course grade.This implies that pre-knowledge is not playing a significant role in how much a student learns inthe course. The conclusion is similar to that reached in the pilot study5, which stated thatstatistics experience does not play a vital role in the SCI score for students in an introductorystatistics course. However, data from Fall 2003 yield significant correlations of SCI Pre-Testwith overall course grade for two courses. The magnitudes of the correlations are similar to theSummer 2003 Engr course, but the larger sample sizes make the Fall 2003 correlationssignificant.ReliabilityA reliable instrument is one in which measurement error is small, which can also be stated as theextent that the instrument is repeatable7. There are several
and innovative product ideas creates an “Entrepreneurial Fire in the Belly”.This three-course series is designed to develop a collegial, co-operative learning environmentthat mimics the activities of a technology incubator. The students pursue their ownentrepreneurial ideas and work in teams. These teams are not restricted to the students in theclass. They can be virtual teams including external experts as members of the start-upmanagement team or the board of advisors. The enthusiasm in these EngineeringEntrepreneurship classes has been observed to be very high - students sometimes arrive an hourbefore the start of class and often stay over late, huddling and hustling, working in small groupson projects, networking with guest speakers
; academic behavior (e.g., attendance, study habits); attitudes and beliefs (e.g., self-efficacy); social and cultural experiences; exposure to STEM through school or home activities;negative school and STEM experiences.‖3Research does show that teachers and students of all levels hold narrow perceptions of engineersand engineering.4-8 Yet, teachers‘ perceptions influence student learning and student perceptionsmediate their choices of study and persistence. According to Matusovich et al., ―we need a deep-rooted understanding of the students‘ perspectives …. [but] little existing research on persistencein engineering has been conducted from the student perspective…‖ 9 Moreover, since teachers‘beliefs have an impact on student learning,10 Nathan et
cell culture techniques,including sterile technique, cell counting, and cell splitting. Next, students perform an in vitrocytotoxicity assay (direct contact) based on ISO-10993, gaining hands-on experience inbiocompatibility testing.In its current form, the core unit consists of two hours of lecture and seven hours of cell culturelab spread over three weeks; however, this unit can be shortened or expanded depending on timeavailable and the amount of supplementary topics introduced. A stand-alone cytotoxicity assay,for example, could be completed by students in one week. Examples of supplemental activitiesthat can be incorporated into the unit are included below:• Expanded group and individual cell culturing: After students learn and practice
not address how that projects are selected as this has been previously reported3,4.The typical design process experience includes Problem Definition, Concept Generation,Preliminary Design, Detail Design, and Communication of Results5. However, the end result ofthis process is ultimately Solution of the Problem which often receives little attention in theacademic setting.There is excellent published literature6.7 that provides guidance based upon learning outcomesand the design process. Common design phases, processes, and products for Capstone projectshas been described8 and provided a foundation for the course experience. Classroom learningactivities have also been described9.There is some published literature regarding the review and
the‘Digital Ladies’ in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. The following sectionswill explain the various operational aspects, impacts and challenges associated with the program.Program StructureStudent board: A WiME board handles the idea-conception, planning and execution of allprofessional development and social activities. The WiME board consists of a group of 4-6women ME students. The chair of the WiME board is usually a senior student, who has severalyears of active participation in planning, organizing and participating in WiME activities. Sheworks closely with the vice-chair, who is a junior student and is the chair-elect for the next year.The WiME board consists of at least one student from each year as well as one graduate
Science, Technology, and the World (STW) component of the general education curriculum at Messiah College for more than 10 years. Page 25.1255.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Teaching Non-Major Students Electrical Science and TechnologyIn recent years, many students in majors other than engineering or science have beenexpected to take a Science, Technology and Society (STS) course, or the equivalent, tosatisfy a component of their general education requirement. Ideally, the STS requirementhelps students learn how culture interacts with science and technology, throughinfluences
experiences to understand how studentsdevelop the professional skills required to participate in engineering judgments. Moreover,environmental science and engineering engineering require contributions from professionals inenvironmental science, systems sciences, data science, computer or mechanical engineering, andpublic health, yet many individuals who are not active in environmental science and engineeringoften do not realize the multiple avenues of participation in environmental science andengineering. Moreover, I was initially excited to pursue environmental engineering as myundergraduate major after one of my professors, Dr. Kimberly Jones of Howard University,explained the field of environmental justice to me. I have chosen to use the first
participants in our technologically-dependent society must know something about engineering3.” All Americans would benefitfrom a general understanding of the wide range to technologies vital to everyday life. Thisunderstanding of technological principles, or technological literacy as it is sometimes called,should encompass more than just an ability to use personal computers and informationtechnologies and include knowledge of a broad range of technological processes and systems.A difficulty in helping non-engineers to develop an understanding of technology is the limited Page 22.493.2number of engineering courses that are intended for the general
