developmentwill be discussed in this paper. Next steps will also be presented.Overview In an environment of increased scrutiny and accountability, engineering educationresearchers are being called upon to describe and defend the tangible impacts of their work on aregular basis. Having a shared language around the impact of engineering research will enablemembers of this community to effectively communicate it to diverse audiences and advocate forits support using consistent messages. Furthermore, a shared understanding among engineeringeducation researchers and practitioners of what impact looks like in our field lends itself to moreproductive conversations on how research can influence practice. Unfortunately, there is verylittle scholarship
Paper ID #38350Building a Community of Mentors in Engineering EducationResearch Through Peer Review TrainingKarin Jensen (Prof.) Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Associate Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. She was awarded a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation for her research on undergraduate mental health in engineering programs. Before joining UIUC she completed a post-doctoral
significantly in reformingtheir educational efforts through curricular reform and pedagogical innovations.6, 7 One intervention used more generally in higher education to address issues of studentretention, engagement and learning outcomes is the living-learning community (LLC). LLCsenable institutions to embed a smaller, more intimate learning environment for students withintheir larger academic enterprise.8, 9 In general, LLCs are recognized as promoting a number ofoutcomes linked to student success including increased engagement and connection to faculty.10,11, 12 Despite this research, LLCs are used infrequently in the discipline of engineering to supportstudents. As a result, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of LLCs
Spring 2020 course offering (offered with title“Technology Innovation: Engineering, Economics, Public Relations”), where 12 students aremajoring in engineering, seven students majoring in strategic communications and two studentsmajoring in economics. The specific case study involves the Impacts of the Implementation ofConnected and Automated Vehicles. By centering around a contemporary, complex, and open-ended problem, the learning experience relies on both technical and non-technical perspectivesfor feasible solutions. Therefore, students from all three areas of study offer necessarycontributions and have access to the skill sets, methods, and perspectives of their counterparts inthe other fields. They engage in a high-level synthesis whereby
NSF ATE grant #1445841Overview of the Research Study:The goal of this NSF ATE research project was to investigate, analyze, and disseminatethe student success of up to 27,000 students who have completed at least one NSFCREATE consortium-funded course and to better assess the impact of over 12 years ofNSF ATE Center funding. In 2016-2017, the research analyzed the significant progress todegree and retention and certificate and degree attainment by community college. Thiswas reported at ASEE 2017. In the 2017-2018 research, a case study will be examined onthe on the 12 years of progress in transferring and graduating students from over 20community colleges to a California State University, Channel Islands (CSUCI) programwhich was developed
Paper ID #42751WIP: In Search of Community: A Collaborative Inquiry Among NeurodivergentEngineering Education ResearchersDr. Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor at Utah State University who leverages mixed-methods research to explore neurodiversity and identity and motivation in engineering. They completed their Ph.D. in Engineering Education where they focused on motivation and identity for engineering graduate students.Theo Sorg, Purdue University Theo Sorg (they/them) is a fifth-year PhD student and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow in the School
of New Mexico. Her research looks at faculty development that happens through Communities of Practices and frames most of my work through the lens of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. The pilot study for paper 2 is completed. I’ve been working on analyzing additional points in time and will create a more extensive case study for my final paper. She is currently focused on creating a Community of Transformation for STEM faculty across the country who are interested in justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion work.Madeleine Jennings, Arizona State University Madeleine Jennings is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant at Arizona State University - Polytechnic Campus, pursuing a PhD in Engineering
history, arts & humanities, global studies, gender, race & ethnicity, community-engagement, a freshmen seminar experience, mid- and senior-level writing experiences, as well as requirements in science and quantitative reasoning. (II) MST Core & Specialization [12 units] The MST academic core consists of 8 units including Multimedia Design, Structures and Mechanisms, two additional science options, one additional math, two MST electives (fulfilled by taking M, S or T), and a course titled “Integrated STEM for Young Learners.” Specialization courses require 4 units. (III) Professional Courses [10 units] MST education majors meet New Jersey’s Certification requirements for a K-5 “highly
