stages and eventually demonstrate the finished circuit along with interesting results. One of the most important stages involves investigating the simulation results, which provides insight in terms of connecting theory with actual circuits. 3. Further our students’ use of CAD tools and to implement hierarchical designs. This involved revising the tutorial and developing new content for two of the more advanced labs. 4. Develop new lecture material to introduce the internal structure of a CPLD and CPLD propagation delay. This understanding of the inner workings of a CPLD allows students to consider propagation delay in theoretical terms, beyond their hands-on experience in lab.At the end of the Fall 2012 semester we
principles are introduced into lower level courses through demonstrations and how thebasic principles of process engineering can be taught to a multidisciplinary student group. Thesepresentations and experiments are drawn from past experience and those of this present year withour new multidisciplinary Freshman Engineering Clinic course at Rowan University.INTRODUCTIONThe Rowan engineering faculty are taking a leadership role by using innovative methods ofteaching and learning, as recommended by ASEE[1], to better prepare students for entry into arapidly changing and highly competitive marketplace. Key program features include: (i) inter-and multi-disciplinary education created through collaborative laboratory and coursework; (ii)stressing teamwork
is avirtual venue for civil engineering educators to meet and share their ideas and lessons-learnedwith a broader community. The paper covers the creation of the ECX program, including itsmotivation, vision, and implementation, and presents opportunities and challenges for thecontinued success of this virtual community program. Details are provided on the format of theseECX sessions and the topics discussed, along with feedback from ECX presenters, moderators,and attendees. Information from this paper will be helpful to professional societies and otherorganizations looking for meaningful ways to engage and strengthen communities of engineeringeducators through virtual professional development programming.Background and IntroductionThe
thinking, encouragingoutside research, real world applications, service learning, or ethics.Alternative methods have been used to address theses issues. Hake8 reported that physicscourses with “interactive engagement methods as those designed at least in part to promoteconceptual understanding through interactive engagement of students in heads-on (always) andhands-on (usually) activities …” resulted in significant improvements in learning outcomes.Many have adopted project based learning in Dynamics in an effort to address some of theseissues. Mikesell9 reports incorporating design projects, Njock-Libii10 describes a projectanalyzing the bounce of NBA basketballs, Jolley2 describes using Lego kits to construct andanalyze four bar linkages. The
[1], [2]. Onerecommendation made by researchers and policy-makers is to increase students’ sense ofengineering identity and engineering self-efficacy [2]. Conceptualizations of these constructsoften include some form of problem-solving [2]-[4]. Therefore, it is reasonable to surmiseproblem-solving self-efficacy (i.e., belief in one’s ability to solve problems) is a core componentof engineering identity and engineering self-efficacy, and that increasing it will increase them.However, before investigating methods to increase problem-solving self-efficacy, researchersmust operationally define it and adopt a reliable and valid measure of it, whether through scaledevelopment or adaptation of a pre-existing scale, the latter of which is the
bring a rich variety ofinterests and experiences to the classroom; instruction that takes advantage of this varietybecomes deeper and richer for all involved (Caffarella, 1994). Taking advantage of theexperience of students is something over which we have a lot of control; this was givenheavy consideration when designing and developing courses and will be discussed inanother session during this conference.Distance The miles that separate us from our students are beyond our control, but thereare two factors buried within this issue that we can influence greatly. The first is theemotional distance that separates students from peers, instructors, and support staff. Thevery means that we employ for students to interact with course materials, with
identify the outcomes of a project originally designed in 1955and how those outcomes and expectations are aligned to meet the department outcomes andABET standards of today. The course identifies and addresses using more than one assessmenttool that translates well to the department and ABET standards for assessment.A Historical perspectiveDuring the 1954-1955 academic year at South Dakota State University, George HarveyWakeman defined a project that would offer the mechanical engineering students, and otherswho enrolled in the machining course, a laboratory experience. He would not have known thathis curriculum design would last for 50 years and beyond. The uniqueness of his prototype andhis attention to the design experience has stood the test
