[2]. Individuals who had the greatest self-efficacy changedtheir environments, such as seeking like-minded individuals for support (i.e., affinitygroups) and improving the discipline for others [2]. However, previous research featuredindividuals who experienced HC and responded to it. This current research thread isfocused on individuals who are resistant to self-/advocacy around engineering HC.MethodsData collection The research team utilized responses to the UPHEME (Uncovering PreviouslyHidden Messages in Engineering) survey, a mixed-methods survey that has beenpreviously validated [12]. The survey contains a video vignette that provides an exampleof what HC looks like in engineering contexts. The video vignette features actors
involved in humanitarian engineering learn valuable technical andprofessional skills and knowledge through the work [3-6]. Unique to this project, the long-termeffects of involvement in humanitarian engineering projects will be studied in comparison to themore immediate effects which have been studied elsewhere. The mixed-methods study utilizes aquestionnaire built from two existing instruments as well as open-ended questions and interviewsto further understand these impacts. This paper will focus on the quantitative data analysisassociated with the two instruments from the questionnaire whereas initial qualitative analysishas been presented in [2].This research is built on the foundational work of many authors in engineering educationliterature
Paper ID #12728How Dialogue on ’Ingenuity in Nature’ Increases Enthusiasm for Engineer-ing and Science in Traditional Religious CommunitiesDr. Dominic M. Halsmer P.E., Oral Roberts University Dr. Dominic M. Halsmer is a Professor of Engineering and former Dean of the College of Science and Engineering at Oral Roberts University. He also serves as the Director of the Center for Faith and Learn- ing at ORU. He has been teaching science and engineering courses there for 23 years, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Oklahoma. He received BS and MS Degrees in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering
manufacturing courses at Btech. I also like learning andreading about technology.”Female: “In all my classes. I maintain a 4.0. Mainly because mathematics gives me a challengeinstead of making it too easy for me. I love challenging my brain as many ways as I can”.One other sub-theme under this category is Camps. This sub-theme includes responses fromstudents who enjoyed previous camp experiences:Male: “The STEM that we did in the camp is fun and I enjoyed the different types of fun andinteresting things.”Female: “Engineering wise, I have gone to an engineering camp in the past and just completedmy second engineering camp. I am not too [good] with technology, but I can effectively drawthings on paint (which is apparently supposed to be hard.”The last
engineering educators to assess performance relativeto the required educational outcomes and the program objectives. The exam has also been aneffective tool in evaluating a program’s continuous improvement efforts. Reports are providedby NCEES to each state PE Board and to each EAC/ABET program following each examadministration outlining the performance of students by engineering discipline on groupings ofquestions by topic area. This information can provide insight on program strengths andweaknesses by topic area, particularly when evaluated over the course of a number ofadministrations. Results may be skewed for individual classes in small programs, but over thecourse of several years, performance patterns can become apparent. ABET
(ESET) in conjunction with their Mobile IntegratedSolutions Laboratory (MISL) accepted this challenge, and over the course of 2013, several undergraduate students in aCapstone design course developed five wireless DC Smart Plugs for NASA. The wireless DC Smart Plugs developed byTexas A&M in conjunction with NASA’s Deep Space Habitat team is a first step in developing wireless instrumentation forfuture flight hardware. This paper will further discuss the X-Hab challenge and requirements set out by NASA, the detaileddesign and testing performed by Texas A&M, challenges faced by the team and lessons learned, and potential future work onthis design.IntroductionNASA has been focusing on deep space missions, and new technologies are necessary
learning among professionals in the workplace, the scholarship of teaching and learning with technology, and organization development. She has been published in Performance Improvement Quarterly, The Journal of Business Communication, Advances in Developing Human Resources, and the International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Recently, she has presented at the Educause Learning Initiative, the International Conference on Transformative Learning, the Lilly Conference on Teaching and Learning and the Conference on Higher Education Pedagogy. Page 23.966.1 c
Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, October, 2021, pp. 1-4.[13] C. A. Berry, A. Bowden, M. F. Cox, T. N. Reid, and L. L. Long, “Black in Engineering: How the Social Justice Efforts of Black Academics Affect Change,” In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, July 2021.[14] M. R. Anderson-Rowland, “The effect of course sequence on the retention of freshmen engineering students: When should the intro engineering course be offered?” Cat. No. 98CH3621 in FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from Teacher-Centered to Learner-Centered Education. Conference Proceedings, November 1998, (4) (Vol. 1, pp. 252-257). IEEE.[15] M. Ashley, K. M. Cooper, J. M. Cala and S. E
by the Ford Motor Company and IBM; and offerspedagogical suggestions for integrating Holocaust materials into engineering and technologyclasses.While this topic is disturbing, it is important that engineering educators arm their students withknowledge of this emotionally wrenching period in history. Knowing the past may result in abrighter future.IntroductionSometimes, a glance into the past is painful. Engineers view themselves as educated, humaneindividuals who are dedicated to making the world a better place: improving living conditions,providing clean water, developing more productive agricultural methods, generating technologyto enhance communications between people in the far corners of the earth. What happened to theengineering
pathway for socioeconomic mobility and broader systemic improvement rather than an additional barrier. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 An exploration of the relationship between physical, social, and emotional r esource access and the development of engineering identity and belonging bstractAThis research paper investigatestheconnectionsbetweenengineeringstudents’resourceaccess andtheirdevelopmentofengineeringidentityandbelonging.Engineeringidentityandbelonging are integral components of engineering student success. In fact, belonging is identified as the most important factor of student
-solving, with special focus on systems thinking and creative thinking. His doctoral research received several awards, including the Zeff Fellowship for Excelling First-year Ph.D. Students and the Miriam and Aaron Gutwirth Fellowship for Excelling Ph.D. Students. Dr. Lavi has recently received an award from the d’Arebeloff Fund for Excellence in Education to develop and teach a new undergraduate course, ‘22.s092 - Tackling Challenges in Climate and Sustainability with Ways of Thinking’. He is the inventor of the SNAP Method® for structured creative problem-solving (US & UK trademarks).Justin A. Lavallee (Lead Technical Instructor)Nathan Melenbrink (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Amitava Mitra Amitava ‘Babi’ Mitra
; Instruction at NC State University. Her research and theoretical interests include race and racial identity in education, African American academic achievement, emotions in education, and critical race theory. Dr. DeCuir-Gunby has served as a statistical consultant on numerous projects including the GenScope Assessment Project, a project designed to assess the use of technology on high school students' learning of genetics. She teaches courses in Educational Psychology, Adolescent Development, and Mixed Methods Research. She is a co-PI on an NSF ADVANCE Leadership grant.Barbara Smith, North Carolina State University Barbara Smith is the Executive Assistant Director of the PURPOSE Institute
, TX, USA Author Note:This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No 1902072.Authors are listed in the order of their contribution to the manuscript.Correspondence regarding this manuscript should be sent to Magdalena G.Grohman at magdalena.grohman@unt.edu.AbstractMultiple studies report the benefits of authentic research experiences in STEMeducation. While most of them focus either on course-based research projects oron undergraduate students’ experiences, few document authentic learningexperiences unfolding in real time among and between graduate students inresearch laboratories. Therefore, we situate our study in the context of authenticresearch experiences in
(Excellence in Civil Engineering Education) Teaching Workshop and in ABET accreditation of engineering programs. In addition to Leader Development, his portfolio also includes Educational Activities, Professional Activities, Raise the Bar, and Sustainability Departments. Jim is also an adjunct faculty member at George Mason University where he teaches leadership and leading change in the Applied Information Technology MS graduate program. Jim is a lifelong learner, seeking to continually improve and reinvent himself. His passions include lead- ership, mentoring, professionalism, personal responsibility, non-verbal communication, and teaching ef- fectiveness. He strives to always ”Be Intentional”–that is, to do everything
practicing engineers. In addition, she conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Cheryl Carrico is a Postdoctoral Research faculty member for Virginia Tech. Her current research fo- cus relates to STEM career pathways (K-12 through early career) and conceptual understanding of core engineering principles. Dr. Carrico owns a research and consulting company specializing in research evaluations and industry consulting. Dr. Carrico received her B.S. in chemical engineering from Virginia Tech, Masters of Engineering from North Carolina State University, MBA from King University, and PhD in