requires a significant investment of time for the instructor toteach and for the student to learn and apply. This extra burden on students is minimized throughthe effective use of CBT tools that can adapt to the student's instructional needs. Theintroduction of CBT tools into the curriculum brought with it the ability to impact other aspectsof the course and student learning. The interactive movies, games, quizzes, virtual world, andother resources offered on the instructional web sites developed for each involved class focusedon course fundamentals that are problematic for students. The additional assistance that studentsreceive from these interactive tools can offset the cost of introducing engineering software intothe curriculum but more
sections of 32 students. This largeclass structure works well for students who thrive working independently, but may not provideadequate support for those who learn better when working in a supportive community.To combat this, our CS1 course is currently engaged in a three-year course redesign process inpartnership with our on-campus teaching center. Through this partnership, we are seeking to learnabout student experiences in the course to identify and address structural barriers that negativelyimpact student learning, particularly with respect to inequities that impact minoritizedstudents.One of the first populations we examined in the data was students who were enrolled in anAcademic Support Program (ASP). ASP provides advising and academic
have challenges andopportunities for the academic infrastructure of a university. They can lead to facultyenhancement (expertise enhancement and scholarly productivity), support and researchopportunities for students (leading to baccalaureate and graduate degrees), and can result inelevating the overall research infrastructure for the university. However, these opportunities arenot without risks (legal and reputational.) Consequently, a university may make the decision toperform on the contract with professional staff without substantial engagement of the academicresources. In this study, the risks and opportunities for creating a Community of Scholars areidentified and discussed. The differences between Contracts and Grants, as defined by
theCSU system, potential competition with the UC system for some students, the reliance on studentpathways that begin with community colleges and the limited number of degree options maylimit gender diversity. Because CSU campuses offer one new, as yet not ABET-accredited, BMEprogram (San Jose State, 2015) and only three ChE degrees, students with these interests maynot be attracted to these campuses even though faculty in other disciplines teach courses, mentorprojects and do research in related topics. Recently, CSU Los Angeles (2015) announced anundergraduate minor in biomedical engineering that will start in Fall, 2016. Some students atCSU campuses who might otherwise have interests in biomedical engineering can choosescience disciplines
. MEPs), and fraternities andsororities (e.g. BGOs) offer community involvement, academic services, and professionaldevelopment opportunities. Previous research has shown that organizations like NSBE andBGOs have a positive impact on students in their ability to expose members to role models,national conferences, industrial and academic professionals, and other engineering students.3Researchers in higher education have shown that student participation in out-of-classactivities generally offers positive outcomes.4,5 In addition, NSBE, BGOs, MEPs and similarorganizations have been shown to provide a sense of community for student members, oftenseen as a family bond,6,7 and as providing academic support to retain minority students.8While these
communication, and civic discourse. One of the most exciting aspects of thisprogram is that students are equal participants in a community of learners that includesboth their parents and their teachers. This article includes initial results of the pilot studyfor this program, conducted with 16 at-risk students from low-income families, theirparents, and seven of their teachers during the Spring 2000 semester. Because the pilotdemonstrated an extremely high degree of positive potential, a number of entities in theLubbock community have formed a consortium to significantly extend the scope of theprogram. This article describes the plan for increasing the scale of the program to make itavailable to a much larger number of participants and to make the
Page 22.809.3way to engage residents and get buy-in was for community members to take ownership andidentify issues that were most important to them. Since the student team did not know what theseissues would be, they could not plan for specific resources. The student team relied on anadvisory team, consisting of a small group of graduate students, to provide assistance withresearch back in the United States once a topic was decided. Given this strategy, the student teamprepared as follows: 1. IPD Background and Process: Scheduled team meetings to gain an understanding of IPD process. Over the span of 3 months, the student team was introduced to survey methodology, appropriate technologies for use in the community, and principles
