Paper ID #37473Future of Work Issues for Florida Two Year EngineeringTechnology ProgramMarilyn Barger (Dr.) Marilyn Barger is the Senior Educational Advisor for FLATE and FloridaMakes, Inc.She has a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering, a licensed Professional Engineer in Florida, and holds a licensed patent. Dr. Barger is a Fellow of ASEE, with over 25 years of experience developing engineering technology and engineering curriculum for K-12 through Graduate engineering programs.Richard Gilbert (Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
,mathematics and technology education. The Center’s programs are systematically organizedinto seven complementary categories:• Instruction, Curriculum Reform & • Pre-College Trio ProgramsStandards • Bridge to STEM• Urban Partnerships• Women in Engineering & TechnologyInstruction, Curriculum Reform & StandardsNJIT provides various professional development programs and technical assistance in thealignment of instruction, curriculum, and assessment with the New Jersey Core CurriculumContent Standards (NJ CCCS) 6. The goal is to assist schools and districts in theachievement of systemic change with a focus on implementing standards-based-instruction inall classrooms.Urban PartnershipsThe
study, allowed the authors to interrogatestudents’ boundary crossing experiences and curate approaches for supporting global learning.The findings can guide educators to intentionally incorporate boundary crossing situations intotheir curriculum to stimulate productive conflict and global learning exchanges that can supportthe development of global leadership competencies.This study is significant as it demonstrates boundary learning focus areas and strategies forscaffolding students’ leadership experiences in global learning contexts. This researchcontributes to the theory and practice of engineering leadership and learning across boundaries inengineering education. However, the research was limited to data from two team projects andstudents
2007, which fosters continual classroom number growth, as well asinternational reputation as research partnerships develop outside the United States.A review of new and revised curriculum development at the undergraduate and graduate levelswill be explained including the details of both the undergraduate and newly developed graduatecertificate program within the engineering school. The greatest assessment of an undergraduateprogram’s effectiveness is to monitor growth in classroom numbers, number of studentsacquiring the certificates, and placement rate of graduating seniors. Trends of these metrics willbe provided. To accommodate working professionals enrolled in the graduate certificateprogram, real-time distance learning principles will be
curriculum engineering courses [9]. Understanding the technologies and hands-onpractice become critical for a successful career in manufacturing engineering. Therefore, educationcurriculum needs to be formed to prepare students to meet the challenges of advanced intelligentmanufacturing industries [10]. In this paper, an innovative empirical methodology based on i4.0technologies has been developed to be used to create sustainable procedures to the interoperationsof manufacturing systems. Implementing IIoT and digital cloud to the curriculum to provide real-time detection of unplanned behavior, fast correction response, and system data documentation forthe analysis will help in understanding manufacturing operations. The methodology is to build
2006-328: DEVELOPMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUSES TO BE USEDIN TWO SEQUENTIAL THERMAL SCIENCE COURSESJohn Reisel, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee John R. Reisel is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wiscsonsin-Milwaukee (UWM). He serves as Director of the Combustion Diagnostics Lab, Associate Director of the Center for Alternative Fuels, and the Co-Director of the Energy Conversion Efficiency Lab. His research efforts concentrate on combustion and energy utilization. At UWM, Dr. Reisel has served on both the College of Engineering and Applied Science's and the university's undergraduate curriculum committees. Dr. Reisel was a 1998 recipient of the
. Page 24.167.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Innovative Transfer Track from Associate in Applied Science in Electrical Engineering Technology to Bachelor of Science in Electrical EngineeringAbstractA new curriculum path has been developed to achieve a Bachelor of Science in ElectricalEngineering (BSEE) degree via an efficient transfer track from eight different Associate inApplied Science in Electrical Engineering Technology (AAS-EET) programs. The transfer froman AAS-EET program into a BS engineering program often requires three or more years ofcourses beyond the AAS degree to complete the BS engineering degree, whereas the transferfrom an AAS-EET
