Session 3560 On Instruction of the First "R" of Environment S. Kant Vajpayee The University of Southern MississippiAbstractThe instruction of environmental issues is no longer limited to science and humanities educators.An increasing number of engineering and engineering technology programs are incorporatingcourses on environment in their curricula. At The University of Southern Mississippi theintroductory course ESC 301: Living in the Environment is one of the several we offer. It is anelective within the university core curriculum. Many engineering technology majors
AC 2009-1240: PEDAGOGICAL MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT ANDCURRICULUM ASSESSMENT TO ENHANCE NONDESTRUCTIVE INSPECTIONIN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY (AMT)Thashika Rupasinghe, Clemson UniversityMary Beth Kurz, Clemson UniversityCarl Washburn, Greenville TechAnand Gramopadhye, Clemson UniversityDeepak Vembar, Clemson UniversitySajay Sadasivan, Clemson University Page 14.948.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Pedagogical Material Development and Curriculum Assessment To Enhance Non-Destructive Inspection in Aircraft Maintenance Technology (AMT)AbstractThis paper presents results from curriculum enhancements implemented at an
wirelessly through aportable device to a base station for analysis and storage. The data is transmittedwirelessly through a modem, received by a personal computer, and analyzed through theuse of different software programs. The paper also presents test results of a practicalexample.IntroductionData logger units are versatile equipment used in today’s industry and is being taught inmany engineering and engineering technology curricula [1-4]. Such units provide usefulinformation that allows an analyst to perform a variety of tasks, including: (a) Creatingmodels, testing prototypes, analyzing results, and adapting to changing test andmeasurement needs, (b) Validating product concepts and ensuring product durability,functionality and safety, (c
AC 2010-1870: INTEGRATING HANDS-ON DISCOVERY OF LEAN PRINCIPLESINTO OPERATIONS, INDUSTRIAL, AND MANUFACTURING CURRICULASharon Johnson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Sharon A. Johnson is an associate professor of operations and industrial engineering in the Department of Management at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She teaches courses in process management, facility layout and design, and operations management. Dr. Johnson received her Ph.D. from Cornell University in Operations Research and Industrial Engineering in 1989. Dr. Johnson’s research interests include lean manufacturing and operations design, process modeling, and improving health care delivery processes. Her work has appeared
-EngineeringETDs, still they contain research in computer science, natural sciences, agriculture, architecture,and other areas of interest to engineers. What information have engineering researchers lost bynot having access to over 60% of the ETDs produced in non-engineering fields?Availability: measured by ease of access to ETDs Page 5.253.13Just as it is clear that ETDs limit the breadth of information available, it is equally clear that theyenhance access to those ETDs that are made available. Consider the 472 engineering ETDs thatare immediately available on the WWW. How else could this access be accomplished other thanthrough an ETD program
University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for over 25 years, and she continues to work on externally funded projects relating to engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Identifying At-Risk Students in a Basic Electric Circuits Course Using Instruments to Probe Students’ Conceptual UnderstandingAbstractElectric circuit analysis is a gateway course for students in the electrical and computerengineering disciplines. Such courses build upon a foundation developed in the first weeks ofclass, making student success heavily dependent upon a strong command of this initial material.Therefore, it is paramount to identify
- cludes enhancing student skill sets through highlighting community resources, integrating micro-video content into engineering core curriculum as a supplement educational resource for undergraduate stu- dents. Ryan is also the recipient of the Syracuse University Graduate Fellowship and the NSF EAPSI Fellowship.Mr. Alexander Johnson, Syracuse UniversityKaty Pieri, Syracuse University Katy is a second year PhD student in the bioengineering program at Syracuse University.Mr. Alex Vincent Jannini, Syracuse University Alex Jannini is a third-year PhD student at Syracuse University in the Biomedical and Chemical Engineer- ing Department. His current research consists of developing tough and elastic double network hydrogels
program (e.g., as student preparation for an electric power class) and those in otherengineering majors (e.g., as student preparation for mechanical engineering lab experiences).The experiential foundation in the motors lab was designed to solidify concepts on efficiency ofenergy conversion and on motor performance. Topics included modeling of electric motors,predicting motor performance, and experimentally obtaining relevant motor constants. Theexperiment used a simple sub-fractional horsepower (Fischertechnik #32293: ~1.5 Watt)electric motor together with a unique small-scale dynamometer. In the experiment, studentswere required to experimentally determine the rotational speed of a motor using an optoswitch-based tachometer to find the motor
