, University of Missouri, Kansas City Dr. Michelle Maher explores student research, teaching, and disciplinary writing skill development and higher education access and equity issues. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reaching Consensus: Using Group Concept Mapping in an S-STEM Research TeamAbstractThis study was done to explore Group Concept Mapping (GCM) as a method to reach consensusfor data collection using document analysis in an S-STEM research team. The team wascomprised of five members and the GCM approach was made up of six steps: (1) Preparation,(2) Generation, (3) Structuring, (4) Analysis, (5) Interpretation, and (6) Usage. The members ofthe
education to communities who lack access to higher education.Vincent Vu Thanh Tran, San Jose State University Vincent Tran is currently a junior at San Jose State University pursuing a Bachelors in Mechanical Engi- neering. His research interest include mechatronics and biomedical technology.Mr. Moises Arturo Vieyra, Canada College I am an undergraduate student at Canada College ready to transfer to a 4 year University. My future plan is to get my bachelors degree in civil engineering and work my way to creating my own company.Mr. Alec William Maxwell, San Francisco State University Alec Maxwell is currently a graduate student in the School of Engineering at San Francisco State Uni- versity (SFSU). Besides actively
thermalimaging, strobe tachometer, integrated thermocouples, flow meters, and pressure gauges withinthe subsystems.Project Student Learning OutcomesFor all Mechanical Engineering majors and most if not all engineering majors, a core curriculumrequirement is a course on thermodynamics to graduate. At Drexel University, mechanicalengineering and engineering technology majors must fulfil this requirement during sophomoreyear. STAR students are recruited at the conclusion at their freshman year. Consequently, as afreshman, rising sophomore, the student will be getting a head start on the material of the courseby working on and completing this research project.During undergraduate research projects, students gain in-depth knowledge in a particular area
Paper ID #30255WIP: First-year Engineering Students’ Study Strategies and TheirAcademic PerformanceAhmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ahmed Ashraf Butt is a doctoral student at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. He is currently working as a research assistant on the CourseMIRROR project funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). He is interested in designing educational tools and exploring their impact on enhancing students’ learning experiences. Before Purdue University, Ahmed has worked as a lecturer for two years at the University of Lahore, Pakistan. Additionally, he has
Engineering from Queen’s Univer- sity, Kingston, Canada with a research focus on engineering design education. He received his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical and Materials Engineering from Queen’s University. His research interests focus on interdisciplinary inquiry and collaboration, qualitative research methodology, and teaching and learning in higher education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Exploring ABET Self-Studies: A Look at Pedagogy, Assessment, and Evaluation of Life-Long LearningIntroductionABET’s standards for accreditation encourage curriculum development in engineering based onthe achievement of specific outcomes. Outcome-based curriculum
) programs in aneffort to more holistically develop future scientists and engineers as described above, but thevery asset of the apprenticeship, the highly-situated nature of the REU, presents challenges forprogram design. REU’s typically mirror the laboratory experience of advanced level graduates,with undergraduates working closely with graduate student mentors and situating knowledge inauthentic and novel research projects over a six-to-10-week summer program, as opposed tohighly structured classroom-style learning models. Historically, many REU’s heap theresponsibility of leading inexperienced undergraduates in learning and integrating into a newfield onto postdoctoral or graduate student mentors who often have “little preparation, support
content into graduate and undergraduatecourses. A combination of the factors led one researcher to the same conclusion “… faculty areoften discouraged from teaching blended courses.”4Current PracticeOnline and hybrid education has been studied extensively with particular scrutiny in the past 10years. A consistent thread within the more recent literature is that hybrid course designcombining face-to-face instruction with a variety of online instructional modalities increased orat a minimum maintained the attainment of the desired learning outcome when compared toeither 100% face-to-face or 100% online courses.5,6,7,13 These instructional modalities included"low stakes" evaluations12, recorded lectures4, online quizzes1, and other online