not completely visible to them.Finally, one of the Fellows, who is also the chair with the longest experience, asked, “To whatextent are university rules on curriculum, registration, withdrawals, etc. oppression?” Thesestatements demonstrate strong participation in the complex and challenging topics at hand, evenfrom the onset of the first session of the L-CoP.In the second session, Fellows discussed the culture and structure of university STEM programs,particularly at our VHHE HSI. Through this work, Fellows realized that “chairs need support justas much as faculty and students to develop because people with very different ways of seeingthings can work together and learn from each other,” as one Fellow shared. The concept ofhidden menus also
, 2006 Development and Implementation of a Cooperative/Distributed Instrumentation and Measurement Laboratory for Diverse-Student Population1. IntroductionThe foundation for quality in product design and manufacturing is instrumentation andmeasurement, so it is somewhat surprising that Instrumentation and Measurements(I&M) has never been a major curriculum at universities1-7. Ideally, a properly trainedworkforce of engineers and technicians should have expert skills in measurements andinstrumentation to maintain higher productivity, and to improve safety standards in theindustry. There is evidence [1-12] that the complexities inherent in the new era ofautomation and intelligent systems require higher degree of
topics, lessons, and assessment tools were diverse. With that, the course outline is actually much larger than a standard 3 credit semester course to allow each instructor to alter or adjust the course content depending on the region they are located, the style in which it is taught, and/or the resources available. I learned various techniques on how to develop a course (and also curriculum/specialty path within a department) from being involved in this process.” “We teach our students about the need to work collaboratively, and it’s about time that engineering teachers walk the talk.” “…The process has been very effective at generating ideas and discussion. I know that I will look to push ahead with a somewhat related
Engineering Field Experience: Industrial Archaeology Studies in England Harriet Svec, Harvey Svec, Teresa Hall, William Martin Whalley South Dakota State University / Manchester Metropolitan UniversityThe practice of engineering could be described as a nascent profession when contrasted withmedicine, law, academia, politics or the clergy. Engineering as a career emerged as recentlyas the 1800s as an outcome of newly created industry-based economies. Today theengineering profession is well established, respected, and contributes to the greater benefit ofsociety. Bringing science, technology and creativity together, engineers conceive solutionsto problems, develop new
2006-627: DEVELOPMENT OF A VIRTUAL REFRIGERATION APPARATUS TOPROMOTE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ACTUAL EXPERIMENTPatrick Tebbe, Minnesota State University-Mankato Patrick Tebbe is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Minnesota State University in Mankato where he serves as the Graduate Coordinator for Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Tebbe received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering as well as the M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri – Columbia. He is currently a member of the American Society for Engineering Education, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the American Society for Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning
averages 7.8% fatalities per year, we cannot ignore the implication ofpotential injury to our student graduates. In our own zeal for these students to succeed, we mustimpart that their own personal safety is at risk once they set foot onto a construction jobsite. Andalthough recent research reveals that it is field experience that develops a worker’s positiveattitude towards safety, we as educators have an additional responsibility to impart to ourstudents the current data. The curriculum must also reflect the safety culture that is necessary toprevent fatalities, injuries, and illnesses.Because of the importance of safety to our students and their apparent complacency to learningabout safety, we have committed to some changes in our program
received a Fulbright award in 2015.Theresa FS Bruckerhoff, Curriculum Research & Evaluation, Inc. Theresa Bruckerhoff is the Principal Research Associate and Operations Manager at CRE., with nearly twenty-five years of evaluation experience, ten years as the principal evaluator. She studies and evaluates training, professional development and other education change programs funded by state, federal and private sources and is a member of the American Evaluation Association, ASEE, and other content and education focused professional organizations. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
process for faculty who engage in diversity and inclusion. A certificate on diversityand inclusion would focus on allowing faculty to attend events on campus that have a focus ondiversity and inclusion and enable them to develop a small portfolio of curricular additions fortheir courses. The hope for this certificate would be to allow faculty to actively create materialsthat help service their diverse students as well as provide faculty with a way to document theirdevelopment for promotion and tenure. The RevED research team believes that having widersupport from department heads would help give faculty more incentive to seek out developmentsin inclusive curriculum. The RevED research team envisions a connection of a variety of campuswide events
