analyze the impact of leadership-mentorship on learning and professional formation. We argue that the degree towhich a leader-mentor is consistently active in the laboratory’s life presentsadvantages and disadvantages with respect to different aspects of learning andprofessional formation. On one hand, professional development of students maybe hindered by the absence of direct oversight from an in-laboratory professionalmentor, resulting in delayed graduation for example. On another, absence ofdirect oversight can compel students to
, the frequency of plagiarism in engineeringeducation continues to increase [2], perhaps because most students believe they have a right toplagiarize if they perceive their assigned workload to be unreasonable [3], or due to the rapidproliferation of contract cheating [4].Source code plagiarism, while a narrow subset of plagiarism in general, is particularly well-suitedfor accurate automatic detection. Source code plagiarism detection or similarity analysis tools,which will be known as “similarity engines” for the remainder of this paper, are an integralcomponent of the assessment pipeline for assignments involving student source codesubmissions. Many distinct theoretical developments have been applied to similarity engines,resulting in a wide
, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Mr. Cristian HernandezJessica Deters, Virginia Tech Jessica Deters is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. She holds a B.S. in Applied Mathematics & Statistics and a minor in the McBride Honors Program in Public Affairs from the Colorado School of
guitar.Mr. Daniel Allen Henderson, Pennsylvania State University While a student at Penn State, Daniel Henderson earned both his M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction (Secondary Science Education) and his B.S. in Engineering Science (with Honors). Currently, he works as a research assistant and will later pursue a full-time high school physics teaching position.Ms. Jennifer Bracken, Pennsylvania State University Jennifer is a mechanical engineering graduate student at Penn State. She is interested in design, prototyp- ing, teams, and advanced manufacturing. Currently she is studying design teams for her PhD work. Her MS work involved designing and prototyping a robotic inspection system for nuclear waste storage cylin
. Page 24.889.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 MATLAB-Based Finite Element Analysis in a Vibrations ClassAbstractThis paper overviews MATLAB®-based assignments developed and implemented in amechanical vibrations class which utilize finite element analysis (FEA) for structural vibrationcalculations. The course is dual level and includes upper-level undergraduates taking it as atechnical elective, and graduate students taking it for graduate credit. In dual level courses, thereare additional requirements for graduate credit as compared to the work required forundergraduate credit. The course is offered via ITV (Interactive Television).A primary component of the paper is an overview of a
these students’ lives weremuch easier. There was a clearly negative moral judgment associated with this attribution ofrelative ease. Other students reported not being able to relate to students in other majors, whileothers talked about degrees of resentment they felt towards the students in other majors that theybelieved had easier work and better lives.Discussion and implicationsIt appears to be a universal feature of human discourse that people of shared experience develop Page 12.618.14shared ways to explain their position and direction in life. Given our analysis that suggests both ameritocracy of difficulty and engineering as lifestyle