the students to feel that they learned a great deal, whether or not their hypotheseswere proven correct. For this reason, the author provides a list of research and design-oriented projectsto the students, rather than allowing the students to work on projects of their own choosing. These listsgenerally contain relatively simple problems for course final projects, and much more challengingproblems for capstone design, independent study, and graduate-level research. As expected, talentedstudents are encouraged to attack the more difficult (and often more interesting) problems, and lessinterested students are given projects which will help improve their understanding of the essential coursematerial. The next section describes a number of
choices, and academic and professional life experiences. Formaland informal mentoring programs for graduate and undergraduate students are also available.Mentoring has been proven to effectively increase the retention of female engineering students [22].Finally, funding is available, though WIEP, for graduate students to present their novel research atprofessional conferences.Extensive quantitative research on gender bias has been done. However, qualitative analysis of thetopic is still scarce, specifically research on how people in STEM responds to gender biasexperiences [17]. The goal of this study is to examine the strategies used by undergraduate andgraduate female engineering students in response to gender or stereotyping or bias in
Paper ID #28964WIP: A longitudinal study of students’ conceptual understanding ofsignals and systemsCaroline Crockett, University of Michigan Caroline Crockett is a graduate student at University of Michigan, working towards a PhD in electrical en- gineering and an engineering education research certificate. Her current research interests include image reconstruction and longitudinal conceptual understanding of signals and systems.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for
Page 22.1544.2Industry.10 The motivation for the study was based on the author’s 15 years at General Motors(including 10 years in industrial engineering and industrial engineering management), 28 yearsof teaching and consulting, and many years of commiserating among consultants and qualityprofessionals about difficulty penetrating the boardroom. The initial research was also motivatedby the QS-9000 mandated use of tools and statistical methods in the American automobileindustry.Survey ResearchA survey for executives in the American automobile industry was developed and tested forvalidity and reliability. The survey consisted of knowledge/use questions, demographicquestions, and organizational quality performance questions. Open ended questions
AC 2011-2360: INSTRUCT INTEGRATING NASA SCIENCE, TECHNOL-OGY, AND RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUM AND TRAIN-INGRam V. Mohan, North Carolina A&T State University (Eng) Dr. Ram Mohan is currently an Associate Professor with the interdisciplinary graduate program in com- putational science and engineering (CSE). He serves as the module content director for the INSTRUCT project. Dr. Mohan currently has more than 90 peer reviewed journal articles, book chapters and con- ference proceedings to his credit. He plays an active role in American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and serves as the chair of the ASME materials processing technical committee and a member of the ASME Nanoengineering Council Steering
leverage resources are heavily influenced by thecircumstances in which they find themselves [20-22].Considering the recognition that the entrepreneurial mindset is the result of a nuanced interplaybetween an individual's traits and their surrounding environment, modern studies generallycombine the two perspectives. Research in this area has also shown that an entrepreneurial attitudemay be fostered and cultivated through exposure to various learning environments and activities.The importance of interdisciplinary approaches and a spotlight on practical consequences forentrepreneurial education and practice is growing as entrepreneurship research and the study ofthe entrepreneurial mindset develop. Educators, parents, and politicians may all benefit
discipline and must work virtually to produce deliverables, another skill that hasbeen deemed necessary for industry [4]. The effectiveness of this type of interaction has beensuccessful—in a pilot cardiovascular engineering course where UG and graduate studentsworked together in teams. The study wanted to analyze if teams of students, including onlinestudents, could be just as successful as on-campus students. The study found that teams withonline students produced deliverables as successfully as teams who only met in person [4].Additional research specifically looked at a team of students in this course who faced a multitudeof barriers, such as varying in geographical location with students being in different time zones,and in educational
