. Page 6.830.7Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EthicsROSALYN W. BERNERosalyn W. Berne is Assistant Professor of Technology, Culture and Communication at the University ofVirginia. Her research interests are ethics in future studies, religion and technology, and the developmentof meaning in young adults. She has been Executive Director of the Olsson Center for Applied Ethics,Director of Darden Admissions, and Head of Tandem Friends School. Page 6.830.8Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore, Maryland, 21202-4012DEBORAH J. HOCHSTEINDeborah J. Hochstein is an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology in the Herff College of Engineering atThe University of Memphis. She obtained a Bachelor of Science degree from Georgian Court College and a Masterof Science in Engineering from the University of Akron. Prof. Hochstein’s present research interests focus onoutcomes assessment in higher education, DACUM, and development of seamless curricula to facilitate professionaldevelopment.JOHN I. HOCHSTEINJohn I. Hochstein joined the faculty of The University of Memphis in 1991 and currently holds the position ofAssociate Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering. In addition to
would like to offer athumbnail sketch of ISO 9000, and through interviews and research, examine the validityof this quality initiative. Finally, we would like to conclude by summarizing the interviewand research and offering recommendations for future initiatives. Page 6.225.1Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationII. Current and Historical ExamplesRecently the media has made the public aware of several examples of quality disasters.The foremost example is the Firestone Tire and Ford Explorer partnership
detection and following scenario. (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure2. The RazorCar system implementing a lane detection scenario. a – The track. b – The camera output. c – The Display connected to the FPGA. d – The car in the lane.Conclusion and Broader ImpactsIn this paper, we presented the RazorCar, a prototyping platform for FPGA-based autonomousdriving systems. Besides helping to validate the self-driving concept, this system could also serveas an excellent educational tool in university programs. The system is designed to allow theimplementation of complex driving scenarios at a high abstraction level by designers with nohardware experience. The goal is to raise the
tools as possible. For example, the Project Learning Library mission is to provide buildingblock technology skills to female (and male) students who may come with less experience thantheir classmates. One example of a library holding is a CD and workbook on spatial reasoningthat NSF research has shown improves retention of women in engineering by teaching them thisskill.3The second core belief is that change will happen faster and be institutionalized if it is supportedfrom the top down. To this end, IWITTS’s focus is not just on STEM instructors, but alsoincludes the key leaders, staff and administrators of the colleges in a variety of functions. For amore detailed description on the resources provided to educators and their female
. Page 7.1148.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationPerhaps the most powerful component of the program is a weekly seminar series that featuresmembers of the Research Triangle high-tech entrepreneurial community. These include venturecapitalists, service providers, and most importantly, engineers and computer scientists (many ofwhom are NC State alumni) who have pursued entrepreneurial careers. Engineers who havebecome entrepreneurs always have fascinating stories to tell, and by virtue of their trade aretypically excellent and enthusiastic presenters. As such, they are highly motivating role
Professional Civil Engineer in Oklahoma and is activelyinvolved in environmental research and education. Dr. Everett received B.S.E., M.S., and Ph.D degrees in Civiland Environmental Engineering from Duke University in 1984, 1986, and 1991, respectively.Marianne CinagliaMarianne Cinaglia is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Secondary Education/Foundations of Education inthe Rowan University. Dr. Cinaglia received a B.S. in Biological Science from Drexel University, and an M. S. inSecondary Education and Ph. D. in Urban Affairs and Public Policy from the University of Delaware. She isactively involved in land use issues on a community level. She is responsible for the evaluation of the Garden Cityimplementation at Rowan. Other evaluation work
Research Center (EERC). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 CoNECD 2024When Two Worlds Become One Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre and Ms. Yvette Moore Pitt EXCELUndergraduate Diversity ProgramSwanson School of Engineering University of PittsburghBackground It started in 1969! BackgroundIMPACT EXCEL• 1969 • Open access re-envisioned• One of the first for MEPs in the US IMPACT 1999-2002• Mission – recruit and retain Black • 2002 Pitt EXCEL and Brown talent in engineering • Mission – recruit, retain and• Was a leading program for
