Paper ID #19736Keeping Current: An Update on the Structure and Evaluation of a Programfor Graduate Women Interested in Engineering AcademiaMs. Nicole D. Jackson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Nicole D. Jackson is a third-year PhD student in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), and is a member of Megan Konar’s group. Her research focuses on applying big data to understand the food-water nexus to promote food security. Also, she is currently a co-coordinator for the Illinois Female Engineers in Academia Training program as well as the
be suitable for senior undergraduateresearchers, particularly for those who intend to continue into graduate study. The twoundergraduate students are interested in pursuing graduate degrees in Mechanical Engineering.Both have committed to continue working on their projects and will complete their projects fortheir master’s thesis in the future.Design and characterization of 3D printable nanocomposite materialsThe design and development of multifunctional composites have been an interesting research topicthat attracts significant attention in the last decade. Three undergraduate students have beenrecruited in an independent research project focused on the design, development, andcharacterization of nanoparticles reinforced composites. The
Doten-Snitker, University of Washington Ms. Doten-Snitker is a Graduate Research Assistant at the University of Washington’s Center for Eval- uation and Research for STEM Equity, where she is part of a team conducting evaluation research for university-level educational and professional training, with a focus on increasing equity and participation of underrepresented and minority students and professionals. She has contributed to evaluation research for a range of programs funded by the NSF, NIH, and USAID. Additionally, she is a Doctoral Candidate in Sociology at the University of Washington, where her scholarship focuses on political processes of inclusion and exclusion.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute
Paper ID #33167Enhancing the Teaching of Research Ethics Through Emotional Priming withEncounters with Patients and ReflectionDr. Ashley J. Earle, York College of Pennsylvania Ashley is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical and Civil Engineering department at York College of Pennsylvania. She received her B.S in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and B.A. in International Studies from Lafayette College. She then pursued her passion for neuromuscular disease research at Cornell University where she received her PhD in Biomedical Engineering. At York, she is passionate about developing pedagogy that encourages students
communicationskills and discovering a passion for research leading to graduate school [8-11]. Engagement incollaborative research and multi-disciplinary networking through such early encounters maypositively affect retention and time to degree [12]. Furthermore, several studies show thesignificant role undergraduate research plays in broadening the diversity of the STEM workforce[11, 13-15].At Penn State, students are not permitted to be in a research experience on a volunteer basis. Theunderstanding is that students should earn something beyond experience through their researchengagement. Volunteering students would add a vulnerability to faculty who could not properlydocument the mentorship and service they added to the student in a quantifiable manner
since 1999. His research interests are in modeling and analysis of complex systems and processes, simulation and visualization, and their applications in manufacturing, healthcare, energy, and information systems. He teaches a number of courses in these areas at the under- graduate and graduate levels, and has developed several of these courses. He is currently leading the effort in designing a new undergraduate program in Data Engineering. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Indus- trial and Systems Engineers (IISE). He served in the Board of the Computer and Information Systems Division of IISE, serves as an Associate Editor of IISE Transactions on Healthcare System Engineering, and is an ABET Program Evaluator for
transform our educational system to better prepare students to livein and address this changing world [10].MethodologyIn this study, the researchers conducted a survey of undergraduate and graduate students from twouniversities, Kennesaw State University (KSU) and the University of Colorado Denver (CUDenver), in construction. The objective of the survey is to figure out how students think aboutsustainable design and construction, also how sustainable education affects students. The surveytime was October 2020 and conducted a survey to the students through Qualtrics Software. Afterthe students finish the survey, data were exported to excel, and then tables and charts wasdeveloped. And compare the data for both universities and analysis the
nanotechnology in China focuses on graduate education based on researchactivities in their universities and research centers. Currently, there are no nanotechnologyprograms in China at the undergraduate level except for programs in materials science,microelectronics, etc.USA is in the leadership role in the world in the field of nanotechnology because of its Page 12.1250.3commitment, investment, and dedication of its scientists and engineers. The United States is alsoin the forefront in nano science and technology education because of funding assistance from theNational Science Foundation (NSF), the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network(NNIN), and
development. In the future it might be possible to develop a course of study thatwould incorporate all necessary skills so that knowledgeable interns could take positions ofseveral months in the Park supporting this unique virtual preservation project.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge the financial support for this project provided by the University ofMaine through the School of Engineering Technology, the 2003 Faculty Research FundCommittee, and the Division of Lifelong Learning; the National Park Service; the Friends of theVirgin Islands National Park; the Virgin Islands Humanities Council.1 Anestis Koutsoudis, Fotis Arnaoutoglou and Christodoulos Chamzas, “On 3D reconstruction of the old city ofXanthi. A minimum budget approach to virtual
Page 14.1370.2changing collective cultures and identities within different student organizations on apredominately white, research university campus.MethodologyThe analysis undertaken here is part of the study “Portraying Success Among URM EngineeringMajors,” an interdisciplinary effort to identify, compare, and contrast the factors contributing toacademic success in engineering of students from different underrepresented minority (URM)populations. While many of the study’s publications seek to describe differences and similaritiesof experiences among the different groups,9-12 this paper is one of several seeking to describe thenuanced differences found among students within the same racial/ethnic categorization.13, 14Using a semi-structured
