Paper ID #25869Additive Manufacturing for Custom Design: Process and Evaluation andCost ManagementDr. Gaffar Barakat Gailani, New York City College of Technology Dr. Gailani is an associate professor in the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Design Technology. Received his Ph.d in Mechanical Engineering from the City University of New York in 2009. His research work is focused on poroelasticity and its application in biomechanics, medical devices, and additive manufacturing. He has published many journal publications and one book.Dr. Angran Xiao, New York City College of Technology Angran Xiao is an Assistant
in delivering engineering technologyeducation.The MMET department offers two ABET accredited degrees at the baccalaureate level:Manufacturing Engineering Technology and Mechanical Engineering Technology. The fourconcentration areas within the Mechanical Engineering Technology curriculum are aeronautical,automation, automotive and mechanical. For the aeronautical concentration, the curriculumincludes a course in Wind Tunnel Design and Testing. The course outcomes include thefollowing: 1. A basic understanding of how a wind tunnel operates. 2. Familiarity with wind tunnel measurement systems such as pitot-static probes, pressure transducers, manometers, thermocouples etc
AC 2012-3455: MULTIPROCESSOR EMBEDDED SYSTEM DESIGN: ACOURSE WITH HARDWARE-SOFTWARE INTEGRATIONProf. Omer Farook, Purdue University, Calumet Omer Farook is a member of the faculty of electrical and computer engineering technology at Purdue University, Calumet. Farook received the diploma of licentiate in mechanical engineering and B.S.M.E. in 1970 and 1972, respectively. He further received B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. in 1978 and 1983, respec- tively, from Illinois Institute of Technology. Farook’s current interests are in the areas of embedded system design, hardware-software interfacing, digital communication, networking, image processing, and biometrics, C++, PHP and Java languages. He has a keen interest in pedagogy
, Page 25.100.2students need to have an advisor from their respective program. The elements emphasized andadopted to promote project evaluation practices include periodic review of journal/log bookentries, presentations, periodic milestone reports, at least weekly meetings with the advisor(s),and the final design report.IntroductionDue to its culminating nature, the senior design project course is probably the most significantexperience of the undergraduate engineering students (1). In the process the students apply whatthey have learned in their undergraduate course work; develop their communication,interpersonal, project management, and design skills; and learn about the product developmentprocess. Students also get an understanding of the
pictureand understand what the other disciplines are doing and how the disciplines need tointeract.Bibliography[1] Northrup, D.A. and Northrup, S.G, “Multidisciplinary Team Assessment”, in Proceedings of ASEE 2007 Annual Conference, - Honolulu, HI, June, 2007.[2] Northrup, D.A. and Northrup, S.G, “Multidisciplinary Teamwork Assessment – A Generalizable Instrument”, in Proceedings of ASEE 2008 Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2008.[3] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, published by ABET, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland, www.abet.org/images/Criteria/E001 06-07 EAC Criteria 12-19-05.pdf, 2005.[4] Northrup, S.G, “Innovation and Improvement of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Course: Increasing Interdisciplinary
engineering design course. J. Eng. Edu., p. 238-287, July 1998.3. Hatton, D., P. Wankat and W. LeBold, The effects of an orientation course on the attitudes of engineering freshmen, J. Eng. Edu., pp. 23-27, Jan. 1998.4. Morris, David, An Experiment in Freshman Design, Proceedings, 1990 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE, Session 1253, p.97, 1992.5. Ponton, M., J. Edmister, L. Ukeliey, J. Seiner, Understanding the role of self-efficacy in engineering education, J. Eng. Edu., pp. 247-251. April 2001.6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ranachaudran (Ed.), Encycl. Of Human Behavior, v. 4, pp.71-81, 1994.7. Selding, A.L. and F. Pajares, Against the Odds: Self efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers, Amer
mobile technologies, user experience, and digital media.Dr. Jennifer A Turns, University of WashingtonDr. Lauren D. Thomas, University of WashingtonDr. Brook Sattler, University of Washington Dr. Sattler is a Research Scientist for the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT) and a Multi-Campus Coordinator for the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE) at the University of Washington. Her research interests include understanding and promoting self-authoring engineers.Dr. Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington Cynthia J. Atman is the founding director of the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the
