spatial perception andvisualization is warranted in a university’s CEM education. Spatial Skills in Construction Spatial ability is a unique type of intelligence which can be best defined as “the ability to presentthe spatial world internally in your mind”.9 In other words, spatial ability is the capacity tomentally organize, understand, and visualize spatial relations among objects. Linn andPeterson10 describe that spatial ability consists of mental rotation, spatial perception, and spatialvisualization. This ability is known as a critical skill in many fields of study, including science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education.11 Spatial ability becomesincreasingly important with the advance of new computer graphics technology
politics….I will follow your progress and bring this up during any methodological review regarding the ‘scientific validity’ of your survey results. Good day. Feedback received via email from a survey respondent as part of an NSF-funded research study.Scholars of engineering education equality and diversity—particularly those from historicallyunderrepresented categories in STEM—have noticed an uptick in a different kind of publicresponse to their work. Marginalization of critical perspectives has plagued scholars across theacademy for decades—from continental philosophers to heterodox economists to women’s andethnic studies scholars. We see a notable rise in similar responses now affecting STEM diversityscholars, and
engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Chen, H. T., Wang, H. H., Lu, Y. Y., Lin, H. S., & Hong, Z. R. (2016). Using a modified argument-driven inquiry to promote elementary school students’ engagement in learning science and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 170-191.Christenson, N., Rundgren, S. N. C., & Höglund, H. O. (2012). Using the SEE-SEP model to analyze upper secondary students’ use of supporting reasons in arguing socioscientific issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21,, 342-352.Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). New York, NY: Sage.Dawson, V., & Carson
Science, Mathematics and Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings at International Conference of Engineering Education, Oslo, Norway August 2001AcknowledgementWe want to acknowledge Dr. John Stewart from the Puerto Rico Development Company forproviding the economic data presented in this paper.Biographical informationROSA BUXEDARosa Buxeda is the coordinator of the Industrial Biotechnology Program at the University of Puerto Rico-Mayagüez. She is a former associate director of the Center for Professional Enhancement and co-coordinator of theABET 2000 accreditation process at UPRM. She is responsible for the freshman experience of the NASA grantPartnership for Spatial and Computational Research and is the assessment director for the HHMI
Session 1630 Linking Student Learning Outcomes to Instructional Practices – Phase I Stephanie Cupp, Paolo Davidian Moore, and Norman L. Fortenberry National Academy of Engineering Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering EducationAbstractThis paper begins to test the assumption that stakeholders in engineering education know whatset of teaching and learning practices by faculty and students will lead to desired student learningoutcomes. The work reported here seeks 1) to identify from published sources, a set of desiredengineering student learning
, they can feel more invested in the results of the workand feel a sense of ownership in the outcomes of the initiatives. In the long-term, it can createactual change within members of the community and can inspire others to strive for change [26].PositionalityI, the first author, am a fifth-year PhD candidate in Engineering Education. My desire to pursue aPhD in Engineering Education comes from my experiences as a Black woman in engineering.Having majored in biomedical engineering for my undergraduate degree, I initially embarked onthis academic path with a desire to create biomedical solutions that can impact Black people’slives. However, I was constantly frustrated by the lack of representation in the field and thenegative experiences faced
-powered mini robot. For the juniors and seniors, because they already have the basictheoretical background, they will team for real-life engineering projects. Under thedirection of a principal manager (a faculty member), each team needs to finish the projectand obtain the predetermined goal within certain timeline. Page 7.567.4 The phase I of the blimp project can fit perfectly into our framework of the engineeringclinic. As we mentioned earlier, blimp system is valuable for research. However, as a Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002
dissemination of national and international research results in engineeringeducation and as a tool to inform a collective research agenda around these issues are alsoexplored.I. INTRODUCTIONA National Study as the Starting PointThe Academic Pathways Study (APS) of the National Science Foundation-funded Center for theAdvancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) was a cross-university study that systematicallyexamined how engineering students navigate their education, and how engineering skills andidentity develop during their undergraduate careers1,2. The APS research is one of three majorinitiatives of CAEE whose overarching goals are to: 1. Identify ways to boost the numbers of students who complete engineering degrees (including increasing the
