engineering institutions?This work-in-progress paper provides valuable insights into the experiences of faculty memberswho participated in a CoP focused on integrating an EM into their instructional practices usingSoTL. The exploration of these experiences serves as a guide for the advancement of effectivefaculty development programs. By investigating the challenges and benefits encountered byparticipants, the study aims to inform the design and facilitation of similar professionaldevelopment communities related to scholarship and SoTL.BackgroundScholarship of Teaching and LearningScholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) has emerged as a critical focus for educators inengineering education striving to enhance pedagogical practices and student
”. 3 LO 3 “Analyze the use of filters and their interpretation in the time and frequency domains and implement standard filters in hardware and/or software”. 4 LO 4 “Apply computations of the four fundamental Fourier transforms to the analysis and design of linear systems”. 5 LO 5 “Demonstrate professional communication through formal documents that communicate solutions to problems and document projects within the domain of signals and systems”.The GUEST approach toward offering office hours (Greet, Understand, Explain, Share, Thank) ispromised to students in the welcome slides shown on the first day of class (Figure 1). This modelis adapted from
for the Center of Enhancement for Engineering Diversity where she taught a seminar for first-year female engineering students and coordinated precollege outreach events. As a researcher, she has previously served as a Graduate Research Assistant on the VT PEERS project studying middle school students reg- ularly engaging in engineering activities. In addition, she dedicates her spare time to exhibiting at the Virginia Tech Science Festival and hosting several sessions for the Kindergarten-to-college (K2C) Initia- tive.Dr. Jacob R Grohs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical
which may facilitate theinnovation and life-long learning necessary within the community of practice[12-14]. It should notbe surprising then that PBL and other student-centered pedagogical methods are being employedin a range of engineering curricula including chemical engineering, biomedical engineering andcivil engineering[15-17]. Evidence from PBL applications in engineering curricula suggests thatPBL based education may have a limited effect on student performance when measured usingtraditional assessment tools such as exams, but the data suggest a marked improvement in theability of learners to embrace the complexity and challenge of real-world engineeringproblems[15, 16]. Yet, PBL is less well documented within environmental engineering
Texas at El Paso Veronica A. Carrillo is a staff member at The University of Texas at El Paso who provides administrative and project management support. She earned a BBA in Management Information Systems from the University of Notre Dame. Beyond her professional responsibilities, Veronica is deeply passionate about civic engagement. Her involvement in her neighborhood association provides helpful insights into community building and engagement strategies that support the university’s mission to enhance student success. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: A Knowledge Graph to Share and Discover High-Impact Practices and Support Decision-Making
and development of strategies to use in the classroom. His teaching philosophy includes building a strong learning community within each class and the use of high-impact practices to engage and challenge his students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Improving Student Writing Outcomes Through Dynamic Feedback, Design Oriented Projects and Curriculum ModificationAbstractTechnical writing is an important skill for engineers that is often cited by employers as aweakness among college graduates entering professional practice. Students are often admitted toengineering programs based on capacity for learning STEM topics and with less regard forreading and writing ability
2020, few expectedthe COVID-19 outbreak in the United States. After the national emergency of the COVID-19pandemic was declared, universities in the United States took drastic measures to close campusand use the spring break week for preparing and switching teaching online. The fast growth oftechnology has laid the ground for online teaching [1] [7]. However, there are still a lot ofuncertainties about the impact of distance learning on students’ learning effectiveness [6], andthe forced online teaching and learning during the Covid-19 pandemic is one of those emergingtopics [4] [5]. Given the narrow time window for this transition, Rochester Institute ofTechnology (RIT) provides the instructors with three alternative approaches to deliver the
several personal and academic challenges during their transitionto college and may be more likely to depart college in response to those challenges. Collegemeans a new lifestyle and a new level of independence and responsibility that some students arenot totally ready to accept and face and this has a direct impact on their overall collegeexperience [7]. Retention in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)majors remains a national priority to meet the employment demands within the STEM fields [8].To provide support to these students during this phase of their life, pre-college academicactivities, specifically, engaging with active learning activities and fostering learningcommunities have been identified as programmatic elements
AC 2012-3435: RE-ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF SUMMER CAMP ONSTEM ENROLLMENTS USING AN INNOVATIVE SURVEY STRATEGYDr. Gary L. Winn, West Virginia University Gary Winn is Co-PI on a five-year NSF STEP-1 project at West Virginia University. His research team has been active investigating the effects of STEM recruitment strategies on enrollments of Appalachian students into STEM fields, particularly engineering. Page 25.1097.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Re-Assessing the Effects of Summer Camp on the STEM Enrollments Using an Innovative Survey
acts and male engineering students engaging in fewer self-promotional and more modest speech acts, then a more collaborative environment could bedeveloped within the team,11,15-17 which may raise overall peer evaluation scores.Rosser16-17 promotes a transformation of the engineering/science curriculum that may lead to aninterdisciplinary approach that uses both qualitative and quantitative methods, removes biasesbased on the views of one gender or social class, and places solutions in view of the impact onsociety. These would lead to greater value placed on a design project’s solution, which providespositive reinforcement to the dynamics of the successful design team.Team Performance Based on Other Types of DifferencesThe experience of
students of color [3], [4], [5], increase job satisfaction [6], and be best served by a variety of mentors at different stages [7], [8]. Impactful projects show students the relevance of their disciplines to the world and improve retention by engaging them in important work early in their academic careers. Projects that emphasize the relevance of the STEM fields through helping people have been shown to increase the retention of students in STEM fields [9], [10], [11] and are particularly effective for women and ethnic minorities when used in the their freshman year [12], [13]. Community-engagement projects have also been shown to improve students’ attitudes towards civic-mindedness when used on
as potential impacts on the workforce andsociety.The instructor selects 6 contemporary topics such as Made in China 2025 8 , augmented reality 9 ,ManufacturingUSA Institutes 10 , artificial intelligence, Internet of things 11 and Industry 4.0 12 .Each student is assigned one of these topics. Each student is required to prepare a shortPowerPoint presentation (5 slides) and a 1-page report to explore four questions given by theinstructor. At the end of the semester, two lectures are used for student presentations. Each lecturecan accommodate three 15-min presentations. The instructor randomly selects a student fromeach topic to make a class presentation using his/her slides. All submitted reports and slides aregraded using a rubric (Appendix
dialogue that can lead to the implementation ofinnovative programs for first-year engineering students. Such topics include developingeffective advising techniques, creating learning communities, using technology in the classroom,and addressing the needs of students from diverse backgrounds.For the past two years, a first-year engineering workshop entitled Dialogue on EngineeringEducation: the Role of the First Year has been held at the University of Notre Dame to engageengineering educators on these and other topics. It was conceived as a way for those involved infirst-year programs to discuss current pedagogical approaches and to engage in an open dialogueon issues that pertain specifically to first year engineering education. The workshop
towards doctoral degree persistence and explored to what extent the findings might differfor students at HBCUs and PWIs.2. MethodA path analysis was used to evaluate the affect of faculty interaction on engineering confidenceand doctoral degree persistence by addressing the research questions in section 2.1. Path analysiswas conceptualized as a means for studying the direct and indirect impacts of measured variableson other measured variables considered to be effects.10, 11 Page 25.1337.3 2 2.1 Research questions 1. When comparing
documentation that students’learning outcomes are being met [1]. Teaming is one of the outcomes – and it is one of therequirements which is difficult to “prove.” The challenges of meeting this learning requirementwere only heightened during the pandemic. To support a rapid shift in course modality, studentswere often tasked with using a wide range of software tools with a myriad of permutations. Thedisjointed nature of the software tools was further exacerbated when students were asked tocollaborate in a virtual team setting. As such, students devoted cognitive load not only to thetasking at hand for assignments but also to organizing files, communicating with teammates, andmanaging tasks in virtual team-based activities [2].Similar studies have been
