2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference A Retrospective on Creating a Video Game Course to Promote Interdisciplinary Collaboration Dr. John William Gibbons University of KansasDr. John William GibbonsJohn Gibbons is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Electrical Engineering and ComputerScience department at the University of Kansas. He holds a Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. in ComputerScience, and has 17 years of teaching experience and has received teaching awards from thestudent, department, and university level. He has led course redesigns and created a new seniorelective for the department
Paper ID #8902Using Shadowing to Improve New Faculty AcclimationDr. Stephen M. Williams P.E., Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Stephen Williams, P.E. is a Professor and Chair of the Electrical Engineering and Computer Sci- ence (EECS) Department at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. He has over 25 years of engineering experience across the corporate, government, and university sectors specializing in: engineering design, electromechanical systems, sensor technologies, power electronics and digital signal processing. His pro- fessional activities include: program chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering
at the evidence: the NEET Ways of Thinking; the project-centriccurricular construct, and; the concept of threads. The main organizing armature ofthe curriculum is now a sequence of projects inspired by the new machines.Students choose a sequence of explicitly interdepartmental projects, whilefundamentals continue to be learned in departmentally offered subjects. Threadsare pathways for inter-disciplinary engineering education that cut acrossdisciplines and departments. Threads could be envisioned in areas such as theInternet of Things, autonomous vehicles and systems, smart cities and urbaninfrastructure, and, large data analysis systems.Engineering education worldwide is struggling with the widening gap betweentheory and practice. Employers
Western Michigan University. Administrators and professors from a varietyof engineering disciplines participated in the pilot and provided feedback.After revision, the final survey instrument consisted of 13 items, asking a range of questions aboutengineering programs in general. Items also asked for information concerning the characteristics ofthe capstone project including its duration, importance in the undergraduate curriculum, andpractices using the capstone design projects to fulfill EC 2000 Criterion 3 and Criterion 4requirements.In September 2001, surveys were mailed to the deans of all 274 institutions with accreditedengineering programs listed in the ASEE Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technologyreference13. Each dean received
pedagogical strategies, curriculum, andassessment adaptations, for example, by leveraging and including cultural diversity and genderdiversity in the classroom (Forbes et al., 2024; Rambo-Hernandez et al., 2019; Yunus, NurulAzhani et al., 2023). Supportive environments can also be created by catering to diverse learningpreferences and cultures (Notaroš et al., 2019; Rice & Mays, 2022). Other approaches includeimplementing more inclusive strategies, such as active learning (Galvis et al., 2019; Theobald etal., 2020). Advocates promote equitable STEM education for diverse demographics, including race,gender, socioeconomics, and disabilities (Holmes et al., 2023). While many efforts focus oncurriculum design and teaching approaches, such as
, [Online]. Available:https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en. [Accessed: Feb.20, 2025].11. National Academy of Engineering, "Grand Challenge Scholars Program," National Academyof Engineering, [Online]. Available: https://www.nae.edu/Projects/GCSP.aspx. [Accessed: Feb.20, 2025].12.. Engineers Without Borders USA, "Engineers Without Borders USA: Engineering a betterworld," EWB-USA, [Online]. Available: https://www.ewb-usa.org. [Accessed: Feb. 20, 2025].13. G. L. Downey, et al., "The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with PeopleWho Define Problems Differently," *Journal of Engineering Education*, vol. 95, no
the good and the applicable from allworking models and then implement it. Three key ingredients for success:1. Students who understand the importance and benefit of understanding and interacting withother international cultures.2. Educational and corporate involvement and commitment.3. International Program Implementation. The International Student Collaboration project will provide an intensive program ofstudy and work for the students from Indiana University – Purdue University (IPFW), during thesummer of 2006. A small group of students from the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology willteam up a similar group of students from University of Kuala Lumpur (UKL) in Malaysia andwork on an assigned design project. The make
