thecontinuous improvement journey at the Construction & Operations Management (COM)Department at South Dakota State University (SDSU) and demonstrates proof of concept via acase study which describes a Kaizen event performed in a multi-disciplinary academicdepartment, in a college of engineering. Higher education is a labor-intensive process, and thedepartment seeks to eliminate non-value added activities of faculty and staff, reduce time andeffort required in daily processes, and to improve student learning experiences in the department.These all illustrate important concepts that engineering management education delivers tostudents. The approach, challenges, and outcomes are presented in the paper to inform bestpractices in lean higher
Paper ID #12226Defining and Assessing Global Engineering Competency: Methodological Re-flectionsProf. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Global En- gineering Program, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan
Paper ID #12789Developing Personal Case Studies as a Method for Deepening Lessons in En-gineering LeadershipMr. Steven W Klosterman, Northeastern University Mr. Klosterman is a Director and Professor of the Practice in the Gordon Engineering Leadership Program at Northeastern University. He has over 25 years of experience in the high technology in computer architecture and systems design at the Digital Equipment Corporation and at startup Stellar Computer. He joined Sun Microsystems in 1990 as a microprocessor designer. At Sun, he led and managed hardware engineering, product design and systems engineering
Names SEW Mentors 1 Computer Integrated Manufacturing Dr. Pablo Biswas 2 Prototyping Techniques with 3D Printer Dr. Namwon Kim 5 Hybrid Fuel Cell Design Mr. Gerardo J. PinzonSkills they learned include teamwork, research, procurement of materials, problem solving andcareer planning. While working on mathematics and engineering related projects they also gotfamiliar with TAMIU’s faculty, students, equipment and other resources available to them. Theworkshops were enhanced by the supervision, guidance and mentoring by our engineering andmathematics faculty. Each team was assigned a department faculty that oversaw the progress
divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Dr. Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics
comprises eight Elements of Thought, and the qualityof thought is to be evaluated through nine core Intellectual Standards. Table 1 lists theseelements and standards and illustrates succinctly the explicit linkage between the Paul/Eldermodel and reading or reviewing a paper. The Elements of Thought comprise the content of atypical primary journal paper. Likewise, the Intellectual Standards correspond to the core reviewstandards of journals and proposals. In Course 1, we have developed exercises and templatesusing this CT model so that students learn to identify and critically assess journal articles andother literature that is relevant to their research projects. The term project for Course 1 is acritical review of several papers. Likewise in
directly, so we get vector equations.The indirect approach, or variational dynamics (also called analytical dynamics), is an alternativemethod of obtaining governing differential equations and is characterized by the following: ‚ Forces that do no work do not need to be considered. ‚ Accelerations do not have to be computed, only velocities. ‚ In general, operations are on scalars not vectors.A timeline showing when some of the primary contributors to dynamics lived is shown in Figure2. The number in the bar is how old he was when he died, and the number on the left is the yearof his birth. The purpose of this figure is to give you a sense of when they lived relative to eachother and how most of the material covered in a typical sophomore
framework.Benefits of Undergraduate ResearchUndergraduate research presents opportunities to significantly enhance the education ofparticipating students. It also offers a number of benefits to the supporting faculty, department,and college. The major benefits are summarized in this section.For the StudentA number of studies have used student and alumni surveys to quantify the benefits ofundergraduate research to the student researchers1,2,3. Their findings are summarized in thissection.Undergraduate research activities enhance student learning. Students who work on researchprojects learn by doing. They gain hands-on experience with research approaches and thescientific method. Research experiences provide the opportunity to apply classroom theories
experience the same kinds of problemsthat students do, it would open up the dialogue to a better awareness of communication skills.Students would learn from and with their professors about the ways that communication develops.By talking about the individual ways that each creates text, all could benefit and learn. This is not aone-way street. Professors, too, could gain from the experience. Questions directed to them aboutparticular communication problems might also enlighten the faculty into problems that they mightbe having. This in itself would promote the purposes of communication. Communication wouldbecome for students something that would allow them to learn more about what they know.Professors while teaching would also be involved in the
consuming to update fifty-one documents everyweek. A computer program may need to be developed in the future.7. ConclusionThe game elements of the capstone chemical engineering laboratory course fulfilled most of thegoals hoped for. Students became more interested and engaged in the course. Elements of thegame that resonated with students the most included the team-based cooperative nature and theability to earn extra points by performing tasks that, while they had not been traditionallyquantified or graded in the past, benefit their understanding of the experiments. Many studentsstated that while they had fun with the game elements, they understood the value of theadditional tasks they had the option to complete, which provided a useful learning
the “traditional” paradigm wherein courses frequently stand as independent entities with no apparent connection. Also, the project allows students to develop a professional design portfolio that can be presented to perspective employers, be used as a valuable reference for future design tasks, or be used as part of CEES’s outcomes-based assessment. Furthermore, Sooner City provides a natural forum for incorporating other pedagogical reform initiatives, such as just-in-time learning, collaborative learning, and laptop computing. The primary goal of the project is to produce graduates who can consistently think at a higher level, and who are thus capable of handling open-ended design