of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Page 24.532.9Bibliography1. Rossetti, M. Clausen, E., Gattis, C. S., Hale, M., & Needy, K. L. (2013) On the development of a student integrated intern research experience as a pathway to graduate studies. 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings. Atlanta, GA.2. Peppas, Nicholas A. “Student Preparation for Graduate School Through Undergraduate Research.” Chemical Engineering Education, V15 (3), pp135-137, Summer, 1981
, a three-phase project. These ideas were based on the literature citing theneed for intensive academic planning through intrusive advising, freshman orientation, academicreviews for low-performing students, special programs that provide academic support includingtutoring, group study, and a study center, a sense of belonging on campus, small classes,exposure to faculty during the first years, supplemental (developmental) educational instruction,meaningful undergraduate research, a freshman seminar course, and support of new teachingmethodologies for faculty.9,10 Cultural changes at the University were led by the UniversityPresident centering on UTEP’s vision and mission of providing quality higher education to adiverse student population
: “Societal and Ethical Issues in Nanotechnology”A. IntroductionSince ABET 2000, ethics training has become an established component of science andengineering undergraduate education, serving to prepare students in the fundamentals ofprofessional practice within their chosen field. It is largely absent, however, in doctoralengineering programs1. This is of particular concern in the area of nanotechnology, which islargely being taught as a specialty in graduate programs. This paper describes a unique newcourse in the societal and ethical issues of nanotechnology that addresses this need.Students who undertake graduate engineering training can find that the conduct of research posesethical challenges that go beyond the norms of professional practice
inherently judgmental act.But what exactly are we judging when we speak of quality? The ‘what’ is highly contextual and forengineering often of a tacit “I know it when I see it nature”. Perhaps one of the best modern attempt todefine quality was made by Pirsig in the popular 1974 book Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance[17], [18] which preceded the wide adoption of the CQM movement. Through the context of a cross-country motorcycle trip Pirsig contrasts quality and aesthetics and relates the notion of quality to a deepsubjective care for, or engagement with, something that leads on one to see beyond an objects surfacefeatures. Quality as a concept allows us to navigate both the objective and the the uncertain andsubjective spaces created by
. Mayhew, “Technical Communication Across the ME Curriculum at Rose-Hulman,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018, vol. 2018-June.[17] K. Wright, P. E. Slaboch, and R. Jamshidi, “Technical writing improvements through engineering lab courses,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ., 2020.[18] L. Reave, “Technical communication instruction in engineering schools: A survey of top- ranked US and Canadian programs,” J. Bus. Tech. Commun., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 452–490, 2004.[19] C. Heylen and J. Vander Sloten, “A technical writing programme implemented in a first- year engineering course at KU Leuven,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 595–607, 2013.[20] W. P. Manion and D
of Phoenix. Dr. Wickliff has been honored with University of Houston’s Distinguished Young Engineering Alumni Award, the Black Engineer of the Year Career Achievement Award for New Emerging Leaders and fea- tured in several publications. She has presented keynote addresses, facilitated workshops and given moti- vational presentations at numerous civic and corporate forums domestically and internationally. She is a contributing author to Tavis Smiley’s book, ”Keeping the Faith”, with her inspiring life story. She believes that her life’s calling and thus career quest is to be a catalyst of signicant, positive change and growth for individuals and entities. However, through it all, Dr. Wickliff gives top
this study was to investigate knowledge regarding the nature of engineering[that students and faculty possess.]. Photo elicitation is a central technique for studies that focuson interpretations of “work” as well as social class and organization, community and historicalethnography, identity, and culture.11, 12 It is a qualitative inquiry approach that emphasizes whatGeertz13 calls “thick description” – going beyond surface details to uncover deeper meanings. Assuch, photo elicitation allows immersion into others’ worlds and worldviews and makes visiblethe meanings of lived experiences. As an example, Harper11 notes that photos prod latentmemory, sharpen memory and reduce areas of misunderstanding, respond to how people thinkvisually, elicit
a generally negative answerto his question, “Are theories of learning necessary?” He took the position thatpsychology was not ready for hypothetico-deductive theories. He expressed the opinionthat psychology needed more facts in order to develop postulates and general theorywhich would subsequently be supported empirically. He objected to interpretations whichmake extensive reference to presumed physiological correlates or to internal mentalevents, or which make extensive use of constructs to represent behavior. In contrast, herecommended that psychologists would be better advised to focus on collecting moreempirical data concerning behavior and at least temporarily to constrain their drawing ofinferences beyond the data collected. The