curricula, such as interdisciplinary thinking, havebeen considered. Attempts have been made to make teachers teach and students develop a widerange of knowledge and skills.1.2 Work to date and the identified gapMitchell et al. [8] developed a programmatic framework across engineering departments toensure students achieve a range of competencies, including technical (in a specific engineeringdiscipline), scientific, and mathematical knowledge, along with transferable skills such ascommunications, teamwork, business acumen, and critical analysis. Such programs aredeveloped with alignment to the philosophies, pedagogies, and outcomes of an educational-basedproject, which creates a connected curriculum. [8]. Trevelyan and colleagues focused onenhancing
sciences.The article also provides a definition of design and states several attributes that good designersshould exhibit and that design instruction should seek to develop. Dym et al also discussed avariety of project-based design courses and concluded that, not only do the project-based designcourses emulate the team-based environments that most engineering graduates will encounter inindustry, “available research suggests that these kinds of courses appear to improve retention,student satisfaction, diversity, and student learning.” (p. 114)Within a project-based design course, the instructor’s design learning philosophy can be animportant factor influencing the students’ design learning experience. A fundamental question ishow instructors’ view of
off-the-shelf VR contents inintroductory STEM courses with the aim to enhance student engagement and improve STEMeducational outcomes. A critical barrier identified amid the project was the lack of pedagogicallysound, learner centered VR contents for the field of study in electrical and computer engineering(ECE). This REU project was then initiated by two motivated students who were enrolled in theredesigned, VR-integrated introductory ECE course, i.e., ECE90 - Principles of ElectricalCircuits. Disappointed by the 3rd-party VR content they experienced, they went on teachingthemselves VR content creation using the Unity game engine and C# programming language,developed a VR prototype (entitled MetavoltVR), and conducted user experience
Educational Partnerships, Old Dominion University Joe Brobst holds a BS in Biological Sciences, MA in Curriculum & Instruction, and Ed.D. in Educational Leadership, all from the University of Delaware. Formerly a high school biology teacher, he is now an ed- ucational research and program evaluation specialist with experience working on a wide range of projects sponsored by organizations including the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Of- fice of Naval Research, U.S. Department of Education, and Corporation for National and Community Service. His areas of interest and expertise include broadening participation in STEM higher education, K-12 STEM teacher professional development, and preservice
Paper ID #36723KarmaCollab: A Communication Platform For Collaborative LearningDamitu Robinson, University of California, DavisMr. Nicholas Hosein Nicholas is a PhD candidate at the University of California Davis with a background in computer ar- chitecture, algorithms and machine learning. His current focus is advancing the electrical engineering curriculum at UC Davis to be more industry relevant inProf. Andre Knoesen, University of California, Davis Andre Knoesen received his Ph.D. degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, in 1987. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering
civilengineering undergraduate students about infrastructure inequities and their support to promotesystemic changes to address this issue [12]. Oulton et al. (2021) investigated the existingknowledge of civil engineering students about social and environmental justice and assessed theefficacy of a curriculum enhancement to improve the students’ knowledge about these topics[13]. Likewise, Armanios et al. (2021) integrated the diversity, equity, and inclusion principleswithin civil and environmental engineering curricula by incorporating discussions of how civilengineering projects are linked to inequitable pollution concentrations, lack of access, anddisplacement of low-income communities thus improve understanding and experience of thesetopics [14
five to ten years, a shift has taken place within engineering schools nationwidetoward greater engagement of students through experiential, hands-on learning opportunities.This evolution began with the move of intensive experimental and project-based labwork fromthe postgraduate to undergraduate level. Now, there is a strong interest in introducing hands-onlearning — including opportunities to collaborate with professors and postdoctoral students onnew research — during a student’s first year.For many underclassmen this change has meant the welcome injection of lab and project workinto a curriculum traditionally given over to didactic math and science prerequisites. It has led togrowing contact and collaboration among underclassmen and
