Paper ID #37029Digital transformation in engineering education: a gapbetween teaching and managementInesmar Carolina Briceno Rivero Techonology and System profesional, with extensive knowledge in programming, Teacher with more than 15 years of experience at the university level in the area of information technology. Solid knowledge in object-oriented programming and agile methodologies, ability to analyze, manage and document projects and Digital transformation.Maria Elena Truyol María Elena Truyol, Ph.D., is full professor and researcher of the Universidad Andrés Bello (UNAB). She graduated as physics teacher
Paper ID #36419Building Learning FrameworksDeborah Besser (CE Chair and Engineering Education Director) Civil Engineering, ChairAnna Roiger Civil Engineering Undergrad StudentNick E PawlakEmma Sullivan I am a second year student studying civil engineering at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Building Learning FrameworksAbstractThe aim of this research is to explore lessons, strategies, and assessment to develop andstrengthen students
Paper ID #37468Virtual Interview Training: Perceptions and Performance using DigitalHiring ManagersStephanie Jill Lunn, Florida International University Stephanie Lunn is an Assistant Professor in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and En- gineering Education (SUCCEED) and the STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International Uni- versity (FIU). She also has a secondary appointment in the Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences (KFSCIS). Previously, Dr. Lunn served as a postdoctoral fellow in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of
Paper ID #40409Agrivoltaics: A Team-Based Analysis of Solar Energy and AgriculturalModelingDylan Marcus Tobey, University of Pittsburgh Dylan Tobey is a junior at the University of Pittsburgh studying Mechanical Engineering, with interests in sustainability and economics.Dr. Tony Lee Kerzmann, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Tony Kerzmann’s higher education background began with a Bachelor of Arts in Physics from Duquesne University, as well as a Bachelor’s, Master’s, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. After graduation, Dr. Kerzmann began his career as an assistant professor of
Paper ID #32998Goal-match Mentoring: A New Strategy for Faculty of Color in EngineeringAcademiaDr. Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Dr. Sylvia Mendez is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She earned a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Kansas, a MS in Student Affairs in Higher Education from Colorado State University, and a BA in Economics from Washington State University. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on effective faculty mentoring practices, broadening
Paper ID #32738Curriculum Design: Using the Five Discourses of Design ThinkingJaveed Kittur, Arizona State University Javeed Kittur is currently a doctoral student (Engineering Education Systems and Design) at Arizona State University, USA. He received a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s degree in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014 respectively. He has worked with Tata Consultancy Services as Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011-2012, India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014 to 2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE
Paper ID #29054Toward Continuous Improvement of EAC/ABET Criteria 3 and 5Dr. Norb Delatte P.E., Oklahoma State University Dr. Norbert J. Delatte, Jr., P.E., is Professor and Head of the School of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing at Oklahoma State University. He is the author of Beyond Failure: Forensic Case Studies for Civil Engineers (ASCE Press, 2009). In addition, he is the Editor of ASCE’s Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. Dr. Delatte is a registered professional engineer in the States of Oklahoma, Ohio, and Alabama and in the Commonwealth of Virginia.Dr. Stephen J
innovation and its commercializationcalled the “Technopolis Phenomenon”.This paper reviews research done on creation of Technopolis communities and highlightsexemplary best practices from Technopolis communities around the world such as SiliconValley, Boston, Austin, Ireland, Bangalore, Taiwan, Sophia-Antipolis, and others. The role ofacademia-industry-government collaboration in creation of Technopolis communities isdiscussed in detail. This involves sustained, collaborative efforts by academics, industryrepresentatives, Entrepreneur Support Organizations (ESOs), Economic DevelopmentOrganizations (EDOs), engineers, entrepreneurs, investors, and other practitioners to developinitiatives, plans, methodologies, infrastructure, and action items for
Engineering Technology Leadership Institute. She is the Assessment Coordinator for the Department of Engineering Technology and has been extensively involved in the articulation of learning outcomes and development of assessment processes at the departmental and college level. Dr. Sharer has been PI or co-PI on several technical projects in the area of microelectronic devices, compound semiconductor and superconductive phenomena in addition to her work in pedagogical innovation and diversity enhancement in the STEM professions.Anthony Brizendine, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Anthony L. “Tony” Brizendine is Chair of the Department of Engineering Technology at the University of North
in engineering programs across the country. As a result,this paper will describe an NSF funded initiative at Wright State University to redefine the wayengineering mathematics is taught, with the goal of increasing student retention, motivation andsuccess in engineering. This paper will provide a brief overview of the WSU model forengineering mathematics education, including its impact on student retention and success. It willalso summarize the scope of a 2008 NSF CCLI Phase 3 award, which includes pilot adoption andassessment of the WSU model by a total of 15 institutions across the country.Introduction The traditional engineering curriculum requires at least one full year of calculus as aprerequisite to core sophomore-level
students.” Among the models of cognitive diversity available to us,Kirton’s Adaption-Innovation (A-I) theory19 provides special insight with respect to ourstudents’ efforts in solving problems. In particular, A-I theory identifies four principal variablesthat can be used to explain many of the variations we see among our students as they solveproblems, namely: cognitive level (capacity/resource), cognitive style (preferred approach),motive (driving force), and opportunity (including one’s perception of it). In this paper, we willfocus on cognitive style, its diversity among our students, and the importance of distinguishingbetween style and level in engineering education.In general, cognitive level is a unipolar construct that relates to one’s
Engineering Education, 2006 Learning through Service: Analysis of a First Semester, College-Wide, Service-Learning Course1. AbstractService-learning is a pedagogy which strives to integrate student learning with communityservice. In an engineering context, service-learning provides a project-based experience in whichstudents are confronted with real clients and problems, often of immediate need. In the context ofcourse development, however, many engineering faculty seem to feel that service learning isinfeasible in technical and/or large engineering courses, and that the overhead and opportunitycosts associated with service learning exceed the benefits received by students.This paper contemplates two years of service
Paper ID #19422STEAM Education through Music Technology (Evaluation)Dr. Brandon G. Morton, Drexel University Brandon Morton received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Drexel University with a focus on Music Information Retrieval. His work focused on the prediction and detection of influence between mu- sicians. Additionally, as a post-doctoral researcher, he is currently interested in the relationship between mobile technology and education. His background in education includes a NSF GAANN Fellowship and a NSF GK-12 Fellowship.Mr. Jeff Gregorio, Drexel University Jeff Gregorio is currently pursuing a PhD in
Paper ID #23446Exploring Team Social Responsibility in Multidisciplinary Design TeamsKatharine E. Miller, Purdue University, West Lafayette Katharine E. Miller is a second-year doctoral student studying Organizational Communication and Public Relations at Purdue University, with minors in corporate social responsibility and research methods.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D
Paper ID #14990A Multi-Institutional Study of Pre- and Post-Course Knowledge Surveys inUndergraduate Geotechnical Engineering CoursesDr. Simon Thomas Ghanat, The Citadel Dr. Simon Ghanat is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel (Charleston, S.C.). He received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Arizona State University. His research interests are in Engineering Education and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. He previously taught at Bucknell University and Arizona State University.Prof. James Kaklamanos, Merrimack College Dr. James
Paper ID #11855The Impact of Teaming and Cognitive Style on Student Perceptions of DesignIdeation OutcomesDr. Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of
Paper ID #12329The Summer Undergraduate Research Bridge Experience for CommunityCollege Students: Providing Connections from Community College to theFour-Year InstitutionMs. Jeanne R. Garland, New Mexico State University Jeanne Garland has worked at New Mexico Alliance for Minority Participation (New Mexico AMP) since August 2002. She received the B.A. from Baylor University and the M.A. from NMSU in English, with an emphasis in Rhetoric and Professional Communication. She worked for the College of Engineering’s Engineering Research Center (ERC) as Technical Writer, then was employed at Arizona State University (ASU) for
Paper ID #12468Sharing the Full Range of Leadership in Student Teams: Developing an In-strumentLt. Col. Brian J. Novoselich, Virginia Tech Brian Novoselich is an active duty Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army and currently a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His is a former assistant profes- sor at the United States Military Academy. His research interests include capstone design teaching and assessment, undergraduate engineering student leadership development, and social network analysis.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education David Knight
Paper ID #7249Girls Go Beyond Blackboards towards Positive Attitudes about EngineeringDr. Christina Kay White, University of Texas, Austin Dr. Christina White completed her Doctoral degree from Teachers College, Columbia University where she studied engineering education. She is the director of the National Academy of Engineering Longhorn Grand Challenges Scholars & K12 Partners Program at The University of Texas at Austin. Dr. White is also the director of an outreach program called Design, Technology, & Engineering for All Children (DTEACh) which has reached more than 1000 teachers and 85,000 students. She is
students to the concept of mass balances. This problem wasused to illustrate how to properly set-up and document engineering problems, design and usespreadsheets, and observe the effect of changing process variables on an overall design. Thestudents also learned technical writing skills by summarizing the project in a short report.Additionally, ENG1101 students were given a problem where they had to use unit conversions tosolve a Biomedical Engineering problem. In Fundamentals of Engineering II (ENG1102), anElectrical Engineering project introduced the students to control logic design. Starting with aconceptual 3- D model of the mechanical design, the project required the team to develop asystem configuration diagram, energy budget, functional