; Instruction/Science Education from Iowa State University in 2005. Her research interests focus on learning to do and teach science as inquiry and promoting student interest in STEM-related professions. Page 22.591.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Engineering identity and the workplace persistence of women with engineering degreesAbstractBased on studies of engineering students, it is recognized that engineering students who pursueengineering due to altruistic intent or intrinsic interest in engineering are more likely to persist
Paper ID #8236Global Engineering Competencies and CasesProf. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Brent K. Jesiek is Assistant Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Com- puter Engineering at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and professional practice.Qin Zhu, Purdue
learning j. Knowledge of contemporary issues k. Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice Page 7.1195.45 Industrial Engineering Program at the University of Cincinnati, College of Engineering6 ABET - Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology “Proceedings of the 2002 American society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”The correlation between IME program’s educational objectives and the program outcomes ispresented in Table 1. Each educational
stores and categorizes raw data; similardata for different products is compared. KB stores lessons learned and draws embedded trendsfrom DB. PP provides parametric systems level analysis and quantifies performance.All three tools are able to function independently, but a data-base without a parametric processcan be seen as shallow, and a parametric process without a data-base can be seen as unfounded.The current prototype DB is a first step in creating fully-functioning product-forecasting system.It is the ultimate goal to have all three tools seamlessly connected in a product developmentenvironment that has the capability to assess the performance of a novel product in physics-basedplatform using proven, justifiable methods and considering the
Department has taught Computer-Aided Design to campus-wide constituency for a decade [53]. Dartmouth College has had a requirement since 1992 thatevery student take a course in Technology and/or Applied Science. The majority of thesecourses are taught by engineering faculty, and some have enrolled as many as 150 students [54].simultaneously with these efforts by engineering departments to reach non-engineers, somecollege and university physics departments have altered their service course offerings for non-majors to emphasize technological topics. Examples include Dudley and Bold’s, “Top-DownPhysics” [55], and Watson’s “The Science Concepts behind High Technology” and “Silicon,Circuits, and the Digital Revolution” courses [56]. Bloomfield has
Project-Based Team Learning: Teaching Systems Engineering When the Data are Sparse Robin K. Burk U.S. Military AcademyABSTRACT: Undergraduate systems engineering courses face several challenges, including the need toprovide students with integrative projects which present sufficient depth and complexity while beingscoped for execution within a one or two semester course.This paper describes the results of providing students with challenging real-world analysis projectsdespite the sparse availability of established technical and operating data. Sixteen teams werepresented with projects regarding evaluation of advanced
Paper ID #45194Think-Aloud Insights: Exploring QuantCrit Challenges and Diverse SurveyResponses Among Undergraduate Engineering StudentsMs. Sheila Kathryn Castro, University of Florida Sheila Castro is a doctoral student in Science Education at the University of Florida’s School of Teaching and Learning. Her research focuses on Latina’s STEM identity, family support, and influences on the experiences of undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Bruce Frederick Carroll, University of Florida Dr. Carroll is an Associate Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Florida. He holds an affiliate
years 2 10+ years 1 Primary Work Modality Bench Science 3 Computational 3 Experimental & Bench Science 1The recording of the first workshop session was transcribed and analyzed to identify emergentthemes within participant conversations. This high-level analysis focused on identifyingrecurring issues and concerns raised by participants and clustering them into related themes. Thisallowed for a better understanding of the main topics of discussion that
inequities through artificial intelligence and machinelearning algorithms that will “learn” from clinical devices, interactions, and interventions theundervaluation of those without dominant, normative bodies [26]. And it will be done under aparadigm of assuming that data is “real”, factual, and objective–these models will use a biasedpast to predict the futures of care.Who gets to design medical technologies? Establishing what knowledge countsPractitioners of medical technologies, including doctors, researchers, engineers of all disciplines,conduct their work in non-diverse working environments siloed away from people living withthe conditions they study. Their technical expertise, bestowed by years of training within highereducation institutions
a Professor of Engineering at Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan. She earned an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, with research in protein engineering. Her current research interests include retention, diversity, and career pathways among engineering students and professionals.Joanna Wright, University of Washington Joanna Wright is an M.Ed. student in Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her education research interests span early childhood through higher education, with a focus on the impact of pedagogical practices and contexts on learning and development.Lauren Summers, University of Washington Lauren
. Table 2. Job Posting Characteristics Track Non-Tenure 5 Tenure 15 Other* 1 Department or School Name Mathematics Specified Only 2 Engineering Specified Only 3 Computer Science Specified 6 Learning Sciences Specified 1 Statistics
Leadership 3.5 3.7 3.4 3.8 3.6 Ethics 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.4 Mathematics 4.1 3.9 4.0 4.3 4.2 Engineering design and applications 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.2 3.9 Information technology, 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.8 programming & computer skills Courses have been easy Some courses have been easy while other courses have been more difficult The difficulty