AC 2011-1235: A SIMPLE LAB PROJECT INTEGRATING THEORETI-CAL, NUMERICAL, AND EXPERIMENTAL STRESS ANALYSISPeter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University Peter Schuster is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Cal Poly State University. His areas of interest are design, stress analysis, and biomechanics. Page 22.101.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A Simple Lab Project Integrating Theoretical, Numerical, and Experimental Stress AnalysisAbstractLearning is enhanced when students consider problems from different
shows that our participants alsoimproved their engineering skills. This is because each modularized task is like a smallbut complete engineering project. Altogether are a complex and large-scale project.‘The engineering experiments in our universities are theory-dominant lectures. However,I have to write thousands of lines of programming codes by myself here.’ (S9-NU8) Thismeans ‘I have to transform the theoretical knowledge learnt immediately to practicalskills in completing engineering tasks.’ (S8-NU7) In this way, our participants ‘witnessedand understood the processes from theory to practices in engineering.’ (S10-NU9)In addition to the disciplinary abilities, another internal conversion factor contributing toour participants' academic
complements and combines engineering thinking andmathematical thinking (Wing, 2006). According to her, computational thinking draws onengineering thinking to solve problems and design systems that interact with humans and the realworld. Interacting with the real world requires thinking about design criteria and constraints –such as safety and efficacy. Like engineers, computational thinkers involve in a process ofproblem-solving (Computer Science Teacher Association & International Society forTechnology in Education, 2011).Promoting problem solving and designing skills is a core focus of both undergraduateengineering education and pre-college engineering education. P-12 engineering education alsohas the potential to effectively impact student
member of "IEEE SignalProcessing and Applications Conference (SIU 2000), chief editor of "International Conference on Electronics Page 7.390.8and Earth Sciences (ICEES)", Technical committee chairman of “Turkish Artificial Intelligence and Neural Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Educational Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationNetwork Conference (TAINN)”. He is member of "Publications and Science Committee" of IU and editor inchief of Istanbul University-Journal of Electrical & Electronics.His current research areas include
will now beresponsible for improving engineering education and pedagogy within the College byundertaking scholarly activities in collaboration with their colleagues in other engineeringdepartments and experts in education psychology and pedagogy. The three key issues that theCollege and ENGE must address are: i) the need for faculty and administrators to betterunderstand the teaching and learning process so that they will be willing and enthusiasticpartners in change, ii) the culture for assessment within COE is poorly developed and lacks anexplicit focus on learning, and iii) the fact that the existing engineering curricula does not fullymeet contemporary standards as suggested by several decades of progress in understandingstudent learning
– [this is] an outgrowth of the dot-com era.”Few respondents were aware of university courses specifically related to dam and leveeengineering. A list of those named is provided in Appendix 1. Many expressed opinionsconsistent with the comment of a state official: “It is probably too much to expect universities tograduate trained dam safety intern engineers. The area is too specialized and too small. Indeed,it would probably be a poor service to graduates to allow them to specialize so precisely.ASDSO’s continuing education opportunities are important tools for turning well qualified civilengineers into dam safety engineers.”While this pragmatic viewpoint appeared to be fairly common among respondents, respondentsalso expressed frustration with
Privacy Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences – 2001, pp 1-6.4. Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC), Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2005-2006, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., November 1, 2005, http://www.abet.org.5. Hagan, Dianne. Employer Satisfaction with ICT Graduates, Proceedings of the Sixth AstralasianComputing Education Conference, Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Vol.30, pp 119-123.6. Joint Task Force on Engineering Education Assessment. A Framework for the Assessment ofEngineering Education, ASEE Prism, May-June 1997, pp. 19-26.7. Maxim, Bruce R. Closing the Loop: Assessment and Accreditation, CCSE Midwestern Conference
, S. U. Rehman, and I. Hussain, “Effect of Grading Policy on Students' CGPA - A Case Study of an Engineering College,” International Journal of Research and Development, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 01–09, 2014.[5] K. D. Barnes and S. M. Buring, “The Effect of Various Grading Scales on Student Grade Point Averages,” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 76, no. 3, p. 41, 2012.[6] J. Millman, S. P. Slovacek, E. Kulick, and K. J. Mitchell, “Does grade inflation affect the reliability of grades?,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 423–429, 1983.[7] Y. Wilamowsky, B. H. Dickman, and S. Epstein, “The Effect Of Plus/Minus Grading On The GPA,” Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), vol. 5, no. 9, 2011.[8
our future work towardthe education practice of design spine and the research questions to understand the relationshipsbetween design tasks and cognitive design skills.References[1] Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F[2] Linsey, J. S., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K. L., & Schunn, C. (2010). A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(041003). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001110[3] Agogué, M., Kazakçi, A., Hatchuel, A., Masson, P. L., Weil, B., Poirel, N., & Cassotti, M. (2014). The Impact of Type of Examples on Originality: Explaining
; Fahlén, L. E., 2012, “A virtual laboratory for micro-grid information and communication infrastructures”, Proceeding of the 3rd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition, October 14-17, 2012, Berlin, Germany, pp. 1-6.[8] Aziz, E.-S., Chang, Y., Esche, S. K. & Chassapis, C., 2013, “A multi-user virtual laboratory environment for gear train design”, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 788-802.[9] Barham, W., Preston, J. & Werner, J., 2012, “Using a virtual gaming environment in strength of materials laboratory”, Proceedings of Computing in Civil Engineering, June 17-20, 2012, Clearwater Beach, FL, USA, pp. 105-112.[10] http://www.virtualgamelab.com, accessed in
AC 2012-5094: EXPLORING THE EFFECT OF DESIGN EDUCATIONON THE DESIGN COGNITION OF SOPHOMORE ENGINEERING STU-DENTSDr. Christopher B. Williams, Virginia TechDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communica- tion in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, and design education. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is Co-PI on several NSF grants to explore identity and interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering design.Mr
education, he continues to work in the area of chemical application system R&D. He teaches coursework in the areas of agricultural materials and processing, CAD, project management, and systems analysis. Page 25.1370.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Training Apples to Perform Like Oranges: A Look at University Teaming EducationAbstractTo effectively function in the workplace today, people must be proficient in their technical skillsand must also be able to function as an effective team member. In the workplace they must workwell with people
program’s facilitation of the integration ofresearch and education, an important strategic objective of NSF. In recent funding cycles theDirectorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) and the Directorate for Social, Behavioral, andEconomic Sciences (SBE) have also provided modest amounts of co-funding. As the programcontinues to develop there are natural opportunities to broaden NSDL’s disciplinary coverage inareas of interest to other NSF supported disciplines; engineering presents one notable area ofopportunity. The program has also co-funded a number of international digital library researchefforts that feature a significant educational component. While NSDL has no formal internationalfunding agreements, this area bears attention given that the
Session 1408 The problem of fluid viscosity management: An interdisciplinary approach to a community-based problem emphasizing undergraduate engineering research Terra L. Smith, Aaron Haga, William S. Janna College of Education, The University of Memphis/ The Herff College of Engineering, The University of Memphis Medical errors are on-going concerns due to their relationship with patient safety. 10 Toheighten patient safety and medical errors concerns in the American health care community, theInstitute of Medicine (IOM) published the report on entitled
from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests broadly include the professional formation of engineers and diversity and inclusion in engineering, with specific interests in human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, assistive-technology, and accessibility. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Phenomenography: A Qualitative Research Method to Inform and Improve the Traditional Aerospace Engineering Discipline I. Abstract This overview paper demonstrates the valuable attributes of phenomenography forinvestigating the