, Communication and Electronics (ETCCE). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6. [4] G. Sasi, P. Thanapal, V. Balaji, G. V. Babu, and V. Elamaran, “A handy approach for teaching and learning computer networks using wireshark,” in 2020 Fourth International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC). IEEE, 2020, pp. 456–461. [5] M. Kuzlu and O. Popescu, “Upgrading of a data communication and computer networks course in engineering technology program,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2020. [6] M. Prvan and J. OˇzEGOVI´c, “Methods in teaching computer networks: a literature review,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1–35, 2020. [7] J. Chandrasekaran, D. Anitha et al., “Enhancing student learning and engagement in the
very important thatmanufacturing engineers study, in depth the topic of mechanical vibrations. According to thelaws of physics, sound and vibrations are very closely related. In other words, if one’sobjective is to reduce noise, one has to reduce vibrations. In this presentation the authorprovides guidelines towards generating a mathematics based curriculum in the area ofmechanical vibrations. He draws from his experience and also from various textbooks andrelates them to the curriculum that is normally encountered in a mechanical engineeringprogram. He also provides outlines for conducting assessment using appropriate data. Thisassessment data will be extremely useful for implementing Continuous Quality Improvement.He also provides examples
helps to promote deeperlearning.IntroductionWith the wide adoption of project-based learning (PBL) in engineering programs, many researchstudies were conducted to evaluate its effectiveness in engineering education [1-3]. Someresearch results showed that PBL is not only effective to deepen students’ understanding ofengineering principles, but also helps them to develop abilities to apply those principles inengineering design practices [3]. In the meantime, many engineering educators have sharedsuccessful stories of using PBL to improve student learning in their practices [4-8]. Evidentially,PBL has shown a strong promise as an effective teaching pedagogy in engineering education.Naturally, a follow-up question is how to develop an effective
inseveral ways. Students are given a list of topics related to the greenhouse gas reductionproject that they can choose to use for their individual presentations. In addition to theindividual speeches that are made during the classroom discussions, each design teamgives two presentations in lab period during the semester. The first design presentationoccurs about four weeks into the project, and is made to the Engineering faculty and theother design teams. The purpose of the first presentation is to convey generalinformation about the building, and initial data gathered, and information about thedirection the design process is taking. The second design presentation occurs at the endof the semester, and is made to the Engineering faculty, their
/professional computing environmentsare impacted by identity; interpret how experiences within computing environments differ basedon identity; relate these experiences to historical/cultural events that impacted people fromminoritized identities; select and advocate for personal/departmental policies and practices thatare more inclusive of identity; and design/implement computing deliverables (courses, modules,and other outputs) at their home institutions [40]. This program ensures that the developedprojects are not simply “replications” of the original “Race, Gender, Class, & Computing”course, where instructors have not invested the necessary time to understanding/developing thematerial. It also ensures that instructors (many of whom have limited
AC 2012-3017: DISTRIBUTED COLLABORATIVE DESIGN AND MANU-FACTURE IN THE CLOUD - MOTIVATION, INFRASTRUCTURE, ANDEDUCATIONDr. Dirk Schaefer, Georgia Institute of Technology Dirk Schaefer is an Assistant Professor at the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. Prior to joining Georgia Tech, Schaefer was a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Durham University, UK. During his time at Durham, he earned a Postgraduate Certificate in ”Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.” He joined Durham from a Senior Research Associate position at the University of Stuttgart, Germany, where he earned his Ph.D. in computer science. Over the past 10 years, Schaefer has been
production of a renewable fuelfrom an agricultural residue, in particular, grape pomace, while contributing to achievingeducational objectives of three engineering programs at the University. Toward this goal, theobjectives of the project were as follows: Page 23.179.2 Objective 1: To determine the optimum thermochemical conversion protocol to efficiently convert grape pomace into a more useful biomass energy form. The form of the fuel would be similar to that of wood pellets and would replace them with a higher energy density. Objective 2: To design the mechanical and