], [9], [10]and [11]. These texts provide comprehensive coverage of communication systems; mostlypresenting analog and then digital modulation. An ebook will be presented which follows adifferent way to teach communication systems; an approach that uses a student driven interactivepresentation of the fundamentals of communication systems. This ebook also takes a differentpedagogical approach to teaching the subject.Following a growing trend, this ebook is open source, open content, and open access, i.e., OpenEducational Resources (OER) material. Links to the ebook are posted on the OER Commons siteand the Wolfram Books site. Open textbooks are becoming ubiquitous. OER material is intendedto provide free access to openly licensed information to
focuses on how students can consistently develop their talent throughout their educational experiences and how parents, school, and community support students, s ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Caregivers’ Roles in Supporting Children’s Engagement in Engineering Activities at Home (Fundamental)AbstractWe began this project with three goals: (1) engage families in engineering activities, (2) increasethe awareness of kids and caregivers as to what engineering is, and (3) increase children’ interestin engineering. We focused on caregivers and home environments because of the important rolethat at-home experiences with STEM play in triggering interest for many
of a Communication Lab (Comm Lab), a co-curricularintervention designed to provide peer-to-peer writing and communication support to engineeringand science students. At its core, the Comm Lab is a STEM-specific writing center wherestudents can meet face-to-face with a peer knowledgeable in their discipline to get feedback onSTEM writing and communication genres. On the organizational level, however, the Comm Labis distinguished by its emphasis on adaptation of structure and services to the desired institutionalcontext. Thus, our research asks which features of the Comm Lab can or should be adapted innew institutional contexts and which features must be retained across contexts to make iteffective. By answering this question for our specific
Software Verification and Validation User Community – A Work in ProgressAbstractSoftware quality is a crucial issue in software engineering. As software has becomeubiquitous, software products have become critical. This poses multitude of problems in thesoftware industry, as there is generally a lack of knowledge of Software Verification andValidation (V&V) benefits and also there is a significant shortage of adequately trained V&Vpractitioners. This paper describes outlines of a research study that focuses on bridging thesesupply and demand and knowledge and training gaps in V&V education. Research outcomesboth in terms of domain-specific research as well as pedagogical impact are presented. The basicproject objectives
approach identified 26 different topics, as shown in Figure2. In comparison, the computer-assisted approach identified 25 different topics. In eachapproach, material posted by instructors in the form of lecture videos, weekly update videos,clear descriptions of assignments, and office hours were some of the most frequently cited thingsthat helped keep students engaged. There were also several types of communication either fromcheck-ins, more office hours, online discussions, and generally good communication that wereidentified. Each approach also identified a group of students saying that nothing kept themengaged. The computer-assisted approach also identified a group of students who specified theinstructor’s humor as keeping them engaged, which
Section 1526PATHWAYS FROM COMMUNITY COLLEGE TO BACHELORS OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING WITH A NANOTECHNOLOGY MINOR Paul M. Hallacher, Douglas E. Fenwick, and Stephen J. Fonash The Penn State Nanofabrication Facility The impact of nanotechnology on the health, wealth, and lives of people could beat least as significant as the combined influences of microelectronics, medical imaging,computer-aided engineering, and the man-made polymers developed in the 20th Century(National Science and Technology Council, July 2000). Some of the breakthroughspromised by nanotechnology include computers with 1,000 times more informationstorage
Americans or combine two underrepresented categories ofstudents into one program (i.e. Native American young women).The following sections discuss brief programs targeting young women and those impactingNative American female high school students. Few pre-college engineering programs targetspecifically Native American high school students. The Siemens Corporation has launched anumber of after-school programs targeting various high school student populations, such asinner-city high school students and Alaskan Native youth. The Siemens program, a semester-long program, delivered science and engineering curriculum in a manner that was culturallyrelevant for the indigenous community in which the program operated. After-school programsoffer the