. Development of semester-long bio-nanotechnology research-based education (Bio-Nano III)As a third phase in this NUE project, a semester long research experience class related tobiomedical nanotechnology for a limited number of undergraduates was developed. High-performing undergraduate students from activity I and II were recruited to engage in semester-long research projects. Students received “Independent Study” or “Independent Research”course credit for this systematically mentored by NUE PIs and their graduate students. Thiscourse was offered as BMEN 570: Research Experience in Biomedical Nanotechnology and Page 26.673.12Engineering for
in thearea of Lab on a Chip. Additionally, student responses recorded at various time pointsthroughout the course identified research skills that were developed as a result of the project.IntroductionRecently, there has been significant interest in the enhancement of research skills forundergraduate biomedical engineering (BME) students. Such research skills are critical forstudents wishing to pursue graduate studies, academic careers, or industrial employment inresearch and development (R&D) positions.1 However, there are limited opportunities forresearch in undergraduate BME programs, and many of these experiences are extracurricular innature or are only available to a small percentage of students.2 For example, students maycomplete
AC 2010-1459: A SUMMER TRANSITIONAL PROGRAM FOR ANUNDERGRADUATE INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH PROJECT: PLANNINGAND ASSESSMENTPatricia Mellodge, University of Hartford Patricia Mellodge is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Hartford. She received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Rhode Island. Her graduate work was completed at Virginia Tech where she received an M.S. in Mathematics and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering. Research interests include control system design, mathematical modeling of microwave processing, and bio-instrumentation.Diane Folz, Virginia Tech Diane Folz is a Senior Research Associate and Laboratory
Technology 7/ Western Carolina University 8 AbstractThis is the fourth paper in the special panel session focusing on issues driving reform of faculty rewardsystems to advance professional engineering education for creative engineering practice and leadership oftechnological innovation to enhance U.S. competitiveness. This paper explores the conceptual beginningsof a template for improved faculty reward systems that better reflect the practice of engineering for full-time, tenure track professionally oriented faculty in schools of engineering and technology.1. Background and HistoryThe United States has built an excellent system of research-oriented graduate education that is second tonone for the
Paper ID #37345The Intersection of Culturally Responsive Pedagogy andEngineering Design in Secondary STEM (Research toPractice)Mariam Manuel Dr. Mariam Manuel is an Instructional Assistant Professor/Master Teacher for teachHOUSTON, a secondary STEM teacher preparation program in the Department of Mathematics at University of Houston. In addition to preservice STEM teacher education courses, Dr. Manuel teaches Physics for Middle School Teachers and has authored/taught graduate level coursework in Engineering Design Education, for the UH STEM Master’s program. Dr. Manuel serves on multiple grants and actively publishes and
Paper ID #34953A New Course Development in Usability Engineering: Hands-On LearningBased on Research WorkMrs. Enas Aref, Western Michigan University Mrs. Enas Aref is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Industrial Engineering Department at Western Michigan University. Mrs. Aref served as an instructor of several Engineering courses at the Graduate and Under- graduate levels. Mrs. Aref has a Master’s Degree in Project Management from Keller Graduate School of Management , a BSc. Mechanical Engineering, and is a certified Associate Ergonomics Professional Mrs. Aref has a 10+ years of experience in several engineering areas including
undergraduate engineering students'attitudes toward graduate studies” 1st Int. Conf. Research in Engineering Education, 2007.[4] G. M. Whitesides, “Whitesides’ group: writing a paper” Adv. Mater. 16(15):1375-7, 2004.[5] Wiki, as defined on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki[6] Wikispaces: http://www.wikispaces.com Page 24.944.8
Paper ID #28369Work in Progress: Pilot Study for the Effect of Simulated Laboratorieson the Motivation of Biological Engineering StudentsMr. Ryan P Devine, University of Georgia 3rd year Biomedical Engineering PhD student at the University of Georgia. Researching blood-material interactions to develop hemocompatible materials to improve the safety of surgical procedures. In addition to technical research, I have over 2 years of teaching experience and am pursuing an interdisciplinary certificate in university teaching.Dr. Dominik May, University of Georgia Dr. May is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education