©Introduction and Objective Most engineering programs expect that their students will develop intellectually inaddition to acquiring knowledge and skills in a specific engineering discipline. However, nearlyall measures of student achievement are focused on content knowledge, process ability (e.g.design), or communication skills; students are assumed to be developing intellectually, especiallyin their ability to think critically, but rarely are meaningful data collected and reported whichsupport such an assumption. However, the recent movement towards outcomes assessm ent nowrequires reliable measures of students’ abilities to make reasoned decisions as they solvecomplex problems. For example, in the U. S. the Accreditation Board for Engineering
, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, College of Engineering and Technology, Wentworth Institute of Technology, 550 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115Prof. Ali Reza Moazed, Wentworth Institute of Technology Ali R. Moazed is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering and Technology department at Wentworth Institute of Technology. In addition to over thirty years of industrial and consulting experience, he has taught mechanical engineering courses full or part-time prior to joining Wentworth in 2001. At Went- worth, he teaches design related courses in the solid mechanics area. He believes in teaching from the perspective of a practicing academician by bringing into the classroom topics related to the practice of
to understand how to do engineering applications, and Level 3 contains all Level2 material plus detailed background on complex derivations or material of a more specialized nature. The currentlevel is indicated by the radio buttons in the upper right corner of the page. Although Levels 1 and 2 "hide" some Page 3.3.3material from the reader, that material is easily available by changing levels or by using the table of contents.their appearance in the text, to call up definitions of related terms from within the Glossary, andto jump to pages in the text where the term or related terms are first introduced. Glossary termsthat
no-stipend policy. Thus,they may have weaker background than the post-bachelor’s Ph.D. students. Usually, post-bachelor’s Ph.D.students (for completing their Master’s level requirements) and M.S. students take the same classes. This 1poses no problem in schools with thriving Ph.D. programs and correspondingly large number of Ph.D.students with a stronger background because then the difficulty level of the classes can be set by the Ph.D.students. In fact, a “notch higher” difficulty level of the classes may benefit and motivate the M.S.students.Not all universities with a graduate program, however, are research-oriented or have a strong Ph.D.program, A number of engineering schools in the
no-stipend policy. Thus,they may have weaker background than the post-bachelor’s Ph.D. students. Usually, post-bachelor’s Ph.D.students (for completing their Master’s level requirements) and M.S. students take the same classes. This 1poses no problem in schools with thriving Ph.D. programs and correspondingly large number of Ph.D.students with a stronger background because then the difficulty level of the classes can be set by the Ph.D.students. In fact, a “notch higher” difficulty level of the classes may benefit and motivate the M.S.students.Not all universities with a graduate program, however, are research-oriented or have a strong Ph.D.program, A number of engineering schools in the
no-stipend policy. Thus,they may have weaker background than the post-bachelor’s Ph.D. students. Usually, post-bachelor’s Ph.D.students (for completing their Master’s level requirements) and M.S. students take the same classes. This 1poses no problem in schools with thriving Ph.D. programs and correspondingly large number of Ph.D.students with a stronger background because then the difficulty level of the classes can be set by the Ph.D.students. In fact, a “notch higher” difficulty level of the classes may benefit and motivate the M.S.students.Not all universities with a graduate program, however, are research-oriented or have a strong Ph.D.program, A number of engineering schools in the
Paper ID #35067A Statics and Dynamics Project Infusing Entrepreneurial MindsetDr. Jennifer Kadlowec, Baldwin Wallace University Jennifer Kadlowec is Professor and Program Director of Engineering at Baldwin Wallace University. She previously was on the faculty of Mechanical Engineering in the Henry M. Rowan of College of Engineer- ing, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ for 20 years. She has been an active member of ASEE since 1998. She joined as a graduate student, after working on an engineering education project and presenting that work and student chapter activities at annual conference. As a faculty member, she regularly
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationlike an “S”. They then examine the area in the middle of the “S” with a magnifying glass. Thenew employee then repeats this exercise with a smaller-sized metal paper clip and records theobservations and differences between the two sizes. What is demonstrated here is elasticdeformation – a type of deformation in which the object returns to its original shape after theforces have been removed. This type of deformation is unique in the realm of mechanicalbehavior because all materials undergo elastic deformation. The new employee is also asked inthe new-hire document to address the following specific questions related to elastic deformationin their memorandum to