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”concept? To be useful, the educator needs to be able to directly measure the concept. Theidentified concepts did not provide sufficient specificity to permit direct measurement.Industry Practitioners. The structured interviews of industry practitioners permitted discussionsthat prevented answers lacking specificity. The most important skill perceived as requisite bythe industry practitioners was the ability to sketch, to render in three dimensions and tounderstand the renderings. The skill was not the use of computer graphics. One respondentspecifically noted that the use of the “fancy toys” facilitated understanding the artifact. But hepointed out that the computer graphic tools did not
. The roles and responsibilities that are traditionally held bywomen emphasize family responsibilities over professional job, especially in fields such asengineering that are considered masculine [19]. Forgasz et al. [20] emphasize that STEM fields,especially mathematics, science, and computing, are globally and locally perceived as male-dominated fields. This view likely discourages Middle Eastern women from continuing in thesefields and leads to the continuation of their underrepresentation. Sabbah and Heyd-Metzuyanim[21] discuss the effects of ethnic and religious issues and gender inequality attitudes on thescientific identity of Arab female students in Israel. The authors show that by combining broadsocial issues with gendered and
: We use technology to try to change the world to suit us better. The changes may relate to survival needs such as food, shelter, or defense, or they may relate to human aspirations such as knowledge, art, or control.3Similarly, Beneson suggested that technology included a “wide range of artifacts, systems,environments, and procedures that have been created by people to address their needs”.8Technology, offered Beneson, included not only the computer—a complex device whose innerworkings may be incomprehensible to the everyday citizen—but the box in which it came, asimple technology whose design is more accessible to laypersons.Elementary-level engineering and technology curricula like The City Technology Curriculumand Engineering
2006-374: A COGNITIVE STUDY OF MODELING DURING PROBLEM-SOLVINGThomas Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University Thomas A. Litzinger is currently Director of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State, where he has been on the faculty since 1985. His work in engineering education involves curricular reform, teaching and learning innovations, faculty development, and assessment. He can be contacted at tal2@psu.edu.Peggy Van Meter, Pennsylvania State University Peggy Van Meter is currently the Professor in Charge of the Educational Psychology Program and an Associate Professor of Education at Penn State where she has
. Students construct a power supplyusing a linear voltage regulator IC, make a few measurements, and observe empirically thestability of the output voltage with line and load changes. With these labs, students miss theopportunity to see what makes a regulator “tick” and how different elements of the regulatoraffect particular regulator characteristics. The laboratory experiment presented here tries toaddress some of the issues that are not covered in depth in common linear voltage regulatorexperiments. They include: • Students build a real regulator circuit from discrete transistors. Students actually see the major parts of the regulator and the interaction between each section. • Students learn the real meaning of terms such as
). Fig. 1. Input-Mediator-Outcome-Input (IMOI) model [18, 29]In our use of this model, individual characteristics (including demographics and cognitive styledifferences as measured by KAI) serve as Inputs; team interactions (as measured by IDN) serve asMediators; and team outcomes (including team members’ perceptions of their solutions) serve asOutcomes. Feedback from the assessment of team outcomes has the potential to influence boththe member characteristics (e.g., learned experience) and team interactions (e.g., decision makingbehaviors). As described in the next section, our approaches for investigating each of these IMOImodel components were originally determined through our investigation of high performancedesign teams; in this study, we
AC 2007-892: EXPERIENCES OF SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AMONG PRACTICINGENGINEERS ? IMPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATIONLlewellyn Mann, University of Queensland LLEWELLYN MANN is a PhD student in the School of Engineering at the University of Queensland and a member of the Catalyst Research Centre for Society and Technology. He has a Bachelor of Engineering (Mechanical & Space) and a Bachelor of Science (Physics) from UQ, as well as a Graduate Certificate of Education (Higher Education). Major research interests include; Engineering Education, Sustainability, Teaching and Learning, Engineering Design, Technology and Society.David Radcliffe, University of Queensland DAVID RADCLIFFE is the
Paper ID #37621Examining the “narrow” and “expansive” socio-technicalimaginaries influencing college students’ collaborativereasoning about a design scenarioJennifer Radoff (Assistant Research Professor) Jennifer Radoff is an assistant research professor at the University of Maryland in College Park. She studies teaching and learning in K-16 STEM, with a focus on the interaction of conceptual, epistemological, and affective dynamics of learning amidst cultural and ideological landscapes. She supports educators as they work to create more equitable opportunities for students’ disciplinary engagement.Chandra Anne
additional academic and emotional work. They work extremely hardto maintain their credibility as competent students as they face the potential of being discreditedbecause of their sexual identity. These students must daily negotiate public knowledge of theirpersonal lives in a climate which reinforces heterosexual norms. LGB engineering students mustactively downplay any cultural characteristics associated with LGB identities, pressured to be“engineers who happen to be gay” rather than “gay engineers.”“Covering” within a Professional Culture of DualismsThe process of becoming a professional involves more than the mastery of technical competenceor expert knowledge, but involves learning a culture and obtaining a professional identity.5, 6