skillfully toproblems, communicate effectively, work as members of a team, and engage in lifelong learning.As a result, engineers and engineering technologists often enter the workforce inadequatelyprepared to adapt to the complex and ever-changing demands of the high-tech workplace8.Research9-11 shows that active learning, learning that involves hands-on experience, significantlyimproves student comprehension and proficiency. In a study12 where researchers comparedlearning outcomes in a management class, taught using lecture-based methods versus activelearning methods, an improvement of one standard deviation was demonstrated with regard tolong-term memory and use of concepts over time for the active learning group8. Similarly, in astudy of over
to various extracurricular activities in engineering [6] and informallearning opportunities at museums [7] as their peers in other places. Many of these challenges areheavily impacted by public school funding, which is often based on the tax-base in schooldistricts [8] and the population density in certain areas [9]. Given that some rural communitiesexperience poverty and are relatively small in size, this often means that schools do not receivesufficient funding.On the other hand, rural places, communities, and schools are often said to be tight knit, whichcan provide a wealth of opportunities to engage in unique ways. For engineering and STEMeducation, this is particularly important. For example, connecting students with local experts
findings of “Innovation withImpact”, a six-year nation-wide study of top engineering schools. One of the conclusions of thatstudy is that engineering education innovation requires, at the least, engineering and educationexpertise working in continual cycles of educational practice and research.The committee surveyed the College of Engineering faculty on their topics of interest, anddecided on a format of a continuing series of one-hour sessions, led by SDSU engineeringfaculty. Over the last five semesters there have been twelve discussion sessions, on topics suchas teaching on-line, engaging students in the classroom, rubrics, assessment, active learning, andacademic quality and rigor. This paper discusses the goals of the series, what has been
academic secretary at the Faculty of Engineering of the Andrés Bello University. The areas of research interest are the impact, relationship and integration of the gender perspective within communications and marketing in the various areas of development, digital marketing and content marketing.Maria Elena Truyol María Elena Truyol, Ph.D., is full professor and researcher of the Universidad Andrés Bello (UNAB). She graduated as physics teacher (for middle and high school), physics (M.Sc.) and Ph.D. in Physics at Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. In 2013 she obtained a three-year postdoctoral position at the Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil. Her focus is set on educational research, physics education, problem-solving
realism. For example,involving students in existing free and open source software (FOSS) projects helps address theissues of having a real product and experience maintaining software [12]. Moreover, Ellis andMorelli [13] proposed focusing on FOSS projects with humanitarian purposes to further exposestudents to social impacts of computing. While these approaches offer unique benefits, FOSScontributor teams are globally distributed and consequently, it is not plausible to adhere to theAgile principle of communicating face-to-face [5]. Likewise, from our observations, the FOSScommunity has a concentration of software developers and not nearly as many business people,often making it difficult to fulfill the principle of developers working with
Device designs aremore complicated than typical IoT sensor nodes and require the convergence of many differenttechnologies.The course breaks these Edge technologies into the following categories: • Networking Communications • Embedded Systems • Sensor Hardware Interfacing • User Interface • Distributed ComputingThese technologies are presented to students through lectures and tutorial examples, thenreinforced by practical, hands-on projects, initially as standalone technologies, but withincreasing integration throughout the semester. For the projects, students are allowed to choosetheir own end-applications, within set guidelines, to improve motivation and promote creativity. 2For the most part, the end-applications themselves are
capabilities, enhance their communication skills, learn about themselves andhow to work with others, how to integrate different aspects of engineering, how to learn new mate-rial on their own, etc. The second special feature is having opportunities for in-depth reflection onone’s own learning experiences. The introduction and use of learning portfolios will accomplishthis. Learning portfolios are narrative statements written by students about their learning experi-ences, viz, what they have done, what they have learned, a honest assessment of themselves interms of the multiple competencies desired, in this case, for future work in engineering, and anidentification of what they need to learn next to further their professional development as
or just a desired outcome if we can afford it. The goal of this paper is to present a literature review about equity in computing education and to propose a definition of equity so we can engage the community in a collective, professional, and productive dialogue about equity. We hope that such dialogue would enable us to move forward on assessing equity and thus broadening participation in computing. The definition presented is adapted from equity in health and mirrors prior definitions of equity highlighting the difference between equity and equality. We close with some concrete suggestions on how to use the definition to define actions that CS programs could implement as part of an equity
Engineers’ Education (GEE) courseThe Global Engineers’ Education (GEE) curriculum is focused on the problem ofsanitation and hygiene faced by an overwhelming part of humanity. Currently 2.6 billionpeople have no access to toilets10. Most of these people are forced to defecate in the open,and lose their dignity and self-respect while making themselves vulnerable to violenceand life threatening disease. Engaging with this issue in collaboration with a partnerorganization in India allows students to experience their role as engineers in context ofthe world they would like to change and improve and this program creates theopportunity for them, as well as for the underserved communities they wish to work with,to thrive.This curriculum aims at educating