engineering ethics, virtue ethics has been identified as a significant and essentialethical lens to be part of engineering ethics courses and learning (Pierrakos et al., 2019; Frigo etal., 2021). A virtue ethics lens will ground our investigation herein.II. METHODSWhile most engineering societies have codes of ethics, for this investigation, we selected only asubset of the available codes. First, we selected the National Society of Professional Engineers(NSPE) Code of Ethics, one of the more prominent and widely used, and representing a cross-disciplinary engineering society constituted primarily by licensed PEs. Second, we selected theCode of Ethics of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), one of the largestengineering
on a program aimed at improving equity in high school computer science programs; she is also co-editor of the SIGCSE Bulletin. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Supporting Undergraduate Engineering Students Who Are Primary Caregivers to Children: A Systematic Literature ReviewAbstractIntroduction: Perhaps surprisingly, about one in five undergraduate students is a caregiver. Thesestudents may have different needs than other students. Because data on student caregivers is lesslikely to be collected than data on other student groups, there are substantial gaps in ourunderstanding of their experiences, including their unique challenges and
and structural engineering courses at VMI and enjoys working with the students on bridge related research projects and with the ASCE student chapter.Craig N. Musselman, A & E Consulting Craig N. Musselman, P.E. is a practicing civil and environmental engineer and is the Founder and Pres- ident of CMA Engineers, a consulting engineering firm with offices in New Hampshire and Maine. He holds B.S.C.E. and M.S.C.E. degrees from the University of Massachusetts and has more than 35 years experience in the planning, design and construction administration of public works facilities. Mussel- man is a former member of the New Hampshire Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and was actively involved in the
data collection tools, analysis methodologies, and effectively pre- senting results, she dedicates herself to promoting Hispanic excellence in STEM. She joined SHPE’s staff in 2021, after serving as a faculty member at Northeastern University and a post-doctoral fellow at the James A. Hailey Veterans Hospital and the HSyE Institute. Holding a PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of South Florida and a certificate in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion from Cornell University, Dayna is deeply passionate about increasing Hispanic representation and success in STEM. Leveraging her analytical skills and data-driven approach, she is committed to creating and evaluating impactful programs and services for the
evaluation. He is presently working on several project including the Environmental Protection Agency, Health and Human Services Administration on Aging and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as well serving as the lead evaluation consultant to seven national centersEugene Brown, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Eugene Brown is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech. In addition to the Virginia Demonstration Project, he has worked on a number of STEM outreach programs and has published several papers describing these activities. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in thermodynamics and fluid mechanics.Gail Hardinge, College of William and Mary
Paper ID #28227Cultural Scripts, Space, and Identity: Perspectives of Two LGBTQ+Engineering Students on Inclusive SpacesJerry Austin Yang, University of Texas, Austin Jerry Austin Yang is an electrical engineering student at the University of Texas at Austin. His interests include the experiences of marginalized groups in engineering and diversity and inclusion in engineering education.Dr. Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin Audrey Boklage is research assistant in the Cockrell School of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. She is particularly interested in improving the culture and environment of
" fighter was the first fighter to actuallyreach an effective 400 mph air speed. While performing up to expectations the Corsiar had somevery nasty stall and spin characteristics.Data for "leading edge technology" environments usually does not come from conventional in-struments. In fact even today, needed data may not yet exist as it often escapes conventional in-strumentation.The first six production Corsairs were test flown briefly, before delivery to the Navy. Five of thesix were sent back to Vought for extensive testing. The sixth wound up in Chesepeake Bay. Sowe had five Corsiars back for testing only a few weeks after delivery: One was for performancemeasurements, one for powerplant testing, and a third for high speed dive tests. A fourth
studying mechanical engineering and doing research in engineering educa- tion—the perfect combination of her interests.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Dr. Sheri Sheppard is in the Design Group of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford. Besides teaching undergraduate and graduate courses on structural analysis and design, she serves an administrative role as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. Her research focuses on the study of educational and career pathways of people interested in technical work (and how to make K-20 education more supportive of these pathways).Dr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University
