Paper ID #18406Classical Engineering Education Revisited - Why it MattersProf. Claudio da Rocha Brito, Science and Education Research Council Dr. Claudio da Rocha Brito is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Currently is the Pres- ident of IEEE Education Society, President of Science and Education Research Council (COPEC), Pres- ident of Fishing Museum Friends Society (AAMP), President of (Brazilian) National Monitoring Com- mittee of ”Internationale Gesellschaft f¨ur Ingenieurp¨adagogik” (IGIP), Vice President of International Council for Engineering and Technology Education (INTERTECH), Vice President of
- Constructionarium, UK University and Industry PartnershipGraham et al.4 found that all eight universities‟ leadership programmes were hosted within theengineering school and that all followed a projects-based approach. The programmes consistedmostly of articulated outcomes (88 %) and, therefore, most activities were curriculum based(75%). Students were exposed to campus based hands-on projects and faculty members (75%)provided mentoring in the majority of the programs. The information from Graham et al.4 wasapplied to develop the new WELA LDP. A summary of the most significant activities or themesacross the eight university programmes is provided in Table 2. Table 2 is adapted from Grahamet al.‟s 4 original summary to illustrate only the most popular (50
staff members)school that offers undergraduate and graduate programs in a number of engineering disciplines(biomedical, chemical, civil, computer, electrical, environmental, mechanical, software) and incomputer science. Because of the bilingual nature of the University of Ottawa, students canchoose to complete their studies in either one, or both, of Canada’s official languages. At theundergraduate level, the Faculty offers an option in engineering management andentrepreneurship in six (6) of its eight (8) engineering programs. In 2006, the Faculty establishedthe $2-M Entrepreneurship and Innovation Endowment Fund (EIEF), thanks to an initial $1-Mdonation from an anonymous alumnus. Operating under the guidance of an expert AdvisoryBoard, the
Engineering, the Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2004.11.26-27, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.8. Safoutin, M. J., et al., “A design attribute framework for course planning and learning assessment”, IEEE Page 10.475.15 Transactions on Education, Vol. 43, No.2, 2000, pp. 188—198.9. Tsai, S.-J., “The experience on curriculum planning of “Mechanisms” with aid of hands-on exercises” Proceedings of 7th National Conference on the Design of Mechanisms and Machines. 2004.11.20, Tainan, “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005
sophisticated softwareto perform the autonomous navigation using the sensor inputs. The complexity of the projectnecessitates the involvement of a relatively large group of students working together on differentparts of the system.The Robotics Laboratory at the University of Central Florida has been participating in the annualIGVC competition since 2002. In this project the students learn about most of the engineeringdisciplines that are typically included in a complex robotic project such as software design,computer vision, sensor data interpretation and fusion, robotic motion planning, vehiclenavigation, vehicle design and construction, electric motor control, computer interfaces tovarious components and many others. Naturally this education
, Inc. and the diagrams inFigures 5 and 6 are courtesy of Digilent, Inc.Bibliography[1]. Altera, Thermal Management for FPGAs, Application Note AN358, Altera, 2012.[2]. P. Chu, FPGA prototyping by VHDL examples, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2017.[3]. P. Chu, “A Cost-Effective Way to Expand the Scope of FPGA Based Projects,” IEEE International Conference on Microelectronics Systems Education, 2015.[4]. P. Chu, Chansu Yu, and Karla Mansour, “Integrating Computer Engineering Lab Using Spiral Model,” Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, 2017.[5]. Digilent, Arty FPGA Board Reference Manual, Digilent, 2017.[6]. Digilent, Pmod TMP2 Reference Manual, Digilent, 2017.[7]. M. Happe et al., “Eight Ways to Put Your FPGA on Fire—A
outreach.There is a large body of literature on the impact of undergraduate research experiences on theirparticipants. There is strong evidence for improvements in retention as well as in the percentageof students who pursue graduate degrees. For example, a large study of nearly 15,000undergraduates funded by the National Science Foundation5 found that undergraduate studentswho participate in hands-on research are more likely to pursue advanced degrees in STEM fields.In a study of factors that promote student retention and success, Nagda et al.6 have shown thatundergraduate research increases retention rates in science and engineering programs,particularly for African-Americans and sophomores. Lopatto7 surveyed more than 1,100 scienceundergraduate