-April timeframe, summerinternship workshops for students are conducted to raise awareness of these opportunities.4.0 Tangible Outcomes and Knowledge DisseminationIt is expected that the graduate fellows develop and test decision-support tools, case studies andcomputational models as part of their research during the program. Due to the holistic andinterdisciplinary nature of the proposed effort, technology transfer will take place by makingavailable the computer codes, simulations and decision-making tools to the public. The fellowsare furnished with the knowledge and training to develop computational and theoretical schemesto model and optimize bioenergy/water systems/designs. The Decision Support System (DSS)will cover the broad range of
the thermodynamic and conservation didactic material of the course allows theintroduction of complex issues of the personal and professional ethics of the practice ofbiomedical engineering in the form of challenges, such as the one posed by the quote above fromthe movie The Insider.1 In this example, the responsible conduct of research and responsibilitiesof a corporation to the general public is discussed while studying the process of biomedicaldevice and drug development. This example is one of several ethical and practice issues that thiscourse addresses. Each ethical issue is introduced in the context of an analytic topic.PHILOSOPHY OF APPROACH“There is no accepted definition of intelligence. Is it thinking speed, reasoning ability,memory
Paper ID #17860Catalyzing a Research Agenda for Enhancing Engineering Education throughInstitutional CollaborationsDr. Keith W. Buffinton, Bucknell University Keith W. Buffinton is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and former Dean of the College of Engi- neering at Bucknell University. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Tufts and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford. Following his graduate studies, he worked as a post-doctoral researcher in the Institute for Mechanics at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland. From 2001 through 2004 he served as co-director of Bucknell’s
skills, independentgroup effort and team work. The program was well received by both the faculty and students.The Office of Institutional Planning and Research undertook a study as part of the assessmentplans. The study compared the impact of the two courses in order to find out the affect of theFED course (as compared to the Engineering Graphics course) on engineering student graduationrates and the affect on academic performance, in general, and in English, Mathematics andEngineering, in particular. The study analyzed outcomes for students who took the EngineeringGraphics course in the 1992-93 or the FED course in the 1993-94.The study showed that there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.01 level) betweenstudent’s EG and FED
have authored over 150 peer-reviewed technical articles and two have been recognized as best papers in American Society of Mechanical Engineers journals. He is a Fellow of ASME. Ali has taught 11 different courses and leads an engineering- based study abroad course in Brazil as well as the jointly-funded NSF-DoD REU site on Hypersonics (HYPER). Ali is well-known for engaging undergraduates in research, and he is UCF’s 2019 Champion of Undergraduate Research inaugural awardee. At UCF and in the broader higher education community, Ali focuses his efforts on expanding the pipeline of graduate students qualified to pursue careers in academia. Just before joining UCF as an Assistant Professor, he earned a PhD in Mechanical
improving it. The general approach of this project is to develop research-‐based curricular materials for use in mechanics of materials courses. A cohort of approximately 20 university and community college instructors will then implement, assess and improve the developed materials. Ongoing research on student understanding of fundamental concepts in mechanics of materials will help support the development of those materials. The graduate students and PI’s conducting this research at Washington State University will also provide support and resources to assist the project team as they implement and assess the newly developed materials. This small
directors of utilizing student long-term tracking methods forevaluating program effectiveness. With access to a large-scale state-level student database, this studylooks at RET programs' long-term impact in Texas on high school student graduation rates andundergraduate STEM major selection rates. Using the Texas Education Research Center database, wewere able to identify RET teachers’ students stretching back to the inception of the NanotechnologyRET at Rice University and examine the RET program's impact on a large scale.The purpose of this study was to compare high school student graduation rates and undergraduateSTEM major selection rates across gender, race, and ethnicity to a comparison sample. Thecomparison determined the Rice University RET
Paper ID #7047Work in Progress:Developing an integrated motion capture and video record-ing for pediatric biomechanical studiesDr. Mohammad Habibi, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Habibi is an assistant professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at the Minnesota State University-Mankato. He received his undergraduate and graduate degrees in Electrical Engineering. Fol- lowing his postdoctoral appointments at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, he joined the Iron Range Engineering (IRE) Program in August 2011. The IRE is an innovative, 100% project-based, upper division engineering program located in
how the academic knowledge they gain in their studies can beused to solve real-world problems. They learned to work as a team to accomplish more than anyone of them could have accomplished otherwise. Some of them gained the experience ofpresenting the results of their research in written, oral, and poster presentations at conferences,and they had the encouragement of awards recognizing the value of their efforts. The positiveimpact of this project is perhaps best seen in the fact that the students were encouraged by theirinvolvement in this project to continue toward graduate studies involving research in geophysics.Thus, the North State Gold Mine Project fulfilled the main goal of the Talent 21 Program, topromote SMET careers among minority
