students for theirteaching assignments and their future careers.Program Overview and SignificanceFew doctoral students receive systematic training on how to teach [1], and many early-careercollege instructors report having insufficient training on how to teach [2]. Yet there isrecognition of the need to develop opportunities for graduate students to enhance theirunderstanding of pedagogy [1], [2], [3] and of the important role that graduate student teachingexperience plays in the developing graduate students into effective teachers [4], [5]. Althoughresearch on graduate student teaching training stretches back more than 20 years, little discussionand research exists on the impact of systematic teaching-focused programs for engineeringdoctoral
leave college, with about half of that retention loss occurring between the first andsecond year, although this number does not appear to be grounded in research literature [4]. A2002 study showed that 30% of engineering students did not finish their engineering degree [5].An American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) survey found retention rates to thesecond year for engineering majors increased nationally from 78% in 2003 to 82% [6]. The samestudy showed that four-year graduation rates in engineering increased from 29% in 2006 to 33% 1in 2011. Results from a 2021 American Society for Engineering Education survey indicated afirst-year retention average of 81.9% and a six-year graduation
is on theresearch completed and the candidate’s ability to conduct research. Perhaps this is, in part, becausethe positive impact of graduate teaching is underestimated. It may seem plausible that graduatestudents already have a large enough workload and need to focus solely on their dissertationresearch without additional compromises. Another concern may be that experienced faculty memberswould be better able to teach undergraduates. However, a recent study reveals that undergraduatesare twice as likely to choose to major in a subject when taught by a graduate student compared tostudents taught by faculty and that “graduate students who teach more frequently are more likely tograduate in a timely manner and more likely to subsequently be
intensive and realistic research experience, has become the world model forsimultaneously conducting academic research and educating graduate scientists, the reform for innovativeprofessionally oriented graduate education calls for an alternative model of graduate education, conducted in thecontext of creative engineering innovation and organized around an intensive and realistic creative technologicalinnovation experience in industry. This new educational reform would require an integrative approach betweenconcurrent professionally oriented graduate studies and creative engineering practice in industry as joint synergisticactivities.Recommendation 3: New Model Development and Vision to Support Professionally Oriented Graduate Studiesfor
encountered, providing an opportunity to develop students’self-efficacy related to independent problem-solving in research. Students in past REU cohortshave indicated that learning to be independent researchers is important to them [4].Difficulties EncounteredSeveral difficulties arose during the collaborative project. In agreement with previous studies [5],it was found that direct communication between the undergraduate REU participants andmentors/advisers was essential to make progress during the short time frame offered by the 10-week REU program. However, not all information that was communicated between the twocollaborating REU participants was relayed to the graduate mentors or faculty advisers. Inaddition, although students began with well
using driving simulator to identify benefits and issues of traffic signal countdown timer in USA His previous research at the National Institute for Advanced Transportation Technology (NIATT) at the University of Idaho include extending the architecture of previously developed Smart Signal System by NIATT using ITS communication protocol (NTCIP) to automatically implement performance monitoring and control strategy decisions. He has also studied queue spill-back mitigation strategies applying hardware-in-the-loop simulation (HILS) with ASC/3 traffic controllers and VISSIM micro-simulation.Kelvin Daratha, Graduate Student at Washington State University
-growing jobs are based in science and mathematics, especially inrelation to engineering. U.S. universities are graduating a significant number of engineers, butmany are studying on visas and returning to their countries or decide to work in another field.Engineers’ salaries are continue to be 20% higher than non-engineering graduates [1].High school experiences and high school teachers are important in the mathematics and sciencebackground needed to pursue an engineering major [4]. However, one-third of U.S. mathematicsand science teachers have a major in the field they teach [1]. In particular, mathematicspreparation is often inadequate for students to successfully pursue engineering degrees [5].Students who perform poorly in mathematics on