, the remote controldesktop, LAN, WAN access software and VPN security software are installed on the remotecomputer. The host computer and VPN server authenticate user names and passwords that areutilized by a remote user to log on to the host computer. From the remote location, the remoteuser has access to the application software and other resources on the host computer through theinternet in order to have control and program the robot and PLC units. Page 14.97.3 Fig 1: Online Automation SystemStep 2: Configuring the network connectionThis step describes the networking and connecting of the host computer to the
, electromagnetic scattering and wearable sensors. Page 24.657.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Growing a STEM Initiative: Establishing Philosophies, Identifying Needs and Lessons LearnedAbstractThe momentum for promoting STEM education is on the rise across the country inunprecedented ways through educational grant offerings, student competitions, mediacoverage, and project oriented curriculums. Indeed, all are making positive contributions,but the need for more such programs in many school districts remains strong. This paper isan attempt at documenting the
moreempirical data concerning behavior and at least temporarily to constrain their drawing ofinferences beyond the data collected. The issues of individual differences in learningability and in learning styles were the focus of a group researchers throughout the twentycentury. Their primary substantive concern has been individual differences, whichusually refers to both the ability and habitual behavior or customary ways of acting,usually referred to as personality characteristics. Their preferred and sometimes exclusiveresearch methods are the correlational methods. Closely aligned with this group is thedevelopmental psychology tradition which has been particularly concerned with the waythat individuals differ at various ages and stages of development
instructor asked a series of questions agreed upon with the speakerbeforehand to guide the speaker through a visual presentation (i.e., Power Point slides).Questions fell into four categories: i) personal story, ii) societal impact, iii) technical details, andiv) general career advice. A sample set of questions for one of the speakers is shown in Table 2. # Question Category 1 Tell us about your path into synthetic biology. Personal Story What types of problems do the labs/companies you've worked 2 for try to solve? Societal Impact What types of biological systems does your current
their own substantial growth as individuals, engineers, and citizens.The Phases and Structure of EPICS ProjectsEach EPICS project involves a team of eight to fifteen undergraduates, one or more communityservice agencies, and a faculty or industry advisor. Each team is vertically integrated, consistingof a mix of freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors. Each team is constituted for several years-- from initial project definition through final deployment -- with students participating forseveral semesters. This structure enables long-term projects. Over time, each project has fivephases: Finding Project Partners, Assembling a Project Team, Project Proposal, System Designand Development, and System Deployment and Support.Phase 1 - Finding
intervention will improve students’ problem-solving skills, give them anopportunity to acquire contemporary technical skills early in their education, and prepare them toapply these skills in future courses and beyond the classroom.To help us determine students’ perceptions of the course, their learning of technical andproblem-solving skills, and their comfort in applying these skills outside of their coursework, weadminister pre and post surveys with multiple choice, likert scale, and open-ended questions. Inour open-ended student responses, many students mention a positive impact on their CSexperience including acquisition of new problem-solving and technical skills. Overall, studentsfind the course useful and interesting and report becoming more
. Through our study, we measured the perceived effectiveness ofundergraduate teaching assistants (UGTAs) in the classroom using a survey and investigatedwhat key strategies undergraduate teaching assistants use to impact the student experience usingfocus group data. The study followed a sequential explanatory mixed method format in whichUGTAs teaching quality survey results were analyzed to find whether the UGTAs were valuableco-teachers in class. Qualitative data were collected in the form of in-depth focus groupinterviews to identify what made the students appreciate and value UGTAs in class and what itlooks like to be effective in class. Quantitative data suggest that UGTAs are highly effectivealthough student perception of the same UGTA varies
. Townsend, K. Stewart, and A. Johnson, “Recruiting students of color through a student organization.”, in Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Mar. 2021, pp. 1249-1249.