onidentifying and combating inequities across race, gender, sexual orientation, disability, andsocioeconomic status. We also detail the creation of, and activities spearheaded by, ourdepartmental DEI committee.2.0 Integration of DEI Issues into CoursesOur curriculum development efforts have sought both to inform our students and empower themto make a difference, especially in communities that have been negatively impacted by a historyof racially-biased infrastructure and environmental decisions. We have sought to deliberatelyconfront issues of DEI in multiple courses via class discussions, team projects, problem sets, andwriting assignments. Through this work our goal is to equip students with the ability to thinkcritically about how they can make
attributes and their intersection with sustainability, learning culture, diversity, equity and inclusion, and continuous course and program improvement.Dr. John R. Donald P.Eng., University of Guelph John R. Donald is a professor at the University of Guelph with over 25 years of leadership experience in post-secondary education and engineering consulting. John is a past president (2017–18) and fellow (2020) of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA-ACEG), ´ and founder of the Guelph Engineering Leadership Program. His current research focuses on engineering leadership and development of professional skills in the engineering design curriculum. ©American Society for Engineering
leadershipin the process of developing technological innovations. However, during a typicalundergraduate engineering program the students are not taught about effective decision-making or leadership, as these are considered to be management modules and outside thecore engineering curriculum. This research paper, based on a case study from PlakshaUniversity, a new engineering university in India presents a pedagogical innovation thatcenters research design as an effective pedagogical tool to teach decision-making andleadership skills to engineering students. To test this, we collected data on three majorquestions: student perception of the importance of decision-making and leadership, actualstudent performance in the course, and student perception of
Engineering Education, 2023 WIP - Certification for Adult Learners and Industry Professionals for Continuous Professional Development Iftekhar Ibne Basith, Ulan Dakeev, Vajih Khan, Sumith Yesudasan, Faruk Yildiz, Suleiman Obeidat, Euijin Yang and Christopher Rabe Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USAIntroductionLearning never ends and there is no age limit to grow yourself. At Sam Houston State University (SHSU),we have experienced these many times. Most of the students of Engineering Technology (ETEC)department at SHSU have always been first generation or working professionals or returning students afteryears of gap. We value this a lot and acknowledge the need
Engineering Technology and Co-Department Chair, presently teaches introductory and advanced computer and networking technology courses for the Electronics Group at Springfield Technical Community College located in Springfield, MA. An active consultant to local business and industry, Bigos provides leadership to the highly successful Computer Systems Engineering Technology program through curriculum reform and course development activities. His current interests are in the area of operating systems, computer and networking security, and sensor networks.Ted Sussmann, Springfield Technical Community College Ted Sussmann, Ph.D., an assistant professor of Civil Engineering Technology and Department
Pre-EntryAttributes on Goals and Commitments (Pre) prior to joining the university. Goals andCommitments lead students to choose AE and subsequently drop it. While Tinto (1993)developed this framework for students dropping out of college, it has been widely used as aframework to understand why students leave STEM (e.g. 16, 17). Due to the similarities withleavers/persisters we used the framework to understand migrators. Understanding this aspectof the framework and how it evolves will lead to a better understanding to why studentsmigrate to other STEM majors.The report by U.S. Department of Education (2014) highlight Pre-Entry attributes such asfamily background (women, minoritized people, first generation individual, low incomebackground
curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Fron- tiers of Engineering Education Symposium in 2013 and awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research Methods Faculty Apprentice Award in 2014. c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #38920Utilizing Virtual Reality to Fortify Professional Skills in EngineeringEducationDr. Albertus Retnanto, Texas A&M University at Qatar Dr. Albertus Retnanto is a Program Chair and Professor of the Practice of Petroleum Engineering at Texas A&M University at Qatar and has been in the Petroleum Engineering program since 2009. He received his Ph.D. degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University. He held a Principal position with Schlumberger and has more than 18 years of experience worldwide in technical and management positions in well testing, field development, and production enhancement