groups experienced the program. We are currently using the data to gain insight onthe impact of the program and learn how to improve it. We demonstrate the experiences ofparticipants and the impacts of the program through case studies of participants.IntroductionEngineering graduate students have few opportunities explore and develop scholarly approachesto teaching compared to graduates in other fields. There are at least two reasons to support thispopulation in getting more preparation on teaching. First, graduate students represent the futurefaculty in engineering education. Thus, helping these students become more effective educatorsprovides one means of promoting effective teaching in engineering (a widely accepted nationalgoal). Second
Oral - Define in Global Assessment - Analysis - Assess Implications of Communication Context Assess Economic Impacts Proposed Solution Environmental ImpactsFigure 4. Student performance on final report and video for key learning outcomes, expressedas percentage of possible points. Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Exemplary 100% Performance on Video and Report
’ expectations within the ECE’s learning environment, which are morefundamental requirements. There are eight themes identified in this study named as: studentperspective on academic and social aspects, limited sense of community in academic settings,motivation and emotional supported needed, search for common communication spaces, need forsynchronous and asynchronous communication systems, design preferences of MR learningspaces, and types of activities to be supported in MR.Figure 4: Remote participant’s view of student participants engaging in an simulated laboratoryscenario using a MR prototype.6.1 Student Perspective on Academic and Social AspectsThis section includes information collected through the interviews. Data collected during
and is licensed as a Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.Dr. Charles R Thomas, Roger Williams University Page 26.1098.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Living-Learning Communities Improve First-Year Engineering Student Academic Performance and Retention at a Small Private UniversityAbstractLiving-Learning Communities (LLCs), in which students share a residence, one or more classes,and extracurricular activities, have been shown to improve first-year student engagement,academic performance, and retention in non
sustaining their student status [4], [5]. Passive learning and lackof connection to others can have lasting impacts on students’ personal association with a subjectmatter [6].Communities of Practice (CoP) have been used to authentically engage students, avoidingperipheral or observatory experiences, and can enhance students’ ability to move to communitycenters through legitimate participation, implicating learning during the process [2], [7]. CoPprovide both short-term and long-term value to members, including, but not limited to: supportstructures for tackling the challenges of purpose-driven work, processes to engage expertise, andconstruction of collective confidence that has long-term impacts on students’ identity development[8].How individuals
at the University of San Diego. Her teach- ing and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education community including serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Edu- cation. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011
overall research question of howfaculty in STEM develop a collaborative change community with the objective to improve theeducation of undergraduate engineering students by adopting RBIS or developing instructionalinnovations.MethodsThis qualitative study employed an exploratory phenomenologically informed approach tounderstanding collaboration amongst STEM faculty [with the support of universityadministration]. The work consisted of semi-structured interviews with 12 STEM faculty acrossacademic ranks who had been or are currently working on a variety of collaborative teamprojects to implement teaching innovations at a large Midwestern research-intensive institution.ParticipantsA purposeful sampling approach was used to study the participants who
Paper ID #35920Beyond the Vanishing Point: Using Future Self Theory and Student-AlumniInterviews to Expand Student Perspectives on Engineering Education andEngineering WorkDr. Harly Ramsey, University of Southern California Harly Ramsey is an Associate Professor of Technical Communication Practice in the Engineering in So- ciety Program at the University of Southern California. She holds a Ph.D. in English, and her training in narrative theory, cultural studies, and rhetoric informs her teaching. Her teaching and scholarship fore- ground the concept of the citizen engineer and the formation of professional engineering
working onthe project itself [8].The Early Research Scholars Program (ERSP) is designed to engage early-college CSstudents in active research groups using a structured course-supported group apprenticemodel with a dual advising structure to increase the number of CS students who participate inresearch. Its focus on community building and support encourages students who are fromgroups that are traditionally underrepresented in CS. Students in the program learn thefundamentals of CS research in a classroom setting and then apply this knowledge in anexisting research group in the department. The program has had an impressive impact atUCSD and is expanding to other institutions [1].Many institutions have various programs and models for broadening
in aninternational technical conference and the introduction to professional networking in thetechnical specialty that this experience provided. Other collaborative efforts with Carl andgraduate researchers that are expected to lead additional conference papers and possiblepublications, and impact of the experience on the undergraduate students‘ current education andcareer plans are also described.Background information on Cognitive Radio, undergraduate research programs, and theparticular program of interest are provided in the next section. Section 3 describes themethodology used in this paper. Section 4 includes observations and descriptions of the studentparticipants‘ experiences before, during, and since completion of the program, and
mentors provide to studentsinclude but are not limited to: annotating examples of previous project designs and technicalcommunication deliverables, attending team meetings outside of class time, rehearsingpresentations with students, and giving advice on a range of topics from technical content toadjusting to life on campus. A previous study conducted on the impact of peer mentors in thiscourse demonstrates that peer mentors are positively received by students; students report thatpeer mentors helped most with development of communication skills, facilitation of betterteamwork amongst team members, and advice on non-course related problems [10].Furthermore, peer mentors facilitate and enhance student learning by providing weekly feedbackto
institution as a community. Results show astatistically significant difference in belongingness among those students in those four categoriesat the five institutions based on students’ classification. However, results suggested thathypothesizing a monotonic increase in the sense of belonging by year in school cannot besupported by the research findings and educators have to ultimately understand what impacts thesense of belonging and how to improve it over time during college years.At each of the three educational institutions where this current study is performed, the percentageof students who are identified as URMs is about one-fourth of the overall engineering studentpopulation. As more initiatives have been emerging in these institutions to help
disciplines: civil, mechanical, electrical/computer, and biomedical engineering.The mature program now includes fully developed lesson plans for two sections of students,Techtronics I for 6th grade and Techtronics II for 7th grade, each led by a graduate studentcoordinator and five undergraduate teaching Fellows. Emphasis is placed on learning throughhands-on experience and creating an environment that encourages inquiry. Students first studyapplicable scientific theory and are introduced to instrumentation and software tools that will beneeded later. Each unit then culminates in the construction of a related project such as balsawood bridges, Lego robotics, AM radios, or heart monitors. With a student return rate of over70% for 2003-2004, the
higher education are identifying the vitiating effects of neoliberalism in education as abusiness mindset dominates and minimizes the loftier goals of higher education. If we want toforestall that continued progression, the engineering education community will need to be moreconscientious about the impacts that these shifts are having on students, faculty, departments,and colleges.Of course, as alluded to with the mention of societal trends, this is more than just themaneuvering of university administrators or private corporations. This is a perennial struggleover institutional ideals and existential purpose. It is a societal shift that has continued sinceneoliberalism gained traction in the 1970s following the stagflation in the Western world
practice10.As Federal research funds began to diminish in the 1970s and 1980s, reduced financial supportfor graduate students impacted the student-faculty mentor relationship by limiting the degree towhich faculty could work directly with students in the research setting. The relationship began toevolve into one where the students worked more independently, often on research that the facultymentor was not involved with. This reduced integration of graduate education and organizedresearch activity occurred at the same time that professional graduate education began to emerge.Professional graduate education, which was intended to provide a more market-drivenpractitioner rather than a researcher, reduced the need for graduate research experiences11.As
years, both technically as well as pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be
Dishonesty Policy in the SyllabusDuring exams, the class has a strict no-phone/no-electronics policy that is described in the syllabusand an abbreviated version is included on the front page of each exam: No communication device (such as phone, smart watch, computer, unapproved calculator) on your body (in hands/clothing/pockets) or within reach (on your seat, between your legs, under your seat, on the seat next to you) during exams. It is considered cheating to have a phone, computer, or other electronic device (other than approved calculator) accessible during an exam.The instructor doesn’t need to catch the student with the phone taking the picture and uploading itduring the exam. In fact, the teacher didn’t catch
Thermo dynamics Engg., AutomotiveClosed-cycle thermal generator Biology, chemistry, physics Engg., Systems Engg.,Biodiesel from Algae Spacecraft thermal systems Public Policy,Home energy savings Economics; system Economics,Small farm economics engineering ManagementHaynes et al14 used the preparation of environmental impact statements on real-life projects as atheme of their project, to converge the interests of students and faculty from various disciplineson problems of common interest into a set of Workshops for faculty on instructional techniquesin science. They used these projects to develop pedagogically sound curricula for learning
. These accomplishments demonstrate the importance and benefits ofmentorship programs in providing support and guidance to individuals as they pursue theiracademic and career goals.Effects on Professional Outlooks from the Hybrid Academic Environment Based on statements from applicants, a hybrid academic environment posed differentneeds for each group. There was a need from the graduate students to increase the visibility ofthe Hispanic engineering community on campus to find stronger support structures while theundergraduates felt our program would be “reassuring” towards making the decision to attendgraduate school and an engaging way to “help each other out.” In the end-of-year survey, students were asked whether they agreed a
sense of community is particularly important for first yearstudents to aid in retention efforts, and professional persistence is related to one’s identity as anengineer. The formation of an engineering identity plays a part in both interest in engineeringand contributes to perseverance in the major [7, 8, 9, 10]. Exposure to mentors and/or rolemodels within the STEM discipline has a positive impact on an academic sense of belonging, aswell as a positive impact of academic self-efficacy [11], while others have noted that poorfaculty-student relationships negatively impact a sense of belonging and the persistence in themajor [12, 13]. Curricular integration within various engineering departments combined withpeer-peer interactions, specifically
preparing technical reports and PowerPoint andposter oral presentations. On the last day of the program, students presented their group projects.We report on a 9-year exercise conducted using the WOW project including detailed studentfeedback from the most recent year. 1. IntroductionEngineering design is defined as the communication of a set of rational decisions obtained withcreative problem solving for achieving certain stated objectives within prescribed constraints [1].The role of design in an engineering curriculum is a key factor contributing to its success [1]. 1Engineering design projects provide students with a broad view related to the material presentedin lectures. Through project-based