theuniversity care about them—view them as people with tight budgets, jobs, and families—andwant them to succeed in the class. Increasing access and fostering a greater sense of belongingmakes students want to stay enrolled and graduate.OER in E/ET ProgramsOER history dates to 1994, when an NSF grant led by James Spohrer resulted in the creationMERLOT to identify and provide access to mostly free, online curriculum materials for highereducation [7]. Rice University’s Connecxions (now OpenStax) and MIT’sOpenCourseWare project were seen as the first two recognized OER project, though the openeducation movement predates this event with roots in open source, open and distance learningand open knowledge. David Wiley coined the term open content in 1998 and
Paper ID #35200Instructing Lab Courses VirtuallyDr. Zhen Yu, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Jenny Zhen Yu is an Associate Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. She has expertise in the areas of Nanotechnology with application in nanomaterial synthesis, electronics devices fabrication and characterization, low cost and robust manufac- turing processes, 3D printing of energy storage device for UAVs and water contamination treatment. Her research has resulted in several patent applications, peer-reviewed journal papers and book chapters, and
entrepreneurship courses often self-select and the courses oftenhave to be counted as electives in their respective programs. In an effort to more broadly exposeengineering students to entrepreneurial skills and topics, some programs aim to embed the topicwithin the engineering curriculum via case studies,12 capstone projects,13-16 or modules.17,18In the Tagliatela College of Engineering at the University of New Haven we employ aninnovative curricular model to develop an entrepreneurial mindset in students that is based onintegrating short e-learning modules into existing engineering courses.19, 20 There have beenmany studies about the effectiveness of e-learning, and some still question it.21 However,examples of e-learning, such as fully online
expand the usage of AR/VR in the university setting. Potential challengesfor widespread adoption include faculty education, lack of educational infrastructure for XR, andlimited curriculum space to fit in this additional component. Therefore, a solid XR traininginfrastructure is desired to facilitate the adoption process.This paper is a work-in-progress and will emphasize the development of the VR infrastructurefor Civil Engineering courses. Three main tasks are involved in this project. The first task is tocompile a broad literature review of the use of XR technology in Civil Engineering education toprovide insight to the instructors. The second task is to develop a series of tutorials for hardwareusage and software usage. The third task is to
utilization of non-visual curriculum3. Currently, there are only a fewefforts focused on encouraging students with visual impairments to pursue higher educationand computing career opportunities at the precollege level, which include the National Centerfor Blind Youth in Science4, the Access Computing Alliance5, and Project ACE (AccessibleComputing Education)6.One of the popular activities that encourage K-12 students to focus their future career goals inthe computer science and engineering fields is the utilization of robotic platforms7. With themultidisciplinary characteristics of the robotics field and its basis in math and science, therobotics curriculum can provide an intriguing and challenging environment for students
University Curriculum” applied technology based on dynamic live case studywith color graphics animated computer simulation in their entrepreneurial course [11]. The livecase study involves multiple student visits to existing companies. Students construct a companysupply chain under the professor’s guidance. Bilen, et al suggested to provide students withmultiple exposures to what it means to have an entrepreneurial mindset [12].Chasaki described a seven-week mini-project “Cyber Crime Scene Investigation” they reservedin their new course for EML activity [13]. The author found that freshman year is a great time tointroduce EML concepts. EML objectives are introduced at the beginning of the mini-project.Students form two groups “hackers” and the
Paper ID #36692Using a Knowledge Mapping Tool in EngineeringInformation Literacy Instruction: A First ExperimentHaoyong Lan (Engineering & Data Librarian) Haoyong Lan is the Engineering & Data Librarian at the University of Louisville, where he provides information literacy instruction, research assistance, data support, and collection development services to engineering students, faculty, and staff. He received a Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering and a Master's degree in Library and Information Science both from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include
.: National Academy of Sciences.17. Barnett, S.M. and B. Koslowski, Adaptive expertise: Effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking and Reasoning, 2002. 8(4): p. 237-267.18. Lang, J.D., et al., Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers. Journal of Engineering Education, 1999. 88(1): p. 43-52.19. Chubin, D.E., G.S. May, and E.L. Babco, Diversifying the Engineering Workforce. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p. 73-86.20. Bloom, B.S., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. 1956, New York: David McKay Company.21. Krathwohl, D.R., A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into
integrity. Once students are accepted into the program and assigned to projects, informationon each student (phone numbers, e-mail addresses, student ID numbers, disciplines, teamassignment, et cetera) would have to be manually keyed into a database. Data entry errors taketime to find and correct—especially if 150 students are involved.Revision control. Curriculum updates occur frequently across the nine participating departmentsand these changes often affected the published IPPD prerequisites. Often these changes wouldnot be reflected in the paper applications for several years. This delay was due to lack ofcommunication between the departments and IPPD. Further complicating the confusion was theproliferation of out-of-date application forms kept
Paper ID #8892A Systems-Centric, Foundational Experience in CircuitsDr. Tom Weller, University of South Florida Thomas M. Weller received the B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering in 1988, 1991, and 1995, respectively, from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. From 1988-1990 he worked at Hughes Aircraft Company in El Segundo, CA. He joined the University of South Florida in 1995 where he is currently professor and chair in the Electrical Engineering Department.Dr. Carol M. Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Carol Haden holds a doctorate in Curriculum and Instruction from Northern Arizona University, with
Design and PracticeSequence. This sequence prepares students for real-world, open-ended design problems [42].Part of the student summative evaluations includes team reports at different stages of the designprocess, such as Scoping and Preliminary Design Concept, Full Design Proposal, or FinalDesign, following Dym et al.[17] framework. Our analysis focuses on the Problem Definitionsections of these reports, which include identifying the problem goal, stakeholders, safetyconsiderations, functions, attributes, and constraints, among other possibilities that can be addedas the students progress in their project design.Feedback Mechanism and Model Fine-tuning:A multi-class classification approach using a fine-tuned LLM is the base for the feedback
author at University of Maryland Eastern Shore forengineering undergraduates, two web-based tools -(i)BITES ( Buildings Industry Transportationand Electricity Generation Scenarios) developed at National Renewable Energy Laboratories(NREL) and (ii) TEST (The Expert System for Thermodynamics) developed at San Diego StateUniversity are introduced to the students and integrated with the course project and classroominstruction.The BITES tool provides a framework to discuss thermodynamic cycles related to power,refrigeration, Otto, and Diesel cycles to energy production and utilization in commercial andresidential buildings, as well as the transportation and industrial sector at large, and their relevanceto carbon emission, ozone depletion, and
faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the University of New Mexico. His broad research interests include engineering education, as well as control and optimization of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power and energy systems, multi-agent systems, robotics, and biomedicine. He is a recipient of UCSB’s Center for Control, Dynamical Systems, and Computation Best PhD Thesis award.Ms. Alejandra Hormaza Mejia, University of California, Irvine Alejandra Hormaza Mejia is a PhD student in the department of mechanical and aerospace engineering at the University of California, Irvine. She received her B.S. in chemical engineering and M.S. in mechan- ical and aerospace engineering from the
Sophomore Engineering Students”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas, June 2012[7] J. Mossbrucker, O. Petersen, and R. Strangeway, “Professional Development for Electrical Engineering Students”, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon, 2005[8] L. Bullard and D. Ollis, “Professional Development Buffet: From Banquet to A La Carte”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Louisville, Kentucky, June 2010.[9] M. Habibi, M. Alaei, and A. Lillesve, “Integrating Professionalism in a Project-Based Engineering Curriculum”, Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering
Paper ID #10424Prototype Design of a Solar Greenhouse Incorporating Clean Energy Manu-facturing ConceptDr. Richard Chiou, Drexel UniversityDr. Radian G Belu, Drexel University (Tech.) Dr. Radian Belu is Assistant Professor within the Engineering Technology (ET) program - Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He is holding a PHD in power engineering and the other in physics. Before joining to the Drexel University Dr. Belu hold faculty and research positions at universities and re- search institutes in Romania, Canada and United States. He also worked for several years in industry as project manager, senior engineer
University in 1993. He joinedthe faculty of Lafayette College in 1996. He teaches courses in applied electromagnetics, electronics,analog and digital circuits, and control systems. Prior to 1996 Dr. Jemison served as a seniorengineer and project manager at the Naval Air Warfare Center, Lockheed Martin Corporation, andOrbit/FR in the field of microwave system design. Dr. Jemison is a member of Eta Kappa Nu, and isa Senior Member of the IEEE.WILLIAM A. HORNFECKProfessor Hornfeck has been an engineering educator for more than twenty-four years, the lastthirteen of these as Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Head at Lafayette College.Professor Hornfeck earned the BS degree from Pennsylvania State University, and the MS and Ph.D.degrees from