opportunity to solve problems using math and science in a “hands-on, minds-on” manner.The idea proposed to Alcoa involved grant funding to hire middle school teachers to work withCollege of Engineering faculty and develop ways to integrate engineering problem solvingmethods into the North Carolina Standard Course of Study curriculum strands in math andscience. Teachers would be paid an amount enticing enough to encourage them to forgo two oftheir short six-week summer. The first week, the teachers and COE faculty met at NCSU tolearn about engineering, technology, exemplary materials and the curriculum strands to becovered in each grade. Lessons and activities were the expected outcome. Then, the followingweek, 50 middle school students were brought
. They compare theirexperience to existing theory and determine its applicability. If experience is not conjunctivewith theory, ongoing reflection with others can produce new theory.” (Raelin, 2007, p. 506)Reflection is valuable for professionals, as well as student interns. Raelin cites Donald Schon(Schon 1983) who coined the term, “reflection-in-action,” and describes the value of “a learningenvironment which permits and encourages practitioners to test their mental models.” (Raelin,2007) Oeij et al. argue that “Donald Schon’s reflective practitioner actually outlines an explicitmodel of the steps that project leaders in practice apply largely unaware” and illustrates withexamples of leadership in innovation projects. (Oeij et al., 2017).As
. Avanzato, R., “Mobile Robotic for Freshman Design, Research, and High School Outreach,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2000.10. Small, T., Hass, Z., et al, “A Sensor Network for Biological Data Acquisition”, Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, 2003.11. Wu, P., Kuo, C., et al, “Design and Implementation of the Remote Control Lab Using PDA”, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education.12. Saad, A., “Mobile robotics as the Platform for Undergraduate Capstone Electrical and ComputerEngineering Design Projects”, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference
that informed citizen of thefuture is a course in Infrastructure for all college graduates. Infrastructure should be taken hereas a widely inclusive term, with many systems and meta-systems (the health care system,electrical power, information technology, transportation, etc.) providing the framework for suchstudies. The how of such a course, what such a course might consist of, possible course syllabi,models and the like, is presented by Hart et al. (2011), but this paper seeks to address a verydifferent question; why require such a course, particularly for non-engineers. More directly put,this paper argues that if we are to address the broad and complex problems posed by ourdecaying existing infrastructure and our demand for future
individuals in professional organizations,” in Frontiers in education, Frontiers Media SA, vol. 6, 2021, p. 755 457. [3] T. Pagano, A. Ross, and S. B. Smith, “Undergraduate research involving deaf and hard-of-hearing students in interdisciplinary science projects,” Education Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 146–165, 2015. [4] D. C. Braun, M. D. Clark, A. E. Marchut, et al., “Welcoming deaf students into stem: Recommendations for university science education,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 17, no. 3, es10, 2018. [5] M. Nikolaraizi, C. Kofidou, and M. Hyde, “The role of self-advocacy in academic access for students who are deaf or hard of hearing in higher education,” Inclusion, equity and access for individuals with
), which often face resource constraints. Rippy, et al. [16] highlightedthe limited integration of sustainable construction practices into MSI curricula, emphasizing theneed for targeted interventions to enhance teaching and learning. Faculty development programslike the BDLA address these gaps by providing expert-led workshops and practical resources,enabling educators to better integrate decarbonization topics into their teaching [17, 18].However, MSIs continue to face distinct challenges that hinder their ability to integratesustainability into curricula. Limited access to sustainability-focused funding restrictsinvestments in faculty development, lab facilities, and curriculum innovation [19]. Additionally,MSIs often have fewer research
Session 3125 Integration of design in the engineering core: Teaching engineering science courses with design in mind. Josué Njock Libii Engineering Department Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805-1499 USAFor more than twelve years, design has been successfully integrated into two, erstwhile, lecturecourses in the ME curriculum of Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne. The coursesare Fluid Mechanics (a required course) and Vibration Analysis (a technical elective
al. [10] 2004 Campus Instructor Led Curriculum change Climate Davis and Finelli 2007 Campus Instructor Led Service learning and [11] Climate undergraduate research Du and Kolmos 2009 Classroom Instructor Led Project based learning [12] Climate Paguyo et al. [13] 2015 Classroom Instructor Led Class activities for Climate retention Lee and 2016 Campus Instructor Led Co-curricular support Matusovich [14] Climate
