/advising students and engaging students in research. The surveyalso measured changes in faculty members’ understanding of STEM degree requirements,strategies for mentoring students, factors supporting students’ success in STEM degreeprograms, and STEM career opportunities.FindingsThe SEECRS program was found to impact both students and their faculty mentors. We begin bysharing impacts on SEECRS students, and will then share findings related to faculty mentors.Student ImpactsSurvey data indicates that the SEECRS program was able to impact the behaviors studentsemployed in pursuit of a degree, when compared to their AST peers (see Figure 2). SEECRSstudents were more likely to study with peers outside of class and to work with academic tutors.SEECRS
time to add new ideas or projects [8]. Theyfound that fewer than 25% of the sampled classroom-specific resources could be completed inone class period or less. There appears to be a need in the engineering education community forshorter EML activities that enhance students' abilities to learn and engage with technical content.Active learning is described in different ways, and some of them include: a) “..anything thatinvolves students in doing things and thinking about the things they are doing”, b) “involvesproviding opportunities for students to meaningfully talk and listen, write, read and reflect on thecontent ideas, issues and concerns of an academic subject”, c) “increasing of studentparticipation or ‘interactivity’, for the purpose of
Indian precollege classroom curriculum, mentorship,and student engagement. This study investigated teacher perceptions of protective and riskfactors impacting American Indian precollege students and non-American Indian STEM teachersteaching on Native Nations. Although literature demonstrates the challenges American Indians intheir nations often face, such as poverty, health, and interfamilial relationships, there are fewstudies that focus on leveraging cultural strengths in the classroom and community by non-American Indian STEM educators in ways that are predicted to have great impact. This studyoffers recommendations for American Indian leaders, pre-service and in-service educationalprofessionals, and education policy makers.Motivation for
be engaged in, are characterized by the nuancedneeds and requirements, and the goal and value conflicts that are inherent to the multipleperspectives of the stakeholders concerned.As a consequence, engineering has developed approaches that consider stakeholder perspectivesin the design process (e.g. QFD in 7) by “engaging the public” 8; and engineering programsincreasingly emphasize professional communication as a core learning outcome. However, wecontend that these efforts are undertaken from an essentially dualist perspective whereengineering students and practitioners view themselves as separate from the context of theirwork. In this view, the consideration of the existing multiple perspectives on the problem at hand
greater flexibility during the 10-week commitment.Goals of the internship include offering early-career college students: • real-world, discipline-specific experience through hands-on engineering, • mentoring from faculty, graduate students, and/or industry experts, • a competitive salary and living stipend, and • a vision and incentive to persist, transfer, and complete a B.S. in engineering.With Department of Defense funding, community college students applied to participate in 10-week, research-intensive internships, either at the University of Colorado Boulder, the Universityof Colorado Denver, or with an industry partner. Students who applied for internships throughEngineering Momentum were provided the opportunity to engage in mock
Paper ID #37718Engineering Learning Community Introduction to ResearchAbroad A 5 year AssessmentMaria Claudia Alves (Senior Director, Halliburton Engineering GlobalPrograms) Dr. Maria Claudia B. Alves serves as Senior Director for Engineering Global Programs at the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. In this position since July 2012, she developed and implemented a multi-year strategic plan on global education programs that led to measurable outcomes such as increase in student participation and learning, as well as faculty engagement in global programs in the College of Engineering. Some of her most
passionate about engineering and science. Spending the last part of their summer teaching and mentoring kids at NSBE SEEK is rewarding and fits well with the mission of NSBE to “increase the number of culturally responsible Black engineers who excel academically, succeed professionally and positively impact the community.” (https://www.nsbe.org/about- us.aspx#.YEa_DJNKimk). As one of the students in our undergraduate 2019 cohort said in the video, “The NSBE SEEK students, they look like me, they came from my background, so it was a good feeling just to be able to give back to my community.” This community-mindedness is undoubtedly a desirable trait to have in future engineers, scientists, and STEM professionals. It is something to