Session 2526 PHOTOELASTICITY AND ITS SYNERGISM WITH FINITE ELEMENT METHOD Said Shakerin, Daniel D. Jensen Department of Mechanical Engineering / Department of Engineering Mechanics University of the Pacific / U.S. Air Force AcademyAbstractThe goal of this project is to enhance mechanical engineering education by incorporatingexperiments in photoelastic stress analysis within the existing curriculum. Photoelasticityis a visual, full-field technique for determining stresses in parts and structures. In additionto its traditional use in industry, there is a renewed interest in using photoelasticity to
sciences andengineering, in: Yuen,W.Y.D., Broadbridge,P. & Steiner,J.M. (Eds) Engineering Mathematics: Research,Education and Industry Linkage (A.C.T., Institution of Engineers Australia).3 Vaezi-Nejad,S.M. (1993), Final Year Project as an Important component of the electrical and electronicengineering degree course at the university of Greenwich, , Int. J. Elect. Engng. Educ., Vol. 30, pp296-3024 Teo, C.Y. and Ho, D.J.(1998), A Systemic Approach to the implementation of Final Year Project in anElectrical Engineering Undergraduate Course, IEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 40, No.1, pp25—30.5 Ferris,T.L.J. (1998), Assessment process for group work final year projects – the problem of fairness,Proceedings Australian Ass. For Eng. Educ
3147 APPLYING CASE STUDIES IN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY COURSES* James L. Barrott, Neal F. Jackson Chattanooga State Technical Community College/Jackson State Community CollegeABSTRACTIn 1996, five Tennessee technical community colleges received funding for a National ScienceFoundation Advanced Technology Education (NSF/ATE) project. The purpose of the projectwas to develop a group of faculty who will provide leadership in telecommunications curriculumdevelopment. Two of the goals of the project were to 1) develop a framework for atelecommunications curriculum and 2) develop thirty
summer courses, flipped courses throughout the semester and professional development in Pennsylvania. In addition, she has advised over a dozen students on the use of Moringa seeds for sustainable water treatment in the developing world.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals
Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, pp. 234-240.[4] Borchelt N. (2007) “Cognitive Computer Tools in the Teaching and Learning of Undergraduate Calculus”, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Volume 1, Number 2, 2007.[5] Kinsner W. (1977) “Computer Programs for Undergraduate Teaching of Field Problems”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Education Society, ISSN: 0018-9359, Volume: 20, Issue 1, pp. 54 – 60.[6] Design, Analysis, and Rehabilitation for Windows software (DARWin 3.1) User’s guide, darwin.aashtoware.org, Applied Research Associates, Inc., www.ARA.com/transportation.[7] AASHTOWare webpage: http://darwin.aashtoware.org/modules.htm
that offers a single solution approach.The first half of the two-term Power the World sequence explores the depth and breadth of energy issues. Thephysics and engineering of energy and power production are introduced. Discussion emphasizes technical solutions,but in a geo-political, socio-economic context. Students meet weekly with the faculty team and also in separatediscussion groups to enforce the multidisciplinary nature of the problems. Activities include a model UnitedNations session to develop nuclear energy policy. Assignments include a literature review of a chosen solar energyproblem and a research proposal for each team’s course-long project. Student teams are allowed to choose their ownproject topics, albeit with faculty guidance
, Communication Patterns of Engineers. (Piscataway, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2004), 67.5. Patricia Galloway, The 21st Century Engineer: A Proposal for Engineering Education Reform. (Reston, VA: ASCE Press. 2008), 91.6. Ibid, 96.7. Ibid, 91.8. Tenopir, “Communication Patterns of Engineers,” 59.9. Deborah Engel, Sarah Robbins, and Christina Kulp, “The Information-Seeking Habits of Engineering Faculty,” College and Research Libraries, 72(2011): 548-567, accessed February 1, 2015, doi: 10.5860/crl-15510. Ibid.11. Laurie Bridges, “Who Is Not Using the Library? A Comparison of Undergraduate Academic Disciplines and Library Use,” Portal-Libraries and the Academy, 8(2008): 187-196, accessed January 27, 2015, doi:10.1353/pla.2008.0023.12. Honora F
learningCollaborative learning is an evidence-based instructional practice that has been adopted by manyinstructors in STEM courses in higher education. Research indicates that engaging students incollaborative activities is associated with increased student persistence and improved student Figure 3: Example of a coding question from PrairieLearn.learning outcomes and retention [8, 9]. Successful and productive collaborations are rarelyguaranteed, but they can be greatly improved by (a) careful design of the task [10, 11], (b)assignment of team roles [12] and (c) the use of available technologies to both promotecollaborations among students and support the instructors implementing these activities[13, 14].(a) Careful design of tasks. We
Academy at West Point. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Georgia Institute of Technology, as well as a MS and PhD from The Ohio State University. Greg is an US Army engineer officer in the Reserves with experience in combat and construction engineering and more recently the 75th Innovation Command. His research is primarily focused on engineering education and biomechanical factors associated with injury and performance.Prof. John R Rogers, U.S. Military Academy John Rogers is an engineer and an educator. He solves problems with a balance of theoretical knowledge and experimentation. He has expertise in mechanical analysis and design, electronics, application of sensors and actuators, and microcontrollers
