developed anddefined using disciplinary knowledge, Computer Aided Design (CAD) programs, and otherdesign tools. From a CDIO workspace perspective, workspaces can provide design-centric workareas where the students can conduct more detailed design studies using CAD tools as well asother analytical means of performing trade studies via parametric variations. The attributes oftypical CDIO Design workspaces include access to computers, printers, and graphic devices, aswell as discussion areas where results can be presented to other students, to faculty and staff, andto outside reviewers. The Physical Prototype Laboratory at Chalmers University of Technology,Göteborg, Sweden is a good example of a CDIO workspace that provides undergraduates fromprograms
paper, we presented the initial results of an ongoing study in which we examine therelationship between learner interaction, self-regulation and learning outcomes in an online Page 10.872.6teacher/faculty professional development program for technology educators. Results showed Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationstatistically significant increases in pre-post content knowledge assessment and in learner self-regulation. Increases were also reported for levels of critical thinking, likely the
MethodologySampleTen students participated in the RCS during the fall semester in 2004. These students werenominated by their research faculty advisors. They were also required to be signed up for anhour of research credit. These students are compensated financially with a $450 stipend persemester.Responses from all 10 students are included in this study. Most of the students are from thechemical engineering department (6), while some are from the mechanical engineeringdepartment (3) and the remaining student is from the electrical engineering department. Of these10 participants, 6 are women and 4 are men. Five students had participated in the RCSpreviously, while 5 had not.Pre- and post-SurveysThe online survey was developed using CTL Silhouette featuring
AC 2011-1596: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A CER-TIFICATE IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENTAndrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is actively involved in ASEE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Engineering Society of Detroit. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, director of the LTU Thermal Science Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate in Energy & Environmental Man- agement and Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and
Paper ID #9345Understanding Change and Development of Engineering Education in ChinaDr. Zupeng Zhou, Guilin University of Electronic Technology Zupeng Zhou got his Ph.D degree at Xidian University in 2012 and he is currently a Post-doc at Washing- ton State University. He is an associate professor at Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin China. His research interests are control and fault diagnosis of complex nonlinear system and life cycle assessment of products.Prof. Charles Pezeshki, Washington State University Dr. Charles Pezeshki is a professor in mechanical engineering at Washington State University
and teaching interests revolve primarily around microorganisms in engineered envi- ronmental systems, including biological wastewater treatment and methanogenesis from unconventional sources. She has nearly 20 years of experience in bioremediation. Other interests include sustainable water infrastructure, increasing diversity among STEM students and faculty, and sustainable community development. Page 23.1123.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Sustainable Water: Development, Delivery and Assessment of K-5 ModulesAbstractDuring
typical chemical engineering undergraduate corecurriculum has not adapted to prepare students for the multiple needs encompassed by thechemical industry. Lack of industry-relevant examples/topics and applications in the coursecontents results in less motivated and/or engaged students. Students therefore often struggleto identify with the profession and are not ready for the workforce when they graduate. ThisNSF PFE: RIEF project examines a unique experience where a student-faculty-industryintegrated community is created to help bridge the gap between industry needs and thecompetencies developed within chemical engineering programs.The project's main goal is to better understand how implementing up-to-date industryproblems into one of the
2017 ASEE International Forum:Columbus , Ohio Jun 28 Paper ID #20727Open source in STEM program for effective learning in developing nationsDr. Simon Obeid, DeVry University, Orlando Dr. Simon Obeid is a full-time faculty in the College of Engineering & Information Sciences at DeVry University in Orlando, Florida. He is also serving the Department Chair of the College of Engineering & Information at DeVry Orlando. He was the Associate Dean of the College of Engineering & Information in Columbus, Ohio. He holds Masters and PhD in Electrical Engineering from the
AC 2007-2475: DEVELOPMENT OF A NANO-FILLED COMPOSITEEXPERIMENT FOR A FRESHMAN CLASSRichard Griffin, Texas A&M University Richard B. Griffin, Ph. D., P. E. (TX) has been a faculty member at Texas A&M University since 1977. He earned his BS at Pennsylvania State University (1964) in Metallurgy/Metallurgical Engineering, and his PhD at Iowa State University (1969) in Metallurgy. His expertise is in the area of materials where he has taught and done research for more than 30 years. Dr. Griffin has worked in various areas of corrosion: erosion/corrosion, scc cracking of high strength steels, and corrosion under organic coatings. He has also worked in tribology where he studied the
number of iLabs have been developed by faculty in a variety of engineering fieldsand made available to students across the globe2-4. The iLab Project has expanded its focus toinclude the development of a standardized, open-source architecture for the development ofremote labs. This architecture, known as the iLab Shared Architecture and initially released in2004, simplifies the development of remote laboratories by providing a set of generic utilitiesand a distributed platform for remote labs to be easily shared5. This architecture has beenadopted by a number of universities, greatly expanding the number and variety of iLabs availableto a given user6.Due to the scalable and economically efficient nature of iLabs, they have sparked
curriculum in a subject, Engineering in Society, was introduced inthe Department of Mechanical Engineering at Victoria University of Technology (VUT). Therevision was thought to be necessary because of structural weakness in the curriculum and poorperception of the subject by academic staff and students. The outcome of the new curriculumwas measured through a questionnaire at the end of the semester. The response of the studentsto this survey placed the subject in the the difficult and complex arena in the academic domain,but the results of the survey also suggested high satisfaction with the new curriculum andindicated that it provided an interesting path into the discipline and profession of engineering.INTRODUCTION In 1996 the faculty of
use of some of Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN)goals as course outcomes can be observed for a specific system dynamics project that specifiesstakeholders and customers for which the student group must formulate questions to be able todevelop specifications and requirements [3]. The PBL approach in this course doesn’t allowstudents to formulate the need and solution as the instructor still provides the specific project needof interest and does not incorporate a digital communication assessment.The third approach is faculty using books that are available to help develop a course project thatincorporates EML. However, the book options are limited in general and even more so limited forengineering educators and professionals [6
the homework assignments, students (in teams of two) complete a softwaredesign project in which they choose a particularly “confusing” concept from the coreECE courses and develop a Java applet that demonstrates the concept in an intuitivemanner. Each team is required to consult with a faculty mentor who teaches the corecourse in their project area. This mentor advises the team on the applicability of theirproject to this course and often continues to work with them after the course ends tofurther develop the software. Due in part to this mentoring structure, many of theseprojects have already found their way into core ECE course materials, either as in-classpresentations, or as one-on-one demonstrations incorporated into class web pages
) team and has also developed Systems Biology outreach mod- ules for high school students.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research.Ms. Evan Ko, University of Illinois, Urbana - Champaign Evan is recent undergraduate graduate in Bioengineering with a minor in Material Science and Engineer- ing at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.Dr. Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University Gary
Paper ID #34209Development and Assessment of a Polymer Processing Learning ModuleDr. Michele Miller, Campbell University Dr. Michele Miller is a Professor and Associate Dean at Campbell University. Prior to joining Campbell in 2017, she was a professor of mechanical engineering at Michigan Tech. She received undergraduate and graduate degrees in mechanical engineering from Duke and NC State, respectively. Her research interests include engineering education and precision manufacturing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Development and Assessment of
AC 2008-2324: A "GLOBAL" CURRICULUM TO SUPPORT CIVILENGINEERING IN DEVELOPING NATIONSFred Meyer, United States Military Academy Colonel Fred Meyer is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy and serves as the Civil Engineering Division Director. He received a Bachelor of Science degree from USMA in 1984, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993, and 2002, respectively. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. Colonel Meyer has been a member of the USMA faculty for over five years and teaches courses in basic mechanics, structural steel design, reinforced concrete design
together to develop the Leadership Academy concept and curriculumwas drawn from diverse areas on our campus: faculty from engineering and the humanities, stafffrom Student Affairs and the Business Office, and staff and the associate dean from Rose-Hulman Ventures, our college’s business incubator. All of these participants shared the beliefthat our students needed leadership training that was specifically designed for technical people.Despite the shared goal, each of us brought different strengths to the curriculum developmentproject. These strengths determined how we would portion out the curriculum responsibilities:the communication faculty member would provide training in leadership communication, thefinancial officer would provide training in
sciences, technology, engineering, mathematics, and/or computational sciences. b. A professional skills component must be developed in consultation with leaders from the targeted industry, business, government, or nonprofit organizations. c. An experiential component that must include at least one capstone project, supervised collaboratively by faculty and employers, evaluated or graded by faculty, and typically developed with an employer(s), which integrates the practical application of scientific and professional knowledge, behavior, and skills. The experiential component typically includes a structured internship and provides an opportunity for students to
problem. There are two unique aspects to this project; the integration ofservice learning in the curriculum and the integration of the local community in all aspects ofthe project. Students and their faculty advisors lived in the community and worked directlywith the community and the local Peace Corps volunteer to develop strategies for design andinstallation that the community could support and maintain. This community-based approachinvolved the local community from the beginning stages of the project. This work describesthe development of the project, the integration of the community in the project team and theintegration of service learning in the engineering curriculum.Introduction and BackgroundInternationalization continues to gain
History of the Development of Engineering Economic Representation within A.S.E.EAbstractThe development of the Engineering Economy Division of A.S.E.E. was an outgrowth ofthe technical progress of the field of engineering economics beginning in 1877 with thepublications of Arthur M. Wellington. As these new methodologies were formed, a fewengineering faculty began to realize that this material should be an integral part of theengineering curriculum. This paper traces the formation in 1942 of the IndustrialEngineering Division in the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education(S.P.E.E., the forerunner of A.S.E.E.) and how these members played a critical role in the1956 formation of the Engineering Economy Division for the