. Studentslearned how to manage multi-hazard floods. Through knowledge gained by participating inlectures, discussions, and the development of case studies, students were able to assess flood riskand current mitigation strategies for coastal communities in Puerto Rico. The learning experienceprovided an overview of the history, needs, and challenges that coastal communities faceregarding flood and coastal hazards. Through the case studies, students were able to appreciateand understand the risk exposure on the natural and built infrastructure, and the importance ofalways taking into consideration the social impact.Keywords: educational modules, multi-hazards, floods1. Introduction.Floods constitute one of the most frequent and most impacting natural
engage in course and curricular innovation, in academic year 1999-2000 a request for proposal (RFP) was put out by the Center (see Addendum). The purpose of these $1,000 grants was to innovate SMET courses in PR- LSAMP institutions. Currently, fourteen (14) faculty from six (6) Alliance institutions are innovating their courses. Special emphasis was given to proposals involving "gatekeeper" and "bottleneck" courses and to the implementation of new teaching/learning strategies. An important requirement of the grant is outcomes assessment. Faculty receiving grants were required to attend a 6-hour workshop on Classroom Research and Assessment and are required to submit pre and post assessment of student
-curricular andextracurricular activities and to take greater advantage of on-campus academic and careerresources. Through this engagement, students may be more likely to meet potential socializerswho can stimulate and expand their career planning. Engineering programs can also liaise withemployers to make sure that job exploration and career mentorship are an explicit component ofco-op and internship programs, in addition to impressing upon industry personnel the impact ofindividual, one-on-one interactions with students on student career decision-making.Engineering faculty particularly have a large platform with which they can influence students’decisions, as they interface with students as professors, academic advisors, club advisors, andresearch
many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to assess impact of good supply chain practices such as
guide future devel-opment.6 RisksWe apply visualization and gamification techniques to wireless communications and introducethem to undergraduate engineering education not to substitute traditional teaching methods, butto complement them. Our hope is that the tools will engage students in the learning process andhelp grasping complex concepts. However, as pointed out in Section 3 of19, students often havedifficulty understanding what the visualization represents. Spectrum is neither visible nor tangi-ble and we provide a computer-aided visual representation of it, based on real measurements andsignal processing, called spectrum sensing. In other words, colors, shapes or other visual effectsrepresent physical phenomena, but are not phenomena
Criterion 3.a-k. In2002, ABET commissioned the Center for the Study of Higher Education (CSHE) at Penn StateUniversity to undertake this assessment. The study, entitled “Engineering Change: A Study ofthe Impact of EC2000,” is a national study of the impact of the new outcomes criteria andassociated curricular and programmatic changes on learning among undergraduate engineeringstudents. As part of that effort, the CSHE project group developed a measure of studentperformance in each of EC2000’s 11 student learning criteria. This paper describes thedevelopment process and the psychometric characteristics of that instrument. Additionally, thecurrent work is intended to provide the engineering education community with apsychometrically sound
; Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education"addition to communication skills, other manufacturing related competency gaps that have beenidentified by employers include application of manufacturing processes, statistics, andmanufacturing systems. While specific reasons for manufacturing related skills deficiencies havenot been identified, it is likely that the reduction in hands-on laboratory experiences that waseffected at the same time that design content in the curricula was being reduced is one of theprimary causes.A second criticism of engineering education has been that there is little effort to integrate parts ofthe curriculum2. Students often echo this view when they complain that
communities will also benefit.There are many definitions and forms of distance education. Students can receivematerial as text, graphics, audio, video, or combinations of these. Faculty may receivefeedback ranging from none to real time streaming video connections. Traditional on-campus students may or may not be present. It is imperative to understand the variousfactors that will influence the learning experience of the students in this hybridenvironment so that faculty can customize their teaching and lesson plans. This paper isfirst in a series of papers that will discuss on-going research activities in the EngineeringManagement department at University of Missouri – Rolla aimed at understanding anddeveloping novel methods for hybrid classrooms
couldbe having a very negative impact on that faculties’ research output, their ability to secure grants,and their contribution to the academic and scholarly community. Eventually, these deficits couldeven harm the students themselves directly.There follows a brief discussion of a typical representation of the objectives of some of the keystakeholders which have just been enumerated, and are summarized in Table 1. Engagedscholarship advocates argue the benefits of integrating practical knowledge within theeducational process. An example of how principles of engaged scholarship is being conducted inthe Industrial Distribution Program at Texas A&M University is presented. While this programis not perfect, it does an excellent job at considering
Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Circadian Rhythm and Sleep Effect on Undergraduate Construction and Engineering StudentsVarious non-educational factors impact the educational performance of students. While thesefactors span a broad spectrum, including social, cultural, economic, and other domains, sleepnorms and routines account for a significant portion of the effect. Despite this, the importance ofproper sleep norms is often overlooked. The physical resilience of students can also mask theissue. Thus, it is imperative to explore the impact of sleep habits and norms on construction andengineering students’ performance and perceptions. This paper reports on the second phase of astudy investigating the effects of
elementary school grades [2, 3],suggesting that interventions at the elementary level may be a productive component of changingfemale students attitudes and interests. W-STOMP has been designed as an intervention forelementary students to address multiple potential areas of impact that have been identified withinthe research on STEM interests and girls. The program is based on another program at TuftsUniversity, STOMP (Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program), which placesundergraduate engineering students into local K-12 classrooms to support teachers engaged inengineering activities. W-STOMP is a variant on that program that focuses on female
tracksdedicated to DEI suggest that many in engineering education agree that equity and inclusionought to be central to our efforts to improve the experiences of engineering students. In order toaddress inclusion, scholars have engaged with critical race theories [6], anti-racism [7], and othertheoretical perspectives that can be ported in to address the systems of oppression brought tobear on engineering practices and programs.One approach to this has been to explicitly engage with the intersecting oppressions facing whitewomen, women of color, and other multiply marginalized members of the engineering profession[3], [5], [8]. Kimberlé Crenshaw’s now widely used term, intersectionality, originally referred tothe intersecting systemic oppressions facing
product. 4. Analyze the operation or functional performance of a complete system. 5. Troubleshoot a failure of a technical component or system.Undergraduate Research and Internship ExperiencesIn 2008 George Kuh identified ten “high impact practices” in higher education literature found toincrease student engagement and learning outcomes [8]. These ten practices are: first-yearexperiences, common intellectual experiences, learning communities, writing intensive courses,collaborative assignments, experiencing different worldviews, community-based learning,capstone experiences, undergraduate research, and internships. In particular, undergraduateresearch and internships are relevant to engineering education but are not utilized by
networks” [1].IoT has shown significant proliferation in industry and our daily lives. As such IoT presents itselfas new technology and tools, offering teaching and learning environments for engineering andcomputer science students with hands-on engaged learning. The multidisciplinary nature of IoTsystems also lends itself to remote learning where students, individually or in teams, may focuson different aspects of engineering and computer science concepts, such as sensors, actuators,microcontrollers, embedded systems, wired and wireless communication, visualization, andinterfacing, to name a few.Remote learning became significantly more important during the COVID-19 pandemic forcinginstitutions of higher education to conduct teaching and learning
during this period highlighted the importance of maintaining instructorpresence and fostering community in online settings [13], principles that are foundational toactive learning regardless of modality.In previous work, the team evaluated the interaction time of students in a flipped learningmodeling course [9]. Students overwhelmingly preferred a single long video to several shortvideos in that work.MethodsStudents were presented with the opportunity to choose between which method (passive oractive) of engagement they wanted to complete for one module of an Engineering Economycourse. Both groups watched the same content and answered the same questions. Thedistinguishing factor between the two groups is how and when the interactions are
presence and help students to build connections with the instructor. The communicationwould begin with self-introductions, followed by any questions or concerns that students may haveabout the course. The instructor would then provide her feedback to students. About 70% of thestudents took part in this activity in 2020 fall semester, and the rate increased to about 85% in 2021fall semester. The increase in the participation rate indicates that students are more engaged in the2021 fall semester.One-on-one communication is a great supplement to the surveys. Many students shared with theinstructor their difficulties or challenges in life or study. Students also talked about their futureplans and career goals. Such information could help the
priorexperience specifically with the Piazza tool. Survey results. Due to the small survey sample size (n < 20), we have limited ouranalysis to descriptive statistics. Tables 1 – 5 display descriptive statistics for all Likert-typescale survey items. These items have been grouped by topic into the tables for a) studentattitudes and beliefs about mathematics, b) course evaluation, c) impact of course on outcomes,d) student self assessment, and e) perceptions of collaboration, community and support. Table 2 contains the descriptive statistics for the survey items that assessed respondentattitudes and beliefs about mathematics including content, engagement, impact, methods,practical value and skills. Although the students responded that
, smaller projects, such as pedestrianbridges, are identified [8].Although service learning in civil engineering is certainly not new, there are various challengesthat could prevent unleashing the full potential and effectiveness of service learning projects. Forinstance, one common challenge is related to the duration of projects. The timelines of someinfrastructure projects for a community are longer than allowed in a semester or an academicyear, which potentially complicates student involvement and learning assessment [2]. Moreover,students may not be able to see the impacts of their work on the community and therebyundervalue the service learning experiences [9]. For some global projects, students may not beable to visit and communicate with
his interest in international affairs and engagement throughout his career. He was keen to explore the additional opportunities, perspectives and experiences which Purdue University could offer him and DIT students.• Explore opportunity for joint research or other scholarly collaboration Our first exchange was an asynchronous in nature. One of the benefits of this model was that we got a joint opportunity to fully explore the research interests and background of our exchange partner. For instance, at Purdue University, Mr. McHale was given the opportunity to engage with current members of the faculty engaged in post-graduate research. He also had an opportunity to review some important undergraduate project work which is undertaken in
about theirperceptions of the value of and need for mentors as they progress through their academic studies.The study yielded a new dimension to the existing literature and is useful for both understandingstudent perceptions and for communicating effectively to students. Students and postdoctoralscholars who participated in the MentorNet study considered mentoring important for thesuccessful completion of their degree.10The College of Engineering at The Ohio State University is one of ten institutions currentlycollaborating in an Extension Services project funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF)entitled ENGAGE (Engaging Students in Engineering). Extension Services projects are modeledafter the Cooperative Extension Service in Land Grant
intersectionalities considered include Hispanic subgroups, race, gender, first-generation status, personal experience as a community college student, and Pell Grant status as anundergraduate.6 One-Year Program Impact on Cohort 1 H-AGEP FellowsThe H-AGEP external evaluation is examining, among other program implementation facets, whatthe Fellows perceptions of and experiences with the program are, and the extent to which programparticipation is broadening and strengthening their: (i) undergraduate STEM teaching andmentoring skills; (ii) professional networks and career-development skills; and (iii) preparation forand transition into the professoriate at the community college level.The findings presented here are derived from data collected from Cohort 1
indicate the coursehelped with: f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; g) an ability tocommunicate effectively; h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context; and j) aknowledge of contemporary issues. The evaluation that the course engendered i) a recognitionof the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning was a pleasant surprise.The evaluation results reported in Table 2 indicate that from the students’ perspective this coursecan be taught effectively in an on-line format. While a few students did indicate that a lack offace-to-face interactions were detrimental, the majority of students did not. In addition
and how they were excited to learn more about itin this course. During the values hierarchy activity, a word cloud was generated by the entire classbased off the values they thought were important for the sustainability of the system they chose toresearch, an example of which is shown in Figure 2. Extending these values to norms of society tobe further reflected in the design requirements was an opportunity for the students to explore howsustainability considers the impacts and outcomes of the systems on all those who interact with it.For a more practical benefit, by asking students to take note of the values represented in otherteams’ systems, students were engaged during the project presentations.Figure 2: Example of a word-cloud created