experience both the frustration and satisfactionof that experience. Such learning prepares them for professional practice in ways that a projectrequiring only a paper/computer design does not. For instance, students in the lower end designteam, while having some background due from their coursework, became much more proficientand confident in their understanding of design and machining. Students designed, programmed,setup, machined, and inspected complex CNC parts. They assembled the parts into a completemachine and successfully tested it. They were able to adapt their engineering skill sets to theproject at hand. This was a lifelong-learning experience the student will not soon forget.Bibliography 1 Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., &
Session 2125 Teaching Innovation and Entrepreneurship Through Design in Inventor’s Studio Burt L. Swersey Mechanical, Aerospace, Nuclear Engineering William Foley Decision Sciences & Engineering Systems Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteInnovation and entrepreneurship are two words that are often put forward as goals forengineering education. Although most of our students will not start new companies upongraduation we can prepare them to act in an entrepreneurial manner within
solution to the problem live for theclass to demonstrate how they approach the problem. A typical week presented 3-5 problems forstudents to solve, meaning by week 7, students had collaboratively designed solutions to 20-30different design problems, which while not hands on, at least gave students an understanding ofhow an engineer would work with each component.2.1.3 Tron DaysEngineering Design Days are two-day long design “sprints” that expose students early in theiruniversity careers to open-ended problems, decision-making, and the role of analysis in design.First offered in 2016, Design Days for first year MTE (“Tron Days”) led students through arealistic engineering design process on a discipline-specific task. During Tron Days studentsworked
weeks prior to the start of the spring 2020 quarter presented aunique challenge for the instructional team who had no prior experience teaching virtually. Thispaper highlights aspects of the instructional transition to an emergency remote virtual format inthe spring of 2020. While the instructor made key decisions on the use of virtual tools out ofnecessity, such as use of synchronous versus asynchronous activities, the instruction team wasinterested in understanding student-learning outcomes. Student data collected during remoteoffering, pre/post Engineering Design Self-Efficacy (EDSE) surveys along with an end ofquarter reflection assignment, provided a starting point for understanding the students’ learningexperience. Presented in this paper
ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering b. An ability to design and conduct experiment, as well as to analyze and interpret data An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic c. constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. An ability to communicate effectively The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility, an ability to communicate effectively, and a knowledge ofcontemporary issues.To help students achieve these goals and perform senior design projects, Department ofElectrical and Computer Engineering at Florida International University provides two courses intwo consecutive semesters: EEL 4920 (Senior Design I) and EEL 4921 (Senior Design II).Specifically, EEL 4920 gives comprehensive lectures, providing the overview of a senior designproject, the methodologies for developing a project, the considerations of ethics, intellectualproperties, standards, health, and safety, and the design tools for using microcontrollers. In thiscourse, students need to define an appropriate project and create a
AC 2009-382: DESIGN AND FLIGHT TESTING OF AN IN-FLIGHTDEPLOYABLE PARACHUTE SYSTEM FOR A SMALL UNMANNED AERIALSYSTEM (SUAS)Ibibia Dabipi, University of Maryland, Eastern ShoreChristopher Hartman, University of Maryland, Eastern ShoreJames B. Burrows-Mcelwain, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Page 14.411.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009Design and Flight-testing of an in-flight Deployable Parachute System for a small Unmanned Aerial System (sUAS).Abstract - Students in the Freshman Spring 2008 design course were challenged toengineer a deployable parachute system for a model aircraft that could be used on a smallUnmanned Aerial System (UAS
Paper ID #19553Pigs in Space: A Bio-Inspired Design and Space Challenges CornerstoneProjectProf. Marjan Eggermont, University of Calgary Marjan Eggermont is the current Associate Dean (Student Affairs) and a Senior Instructor and faculty member at the University of Calgary in the Mechanical and Manufacturing department of the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary. She teaches communications in their first Engineering Design and Communication course taught to all incoming engineering students. She co-founded and designs ZQ, an online journal to provide a platform to showcase the nexus of science and design
