, therefore it enhanced theirunderstanding of the concepts learned in the classroom. The grading rubrics for the written reportand oral presentation were given to the students to assess the team’s performance. The phasereports must be turned in on time to report the team’s progress. Students need to follow thesuggestions on the graded phase reports to improve the subsequent updates. In addition to theinstructor’s grading rubric, peer evaluation and the team evaluation sheets were used todetermine each team’s final grades as well. Their oral and written communications, ability towork in team, problem solving, information collection, and project management skills have beenimproved in IGL environment.Current Curriculum and Course StructureThe goal of
. Sokoloff, “Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula”, Am J of Phys, 66(4), 338-352, (1998).19. R. Beichner, J. Saul, D. Abbott, J. Morse, D. Deardorff, R. Allain, , et al, “Student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project”. In E. F. Redish and P. J. Cooney (Eds.), PER-Based Reform in University Physics. College Park, MD: AAPT, (2007).20. R. Beichner, “North Carolina State University: SCALE-UPW”. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning Spaces. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE, (2006).21. Y. J. Dori, and J. Belcher, “How does technology-enabled active learning undergraduate
visualization and orthographic drawing test using the Macintosh computer. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, Vol. 54, Vol. 1, pp. 1-7.[2] Rani, A. M. A., Wahab, A. A., Shaarani, R. & Aziz, A. R. A. (2000). Facilitating learning of engineering graphics instead of learning CAD. Platform, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 2-7.[3] Anglin, G., Towers, R. & Moore, K. (1997). The effect of dynamic and static visuals on the recall and comprehension of information using computer-based instruction. Journal of Visual Literacy, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 25-37.[4] Bagui, S. (1998). Reasons for increased learning using multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 3-18.[5] Ault, H. K. & John, S. (2010). Assessing and
short time the American students learned: thedifferences in the German and American university system; the similarities and differences of theengineering curriculum; how the German design process differs from the USA; that there aremany global issues facing engineers; there is a rich history of technology development inGermany; and that the Euro Cup isn’t a beverage cup at all. Even in this short time, manyfriendships and connections developed between the students from both continents.The assessment of the course, by both the American and German students, has been extremelypositive, and it is therefore likely that it will be repeated in future years. Updated informationfrom the 2013 offering of this course will be reported in the June oral
IPv6 specific vulnerabilities and their mitigations The appropriate methods for performing IPv6 security assessment of an IT environment Page 23.834.4 Current IPv6 security best practices Industry standards and requirements for IT security productsLabs implemented in the course are designed to provide the student with the following practicalskills: Capture malformed IPv6 Packets and identify various threat vectors Observe IPv6 based reconnaissance techniques and mitigate against them Define and implement best practices for ICMPv6 Observe and mitigate against ICMPv6 DDOS attacks Security
natural energy boosts. Students were required to show up formeals, especially breakfast, to stress the importance of healthy eating habits and self care.Assessment and ResultsTwo surveys were administered to the 14 Backstage Bucknell participants to assess the impact ofthe program. The first survey was administered immediately at the end of the BackstageBucknell before orientation and the second was administered five weeks after the beginning ofclasses after the first round of exams had been given in both physics and math.At the end of the Backstage Bucknell, the students’ responses to the survey showed that theygreatly valued the preparation sessions in math and physics and suggested that more time bedevoted to these topics in the future. The
revealed the following characteristics of individual learners: 1)all students (regardless of their ethnic groups) have high perceived general and engineering self-efficacy, and high expectancy values; 2) Hispanic students exhibited significantly lower domain-specific self-efficacy comparing to the others.The comparison between the pre and post survey results indicated a general increase of students’efficacy in almost all learning outcomes (shown in Tables 1 and 2). However, the biggest growthoccurred at the outcomes that were directly related to the project experience. This result isconsistent with our multi-year assessment findings since 2010, which validated that CPBL doespositively impact the development of domain-specific self-efficacy to
: ________________ Course: __________ Date: ___Spring 2013 As part of our effort to continuously improve our courses and methods of delivery we need your feedback. Please answer the questions below and return the form to a staff member. Has this course met its objectives in teaching you the following techniques, skills and knowledge of the subject matter? How would you assess your own abilities in the following areas? Please mark the table using a 5 point rating scale with 4 being Confident and 1 being not at all. Outcome Description 1 2 3 4 Use Kirchhoff’s Laws for circuit analysis 1 Use loop and node analysis techniques to analyze series