Curriculum (MUSIC), Techtronics Program) and is currently co-investigator on a grant developing computer software to teach immunology to middle school students. Her special interests include developing ways to teach science/engineering to engage diverse populations especially females and underrepresented minorities.Paul Klenk, Duke University Paul A. Klenk, Ph.D., is a Visiting Scholar at Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society, developing K-12 engineering education programs. He received a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science from the Pratt school of Engineering at Duke University in 2006. He is the Duke Project Director for the TeachEngineeirng Digital Library Project
[14, 15, 18]. Gender imbalances in makerspaces can discourage women [18].Many other barriers likely exist that research has yet to identify. The current work providesanother avenue for identifying barriers.The proposed network modeling technique is reminiscent of actor-network theory (sociology oftranslation) from sociology [19], which has recently been applied by Braga and Guttmann tonetworks of knowledge exchanges between students [20] and by Biermeier to study emerging © American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 2020 ASEE Conferenceproperties in curriculums [21]. Lord et al. reframed the examination of persistence in engineeringeducation by expanding the pipeline and
institutions, service andadvocacy organizations, and philanthropic organizations supports the effective delivery ofworkforce training and services [28]. Additionally, The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022,“modifies and extends the clean energy Investment Tax Credit to provide up to a 30% credit forqualifying investments in wind, solar, energy storage, and other renewable energy projects thatmeet prevailing wage standards and employ a sufficient proportion of qualified apprentices fromregistered apprenticeship programs” [29].4. Organizational Change TheoryLeaders of partnering organizations such as local community groups, manufacturers, andcolleges must be willing to compromise on the engineering and technology curriculum, methods,and alignment with
analyzed to highlight the rich interactionswith math, science and engineering concepts and representations used throughout the classesThis study draws on video from two high school classrooms during multi-day units inmechanical and electrical engineering to help support generalizations of the findings.The Need and Challenge of Enacting STEM IntegrationEngineering education at the K-12 level in curriculum programs such as Project Lead the Way(PLTW) is often organized as a collaborative, project-based experience where students encounterideas and activities across a broad range of modalities, including: Abstract mathematicalequations, graphs and diagrams; 2D design sketches, computer-aided design (CAD) and
(MIDFIELD) is used to identify common transfer paths students followwhen entering or leaving Industrial Engineering (IE) degree programs. This includes whenstudents are transferring from non-engineering programs into IE, transferring from IE to non-engineering programs, or changing degree programs to or from IE while remaining withinengineering. It was found that IE was far more commonly the destination for degree programtransfers, rather than the origin, both within engineering and in general. Fields that often led toIE included Electrical Engineering and Chemical Engineering as well as Business and ComputerScience. However, when students did transfer out of IE, they were much more likely to beleaving engineering entirely than changing to a
of Engineering is aiming to tackle theseissues concurrently. In a first pilot run of a small slice of the new program, students developed aspace mission concept to change the power dynamics around water quality in northern Canada,giving communities direct control of data to measure their water quality and quantities. Thedesigned mission had to be implementable sustainably, with the community engaged at everystage. This concept is being developed into a full 4-year program, where students will choose amanaged path through project activities that give them all the core and complementary content ofa traditional space program. Students will design, build, launch and operate a CubeSat mission,with a community, every 4 years, to address a societal
require course chairs toestablish clear and, more important, measurable linkages between classroom activities anddesired program outcomes. At this point, course outcomes have gone through two full iterationsof development and review by both curriculum committees and teaching faculty. As a result,every engineering technology course in Penn State ET programs is now directly associated withone or more of a program’s expected outcomes, each program outcome is broken down intoexplicit, course-relevant outcomes that support it, and each course outcome is characterized interms of reasonably clear and measurable student actions. As noted earlier, these linkages between program and course outcomes are communicatedto faculty via the standard course