implicit curriculum. This is becauseimplicit curriculum strategies might help engage students’ interior attributes, such asawareness, values, and beliefs, into learning spaces. Here explicit or intended curriculum refersto the technical content that needs to be covered to prepare students with a specific set ofknowledge and skills for the workforce [12]. On the contrary, the implicit or hidden curriculumis unpredictable and highly influenced by the social context of the university.In response to the previous demands described in the literature, this research analyseseducators’ and students’ experiences of the explicit and implicit curriculum—which is learntfrom the organisation, intentions, attitudes, and behaviours of the educators, for example
, carry out theexperiment, write a formal report and give an oral presentation.This paper provides a detailed description of the course, including examples ofexperiments, and discusses how it promotes active learning, introduces lifelong learningconcepts, fosters teamwork, increases communication skills, and prepares students forfurther laboratory courses or experimental activities. It is found that by providingincreasingly open ended experiences, students become actively engaged in the laboratoryexperience, and exhibit a high level of satisfaction with the course.IntroductionThe EC 2000 accreditation criteria require that an institution have in place acomprehensive outcomes assessment program to ensure the quality and continuousimprovement of
ethics education in this context, we can draw from the extensivescholarship on group communication. This body of literature suggests that team memberinteractions and communication have a major impact on a team’s decision-making abilities, aswell as the information that is discussed during the problem-solving process1-4. Therefore, thisproject seeks to understand how everyday ethical decision-making is embedded in the processesand interactions of diverse engineering design team and their recognition of the long-term designconsequences of their solutions and it guided by the following four research questions: RQ1: How is “everyday ethics” experience and communicatively constituted by students in multidisciplinary engineering design teams
project is designed to include or beneficially impact the LGBTQ+ community is included in this abstract description, hence this grant is coded as a 0 for BI). 1 Focus on improving the “The principal investigator will assign Wikipedia editing in well-being of LGBTQ+ engineering classes and host Wikipedia edit-a-thons for the populations is peripheral scientific community, both improving the students’ scientific writing and communication abilities, as well as Wikipedia’s technical content and the representation of
’ desire to engage more in an active learning environment was expected;however, their desires to integrate the topics and provide a contextual application wereunexpected. To meet this challenge, a set of three lessons was designed with interactiveexercises and discussions, integrated across the TDLC skills, and scheduled early in the semesterto provide an opportunity for use by the student teams in the course projects. The new TDLClessons were included in the fall 2005 semester curriculum. A full course survey wasadministered following the third lesson. The students were asked four questions related to theTDLC lessons: 1. Were we effective in integrating the four skills: Teamwork, Communication, Diversity, and Leadership across the lessons
seeking academic careers in MRE, and industry professionalsdesiring to shape the future workforce. Workshop activities included short presentations on sampleMRE programs, breakout sessions on specific topics, and open discussion sessions. As a result ofthese workshops, the MRE educational community has been enlarged and engaged, with membersactively contributing to the scholarship of teaching and learning.This paper presents the workshops’ formats, outcomes, results of participant surveys, and theiranalyses. A major outcome was identifying concept, skill, and experience inventories organizedaround the dimensions of foundational/practical/applications and student preparation/MREknowledgebase. Particular attention is given to the extent to which
study groups rather than engaging with the technology as a partner for learning.Some learning outcomes within the course, notably those related rigid body kinematics and rigidbody kinetics (via Newton’s laws), reveal that students perceive high value of the videosregardless of their grade on assignments related to those outcomes. We find significant interplaywith other factors reported on student background surveys, especially their views oncollaboration. The data suggest that peer collaboration and video usage have a mutually-reinforcing effect, with students actively engaged in both earning better grades in the course.IntroductionTechnology-based innovations in engineering education have a long history, and the relativelyrecent maturation of
for addressing common issues.We set out to develop instructional modules for online delivery (on the CareerWISE website)using recommended practices in the educational psychology, pedagogical theory and virtualenvironment15 literatures. Our approach employs interventions to bolster coping skills16,17,provide instruction in systematic problem-solving18, and offer a form of e-mentoring19, and isbased on recent internet-based psychosocial training efforts that have shown promise inincreasing knowledge, attitudes, and skills in circumscribed settings 20,21,22. This approach waschosen to ensure we were providing the most relevant information in an optimal way.As an initial step, our interdisciplinary team of faculty and students engaged in an