engineeringchallenges and pathways. They point to work by Blash et al. [14] who share that time-to-degreeis another major challenge facing these students. Xu et al [15] examined whether or not being atransfer student was a “good bet” due to a delayed time of entry to the workforce explaining thatfinancial outcomes are important to these students. Much of the literature also points to “transfershock”, as originally coined by Hills et al. in 1965 [16]. This “shock” certainly relates toSchlossberg's theory introduced over a decade later.It is important to support transfer engineering students in effective ways due to limitedinstitutional resources. Financial assistance and high-impact practices are known to meet animportant need for transfer engineering students
positions for those in power. Research is needed that examines how strategicambiguity is navigated or negotiated in the course of promotion reform, and especially whengendered power differentials are in play.In this paper, we address this gap by investigating the process by which reform of the Associate-to-Full promotion system unfolds within a STEM-intensive university. Drawing from in-depthlongitudinal case study data, we find that reform involves management of strategic ambiguityusing three inter-related micro-processes: 1) negotiations over the what of promotion criteria andsystems; 2) struggles over who controls the formulation of promotion policy and interpretation ofcriteria; and 3) decisions over how the change process itself should unfold
and quickformative assessments of student understanding? In the Nigerian context, particularly as observedin this study, there was a huge reliance on visual and auditory stimuli as forms of formativeassessment by all the observed instructors.Although blatantly subjective, this cue was particularly effective in helping teachers navigatethrough the courses they taught. It became a matter of discussion during the follow-up interviews.I was particularly interested in understanding how instructors initiated them, how they interpretedthese visual and auditory cues, and how they learned to move on after the verification orelaboration had concluded. One instructor suggested that it was not ideal, because it was not anobjective test of understanding
? What factors hinder or facilitate the success of returning students in graduate school? What similarities and differences do returning students perceive between themselves and direct-pathway students?The data from this study are useful in beginning to answer these questions, and in informingfuture studies. Furthermore, with such data, universities will be able to more effectively advisereturning students. This will allow the university to gain from the strengths returners bring, aswell as better equip returners to earn their graduate degrees.BackgroundA significant number of graduate students have not followed a direct pathway from theirundergraduate education to graduate school. These students, referred to in various places as
. Knight is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Special As- sistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of Research of the Academy for Global Engineering at Virginia Tech and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, tends to leverage large-scale institutional, state, or national data sets, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. He has B.S., M.S., and M.U.E.P. degrees from the University of Virginia and a Ph.D. in Higher
specimen with girders embedded was initiated, but completed soon afterthe REU site ended. As a result, the effect of embedding girders in the diaphragm could not becompletely evaluated during the project duration, but initial assessment of performance wasreported. Prestressed concrete bridge girders are fabricated by stretching steel cable strands to atension of approximately 200 ksi. Concrete is then poured around the stressed strands and whenthe concrete reaches the specified strength, the steel cable strands are cut at each end of thegirder. The strands inside the girder acts like a rubber band and attempt to snap. However, sincethe strands are bonded to the concrete, the concrete prevents the strand from snapping back to itsfull
research builds on five foundational assumptions: 1) leadership is aprocess of solving adaptive challenges, 2) it can be developed, 3) it requires holistic individualdevelopment, 4) it is relational, and 5) it happens in context. They go on to suggest that theumbrella term, leadership learning, is made up of three discrete elements: leadership training,leadership education, and leadership development. Leadership training involves activitiesdesigned to improve the performance of individuals in specific managerial roles; leadershipeducation aims to improve individuals’ leadership competencies beyond their current roles; andleadership development involves a “continuous, systemic process designed to expand thecapacities and awareness of individuals