“Building Informed Designers” project is to incorporate engineeringdesign into existing high school science courses with minimal expense to improve designthinking and problem solving by all high school students. A secondary goal is to increase thenumber of students who will pursue college or community college engineering career pathways.Problem solving and thus problem framing are a key first step of the engineering design process.Davis, Beyerlin, & Davis [3] describes the role of a problem solver as one in which she“examines the problem setting to understand critical issues, assumptions, limitations, andsolution requirements.” Problem solving has been studied and found to be critical in design anddecision making [4-8]. Complex problems can
a two-year plan for the pilot project has been drafted. It also helps in passing the learned experience to the successive teams while keeping the project requirement same. Since FIT’s senior design course is three semesters long, a team of junior or sophomore has been proposed with the understanding that the same team or members of the team keep continuing on the project during their capstone senior design project course. Whereas, team at FAMU-FSU College of Engineering will help them to provide the initial senior experience that includes project planning and management concepts learned in their Engineering Design Methods course for the initiation of the project. Later on, during the second year, a new team at FAMU-FSU
, and Fila, Hess, Purzer, and Dringenberg[20] examined how students develop and utilize their empathy towards users during a design taskwithout direct interaction with users. Furthermore, Beckman and Barry [21] discussed students’empathy in problem framing. They explained that at the first stage of the design process,empathizing with the students allows them to interpret a problem situation with users’perspectives. It implies that empathy is essential in framing and reframing processes.In consideration of the importance of engineering students’ framing and reframing processes andempathic design abilities, there have been critical work surrounding their problem-framing andempathy. However, there is still a gap in understanding of engineering
sensitivity to the socio-cultural aspects of their projects. Continental Crossingspent time with the community leaders to ensure that the community needs were met. The teammodified the design to best suit the community to ensure community commitment to the project.Criterion 3h, 3i and 3j: Criterion 3h requires that students demonstrate the broad educationnecessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in the global, economic,environmental and societal context. Criterion 3i requires that students demonstrate therecognition for the need and an ability to engage in life-long learning and criterion 3j requiresthat students demonstrate knowledge of contemporary issues.These ABET criterion address many of the other important aspects that go
design and providing service learning opportunities for first-year programming students through various K-12 educational activities. Dr. Estell is a Member-at-Large of the Executive Committee for the Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET, and also serves as a program evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission. He is also a founding member and serves as Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions through a standardized rite-of-passage ceremony.Prof. Susannah Howe, Smith College Susannah Howe, Ph.D. is the Design Clinic Director in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College, where she coordinates and
to your professional development/readiness? Both technical and non-technical aspects. MTRE 4800 introduces the engineering design workflow, from concept to prototype. Often, this can be just as or even more important than the design itself in the real world. A systematic workflow helps to ensure that standards of safety are being followed, and that all parties involved clearly understand the requirements of the design and what will be needed to satisfy these requirements. Through the completion of a semester-long project, we learned the stages of the engineering design workflow, as well as the associated documentation, presentations, and reports that will be required of us in industry
engineering instructor. Both good team cohesionand an embedded communication instructor create better capstone experiences, and we arelooking into how to help students understand the importance of both. In the future, we propose tolook more deeply at how the teams are performing and perhaps develop interventions thatpromote more collaboration between team members.References [1] A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen, “A review of literature onteaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, pp. 17-28, Jan. 1997.[2] D. R. Brodeur, P. W. Young, and K. B. Blair, “Problem-based learning in aerospace engineering education,” In Proc. ASEE Annual Conference, 2002, pp. 16-19.[3