fully the potential of online web-assisted tools along with face-to-face meaningful and engaging interactions inside class rooms, the blended learning method hasoften successfully merged traditional teaching methods with computer assisted instructional modelsof modern era [9]. In one variation of this approach, online video lectures and other instructional materials wereused for skill preparation and learning before the normal hours designated for class roomengagement. A viable instructional model emerged from this, involving subsequent face-to-faceinteraction of faculty with students through problem solving, active learning, and skill application,within the class room environment [10]. This model is intended to help shift the role of
solution manuals available whencompleting the homework9. Further, Passow et al. have shown that the decision to cheat or notcan vary depending on the type of assessment11 (homework vs. exam). In general terms, studentsare more likely to cheat on a homework assignment than on an exam. Passow et al. have alsosuggested that students who cheat on homework in their first years of college withoutconsequence may develop skills to allow them to continue to cheat, and on higher-riskassessments such as tests, as they progress through school.Certainly the issue of academic misconduct extends beyond a single course, but due to itsprevalence on homework, impact on learning, and ethical implications it deserves attention inoverall course design. Simply
ProjectIntroduction Engineering educators have an essential role in preparing engineers to work in a complex,interdisciplinary workforce. While much engineering education focuses on teaching students todevelop disciplinary expertise in specific engineering domains, there is a strong need to teachengineers about the knowledge that they develop or use in their work (Bucciarelli 1994, Allenby& Sarewitz, 2011; Frodeman, 2013). The purpose of this research is to gain a betterunderstanding of the knowledge systems of practicing engineers through observations of theirpractices such that the insights learned can guide future education efforts. Using an examplefrom a complex and interdisciplinary engineering project, this paper presents a case
forincreasingly large classes of CS students. In particular, schools are struggling to provide timelyaccess to help in office hours [4][5][6].Timely feedback is important for student learning [7][8], and universities are using a variety ofsolutions to combat long wait times. One solution of interest is to increase the number of teachersavailable to help students in office hours through the use of peer teachers. According to Smith et.al. [9], peer teachers are ”more senior students who are further advanced in the program of study”that can provide one-to-one instruction in an office hours setting. Because the number of studentscandidates for peer teachers increases as the course increases, peer teachers can scale as classescontinue to grow.Another solution
, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Schellings, G. L. M., van Hout- Wolters, B. H. A. M., Veenman, M. V. J., & Meijer, J. (2013). Assessing metacognitive activities: the in-depth comparison of a task-specific questionnaire with think-aloud protocols. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 963-990.Redish, E. and Smith, K. (2008). Looking beyond content: Skill development for engineers. Journal of Engineering Education 97(3).Schellings, G.L.M., van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M., Veenman, M.V.J. et al. (2013). Eur J Psychol Educ 28: 963.Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology
. The Experiments1. Slider Control of the Robotic Arm:This experiment is designed to give the lab user a feel of the workings of the robotic arm.Each of the servomotors (degrees of freedom (DOF)) of the robotic arm is controlled by aslider on the front panel of the LabVIEW VI. The user moves each slider to move each of theDOFs.The LabVIEW VI was designed so that the user gives in the angular positions desired foreach of the motors of the robotic arm. Each slider has variations from -90° through 0° to 90°.Each slider has a digital display beside it so that the user can view the exact angular positionhe is sending to the arm. Buttons are also included beside each digital display forincrementing and decrementing the angles. The design lets only
stakeholderperspectives.4,13,14,15Increasingly, listening in engineering is promoted as an essential professional skill notonly by individual scholars and practitioners, but also by engineering organizations. TheUS National Academy of Engineering (NAE) states that its vision for the engineer of the21st century includes the ability to engage multiple stakeholders (i.e., governments,industry, and the public) nationally and internationally through “good communication.”“We envision a world,” says the NAE, “where communication is enabled by an ability tolisten effectively as well as to communicate through oral, written, and visualmechanisms.”16 The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) also considerslistening a key element of good communication. In its own