, and academic integrity. Each process in the educational product ITBA can be explained via the format: inputs,process, and output. Thus, the rubrics from self-reflection are the objectives for theprocess-oriented analysis and improvement based on the following approach presented inTable 1. Table 1. The process approach to the Educational Program analysis. Inputs Processes Outputs motivation teaching and learning (methods and environment), graduates’ skills and knowledge, resources studies and research, employees’ feedback, delivered people academic integrity
-Learning) for approximately ten years. She has incorporated service-learning projects into her classes and laboratories since she started teaching in 2000. Her research interests include community engaged learning and pedagogy, K-12 outreach, biomaterials and materials testing and analysis.Dr. M. Suzanne Franco, Wright State University Professor of Statistics and Research, Leadership Studies in Education and Organizations, College of Ed- ucation and Human Services. Program Director for EdD in Organizational StudiesBrett Doudican, University of Dayton Brett Doudican is the curriculum coach of the NSF RET for Materials and Manufacturing program. He also is a full time math teacher and department chair at the Dayton Early
2006-1207: CURRENT RESEARCH THRUSTS IN CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTALENGINEERING AND IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATION: A BIG 10+PERSPECTIVERonald Harichandran, Michigan State University Ronald Harichandran is professor and chairperson of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan State University (MSU). He has been chairperson since 1995 and is a Fellow of ASCE. His department leads the largest engineering-based study abroad programs in the country. He currently serves on the ASCE Department Heads Council Executive Committee, the Accreditation Committee of the ASCE Committee on Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice, and the ASCE Body of Knowledge II Committee. He is the
for decades now. In the past, STEM fields have resulted in the U.S. accounting for40% of all research and development, 35% of science and engineering publishing, and 44% ofscience and engineering citations, while employing one-third of the world’s scientists andengineers [2]. However, this intellectual capital is now the focus of other nations because of thelack of interest of the American youth towards science and engineering [3]. The President’sCouncil of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) report corroborates this and highlightsthe need for 1 million more college graduates in STEM fields [4]. In response to this need, the 2STEM
The Minorities in Engineering Division (MIND)- Division 70Encourage Students with Physical Disabilities to Study Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology: Program ACCESS Ali Mehrabian, Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Arizona John T. Olson, IBM Georgia Ehlers, Graduate College, The University of Arizona David Lovelock, Department of Mathematics, The University of ArizonaI. IntroductionStudents with physical disabilities are underrepresented in science, mathematics, engineering,and technology (SMET). According to the National Science Foundation
Paper ID #41053Exploring Teamwork Experiences in Collaborative Undergraduate Research(REU) Programs through Tuckman’s Group Development TheorySakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University Sakhi Aggrawal is a Graduate Research Fellow in Computer and Information Technology department at Purdue University. She completed her master’s degree in Business Analytics from Imperial College London and bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Technology and Organizational Leadership from Purdue University. She worked in industry for several years with her latest jobs being as project manager at Google and Microsoft. Her current research
Paper ID #38314STEM Identity Development for Under-represented Studentsin a Research Experience for UndergraduatesGillian Roehrig (Professor)Ngawang Gonsar Ngawang Y. Gonsar, PhD. Biology Faculty, Normandale Community College, Minnesota.Alison Haugh Nowariak (Graduate Student STEM Education Researcher) Alison Haugh Nowariak is a Ph.D candidate at the University of Minnesota in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. She is also a STEM specialist teacher for K-5th grade students in ISD 196 in Minnesota. Prior to working in the schools and attending the University of Minnesota, she worked as an undergraduate
Paper ID #22953New Engineers’ First Three Months: A Study of the Transition from Cap-stone Design Courses to WorkplacesChris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech Chris Gewirtz is PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests revolve around how culture, history and identity influence assumptions made by engineers in their design practice, and how to change assumptions to form innovative and socially conscious engineers. He is particularly interested in humanitarian engineering design, where many traditional engineering assumptions fall apart.Dr. Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder