Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session - Expanding horizons

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Justin L Hess, Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Nael Barakat, The University of Texas at Tyler; Sara E Wilson, The University of Kansas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

, and how to most effectively reach out to and engage with them, b) identify specific questions we should ask stakeholders, including to capture contextualized needs, concerns, and future outlooks that will assist in guiding ethics- related learning and training goals, content, pedagogy, assessment, etc., and c) identify specific opportunities for future “ethics R&D” efforts that may be worthy of further exploration.To help prepare for the event and seed initial lines of discussion, a survey was developed by theleadership team and deployed to all invitees. More detailed information about our approach tosurvey data collection and analysis is presented below, followed by a summary of the findings.The HEEE event itself

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 6

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

hongbo zhang, Middle Tennessee State University; Reshma Rajan, Middle Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

featured with embodied andconventional learning methods for robotics technology instruction. By systematically analyzinguser engagement and sentiment toward the video content with the LLM methods, this study isable to provide a comprehensive understanding of how the videos featured with embodiedlearning method impact the learning effectiveness of the robotics technology. For this purpose,through the utilization of the LLM based data extraction, transcription, sentiment analysis, andstatistical techniques, our research is able to ensure accurate and reliable video analysis for thedesirable research outcomes. We seek to assess whether videos featured with embodied learningtechnique is able to better engage with learners in comparison to conventional

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Ann Weitnauer; Jacqueline Rohde, Georgia Institute of Technology; Thomas Martin, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

Paper ID #38940Lessons Learned While Managing ”Raise Your Hand,” a MultidisciplinaryCollaboration between Engineering and the ArtsMary Ann WeitnauerDr. Jacqueline Rohde, Georgia Institute of Technology Jacqueline (Jacki) Rohde is the Assessment Coordinator in the School of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests are in sociocultural norms in engineering and the professional development of engineering students.Thomas Martin, Georgia Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons learned while managing Raise

Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Vegas Lewis, SUNY Fredonia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 3: Mentorship and Communication in Engineering Graduate Programs

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Magdalena G. Grohman, University of North Texas; Matthew J. Brown Ph.D., Southern Illinois University; Nicholas Raphael Gans, The University of Texas at Arlington; Jeff Glenn Edwards, University of Texas at Dallas

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

learning processes that lead to these outcomes [4], [5].CURE, as a course-based experience with pre-defined learning outcomes, is very amenable tooutcomes-focused research using surveys, test-based assessments, and grade-point averages [6].However, URE does not have the same kind of set learning goals; the primary goals of the UREcontext are the knowledge-production goals of the working laboratory. Learning here will, ofcourse, be a more organic by-product of the enculturation of students into scientific (andengineering) practice. Graduate research experiences are akin to URE in terms of difficulty toassess learning outcomes. Rather than focusing on outcomes defined from the start, we usecognitive-ethnographic methods to understand the social

Conference Session

Online and Remote Teaching

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nazanin Mansouri, University of Portland

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

met. The assessment of the identified ABET performance indicators at the end of the semester were above the acceptable threshold and comparable with the in-person course. This experience demonstrates that through innovation, some of the engineering laboratory courses can be taught remotely without sacrificing any experiments.1. Introduction One of the most meaningful measures of an engineering program is for its graduates to be able to perform from the first day on the job. It is only through a fine interplay of the theory and practice that such an outcome can be achieved. Hence, it is imperative that when developing courses and curricula, we keep a theory to practice outcome in mind. What distinguishes the new graduates in

Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret E.B. Webb, Virginia Tech ; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

Conference Session

Interdisciplinary Integration at the Course Level

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

socialjustice. Using a particular perspective on sociotechnical thinking (STSE), the goal of thisresearch was to explore sociotechnical thinking within engineering instructor teaching goals andpractices. The study also sought to identify the challenges and enabling factors that engineeringinstructors experience in utilizing teaching practices related to sociotechnical thinking. STSEwas selected given both its inherent flexibility, and its specific features that allow for somenatural connections with engineering. Using STSE also allowed for the introduction of aframework from a different context to assess its utility and relevance to the engineeringlandscape.This study employed an online survey, featuring both qualitative and quantitative methods

Conference Session

Intersections of Identity and Student Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice Technical Session 10

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaylla Cantilina, University of Michigan; Robert Loweth, University of Michigan

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 3: Mixed - Research, Engineering Design, Design Thinking, and Curriculum Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hugh Scribner, University of Colorado Boulder; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver; Jean Hertzberg, University of Colorado Boulder

generally had a strong interest in aesthetics and design.This meant that it was difficult to detect significant positive shifts across student responses.ResultsTransformative ExperienceThe AesDes survey assessed the transformative experience by measuring the three indicators:expansion of perception, motivated use, and affective value. The findings are presented below.Expansion of PerceptionExpansion of perception was measured by Questions 9, 10, and 11, as shown in Table 1.It was found that the responses to Question 9 were positively saturated, as 51% (n=15) of thestudents who came into the class gave responses like the following on the entry survey: “In the engineering field, even though aesthetics is rarely mentioned in any textbooks or

Conference Session

Values in Engineering: Ethics and Justice-Oriented Engineering

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fatima Naeem Abdurrahman, University of Maryland, College Park; Sona Chudamani, University of Maryland, College Park; Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland College Park; Jennifer Radoff, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matthew Perkins Coppola, Purdue University Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Emil H Salib, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

students in the creation and submission of a smart contract, and verification oftransaction blocks through a proof-of-work consensus algorithm. A preliminary assessment of thelab exercises by undergraduate students allowed us to present in this paper (see Appendix A) awell-tested set of lab exercises.The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we provide a brief overview of the opportunitydefinition and the solution goal and objectives of the work described in this paper. In Section 3,we provide a brief description of the core and special components of the Ethereum blockchainplatform. Also included is a walk-through of the data flow of blockchain transactions and blocks.Section 4 focuses on the solution implementation stages and section 5

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Recruiting and Retention

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nisha Abraham, University of Texas at Austin; Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

“Q” noted on their transcript [17]. ● QDFW% rates: the percentage of students in the course who Q-dropped the class, made a D, F, or withdrew (and received a W on their transcript), in comparison to the whole student population for that course. ● “SI” students: students who attended 6 or more sessions ● “non-SI” students: students who attended 5 or fewer sessions.IV. Research Questions To assess the impact of SI on freshmen engineering participants, this report addresses the following questions: 1. How did SI attendance affect overall course GPAs for SI students versus non-SI students in this course? 2. How did SI attendance affect QDFW% rates for SI students versus non-SI students in this

Conference Session

Bridging Content and Context in the Classroom

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Heather Dillon, University of Washington Tacoma; Tammy VanDeGrift, University of Portland

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education, Equity

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amanda Gonczi, Michigan Technological University; Whitney Nicole McCoy, University of Virginia; Robert M. Handler; Jennifer L. Maeng, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

orlittle confidence using computer assessed design (CAD) (n = 22, 81.5%), probes/sensors (n = 18,66.7%), and programming software (n = 16, 59.3%).RQ 2: Appropriateness for Engineering InstructionRegarding whether teachers felt it was appropriate to use each of the digital technologies withintheir classroom to support engineering instruction, all teachers (n = 27, 100%) indicated digitalimages, simulations, and interactive visualizations were somewhat to extremely appropriate(Figure 2). One or more teachers indicated spreadsheets (n = 12, 44.4%), computer-assisteddesign (n = 6, 22.2%), probeware/sensors (n = 3, 11.1%), and programming software (n = 2,7.4%) were not appropriate to use. Digital image use was most frequently ranked by teachers

Conference Session

Design Across the Curriculum 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Caroline Grace Sawatzki, Saginaw Valley State University; Rajani Muraleedharan, Saginaw Valley State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, space, or resources to support course offerings in emerging fields [2].Students who left engineering programs have cited a lack of interest in their major and theinability to work closely with faculty on research projects throughout their undergraduateeducation [3]. Students’ own experiences and performance on assessments indicate that thetraditional “lecture-homework-exam” method of engineering education is insufficient to fulfillthe goal of long-term information retention and academic and professional success [4].Furthermore, students who struggle significantly to succeed in classes employing this method ofeducation are more likely to discontinue their pursuit of engineering, as evidenced by the >50%attrition rate observed in many

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Student Issues as Related to Culture

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prashant Rajan, Iowa State University; Charles T. Armstrong, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Elizabeth J. O'Connor , Ketchum Change; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Rebecca L. Dohrman, Maryville University; Colleen Arendt, Fairfield University ; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology. Page 26.1711.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Vulnerable heroes: Problematizing metaphors of male socialization in engineeringAbstractWhile extensive research and intervention has occurred over the past two decades to amelioratethe underrepresentation of white females and

Conference Session

Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lari Garrison, University of Washington; Reed Stevens, University of Washington; Portia Sabin, University of Washington; Andrew Jocuns, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

shape their actions. In particular, we suggestthat students construct a cultural model of the admissions process in order tobetter understand and navigate the process. To understand this cultural model weneed to examine the beliefs that are born from it. In other words, to understand thestudents’ cultural model of the process we must examine what they report theirbeliefs about the process to be. It is important to understand this cultural model,because it is an evaluative tool, one that allows them to assess themselves andothers. This in turn shapes the students’ view of themselves and others, and howothers see them as well. Page 12.428.2Gaining entry to a

Conference Session

IFEES: The Globalization of Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lueny Morell, Hewlett-Packard; Claudio Borri, Universita' di Firenze; Sarah Rajala, Mississippi State University; Bruno Laporte, World Bank; Maria M. Larrondo Petrie; Seeram Ramakrishna, National University of Singapore; Xavier Fouger, Dassault Systemes; Jose Carlos Quadrado; Adriana Garboan, Politechnica University of Bucharest; Duncan Fraser, University of Cape Town; Hans Hoyer, American Society for Engineering Education

Tagged Divisions

ASEE Global Programs

of accelerated globalization, “grey matter” is a country’smain durable resource. Its exploitation for economic and social well-being is increasingly at thecenter of development strategies. The analysis and information on which this book is based arelargely drawn from work by the World Bank Institute’s Knowledge for Development program,launched in 1999, which has carried out a number of knowledge based economy diagnostics andcase studies, using the Knowledge Assessment Methodology (KAM) 5 .What are the basic foundations of knowledge based economies? The World Bank suggests fourmajor areas [2]: • Education & Training– An educated and skilled population is needed to create, share, and use knowledge. • Information

Conference Session

Professional Graduate Education and Industry

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Norman Egbert, Rolls-Royce Corporation; Eugene DeLoatch, Morgan State University; Donald Keating, University of South Carolina

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

: Definition PhaseTask #1: Define Progressive Growth Levels of Engineering Beyond Entry [I – IX] Assess the progressive stages of growth and levels of increasing responsibility in the practice of engineering for leadership of responsible technology development and innovation in industry14.Task #2: Identify Core Progressive Skill-Sets in Engineering for all Levels Identify the professional skill-sets, experience factor, and knowledge required at all growth levels for engineering-leadership of technology development and innovation a) Early-career Level I – III Engineer b) Mid-career Level IV–VI Engineer c) Senior-career Level VII–IX

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Innovation: The Student Experience

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Conference Session

Engineering Social and Human Ethical Impacts

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Debra S. Fuentes, Brigham Young University; Stephanie Claussen, Colorado School of Mines; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Debra S. Fuentes, Brigham Young University Debra S. Fuentes is a doctoral student at Brigham Young University in Educational Inquiry, Measurement, and Evaluation specializing in Mathematics Education. She received a Master’s degree in Curriculum and Instruction emphasizing English as a Second Language, and a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, minoring in

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Focused on Female Students

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeanna R. Wieselmann, University of Minnesota; Emily Anna Dare, Florida International University; Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota; Elizabeth Ring-Whalen, St. Catherine University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

participation in groupactivities. Other studies have found that mixed-gender groups are associated with more positiveoutcomes than single-gender groups. For example, researchers [82] found that middle-schoolstudents participating in a design-based physics curriculum performed better on assessments ofcontent and practices if they had worked in mixed-gender as opposed to single-gender groups.Schnittka and Schnittka [27] found mixed-gender groups to be beneficial in engineeringeducation, with girls learning more in such mixed-gender groups.Although research findings related to the influence of group gender composition are mixed, anumber of studies [78], [83] – [85] have found group gender composition to be significantlyrelated to students’ participation

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University; Nirangkush Das, Arizona State University; Brent Wallace, Arizona State University; Phil Blake McBride, Eastern Arizona College; Clark Vangilder, Central Arizona College; Tim S. Frank, Glendale Community College; John W. Griffith, Mesa Community College; Russell Cox, Mohave Community College; Eddie W. Ong, Phoenix College; Ernest Moulinet Villicana, Phoenix College Engineering; Celia . Jenkins, Cochise College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

associated surveys (assessment instruments).It should be noted that our surveys have been designed to (1) educate students about important items/choices/topics/processes that they should be thinking about, etc. (2) deeply understand how students feel about a variety of issues (3) get relevant feedback to alter instruments, surveys and practices.The latter two are very important in order to provide very directed student-centric mentoring and to supportour grounded theory approach (Barney Glaser, Anselm Strauss, 1965, 1967: [53], [54]). Here, groundedtheory refers to an inductive data-based approach to identify patterns and develop empirical-based workingtheories.The following subsections

Conference Session

Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Jennifer Radoff, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Hannah Sabo; Gina Marie Quan, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

field experiences, andreceive in-the-moment pedagogical coaching within the pedagogy course.Critical and constructive reflection on teaching practice, which we assume is needed to helpstabilize student-centered instructional approaches, is scaffolded through course assignments andin-class activities. LAs regularly reflected on (and wrote about) how course readings connect totheir to own experiences both as a student and as a peer educator within the ENES100. Throughboth field note assignments and in-class video analysis sessions, LAs were encouraged to (1)develop detailed descriptive accounts of classroom events, (2) generate multiple plausibleinterpretations of classroom events, and (3) assess the affordances of instructional moves inrelation

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Capstone Design Practices

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey T. Schimpf, Concord Consoritum; Xudong Huang, Concord Consortium; Charles Xie; Zhenghui Sha, University of Arkansas; Joyce E. Massicotte, Concord Consortium

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

review briefly outlines some of the common motivations behindthe development of design agents as well as providing a high-level overview of the softwarearchitecture used in these systems.A frequent motivation or target goal of design agent systems is to create intelligent assistive toolsfor designers, often by having agents search a design space for solutions6,43, 45-46. These designagent systems typically employ multiple agents, called multi-agent systems, which includesmultiple agents with the same role as well as differentiated roles across agents6, 43, 46-47. Some ofthe roles design agents may take on include search/configuration agents that create solutions4-5,43-44 to evaluators that assess the performance of a generated solution44-46

Conference Session

Notable Topics in Civil Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Greg Rulifson P.E., University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Paper ID #15378Attitudes that Students Believe Best Characterize EngineersDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the ABET assessment coordinator for the department and its three accredited bachelor’s degrees. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where inter- disciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Professor Bielefeldt’s

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan E. Walden, University of Oklahoma; Cindy E. Foor, University of Oklahoma; Rui Pan, University of Oklahoma; Randa L. Shehab, University of Oklahoma; Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

is not uncommonfor one or two students to be excluded from the leadership clique. P863: It was kind of a voting thing and it was also last year's members kind of assessed the team and semi-determined what they think needed to be done… There wasn't an actual sit down vote, it was more so like Mike and Richard said Susan you need to be Captain and Don you need to be co-captain. They were like "do you have a problem with that?" Nobody said anything.As one advisor commented, “You know these captains we have, sometimes they get elected on apopularity contest. Loyalty and commitment most definitely trumps the right person for the job.”One of the potential weaknesses of leadership which arises from and is embedded in

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Fundamental; K-12 Students & Engineering Division: Fundamental; K-12 Students & Engineering Design Practices: Best Paper Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chelsea Joy Andrews, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

as it: encourages students togenerate ideas and consolidate solutions (Kapur, 2008), activates prior knowledge differentiationand allows students to critically assess their current knowledge (Bransford & Schwartz, 1999;Kapur, 2011), can set the stage for noticing critical features of a solution (Bransford & Schwartz,1999), provides an impetus for prediction and causal reasoning (Schank, 1982; Gartmeier et al.,2010), helps students resolve misconceptions (Gartmeier et al., 2010), and makes it easier toretrieve experiences for future problem solving (Kapur, 2010; Schank, 1999; Gartmeier et al.,2008).Tawfik and colleagues (2015) argue based on the prior research that failure “generates anadditional inquiry process at the point of