presented in this paperpoint to many students describing relatively good psychological safety, to explore how studentdiversity and participation on specific teams impact the results, we further analyze andcontextualize the survey data and will conduct future research using interviews. In particular, weare interested in exploring how psychological safety and team culture are related and howminoritized students experience working on diverse teams. We plan on using these findings toimprove inclusivity on student-organized teams and to promote awareness of concerns related tostudent psychological safety among project advisors.Literature ReviewTeam formation and function has been studied in engineering classrooms for decades [3–5].Some research also
strategies employed by institutions of higher education,are well known to contribute positively to student engagement and success and have bothcumulative and compensatory effects [3]. Service-learning is an established high-impact practiceand has shown to contribute to a deeper understanding of community needs as well as deepersubject knowledge [4]. Traditionally engineering curricula have employed service-learningcourses less frequently [5], however, recent research suggests that faculty are embracing thispedagogy as an effective means of applying engineering knowledge to assist community partnerswith challenging problems [6].Curriculum DescriptionWSE 381: Service-Learning in STEM is a one-credit course for juniors and seniors designed tointegrate
EE majors, which focuses exclusivelyon electrical engineering content. Approximately 140 students per year move through thiscourse, which has had a significant impact on boosting retention within that major. To this end,the Microsystems and Nanotechnology (MSNT) program at UW-Platteville implemented a one-credit lab for freshmen MSNT majors in Spring 2012. Since this is a new degree program, thepurpose of this course is as much retention as it is exposure and recruitment of students to enrollin either the major or minor in MSNT.The instructional goal of this course is rather straightforward: to expose students to severalaspects of both microsystems and nanotechnology; to engage students in hands-on activities inboth sub-fields; to excite
which the surveys are deployed can impact responserates.AcknowledgementsThe work reported herein was funded, in part, by the Kern Family Foundation. We are grateful to all thefaculty that have deployed the modules in their courses and assisted in the collection of feedback. Specialthanks to Professor Cheryl Li for her on going contribution towards promoting and measuring anentrepreneurial mindset of all our students.References[1]. Engineering Unleashed, “The Framework” https://engineeringunleashed.com/framework (AccessedFeb 1, 2022).[2]. Harichandran, R. S., & Carnasciali, M., & Erdil, N. O., & Li, C. Q., & Nocito-Gobel, J., & Daniels,S. D. (2015, June), Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in Engineering Students by
disability impact disabled student experiencesin the engineering classroom?Conceptual Framework Critical Disability Theory [CDT] (Hall, 2019) and the Design Justice framework(Costanza-Chock, 2020) were used as lenses to guide our research. CDT is a framework used forthe analysis of disability through the centering of disability and challenging of ableistassumptions surrounding disability. CDT describes disability as the complex relationshipbetween the medical contributions of disability and the barriers imposed on the concept ofdisability by the social environment (Hosking, 2008). The Design Justice Framework analyzeshow design works to benefit and burden different groups of people by elucidating how designreproduces and/or challenges the
.) and how the experience gained from those moments is important to their development aspracticing professionals, effective mentors, and strong leaders. From these milestones, weidentified common themes and experiences, including the impact on students’ cognitive andprofessional identity development.Milestones were identified based on the forum for the experience such as classroom coursework,university-sponsored projects, extracurricular activities, student mentorship, and internshipexperiences. In addition, we examined each milestone to determine the types of skills/learningand professional competencies students identified as a result of each experience. The resultsoffer a fascinating snapshot of how and where students recognize and value the
, analyzing and improving organizational systems. He is internationally recognized, has contributed to scholarship more than 150 articles, presentations, books and reviews on software development methodologies, management, organizational change, and program management. Dr. Springer sits on many university and community boards and advisory committees. He is the recipient of numerous awards and recognitions; most recently he was awarded the Purdue University, College of Technology, Equity, Inclusion and Advocacy Award. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State
creative physical products. Our campus Makerspace islocated within the College of Computing and Informatics. Since Fall 2016, it has been open forgeneral use by the entire university community (∼ 30K students), as well as the on-campusengineering early college high school (∼ 400 students). The Makerspace is equipped with a widevariety of fabrication tools and is a specialized laboratory to support peer-driven informal STEMlearning and foster a community of practice [2] around Making.We are investigating the educational impacts of our on-campus Makerspace through anexploratory research project that focuses on a socially-relevant challenge problem: designing andfabricating prosthetic hands for children. The project is in partnership with a regional