Paper ID #10889Inspiring Student Engagement through Two-Minute FolliesDr. James L Klosky P.E., U.S. Military Academy Led Klosky is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civl and Mechanical Engineering at West Point. He is a past winner of ASEE’s National Teaching Medal and works primarily in the areas of Engineering Education and Infrastructure.Mr. Scott M. Katalenich, U.S. Military Academy Major Scott Katalenich is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineer- ing at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from the United States Military Academy
prevalent issue. A 2007article in the ASHREA Journal sought to teach people skills to engineers because schools oftenfocus on technical skills and not the skills necessary to effectively work with people in theworkplace 18. While it may be true that some engineers could use some refinement in the area ofpeople skills, much of what is represented in the media about engineers’ ability to relate topeople is extremely exaggerated and can be detrimental to potential engineers entering the field.Importance of this Work The media articles selected for this study build a picture of engineers that lacks diversityin regards to race and sex/gender, as will be discussed in a later portion of this paper. The mediaarticles also provide an extremely
artscollege. Moreover women have not been adequately represented in the field of engineering andthe program at Smith College will help remedy this. The engineering program’s goal is toeducate engineers who are adaptable to the rapidly changing demands of society; preparing themto lead society toward an equitable and sustainable future.1 The engineering faculty membersrealize that establishing this program and achieving these ambitious goals will require substantialinnovations in pedagogy and curriculum. This paper describes some of the pedagogicalapproaches that are being put into place. The creation of this pedagogy is a work in progress.All the pedagogical innovations share several goals and chief among these is that the learning bemeaningful
Session 3268 Laboratory Exercises for Statics and Mechanics of Materials on a Shoestring David Hall, Paul Hadala, Freddy Roberts Louisiana Tech UniversityAbstractThis paper outlines the design, construction, and fabrication of seven laboratory exercises and adesign project for a sophomore level integrated statics and mechanics of materials course. Theacademic setting in which the course was created is given along with an overview of the coursecontent. Each laboratory and design project is described in detail, including photographs,drawings of the
AC 2010-2156: PORTABLE CYBER-LABORATORIES FOR ELECTRICALENGINEERING EDUCATIONSteve Warren, Kansas State University Steve Warren received a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University in 1989 and 1991, respectively, followed by a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin in 1994. Dr. Warren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Kansas State University. Prior to joining KSU in August 1999, Dr. Warren was a Principal Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, NM. He directs the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory, a facility supported by the National
Interaction, Authoring Tools, MultimediaApplications Page 7.516.1* ASK is not an acronym. It is a technical term that we will define later in this paper. “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”Contents· Overview· Background o Improving a biomedical engineering laboratory course o The Socratic Method and PCK Expertise § Possible Solutions § Our Solution· Description and Development of the SASK Dialysis Mentor
area of the integration of Design and Communication across the curriculum.Jason A. Foster, University of Toronto Page 22.1496.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Research Studio: Integrating Information Literacy into a First Year Engineering Science CourseIntroductionIn this paper, we describe a set of strategies and an associated activity used to overcome thedrawbacks of traditional methods that have been used to teach information literacy skills to firstyear engineering students. Traditional methods and models for teaching information literacy
does not make it grow.”However, without an understanding of students’ readiness, we are not able to target their furtherdevelopment in constructive ways.This paper describes the first known attempt to create an open-source instrument as an aid toengineering educators to measure students’ readiness to collaborate for sustainable design. Theinstrument presented in this paper, like the FE exam, attempts to measure “parts” rather than thewhole. However, we believe its value is in simply answering the question of whether the “parts”exist, with the assumption that their existence is a necessary if insufficient condition; we alsobelieve it provides the educator with an opportunity for a deeper reflection on the engineeringcurriculum as a whole. We
Paper ID #9851The Distribution of Family Friendly Benefits Policies across Higher Educa-tion Institutions: A Cluster AnalysisMr. Corey T Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Schimpf is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education. His research interests include examining how cyberlearning and informal learning environments can be brought into the engineering curriculum, how educational policies affect academic pathways for faculty and students and design research. His dissertation explores how a gaming platform can be used to facilitate early college engineering students skills development.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue
Paper ID #9492The Use Of Peer Evaluations In A Non-Traditional First Year System DesignClassMr. Joseph Pow, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, RIT Joe Pow is the Associate Director of the Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science at the Rochester Institute of Technology. He was the designer and first instructor of a new non-traditional project-based course for incoming Imaging Science freshmen which has had a transformational impact on the Cen- ter. Prior to his arrival at RIT, he was a project manager for the Department of Defense, where he was responsible for the development and production of a wide