Guaranteed 4.0 Workshop. This three-day study skills workshop basedon the “Guaranteed 4.0 Learning System22” was piloted in the spring semester of 2010. The core Page 24.529.5emphasis of the curriculum involved equipping students with strategies for classroom success:active listening skills during classroom instruction; self-efficacy and self-advocacy skills forworking with college professors; and a note-taking system for classroom lecture, assignedreading and problem sets, and exams based on pre-conditions, repetition, and effectinginformation input. The program included not only structured DVD viewings of actualGuaranteed 4.0 Learning System
questions thatwere administered for each research question. Data for each research question are reviewed insubsequent sub-sections.Table 1: Research Questions and Associated Survey QuestionsResearch Question: How do Senior Capstone Design students perceive targeted conceptgeneration training?How interested are you in learning strategies to generate ideas?(scale: 1-7, 1=not at all interested, 7=very interested)How important is it to have a variety of ideas to explore during idea generation?(scale: 1-7, 1=not at all important 7=very important)How helpful for your project was the in-class Design Heuristics training?(scale: 1-5, 1= very unhelpful and 5 = very helpful)Please Comment(scale: open-ended)Do you think additional in-class Design Heuristics
be easy to implement. Specific issues included: • The freshman courses were loaded with content, some of which was deemed critical to various disciplines, and therefore, could not be replaced. • Other projects were also competing for “space” in the freshman courses. For example, a design and build module was incorporated into UML’s “Introduction to Engineering I” as part of a college-wide service learning initiative, a project module is required for freshmen in NEU’s introductory engineering course, and the freshmen seminar for UNH’s chemistry students is intended to provide an overview of the profession. • There was considerable interest in incorporating nanomanufacturing concepts into other parts
thesource and risk to human health and the environment. Students need to be knowledgeable of thedesign and use of separation processes from a green engineering perspective. Using greenengineering principles at the start of the design process can lead to processes and products of asustainable future. Through the use of in-class examples, cooperative learning exercises, casestudies and homework assignments, students can be learn these concepts without the facultymember using substantial additional class time.Introduction Green engineering was originally defined by the EPA as the design, commercializationand use of processes and products that are feasible and economical while minimizing:generation of pollution at the source and risk to human
Teacher" by McKeachie10.Both of these sources offer excellent advice on how to develop a course including syllabi,textbooks, lectures, exams, and grading. Tools for helping students learn are also widelydiscussed. "The New Professor's Handbook"11 and "The Effective, Efficient Professor"12are particularly useful sources for managing time, teaching as well as conductingresearch, obtaining grants, publishing, reviewing, and presenting results. Additionalresources on mentoring and managing a research lab include "Making the Right Moves"and supervising PhD students13,14.Boice's book, "Advice for New Faculty Members" with it's 'everything in moderation'theme is extremely valuable15. In the introduction, Boice notes that novice professorstend to falter
process design engineer. Once these attributes or criteriahave been established, performance measurements or rubrics can be designed to guide or promptan assessor or evaluator to look for outcomes from a performance activity related to the desiredcriteria. A “performance activity” for the purposes of process design is defined as any activity byan individual, a group or team, or an individual within a group or team that is working towardsachieving the goals and learning outcomes of the design assignment or project. Examples ofperformance activities would include but are not limited to group meetings or work sessions, oralpresentations, meetings and interactions with the “customer” or “client” of the design project (suchas faculty, industrial
andspeech courses are generally required in the first years of college, well before the student hasdeveloped a technical vocabulary or facility. It is unusual for a civil engineering program torequire a technical presentation course or technical writing course in the junior or senior years.Even if the student takes that course later in his or her academic career, courses are generallydesigned and offered at the freshman or sophomore level. As such, students generally learn therudiments of presentation outside the context of complex engineering subject matter. While theskills they learn in Speech 101 could translate into stellar business proposals and clientpresentations, somehow this is not the case, and engineers continue to struggle with
response theory methodology.Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Mary Lynn Brannon, Instructional Support Specialist at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at the Pennsylvania State University, has a Master of Arts Degree in Education and Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with engineering course innovations. She is a faculty development consultant with previous experience in instructional design and instructor of the Graduate Assistant Seminar for engineering teaching assistants.Elizabeth C. Kisenwether, Pennsylvania
their preparation, their understanding of thepower of mentorship and persistence, and their financial need. Seminars and social functionswere provided for the students, and they were given guided opportunities to reflect upon theirexperiences and improve their future performance [14], [15]. The program attempted to providecollegiate guidance to students with little or no family background in the world of highereducation. The entire program was intended to take advantage of the RS students pre-existing talents,utilize already operational campus programs, and provide several active learning opportunitiesthat are demonstrated to stimulate retention and persistence [16], [17]. Twenty-one studentsacross three entrance years to college were