Waterford was on the development ofeducational resources and the founding of the Engineering Community of Practice withinIreland in the same year9. The Engineering Community of Practice, emanated from theNational Digital Learning Repository initiative. This Community presented funding throughthe Higher Education Authority in Ireland for the first time to aid broad collaborationamongst academics for the joint development, effectiveness assessment, collation, andsharing of educational resources. Over 500 digital learning resources and some on-goingcollaborative networks were established from this initiative [http://www.ndlr.ie/].Although there are no specific Irish or Portuguese journals for publication of EER results,there are several other journals
. Utilizing the DAQ’s digital and analog inputs and outputs. F. Use VBA to drive an action (by way of the DAQ) when a threshold temperature is attained.It is anticipated that students will find VBA programming more useful and relevant than VB6; itis hoped that this will spur an improvement in programming proficiency. A class survey will beused to assess students’ programming competence and whether they expect to use VBA after theconclusion of the course.AcknowledgmentThe bulk of the stations and procedures in the Sensor Lab at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville was created by Prof. W. Doyle St. John, and the author gratefully acknowledges hissupport over the years.The University of Wisconsin-Platteville’s Curriculum Improvement
, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs.Family Practice, 19(1), 105-111.9 Peytchev, A., Baxter, R.K. & Carley-Baxter, L.R. (2009). Not All Survey Effort Is Equal: Reduction ofNonresponse Bias and Nonresponse Error. The Public Opinion Quarterly , Vol. 73(4), 785-806.10 Heberlein, T.A. & Baumgartner, R.. Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A QuantitativeAnalysis of the Published Literature. (1978). American Sociological Review , vol. 43(4), 447-462.11 Jepson, C., Asch, D. A., Hershey, J. C., & Ubel, P. A. (2005). In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire lengthhad a threshold effect on response rate. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 58(1), 103-105.12
. http://library.nu.edu/4. Begum, D. (2009). East West University Library: A Model of Automated Information Services”. In the proceedings of International Conference on Academic Libraries (ICAL-2009), Oct. 5-8, Delhi, India.5. http://www.goalexandria.com/6. Gbadamosi, O. (2011). “Assessing Library Automation and Virtual Library Development in Four Academic Libraries in Oyo”, US-China Education Review 8(5), p711-717.7. Yurtay, N., Bicil, Y. and Celebi, S. (2011). “Library Automation Design for Visually Impaired People”, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 10(4) p255-260.8. Pace, A. (2009). “21st Century Library Systems”, Journal of Library Administration. Aug/Sep2009, 49(6), pp. 641-650.9. Back, G. and Bailey
Education Conference, Nov. 2002, pp. S3C- 13 – S3C-19 4. R. Felder, G. Felder, M. Mauney, C. Hamrin, E. Dietz, “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Retention. III. Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 84, No. 2, 1995, pp. 151–163 5. N. Klingbeil, K. Rattan, M. Raymer, D. Reynolds, and R. Mercer, “The Wright State model for engineering mathematics education: A nationwide adoption, assessment and evaluation,” Proc. of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2009, AC 2009-1416. 6. R. Hensel, J. Sigler, A. Lowery, “Breaking The Cycle Of Calculus Failure: Models of Early Math
the individualstudents’ tests prior conducting concept group exercise was around 29.9/50. To achievecontinuous learning improvement, concept group exercises operating at basic, moderate andadvanced levels were developed and routinely administered after every four lectures. Theseconcept exercises were developed with the non-equivalent control design without taking intoaccount the group influencing variables. In basic concept group exercise, a slightly higher scorewas observed as compared with advanced level group concept testing. The assessment of theseexercises revealed overall improvement in students learning ability, which was reflected in anaverage posttest score of 45.4/50. This study suggests that collaborative learning has improvedthe
faculty member within the First-Year Engineering Program at Purdue, the gateway for all first-year students entering the College of Engineering. She has coordinated and taught in a required first-year engineering course that engages students in open-ended problem solving and design. Her research focuses on the development, implemen- tation, and assessment of model-eliciting activities with realistic engineering contexts. She is currently the Director of Teacher Professional Development for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE). Page 23.325.1 c
in a math RET participant’s classroom where the students will provide feedback tothe biology team in the form of a financial analysis of what such a product would cost.Program evaluation It is a challenging task to rigorously evaluate a project that touches such a large numberof students, as in our program, especially using the very limited funds available in an RET siteprogram for research and evaluation. It is tempting to rely primarily on teacher surveys, but ourexperience is that these surveys tend to be very positive (and in an undifferentiated way) and notparticularly aligned with what actually happens in the classrooms. We utilize a multi-prongedapproach to assessment that is rigorous, cost-effective, and aligned with our goals
tracking using a Lego cart with a wireless camera3. Crop monitoring system3.1 Research objectivesIn the summer of 2012, NNU was one of the recipients of the 2012 Idaho Specialty Crop BlockGrant, which provides research funding specifically for specialty crops. Specialty crops includefruits, vegetable, and ornamental plants. The overall objective of this research is to develop acrop monitoring platform (CMP) to assess the conditions of a crop including crop dimension,normalized difference vegetation index, and canopy nutrient content. A MVS is used as thevisual sensor for the CMP and includes both color and infrared images. The following sectiondiscusses how a tree canopy can be analyzed using a MVS
assessment of “TechnologicalLiteracy” and “How Things Work” courses, funded by the National Science Foundation,indicated that the hydraulic analogy to circuit theory would be helpful in educating non-STEMstudents.Students generally learn new concepts by comparing them to things with which they are alreadyfamiliar. One of our problems with the present generation is that students tend not to be asphysically active as they were in previous generations. We have fewer “farm boys” and “shadetree mechanics” coming in as freshmen. They may never have siphoned water, played with“friction motor” cars, or gyroscopes. They may have no idea that flowing water has inertia, thatwater pressure in your house is due to the water tower in your town, and that water
textbooks in circuits, semiconductor devices, integrated circuits, microprocessors, microcontrollers, and data communications. Some of these textbooks have been published in six different languages. He has been responsible for program accreditation and made presentations at national and regional conferences on integrated engi- neering programs and assessment. His research interests include microcontrollers, biomedical systems, and mathematical modeling of electromechanical systems. He is been a member of IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers), ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers), and ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education) and he has been a reviewer, presenter and a facilitator at
, June 2009. 9. J.M. Grandin, N. Hedderich. "Intercultural Competence in Engineering: Global Competence for Engineers" in: Darla Deardorff (ed.). The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence, 2009, pp. 362-373 10. Institute of International Education. (2012). "Fields of Study of U.S. Study Abroad Students, 2000/01- 2010/11." Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange. Retrieved from http://www.iie.org/opendoors 11. J. R. Lohmann, H. A. Rollins, Jr., and J. J. Hoey, “Defining, developing and assessing global competence in engineers,” European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 31, No. 1, March 2006, 119-131 12. Georgia Institute of Technology. 2005. Strengthening the global competence and
study utilizing semi-structured interviews to compare the two methodsof conducting a capstone design course was conducted [2]. The interview data used in this study Page 23.411.3came from three sources: senior exit interviews, IAB meeting notes, and interviews with thepracticing engineers who mentored students in both semesters.Exit interviews are conducted with every student graduating from the department. Theseinterviews are used to improve the undergraduate education and experience offered by thedepartment and gather assessment data. The interview questions were prepared by a small groupof faculty and were approved by the department as a
identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching;2010, 47, 978–1003.[15] Cribbs, J., Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. Development of an explanatory framework for mathematicsidentity. In Proceedings of Psychology of Mathematics Education – North American (PME-NA) ChapterConference; 2012.[16] Potvin, G., Beattie, C., & Paige, C. Building a valid and reliable assessment of physics identity . In NationalAssociation for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference; 2012.[17] Lent, R. W., Brown., S. D., & Hackett, G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academicinterest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior; 1994, 45, 79 – 122.[18] Lent, R. W., Brown
. Borislava, “Improving Success Rates in Calculus”, MAA Focus, 28(5), 20–21, 2008. 10. B. Howard, "Enough of This Science and Mathematics, Let's Do Some Engineering," Proceedings, Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 3, 13d2-8, 1999. 11. S. Felszeghy, “On Reforming the Teaching of Calculus to Engineering Students at CSULA”, February 8, 2010, http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/sfelsze/CSULA_Calculus_Reform.pdf. 12. N.W. Klingbeil, R.E. Mercer, K.S. Rattan, M.L. Raymer, D.B. Reynolds, “The WSU Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: A Multiyear Assessment and Expansion to Collaborating Institutions”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2008. 13. N.W. Klingbeil, R.E. Mercer