from Dickinson College.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah E. Zappe is Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State University. In her current position, Dr. Zappe is re- sponsible for supporting curricular assessment and developing instructional support programs for faculty in the College of Engineering. In her research role, Dr. Zappe is interested in the integration of creativity into the engineering curriculum, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Dr. Zappe holds a doctorate in edu- cational psychology specializing in applied testing and measurement. Her measurement interests include the
(suchas pre- and post-assessment after significant course or work events) may be used to define,measure, and document demonstrated outcomes. Measurements of the developing outcomes maybe used to advise, coach and mentor the students’ professional development.Implementation of Paradigm ShiftsIn the Fall of 1999, a constituency of over one hundred ISU faculty, partnering internationalfaculty, co-op and intern students, employers, and alumni were asked to assist the ISU College ofEngineering Cooperative Education and Internship Program in developing a next generation ofperformance assessment tools, ones that would be aligned with the ABET’s new EngineeringCriteria 2000. Specifically, we set out to create a set of assessment metrics for the co-op
microcontroller technologies as the fundamental control device of amechatronic system. Similar approaches are noted at other educational institutions4. Further, aswill be made clear in this paper, the inception of a mechatronics course at the final seniorsemester level provides an opportunity to explore aspects of innovation, new productdevelopment, intellectual property issues and marketing. To do this in the most effective waypossible, it was determined to team-teach the second course with business-oriented faculty. Page 5.215.2II. Development of the Mechatronics LaboratoriesThe NSF-ILI proposal, “Development of a New Multidisciplinary Undergraduate
tool,and a collection of test-your-knowledge exercises with response feedback. This paper describesthe objectives of developing VLSM, and gives an overview of some of its modules that havealready been developed and are currently being used and evaluated at the designated Web site(www.ae.msstate.edu/vlsm).I. IntroductionThe use of computers in engineering education is not new. According to the U.S. Department ofEducation, engineering faculty have been the quickest to adopt learning technologies. Since theFall of 1992, engineering faculty have surpassed all other disciplines by using computationaltools and software to implement computer-aided instruction.1 A significant shift in technologyimplementations that is apparent in engineering education
exploring how technology shapes our world and leveraging new developments to enhance library experiences.Ms. Kari Kozak, The University of Iowa Kari Kozak has been the Director of the Lichtenberger Engineering Library at The University of Iowa since July 2011. In her capacity, she oversees library operations and supervises a team of three full-time staff members. Kari is dedicated to providing instruction, reference, and consultation services to students, faculty, and staff across various departments and research centers within the College of Engineering and the Department of Computer Science. Her professional interests encompass outreach, instruction, innovation, and design. Additionally, Kari also leads classes on
Development of an Automated Liquid Handling System for Science Lab Automation Akihiko Kumagai, Tien-I Liu, Stefan Setiadharma, Yasuhisa Komura Department of Mechanical Engineering California State University, Sacramento Sacramento, CA 95819-6031AbstractIn recent years, various automation technologies developed in engineering fields have beengaining attention from scientists and researchers to improve productivity, accuracy and quality ofwork in their science labs. This paper presents a unique case study of a private companysponsored project to develop a prototype of an automated liquid handling system
heavily on signal processing. Electrocardiographicmonitors and implantable cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators all need to perform signalprocessing but each has a very different set of constraints, e.g. energy. Very different methodsare employed, for example subthreshold analog or switch/capacitor implementations with onlyvery limited DSP in a cardiac pacemaker, and nearly full DSP implementations in an externaldevice. Within the category of DSP there are many different possible approaches.We developed a course module, partly web-based, which presents several relevant signalprocessing methods and shows their application. Page 7.402.1
Paper ID #8547Undergraduate Research and Development Explores new Technologies in En-ergy Conservation InnovationsDr. Saeed D. Foroudastan, Middle Tennessee State University Saeed Foroudastan is the Associate Dean for the College of Basic and Applied Sciences (CBAS). The CBAS oversees 10 departments at Middle Tennessee State University. He is also the current Director for the Master’s of Science in Professional Science program and a professor of engineering technology at MTSU. Foroudastan received his B.S. in civil engineering, his M.S. in civil engineering, and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Tennessee
are centered on developing an independent scholarwho is capable of performing research at a faculty level. Faculty advisors and dissertationcommittee members look to see that the student is capable of being a colleague in the researchenterprise and will often express such performance as “I know it when I see it”. As Mullins andKiley state2:“Experienced examiners make judgements about the quality and quantity of students’ workbased on their own extensive experience or mastery of the area. These examiners ‘know’ whatconstitutes a passable or outstanding thesis.”This expertise can be field specific and standardized measures are not well documented.Learning objectives include students having a deep knowledge of their research area and
262 Work in Progress: A Student Developed Repository of Design Knowledge Brittany Ballard, Nathan Barrett, Brandy Holmes, Jay McCormack University of IdahoIntroductionThe construction and use of a repository for design knowledge can serve several roles in aneducational setting. For the instructor, the repository can act as a window into the students’design process, status in a design project, and understanding of design concepts where theconstruction and use of elements of design knowledge require achievement at levels of learnerknowledge corresponding to