reflect on what thatimage is pays dividends in their curriculum development and overall effectiveness. I know that Ipersonally now feel that I have greater clarity on the student-image I’m trying to create and that ithelps me choose and develop appropriate educational materials.Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Leading up to my interview with ourMCC, I wondered if I had done anything worthy of being interviewed about. I have long beeninterested in helping my students to engage the material in my classes whether they intended to or not,and I have sought ways to do this. Most of the reflection I have had my students doing was informal onin-class activities or discussions. For example, having students explain, dissect, and
more recent article, Andrews et al. described engineering curriculum-wide andmultidisciplinary efforts to build students’ writing skills in technical courses through help fromtechnical writing faculty in the English department [5]. The developed writing guidelines andWriting Center assistance resulted in improved writing skills among graduating seniors [5] in avariety of writing documents, including lab and project reports. Miley et al. presented a StudioModel used to assist undergraduate electrical engineering students with improving their technicalwriting skills through assignments and Writing Center facilitators [6]. Moving to writing among graduate students, Colwell et al. investigated writingchallenges among graduate students of
Paper ID #13811Engineering the Future Workforce Required by a Global Engineering Indus-tryDr. Michael Richey, The Boeing Company Michael Richey is an Associate Technical Fellow currently assigned to support workforce development and engineering education research. Michael is responsible for leading learning science research, which focuses on learning ecologies, complex adaptive social systems and learning curves. Michael pursues this research agenda with the goal of understanding the interplay between innovation, knowledge trans- fer and economies of scale as they are manifested in questions of growth, evolvability
example, in a study of over 4,500 students at various doctoral and master’slevel institutions, Lundberg and Schreiner9 found that the quality of faculty-student relationshipssignificantly predicted learning for all ethnic groups. In a much broader study of over 43,000students from 119 majors across nine campuses, Kim and Sax10 report that students’ contact withfaculty and undergraduate research engagement were significantly related to their cognitivedevelopment. In a smaller study of approximately 200 students at a single institution, Halawah11provides evidence that both faculty concern and informal faculty relations were significantlycorrelated to intellectual development. Although these results were significant across all majors,a positive
methods the PRESS Office used to develop a very valuableand meaningful program that supports our community and benefits the University.I. IntroductionWorking with local high schools to improve the pipeline of minorities entering engineering andother technical fields can prove to be very challenging. Immediately many questions arise suchas: Who do you speak with at the high school: the principal, counselors, or individual teachers?How do you recruit for students? Do you visit during science and math classes, or have anassembly or invite parents for a career night discussion? The barriers to working with severalhigh schools can be overwhelmingly complex for an engineering department at a typicaluniversity.One solution to improving your odds of
models when people like engineering faculty, “Lead by example. Act the wayyou want other people to act. Think about what you are doing and how it will affect other people.Make good decision that can be passed on. Do you say things that someone might repeat? If yes,than make it something good.” 2 Page 22.1263.3By the time students reach the junior and senior levels they have become engineers. They arelistening to their instructors as mentors to the challenging careers that lie ahead. The captivatingquality of the engineering curriculum lends itself to be the base upon which communication skillsare presented to engineers. Professors would not
Introducing Practical County and City Management to Undergraduate Students through the Course “Public Works Engineering and Management Practices” Dr. Fazil T. Najafi and Hammad S. ChaudhryProfessor, Department of Civil & Coastal Engineering, University of Florida/ Ph.D. Student, Department of Civil & Coastal Engineering, University of FloridaIn every country, healthy infrastructure is essential to economic and social developmentof communities, regions, and nations. A public works department focuses on all criticalissues related to city and county infrastructure management and operations. A publicworks engineering and management course has been developed within the