Connecticut Technology Education Content Standards (Draft,2004).The authors of the 2004 Connecticut Core Science Curriculum Framework identify two distinctbodies of standards: those which relate to scientific literacy and those which relate to “conceptualthemes” in physical, life, and earth sciences. The primary conceptual themes emphasized in thismodule are related to Physical Science (Themes II, III, and IV). But perhaps most importantly,this module also has a cross-disciplinary focus on innovation. The relevant state science standardis Conceptual Theme I: Inquiry; the relevant technology standard is Standard 3: Research,Design & Engineering. Note that themes from Ongoing Guided Discussions are not included inTable 3 because their
between engineering education in different countries." I worry about "myshyness."I worry we won’t have enough time. "5 days might not be enough,” so I should "dedicate thetime to think about the structure of our program", reserving "moment[s] to reflect on my...specific challenges but not be constantly preoccupied with them." I worry I won’t be ready and"may need more practice" once I leave, because doing things "without an adequate knowledgebase will result in a lot of... wasted time."I want to "actually change something in my home institution" and worry I’ll be blocked bythe "culture" of my students, government, or nation; the "institutional requirements of teaching &assessment may compromise new approaches,” and experiences may be "not
by Teaching,” inInternational Society of the Learning Sciences, Indiana University, 2006, vol. 1, pp. 509–515.[11] J.-P. Martin, Zum Aufbau didaktischer Teilkompetenzen beim Schüler:Fremdsprachenunterricht auf der lerntheoretischen Basis desInformationsverarbeitungsansatzes. Tübingen: Narr, 1985.[12] M. C. Nisbet and C. Mooney, “Framing Science,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5821, pp. 56–56,Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1126/science.1142030.[13] H. Greene, “Learning Through Student Created, Content Videos,” International Journalof Arts & Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 469–478, 2014.[14] A. R. Carberry and M. W. Ohland, “A review of learning-by-teaching for engineeringeducators.,” Advances in Engineering Education: P-12 Education Special Issue, vol. 3, no
solving in statics. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 99(4), 337-353.[20] Forbus, K. D., Whalley, P. B., Overett, J. O., Ureel, L., Brokowski, M., Baher, J., & Kuehne, S. E. (1999).CyclePad: An articulate virtual laboratory for engineering thermodynamics. Artificial Intelligence, 114, 297-347.[21] Taraban, R., Craig, C., & Anderson, E. E. (in press). Using paper-and-pencil solutions to assess problemsolving skill. Journal of Engineering Education.[22] Reif, F., & Heller, J. I. (1982). Knowledge structures and problem solving in physics. EducationalPsychologist, 17(2), 102-127.[23] Daw, N. D., Niv, Y., & Dayan, P. (2005). Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateralstriatal systems fro behavioral control. Nature
some haveeven asked for another AIAD for the upcoming summer; again this speaks to the success of theprogram motivating and educating students potentially interested in careers in engineering. Figure 5. Sophomore AIAD SurveyProject Sponsor ExperienceProject sponsor feedback is voluntary, and it provides us with an outside look at our academicprogram. We send students, who are products of our curriculum, out to an AIAD. We shouldknow if we are preparing them for engineering in the real world. Sponsors are asked to assess thestudents’ abilities and our program objectives. Their feedback helps in our internal assessment ofthe department’s goals, the level of student competence, and the scope of certain
AC 2011-2748: A MODERN EDUCATION POWER ELECTRONICS LAB-ORATORY TO ENHANCE HANDS-ON ACTIVE LEARNINGSanghun Choi, Purdue University Sanghun Choi received the B.Sc. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois in Urbana Champaing (UIUC), in 2009. He is currently working towards his M.Sc. degree in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University.Maryam Saeedifard, Purdue University Maryam Saeedifard received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, in 2008. From 2007 to 2008, she was a Visiting Research Associate with the Power Electronic Systems Group, ABB Corporate Research Center, Dttwil-Baden, Switzerland. Subsequent to
Page 25.1003.2of the current economic conditions on online education. The results of the surveys conducted in[3] based on the responses from 2,500 colleges and universities are summarized in Table I. Theauthors of the survey conclude their report by stating that “online enrollments in U.S. highereducation show no signs of slowing.” One discipline that has lagged behind all others in the development and delivery of onlineeducation is engineering. While close to 320 engineering schools in the USA have receivedaccreditation from ABET, formerly known as the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) for their undergraduate programs, only a handful of those offer engineeringprograms that are completely online at the graduate