1000 previously-excluded homes per day past the year 2000 and to continue theexpansion program through 2025. The problem for engineers is how to accommodate thistransition given the past very unequal social network relationships. In terms of network states,Eskom wants to get into a State 2 stable relationship with black South Africans in the wake ofApartheid. One problem is trying to change a culture of nonpayment for services. This is theflip side of being excluded from a service. How does Eskom get into a stable trading-zone wherepeople will pay for a new service? How do engineers design a technological system to promotea more stable relationship between Eskom and black South Africans in the context of severemistrust?III. State 2 NetworksIn
psychological wellbeing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Real-Time Ecological Momentary Assessment of Students' Emotional State in StaticsAbstractThis paper/poster shares the initial findings of an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)study conducted in an undergraduate engineering mechanics course (Statics) at a 4-yearuniversity. Like many early undergraduate engineering courses, Statics is notorious for highattrition and often stifles students' subsequent persistence in engineering programs. Theobjective of the study described herein is to identify links between students' self-efficacy,motivation, emotional states, and other factors that may serve as early
’ communicationskills, as they are still developing these skills during their second year in the engineering program. Intotal, nine student outcomes were quantitatively assessed. Rubrics with four performance levels foreach student outcome were used to directly assess the submitted group work from two sections of theclass taught in spring 2021. A majority of all groups met all nine EM student outcomes, indicating theproject successfully met the EML goals. Students individually assessed their own EM performanceand provided feedback via an anonymous survey instrument. Student feedback and project developerobservations were used to qualitatively assess the project and its educational impact.IntroductionIn a survey given by the American Association of Colleges and
mathematical skills throughout thecurriculum. Moreover, learning of complex engineering concepts at higher level classes requiresminimum pre-requisite knowledge, the lack of which can lead to attention problems, aversion tothe course, and finally to overall poor performance. While such issues are partly addressed bycurriculum rules which enforce mandatory pre-requisite courses, a major fraction of students stillenrolls in higher-level courses with the minimum grade allowed to move on in these pre-requisitecourses. With deficient or subpar foundations, they may face more difficulties and eventually dropout or change their engineering major for academic survival. While this issue prominent in allengineering programs across universities, it becomes more
wereselected specifically so the videos were created before topics were covered during lecture.The aim of each video is to introduce the AI topic to other introductory AI students (i.e., theirpeers). The AI students can assume that the audience will have general knowledge aboutcomputers, computer science/computer engineering, and programming in C++/Java/other similarlanguages. The students can introduce the topic in any method that they wish. The students couldfilm themselves “lecturing” on the topic, do a demonstration on the topic, pick a current event orinteresting project on the topic, or any other creative ideas. The instructions were to be creative,make the video interesting to their peers, but stay rated PG. The assignment, as given to
), his mother (a nurse) and grandparents (dairy farmers). He has had the great good fortune to always work with amazing people, most recently professors teaching circuits and electronics from 13 HBCU ECE programs and the faculty, staff and students of the SMART LIGHTING ERC, where he is Education Director. He was ECSE Department Head from 2001 to 2008 and served on the board of the ECE Department Heads Association from 2003 to 2008.Dr. Dianna Newman, University at Albany/SUNY Dr. Dianna Newman is a research professor at the Evaluation Consortium at the University at Al- bany/SUNY. Her major areas of study are program evaluation with an emphasis in STEM related pro- grams. She has numerous chapters, articles, and
following: developing the new contest theme andformulating contest rules, formulating contest judgment criteria, recruiting participants, fund-raising, public relations, and recommending improvements. At the contest the joyful experiencesinclude observing the action, judging the competition, providing feedback for team projects andcontest organizers, learning about robotics, participating in the contest symposium, encouragingstudents and teachers, testing and evaluating new assistive robots, and giving prizes.EvaluationThe goal of our evaluation was to measure the impact of the 2009 competition and to see ifRoboWaiter met its goals. Our special interest was to get evidence on to what extent thecontestants are motivated by the engineering, humane