worked extensively in the domain of welding, specifically in the area of weld- ing technology and training. He has a deep appreciation for the importance of the welding field and plan to continue pursuing research projects that benefit the welding community.Ms. Audrey Fyock, Iowa State University Audrey Fyock is a senior in Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering and first year Master of Business Administration student at Iowa State University. This is her first year doing an undergraduate research assistantship with the IMSE Department, where she is studying the impacts of undergraduate research on retention rates and graduate school.Devna Fay Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University Devna Popejoy-Sheriff is
enrichinghands-on learning experiences, capstone projects and study abroad research excel at cultivating partiallydistinct skill sets geared toward entering engineering fields or global scholarship respectively. Though these differences exist, we can still find shared traits and parallels in different forms ofUREs. A study shows that juniors and seniors who participated in undergraduate research are often moreinterested in pursuing graduate degrees than those who do not participate [7]. Similarly, in alternativeURE formats, when students collaborate and conduct research abroad, there is a common tendency toshow interest in pursuing graduate education [4]. The combination of results from various studies stronglyconfirms that UREs not only push
the participants.Researchers. The authors of this paper include an engineering education graduate student, anengineering education faculty member, and an education faculty member. These threeresearchers were involved in designing the research study and creating the interview protocol.The engineering education graduate student administered the questionnaires and drawings andconducted the individual student interviews. The graduate student worked with two former K-12educators and current education graduate students to conduct the coding for the study.Conducting data analysis with researchers in different areas was beneficial for looking atdifferent perspectives while discussing the students’ responses
capable of developing new/better solutions.Undergraduate research is receiving more attention than ever before. Various studies try toinvestigate and propose methodologies to help the students benefit more from experience ofdoing research (Kardash, 2000; Kremer et al., 1990). Most of the students who are involved withresearch on their undergraduate studies, show more interest to continue researching and attendmore to graduate studies (Kardash, 2000; Laursen et al., 2010; Lopatto et al., 2010).Furthermore, for the underrepresented minority students and also women, it can provide theenvironment to interact more with the other students and scientists, helping them to thrive morein their studies and careers (Barlow et al., 2004; Eagan et al., 2011
interests in engineering education include the development student identity and attitudes, with a specific focus on the pre-professional identities of engineering un- dergraduates who join non-industry occupations upon graduation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work-in-Progress: A Delphi Study of Skills and Competencies for the Hydrocarbon IndustryAbstractThis paper describes an in-progress research study to develop consensus among working industryprofessionals and chemical engineering faculty on the particular skills and workforcecompetencies needed in the hydrocarbon industry for the National Science Foundation
through discourses—socially recognizable actions,communications, interactions, language, objects, symbols, tools, ways of thinking, values, andbeliefs1. One of the ways that engineering students are identified, or identify themselves, isthrough the values and objectives promoted by organizations that have a stake in engineeringeducation. Discourses promoted by organizations that educate and employ engineers identifywhat it means to belong to the engineering profession, what an engineer should know, whatvalues they should hold, and how they should act. These discourses can influence students’decisions to pursue and persist in engineering education as well as the kinds of careers thatstudents pursue after graduation. In this study, we examine
Journal recentlystated that companies are “expecting graduates to arrive job-ready from day one” [8]. This is, inpart, because some firms have chosen to reduce the amount of training available for such entry-level positions. Graduates simply must obtain prior experience to have a fighting chance atlanding a new career. What better way for said experience to be acquired than through the LL orsimilar course?Research QuestionThis research study will focus on examining if experiential learning in the IUPUI CIT 485Living Lab helps IT graduates gain employment and enhance their ability to perform as anemployee. CIT graduates who were involved in the Living Lab will be surveyed about how theirexperiential learning has or has not contributed to obtaining
retention. This programis an 8-week research experience for regional campus STEM students that includes working witha faculty for 6 weeks at their home campus and spending 2 weeks with a faculty at UniversityPark. In addition, students engage in professional development and team building activities. Todate, about 270 regional campus students have participated in the MC REU program during itsfive-year tenure. Additional goals of the program include broadening education for regionalcampus students, increasing the number of regional campus students entering graduate studies,and promoting mutual awareness and collaboration among faculty across the Commonwealth.Anecdotal evidence has indicated a positive effect on the retention of MC REU participants
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A study of alumni of the Leveraging Leadership for a Lifetime leadership development courseABSTRACTOver the past two decades there has been abundant discussion, research and subsequentpublication about the need for leadership skill development for both newly minted and seasonedengineers. The calls have come from both engineering practice and academic communities, andthe expectations have been codified by ABET for engineering academic preparatory programs.But there is a dearth of information about whether, and how, this education has been of value tothe graduates and their organizations. This study documents the results of a survey of alumni ofseveral post-graduate
AC 2010-989: FACTORS INFLUENCING STUDENT SUCCESS IN A SUMMERRESEARCH PROGRAM: FORMAL VERSUS INFORMAL RELATIONALSTRUCTURESMonica Cox, Purdue University Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She obtained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the
of the IoT (see Table 1 for student contributions tooffered IoT research projects). High-quality mentoring is a hallmark of successful REU sites.Our REU research faculty had prior experience mentoring undergraduates, thus they did nothave to participate in a mentor training workshop. However, graduate students in the labswho were often the first line supervisors and mentors for the students, were required toparticipate in a mentor training workshop co-taught by the Director of the Office ofUndergraduate Research and the Associate Dean of the College of Graduate Studies at UCFprior to the start of the program.Table 1: Student Contributions in Research Projects Project Name
), Fujisawa, Japan, March 18-20, 2023.14. Rowe, J., Mulroy, T., 2004, “A Qualitative Study Of The Student Internship Experience,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004.15. Fisher, E., 2017, “Sharing Student Learning from Individual Internship Experiences,” Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 25-28, 2017.ABIGAIL LEHTOMs. Lehto is a Ph.D. student and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah StateUniversity. She has earned her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and M.S. in Engineering Education. Her researchinterests include student engagement of engineering students, first-generation college
FactorsA prior paper6 shared the results of a longitudinal follow-up study of nearly 300 professionals,most from business and industry, who graduated from Purdue University’s Center forProfessional Studies in Technology and Applied Research (ProSTAR) programs. This cohort-based set of programs employed a hybrid classroom and distance-supported, innovatively-delivered graduate degree (MS) in technology. An online survey collected the data and cross-tabulation and frequency analysis identified the findings. Consequences; with respect to careerexperiences, advancement and salary; were reported and evaluative perspectives – generated inretrospect – shared. The paper also included the context for the evaluation and follow-up and abenchmarking of its
skills could help to better understand the representation of Black engineeringgraduates in engineering careers.Motivation and PurposeBased on my own positionality as a Black woman who felt as though certain activities in myundergrad influence my career skills development, I wanted to understand if this was commonacross other Black engineering graduates, and if that experience differed from our non-Blackcounterparts.This research aims to answer the following research questions: (1) Which undergraduate studentactivities are most likely to develop leadership and career skills for engineering graduates? (2)Do the activities that develop leadership and career skills differ for Black vs. non-Blackengineering graduates?Literature ReviewNumerous studies
theoretical foundationand the overall framework of this program, this paper describes its three primary elementsincluding: 1) recruitment and selection of REU participants, 2) REU research projects, and 3)seminar and workshop series and a final symposium. Selected student comments, as well aslessons learned, are also presented in this paper. Many REU students expressed their desire topursue further graduate studies, or teaching, to advance their professional careers.IntroductionExtensive research evidence has suggested that undergraduate research experience (REU)significantly improves students’ academic performance and confidence, and has a lasting impacton their career paths 1-3. The National Science Foundation has been supporting
Establishing a Technology-Based Business Incubator at a Regional University: A Conceptual Framework and Case-Study. W. A. Clark, A. J. Czuchry, W. D. Andrews, M. L. Woodruff and D. A. Lawrence East Tennessee State University, Johnson CityAbstractUniversity managed technology-based business incubators evolved at major research institutionsas a mechanism for university professors to pursue commercial applications of their researchwithout having to resign their university positions. These incubators assisted the universities inretention of valuable faculty and also provided for the development of
@eng.famu.fsu.edu 3451-8524 klowe@eng.famu.fsu.edu https://orcid.org/0000-0002- 1241-023X Abstract— The purpose of this work is to explore the development of structured summer internships targeted toward an emergentand resilient workforce. This works in progress paper is based on multi-year, mixed methods external evaluation studies of mentoredresearch experiences for undergraduate students (REU). These mentored research experiences take place at a shared engineering school(i.e., a Public University and a Historically Black University (HBCU)) workspace. The objective of the REU is to increase
southeasternregion. The research experiences for undergraduate students were built upon the followingprinciples: • Students should demonstrate knowledge of fundamentals and be proficient with computational tools as preparation for graduate studies and, ultimately, to be more marketable for competitive jobs; • Students deserve opportunities in supportive learning environments to develop as independent thinkers within cutting-edge research projects; and • Students should be encouraged to explore their passion and developed interest field, as it might not be as present in their home institution, which in turn should facilitate understanding the value of more education.2.1 Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Research
-taught model provides legitimacy and real world experience to thestudents [15]. Graduate students and their faculty supervisors need to believe the course ortraining is important before they will support it. A discipline specific faculty member canprovide this legitimacy. In an approach to craft a curriculum for RDM, Piorun, et al. built a teamof information technologists, librarians and research faculty to create “case studies” basedmodules for instructors [23]. Another reason for having a team approach including a facultymember is the graduate student’s desire for discipline specific examples [21]. Johnston andJeffryes had a civil engineering faculty member review the material to make sure it was withinthe disciplinary norms that students
teamworkinteractions; and 4) more equitably balancing the liaison responsibilities and workload of otherteam members.Collaborative Departmental Internship Partnership & CLIR FellowEfforts to increase the library’s integration into the CoE’s educational and research environmentsand to support the library’s strategic plan to evolve and engage user centered services led topartnering with faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering in the recruitment andhiring of a Council of Library and Information Resources (CLIR) fellow to study energy socialscience, with position support funding from CoE. The CLIR Postdoctoral Fellowship is amutually beneficial career development program that offers recent PhD graduates the chance tobe an active collaborator at
teaching she also pursued a Masters degree in Science Education as well as a Master’s degree in Curriculum and Instruction in STEM Education. Jessica is a NASA Endeavor Teaching Fellow and also a graduate of Carnegie Mellon’s Robotics Academy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring Design Failure in the Design Process: A comparative case study of young engineering students Research Questions What are designPurpose
department ofenvironmental health in the College of Medicine (studying infectious disease as related tobioterrorism for her research topic). The remaining six students were from the Department ofCivil and Environmental Engineering. Overall, the students enrolled in the course could begeneralized as mature graduate students working toward M.S. or Ph.D. degrees in biology-related fields.Third course offering in the Spring of 2003. Currently, enrollment is open for the third offeringof the course. Already, early registration indicates that at least twelve students will be enrolledincluding seven students from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, onestudent from the department of chemical engineering, two students from the department
research project’s participants are graduate students inbusiness and technology. The opportunity to participate in thestudy was presented in four graduate classes in the summer of Fig. 2. Example of dashboard provided by Edy after coaching session2023. The instructor for each of the classes gave the studentstime at the end of a class to move to a private room to complete We did not include time duration for the video session as athe steps of the study. The instructor could not determine if a variable in the data collection plan. The Edy AI Coach recordsstudent participated in the study or not. A total of 50 students various metrics for each session, including Pace (measured inwere offered the opportunity to complete the