discussed and showed that collaboration is “doable and critical to success”. Baker-Doyle3 described how teachers (especially new ones) can develop their Intentional ProfessionalNetworks for support. Research by Stump et al.4 indicated that collaborative learning strategieshelped students increase their self-efficacy in learning course materials. In the area of roboticseducation, Ren et al.5 surveyed over twelve syllabi from different universities and suggested aproblem/project based approach to foster creativity and insight about robotics in students. Other Page 23.341.2researchers also concurred in this approach such as Cappelleri6 , Correll
? In his book “Collaborate!”,Sanker2 discussed and showed that collaboration is “doable and critical to success”. Baker-Doyle3 described how teachers (especially new ones) can develop their Intentional ProfessionalNetworks for support. Research by Stump et al.4 indicated that collaborative learning strategieshelped students increase their self-efficacy in learning course materials. In the area of roboticseducation, Ren et al.5 surveyed over twelve syllabi from different universities and suggested a Page 21.24.2problem/project based approach to foster creativity and insight about robotics in students. Otherresearchers also concurred in this
Paper ID #29859Initiatives to financially, academically, and socially supportunderrepresented minorities in STEM disciplinesDr. Anitha Sarah Subburaj, West Texas A&M University Dr. Anitha Subburaj is an Assistant Professor at West Texas A&M University. She received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2014 from Texas Tech University, where she worked as a Research Assistant on the project, ”Advanced Battery Modeling and Evaluation”. She received her ME degree from Anna Uni- versity, India in 2007. She held a position as Assistant Professor, at Kumaraguru College of Technology, India for three years. Her areas
AC 2009-658: A VIDEO GAME FOR ENHANCING LEARNING INDIGITAL-SYSTEMS COURSESKaren Butler-Purry, Texas A&M University Dr. Karen Butler-Purry, a Professor and Associate Head in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at Texas A&M University (TAMU), serves as the PI for the project. Her research interests are in the areas of distribution automation and intelligent systems for power quality, equipment deterioration and fault diagnosis, and engineering education. Dr. Butler-Purry is a member of the Power Engineering Society, the American Society for Engineering Education, and the Louisiana Engineering Society. Dr. Butler-Purry has served on the TAMU Center for Teaching
Education at The Ohio State University. She holds degrees in Electrical Engineering (BS, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, and in Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include learning experiences in fundamental engineering courses and data-informed reflective practice. Michelle’s professional experience includes roles in industry and academia, having worked as a software engineer, project lead and manager before becoming Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Elec- trical Engineering at the Ateneo de Davao University.Dr. Tamoghna Roy, DeepSig Inc. Tamoghna Roy works as a Principal Engineer at DeepSig where he is responsible for creating
resources and research practices ● Providing consultations to biomedical engineering faculty, researchers, and students at each stage of the research life cycle, on topics such as research data management, scholarly publishing, grant development, and research integrity ● Partnering with faculty by actively contributing to research proposals and projects, curriculum development and delivery, and evidence-based decision makingThe size of the Biomedical Engineering program has increased and that has resulted in the BMEliaison librarian having an opportunity to focus more on the design of 100 level classes.Connections between the library and the BME department have always been strong, but now theapproach is more
AC 2012-5302: THE CPLD PROVIDES A THIRD OPTION IN THE IN-TRODUCTORY LOGIC CIRCUITS COURSEDr. Jonathan M. Hill, University of Hartford Jonathan Hill is an Associate Professor in electrical and computer engineering at the University of Hart- ford in Connecticut. He has a Ph.D. and M.S.E.E. from Worcester Polytechnic Inst. in Worcester, Mass., and was previously a Project Engineer at Digital Equipment Corp. He instructs graduate and undergrad- uate computer engineering computer courses, directs graduate research, and performs research involving embedded microprocessor based systems. His current projects involve small system design, signal pro- cessing, and intelligent instrumentation.Dr. Ying Yu, University of Hartford
study major prior to the start of theirfreshman year. To satisfy this objective, the cross-disciplinary course that was developed isbased on completing a software-driven, electro-mechanical engineering project that, at varioustimes and to various extents, calls upon students to function in the capacity of an electricalengineer, a mechanical engineer, a technician, a mathematician, a computer scientist, aresearcher and a communicator of technical material. In so doing, the students gain insight abouthow engineers combine knowledge from these diverse disciplines to solve a real problem—inthis case, constructing and characterizing a 2-DOF, servoed laser system used to trace arbitrarypatterns against a wall. Using an "inverted curriculum" approach