AC 2010-1902: TEAM-BASED NEGOTIATION OF IDEAS ON DESIGN DECISIONMAKING PERFORMANCEYogesh Velankar, Purdue University Yogesh Velankar is a doctoral candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests are in corporate training and professional development of engineers, designing effective learning environments and methods for engineering education research.Sean Brophy, Purdue University Sean P. Brophy, PhD. is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Brophy is a learning scientist and engineer; his research focuses on the development of learners’ development of adaptive expertise needed to solve complex problems in
AC 2011-973: PROJECT-BASED LEARNING (PBL) AN EFFECTIVE TOOLTO TEACH AN UNDERGRADUATE CFD COURSEWael Mokhtar, Grand Valley State University Assistant Professor School of Engineering Page 22.1188.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Project-Based Learning (PBL) – An Effective Tool to Teach an Undergraduate CFD CourseAbstractAn undergraduate technical elective Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) was developed. Thecourse was designed to be a balance between theoretical foundation of the subject and hands-onexperience. Project-Based Learning (PBL) was used as part of the course to
AC 2011-1226: PROGRESS REPORT - THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHPERFORMANCE CAPSTONE PROJECT TEAMS AND THE SELECTIONPROCESSStephen W. Laguette, University of California, Santa Barbara Stephen Laguette is currently a Lecturer at the University of California, Santa Barbara in the College of Engineering in the Department of Mechanical Engineering (ME) and the Technology Management Pro- gram and is responsible for the undergraduate ME Capstone Design program. He received his BS, MS in ME from the University of California, Los Angeles. His professional career has included executive Research and Development management positions with a number of medical device companies. He has been responsible for the creation of complex medical
AC 2011-815: BODY-STORMING, SUPER HEROES AND SCI-TECH PUB-LICATIONS:TECHNIQUES TO ENHANCE THE IDEATION PROCESSDaniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy Dr. Dan Jensen is a Professor of Engineering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (Mechanical Engineering), M.S. (Applied Mechanics) and Ph.D. (Aerospace Engineering Science) from the University of Colorado at Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and MSC Software Corp. His research includes development of innovative design methodologies and en- hancement of engineering education.Kendra Crider, U.S. Air Force Academy Kendra
firms. Page 15.419.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Development of High Performance Capstone Project Teams and the Selection ProcessAbstractA successful Capstone Design program including companion design courses has beendeveloped1,2 that has become an integral and important component of the MechanicalEngineering curriculum. A variety of challenging projects are created each year to appeal tostudent academic and career interests. Students work in teams with the assistance of a facultyadvisor to tackle a significant mechanical engineering design project. The formation of studentteams
Paper ID #18342Work in Progress: Teaching Design Theory and Mastercam in a HybridFlipped Classroom EnvironmentDr. Austin Talley P.E., Texas State University, San Marcos Dr. Austin Talley a Senior Research Fellow with LBJ Institute for STEM Education & Research and Senior Lecturer in the Ingram School of Engineering at Texas State University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas State University, Dr. Austin Talley worked as a manufacturing quality engineer for a test and measurement company, National Instruments, in Austin, TX. Dr. Austin Talley is a licensed by state of Texas as a Professional Engineer. Both of Dr
AC 2007-1582: FROM CAPSTONE COURSES TO CORNERSTONE PROJECTS:TRANSFERRING EXPERIENCES FROM DESIGN ENGINEERING FINAL YEARSTUDENTS TO FIRST YEAR STUDENTSMartin Grimheden, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Page 12.768.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 From Capstone Courses to Cornerstone Projects: Transferring Experiences from Design Engineering Final Year Students to First Year StudentsAbstractAt KTH, the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden, large capstone courses havebeen the base of higher engineering programs in product development during the last 20 years.The capstone courses has since the
Session 3125 Team Development in a Preliminary Year Design Class M. G. Britton, M. J. Frye Associate Dean (Design Education), Engineer-in-Residence University of Manitoba ABSTRACTThis paper describes the approach taken to team development in a preliminary year engineeringdesign class at the University of Manitoba. With this approach, student design teams assume asignificant level of responsibility for the conduct of all components of the course. The coursemanagement system that emphasizes individual and collective