, was completed by 113 students.Of those 113, 102 (90%) students were able to make reasonable assumptions about the type ofinformation that would be found at the site with the provided reference. Even if the studentscould not determine what information they would expect to find on the page, 106 of the 113(94%) provided good reasons why they would or would not use the source for a project.In most cases the students who did not make an accurate assessment of the type of information tobe found on the page were unable to give a coherent response on why they would or would notuse the site. In a couple of cases, students who inaccurately indicated what could be found on thesite were able to clearly articulate why they would not use such a site for a
shape.References1. Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, 1344-1360.2. Brinkman, G. W., & van der Geest, T. M. (2003). Assessment of Communication Competencies in Engineering Design Projects. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12 (1), 67-81.3. Froyd, J. E., Wall, A., & Williams, J. M. (2002). Writing to Design/Designing to Write: Using the Correlations between Communication and Engineering to Improve Student Reflection. Session 2132. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.4. Hirsch, P. L., & Yarnoff, C. (2011). Integrating Design and Communication in
diesel with regard to climatechange and other pollution considerations. The STEAM educators and researchers did get anexposure of the present status and future prospects of bio-fuels from ethanol and biodiesel tobiotechnological routes to biohydrogen. The handouts given out at the institute included theteaching materials and information on feedstock systems and biodiesels from various sources,instructions for the tools (each participant received a biodiesel kit from Utah Biodiesels Supply[4], and information on various resources and careers related to sustainable bioenergy. Throughdiscussions and hands-on experiences, the participants are able to learn about making minibatches of biodiesel using different types of oil; and how to assess
delivered numerous workshops on student-centered learn- ing and online-learning-related topics during his service in Indonesia. Dr. Lawanto’s research interests include cognition, learning, and instruction, and online learning.Mr. Raymond Edward Boyles, Technology and Engineering Education Raymond Edward Boyles has an associate’s in specialized, avionics, May 1992, from Pittsburgh Institute of Aeronautics, and a B.S., information technology, May 2008, and M.S., technology education, Aug. 2009, from California University of PA. Most Relevant Papers: Santoso, H., Boyles, R., Lawanto, O. & Goodridge, W. (2011). A Preliminary Study of Conducting Semi-Structured Interview as Metacognitive Assessment in Engineering Design
to and subsequent to iPad technology utilization and managed throughan independent third-party testing entity. The perceived value pre-survey was done prior tostudents having knowledge that they were going to be receiving iPads for use in the 14-weekcourse. The assessment for the comprehension component of the study focused on four cohorts ofstudents. All cohorts of students were taught the same way from the commencement of thesemester until the time of the first course exam. This was done to limit and account for thepossible variance of class grades. At the beginning of week seven, iPads were then introduced andprovided for the second, third and fourth cohort of students. The usage of the iPad in classassignments was focused on maximizing
environment. Students werepresented with the opportunity to conduct tests with a Basic Stamp Microcontroller, PBASICcompiler, and other interfacing devices. By using the Board of Education platform, along with aBS2 series controller, students learned the interfacing concepts for especially industrialapplications. It concludes with an informal assessment of the project’s success and preliminaryideas for related projects based on this experience [5-7].The difference between this course and traditional microcontroller course is to use of variety ofinexpensive sensors and electronics components available in the lab environments or easy toobtain. Some of the kits with pre-made boards are available in the market only allow or forcestudents to use
be included in future programs areshaft design, seal selection, coupling sizing, clutches, and brake selection. Assessing the impactthe software has on student learning will play an important roll in the development of thesoftware. Student input and feedback is necessary in order to gear the software in a way that willenhance student learning. Although the software has been introduced to the students on apreliminary basis, the student feedback has been very positive. Also there has been a positiveresponse from faculty teaching in the area of machine elements. My goal for the software is tocomplete all topics mentioned above and make the software available on a CD or through a website.References1. Dayco, Dayco Engineering Guide for