clubs and one-dayengineering programs. There is some evidence of the success of these programs. STEM outreachefforts toward female students are common at Texas Tech University; however, there have beenfewer efforts to target their male counterparts who have been underrepresented in the STEMdisciplines, and it was decided that this program should focus on that male population. Aparticular objective of the program was to provide a hands-on learning environment thatencouraged minds-on engagement. Many programs adopt hands-on approaches but may lack thedeep engagement that promotes conceptual understanding. A further challenge is to provide anentertaining environment while retaining extensive content.During Active STEM, program participants learned
engineering activities tofoster not only critical thinking and problem solving but also the 21st century skills ofcommunication and collaboration that need considerable attention in a special needs class. Theessential question addressed in this paper is “Do students improve their 21st century skills as aresult of their engagement in engineering activities?”3The specific skills of communication and collaboration were selected for analysis because thesoon after the PISA2 in-class support sessions began in October, 2010, the teacher of the classnoticed that the students’ behavior was considerably more appropriate and focused when theywere working on engineering activities. Therefore, she and the CIESE staff member beganobserving and documenting
Paper ID #42445Exploring an Intervention to Increase Psychological Safety on Student EngineeringDesign TeamsJenn Campbell, University of Arkansas Jenn Campbell is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. She studies engineering and design and is specifically interested in how engineers think, how they work on teams, and how this impacts social and environmental sustainability. Before going to grad school, Jenn worked in engineering and marketing for 9 years which sparked many of her research and teaching interests. She received her undergraduate degrees in mechanical engineering and
outcomes. She is currently serving as Co-PI for several funded projects examining the impact of various engineering education models on student persistence, intentions, attitudes, etc.Joseph H Holles, University of WyomingJingfang Ren, Michigan Technological University Jingfang Ren’ is currently an Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Technical Communication in the De- partment of Humanities at Michigan Tech. Her research interests include technical communication theory and practice, rhetorical theory, visual rhetoric, research design, and intercultural and international com- munication.Ted W Lockhart, Michigan Technological University Adjunct Professor of Philosophy, Michigan Technological University, 2010-present
and academic success of engineering students is a critical issuethat will generate a profound impact upon the nation‟s economy and prosperity.1 According tothe American Society of Engineering Education, enrollment in baccalaureate programs increased14% between 2000 and 2005, but the number of engineering graduates remained relativelyunchanged since 2005.2 The demand for qualified engineering graduates will grow 11% between2008 and 2018 based on the most recent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projections.3 Therefore,preparing a qualified engineering workforce is a national issue particularly since the scientificand technological leadership of the U.S. has “experienced a gradual erosion”4 of its position.Considering the critical role played by
andBusiness.AssessmentThe current project courseware and assessment of its impact was evaluated via a variety ofsatisfaction assessment and examination instruments and transparent analytics tools. Only a briefsummary of the important results is provided here as detailed data and statistical interpretationare provided elsewhere in Refs.26-32.1. Quantitative Assessment Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy: All students were given a multiple-choice final examination. The examination questions were not exactly the same at all fourinstitutions because the syllabus and approach in the course differed at each institution.However, more than 50% of the questions were common on these examinations and coveredboth the lower-three and higher-three levels outlined by Bloom and colleagues
Student Outcome (2) regarding students’ ability to design systems, components,1 https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-technology-programs-2019-2020/or processes for well-defined engineering technology problems appropriate to the discipline. Ourassessment model relies on a direct assessment method called performance appraisal using ascoring rubric, and it has been successfully used to assess both the Program Criteria and the newStudent Outcome (2). We believe that our method of incorporating assessment as regular courseactivities helps achieve the ultimate objective of education, i.e., continuous and constantimprovement of students’ competencies and learning experiences.The rest of the paper