from a set of 24 available interviews to analyze thechosen topic of mentorship more specifically amongst a manageable size of interviews. The fullset of interviews was from the SPRITE, Student Perspectives on Research Identity andTransformation of Epistemologies, research project. The goal of SPRITE, a 5 yearlong study, isto better understand undergraduate researchers’ identity and epistemic thinking developmentthrough research experiences. For the larger project, 24 interviews were conducted (20 withundergraduates and 4 with graduate students). The interviews were conducted over thetimeframe of two consecutive academic years. Each interviewee was chosen from an initialphase one survey, which lead to a semi-structured interview in the second
challenges associated with incorporating research into undergraduate classes.This paper presents a series of course-specific approaches with comments about their effect onstudent learning. Diverse experiences from six courses in five STEM disciplines and one inglobal security and intelligence provide ideas from previously tested methods for incorporatingresearch. The total of seven classes included in this study had a total of 341 students rangingfrom the second to the fourth year. Admittedly, the small size of the university andcorrespondingly small class sizes (less than 30) made it easier to maintain contact with students,improving monitoring and feedback
ZJU have founded more than 100 public companies. ZJU’sgraduates also account for 80% of owners of science and technology business in the city ofHangzhou. Since 2012, graduates from ZJU have founded over 1,700 science and technologycompanies in the National High-tech Industry Development District in Hangzhou. As a result,graduates from ZJU have been recognized as one of four major entrepreneurial forces in the Province(the other three are the “Alibaba” corporate group, “Zhejiang merchants,” and “EntrepreneursReturning from Oversea”).3.2 Case Study of Xi’an Jiaotong University (XJTU)Located in Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, Xi’an Jiaotong University (XJTU) is a comprehensive, nationalkey research university with traditional strengths in science and
abundant qualitative research looking at the obstacles faced by women and girlswho have an interest in and aptitude for engineering. These studies have provided insight intowhy women either did not complete their engineering majors or did not go on to engineeringcareers.The need to assess the effect of faculty on the number of women graduates is highlighted by thefact that a review of the literature on women engineering students by Waychal et al. found onlynine articles out of 69 dealt with faculty and only three of the nine addressed stereotypes orculture. [2]This paper uses a quantitative measure to show a possible cause of the stagnation of womenengineering graduates is the climate of universities and academic departments that have a
Texas A&M University.Ms. Maria Polyzoi, Texas A&M University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Pilot Study: Impact of Coaching in Leadership Development for Engineering Undergraduate StudentsAbstractHow much will students perceive themselves to grow in various leadership competencies afterworking with a coach? As a pilot study, the Zachry Leadership Program in the College ofEngineering at Texas A&M University offered coaching as an optional activity for students andrecent graduates of the program, and 24 people accepted. These participants met with theircoach approximately three times during the fall 2020 semester using
the time I was anxious to apply my knowledge of thermo/fluid sciences and mechanical design toward a real world application/engineering project, as well as learn more about renewable energy. The UTC project provided that experience allowing me to gain knowledge in passive solar energy systems and experience in conducting experimental research. Overall I feel fortunate to have the opportunity to be part of this project. I have learned more than I imagined at the beginning of the project and I have already applied some of these skills toward my graduate research. -Student ResearcherNext, an experimental plan was developed to obtain the
. Peter Golding, University of Texas at El Paso Director, Center for Research in Engineering & Technology Education (CREaTE) and Professor in the Department of Engineering and Leadership at UTEP.Dr. Diane Elisa Golding, University of Texas at El Paso Diane is a passionate educator and proponent for K-12 engineering education and the education of future teachers. She is a professor in the College of Education at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). She earned her undergraduate and graduate degrees from UTEP and holds a doctorate from the Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.Dr. Scott A. Starks, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Starks is a Professor of Engineering Leadership
Paper ID #29312A Study of Secondary Teachers’ Perceptions of Engineers and Conceptionsof EngineeringEmel Cevik, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr
, they receive their 2-page project summary and are contacted by their faculty and graduate student mentors to discuss their summer project, answer questions, and receive additional background material that will enhance their knowledge of the project prior to their first day in the laboratory. iii. Orientation - At the beginning of program, students participate in a rigorous 2-day orientation to bring the entire cohort to a shared understanding of: research, scientific ethics, laboratory safety, conducting literature reviews, data treatment and analysis, UC Berkeley’s campus and resources, and energy-themed research at the three hosting NSF- funded Centers. iv. Growth seminars - Growth is one
mainly involved in identifying the research questions for the projectsand making decisions about how the results of the research-focused projects will beimplemented. This paper presents a replication of a model focused on university-communitycollaboration, student engagement and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)attraction and retention using three research-focused projects addressing community needs. Thethree projects are (1) empathic design project aimed at improving quality greenspaces andpedestrian streetscape experience, (2) food justice project to study the disparities in food accessbetween local regions, and (3) analyzing water quality in a local creek. The projects provided aunique opportunity for students to directly
teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Matthew Charles GrahamMadison E. Andrews, University of Texas at Austin Madison Andrews is a STEM Education doctoral student, Mechanical Engineering master’s student, and graduate research assistant for the Center for Engineering Education at the University of Texas at Austin. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University in 2017.Dr. Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon Jenefer Husman received a doctoral degree