assembled into ateam staffed for a specific project and are supported by a faculty and industry adviser. Thestudents tackle a design process in the first semester and then complete a detailed design andprototype realization in the second semester. The curriculum is organized so students can applytheir technical and non-technical skills in solving their capstone problem and gain knowledge viaa culminating major design-build project. The capstone projects are intended to provide studentswith hands-on learning, continuous practice of a broad set of technical, management, andprofessional skills, ideally in a cross-disciplinary setting.In this project, the students designed a UAV capable of flying under direct manual control andindirect automatic
will find that the said disfranchisement is a big bump onthe road from dynamics to thermodynamics.Having learned the above “disfranchisement” in thermodynamics, we may return to the questionposed for the system in Fig. 3. The student, who has taken and understood a course in dynamics,but not thermodynamics, obviously employs the principle of work and kinetic energy as given inEq. (30), which is applicable to conservative as well as nonconservative systems, to compute thework U1→2 done on the block by the weight force W. Naturally, he asserts, “The work done on Page 7.845.12the system is equal to Wh.” Proceedings of the 2002 American
Paper ID #41216Supporting Undergraduate Engineering Students Who Are Primary Caregiversto Children: A Systematic Literature ReviewDr. Julie M. Smith, CSEdResearch.org Dr. Julie M. Smith is a senior education researcher at CSEdResearch.org. She holds degrees in Curriculum & Instruction and Software Development. She also completed a doctoral program in Learning Technologies at the University of North Texas. Her research focus is computer science education, particularly the intersection of learning analytics, learning theory, and equity and excellence. She was a research assistant at MIT’s Teaching Systems Lab, working
managebudgets, practice proper documentation, give technical presentations, and hone these practicalproject management skills that often receive less attention in engineering curricula (Mueller,2002). These projects allow students to develop their knowledge and abilities (Horenstein et al.,2023) in a learning environment that is more forgiving than a real world scenario and allow fordirect feedback.Many different approaches to senior capstone projects are mentioned in the relevant literature,each with different benefits and drawbacks to the students. Introducing a client-customerrelationship in the project can enhance the student experience, the end product (Estes & Welch,2003), and students’ communication abilities (Norback et al., 2006). In
, accounting, engineering,and statistical control. Hudson, Smart, and Bourne26 (2001) identified requirements for asuccessful PMS: audits, user involvement, clear objectives, measurement criteria, periodicmaintenance, management support, worker support, and setting realistic timeframes. Kaplan andNorton31 (1992) developed the balanced scorecard (BSC) approach as a framework for aligningthe organizations values, objectives, expectations, and aspirations with customer satisfaction.Kanji29 (1998) developed a comparative business scorecard (CBS) that included additionalaspects to attain process excellence, advance learning, and achieve profits.Pun and White44 (2005) reviewed both existing and emerging trends in performancemeasurement systems to discover
SPSU. The institution and faculty have used this component of boundary work as ameans of exercising Gieryn’s concept of expulsion where “boundary work excludes rivals fromwithin by defining them as outsiders.”53 The expertise of “applied” and “hands-on” educationalexperience has allowed the ET programs at SPSU to demonstrate their superiority overengineering. An ET faculty member writes They (ET degrees) train the students for real engineering jobs. They have hands on courses and students also learn computer packages and programs necessary for the jobs. Employers do not need to train the graduates. The graduates have found real engineering jobs because they have learned both theoretical and hands on stuff. The
as manifestations of design ideas," ACM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 15, p. 7, 2008. 2016. D. T. Stowe, "Investigating the role of prototyping in mechanical design using case study validation," Master of Science, Clemson University, 2008.17. V. S. Gordon and J. M. Bieman, "Rapid prototyping: lessons learned," IEEE software, vol. 12, pp. 85-95, 1995.18. V. K. Viswanathan and J. S. Linsey, "Build to learn: effective strategies to train tomorrow's designers," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012.19. V. Viswanathan and J. Linsey, "Understanding physical models in design cognition: A triangulation of
Polytechnic Institute and State University Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics and the Learning Sciences and Technologies at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics ( ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Who are we? Research- and Practice- Informed Insights for Relevant Background Recognizing
Jobes P.E., Geneva College Dr. Jobes is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Geneva College in Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania, a Professional Engineer certified in Pennsylvania with his own consulting company, and is a Research En- gineer for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Pittsburgh Research Center. He worked for the U. S. Bureau of Mines in control and navigation of a computer-assisted mining machine from 1987 through 1997 earning his Professional Engineering certification from Pennsylvania in 1989. Dr. Jobes has since been working for NIOSH in Mining Equipment Safety, Jolting and Jarring Abatement in Mining Machinery, underground refuge alternatives, and Interventions to Enhance
rate monitor or even a phone (which needs 5 volts) in any environment colder thanroom temperature.Other improvements include connecting the power input from the TEGs directly to the heart ratemonitor without the help of the computer. We could do this by adding a rechargeable battery orcreating a resistor-capacitor circuit to store and distribute the voltage that the TEG produces. Therewould also be a display screen to show the user’s heart rate, or a Bluetooth connection to show theheart rate on a user’s device. To make the device more comfortable and streamlined we could usethinner, flexible thermoelectric generators such as those made with PEDOT:PSS [7]. A thin layerof fabric would also be wrapped around the device.The skills learned from