Paper ID #11265Why girls with an interest in IT in high-school do not choose IT career – anextended studyDr. Tanya Stanko P.E., Innopolis University Tanya Stanko is a Vice-Provost for Education at Innopolis University. She specializes in launching new Universities from scratch, including setting up curricula and polices, recruiting faculty and students. She holds PhD in Computational Aeroacoustics from the University of Leeds and worked as researcher at Technical University of Munich. Her current research interests include investigation of the professional competencies, foreign learning environment, gender diversity in
the newcurriculum has made on retention of students to gauge the value of the revised content.The researchers feel there are many more areas to analyze to truly understand the impact of thecurricula redesign which will result in multiple studies and subsequent papers.References[1] Wulf, WM A. “The Urgency of Engineering Education Reform.” The Bridge, vol. 28, no. 1, 1 Mar.1998,doi:https://www.nae.edu/19582/Bridge/EngineeringCrossroads/TheUrgencyofEngineeringEducationReform.aspx[2] Douglas, E. National Science Foundation. September 12, 2015. Engineering Education Programs atNSF [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nsf.gov/attachments/136262/public/EngEdwebinar_09-29-15_508.pdf[3] “Our Mission.” American Society for Engineering
narrow range ofskills and techniques. Tenure, publication, and status all depend on leading-edge research,which is most readily accomplished by focusing all of one’s efforts on one specific aspectof a narrowly-defined problem or process. The goal of the engineering academician is tobecome the leading expert on a specific topic. Graduate level engineering education,viewed primarily as training to do research, is closely aligned with the advising professor’sown research and will therefore remain similarly focused. Unfortunately, this focusextends to the undergraduate level, as each engineering subject is presented by a specialist.Engineering design courses can be viewed by faculty as cumbersome distractions, as theyrequire preparation that is
, Eyvind. "Towards a model of strategic actions in the classroom: Games theory asresearch heuristic." Scandinavian journal of educational research 46.1 (2002): 65-81.[8] Washington, Alicia. "Designed to disrupt: A novel course for improving the culturalcompetence of undergraduate computing students." 2022 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition. 2022.[9] L. Springer, M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan, “Effects of Small-Group Learning onUndergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis,”Review of Educational Research, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 21–51, Mar. 1999, doi:10.3102/00346543069001021.[10] N. Francis, C. Pritchard, Z. Prytherch, and S. Rutherford, “Making teamwork work:enhancing teamwork and assessment in higher
. R c a d , L.G., M.G a , W.T. Sc e e , a d R.D. La de , P Ac ve Learning with Cases and I c a M d e , ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, vo.84, no.4, Oct.1995, pp.375-381.10. Shapiro, B.P., An Introduction to Cases, Harvard Business School, 1984.11. P ce, M c ae , D e Ac e Lea W ? A Re e e Re ea c , ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, vol 93, no.3, July 2004, pp.223-231.12. Online Collaborative Learning in Higher Education,, accessed 11/15/ 2004.13. S e , L., M. S a e, a d S. D a a , E ec S a -Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-A a , Review of Educational Research, vol.69, no.1
Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. His research interests include mechatronics, dynamic systems, and control with applications to piezoelectric actuators, hysteresis, and perception. He serves as the faculty advisor for the LTU Baja SAE team. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 From Industry to the Classroom: A Low-Cost Hardware-In-Loop Simulator for Classic Controls ExperimentsAbstractControl system design and validation can be a frustrating experience for many students. Thesestudents benefit from the inclusion of a laboratory component that provides a hands-onexperience to complement lecture. However, physical space and funding for educational labs arealways
AC 2010-1795: UNDERGRADUATE INVOLVEMENT IN DEVELOPING K-12HANDS-ON ACTIVITIESRobert Edwards, Penn State Erie, The Behrend CollegeKathryn Holliday-Darr, Pennsylvania State University-Erie, The Behrend CollegeMelanie Ford, Pennsylvania State University, Erie Page 15.1294.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Undergraduate Involvement in Developing K-12 Hands-On ActivitiesAbstract:The School of Engineering takes a very active role in the K-12 outreach programs at Penn StateErie, The Behrend College (PSB). The school participates in several formal on-campusprograms. Additionally, many faculty members go to local schools to work with students in
Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition 1 Copyright © 2004, American Society of Engineering Educationmanipulation, website design, CAD, etc., and (4) teaching students a new software toolwill require diversion of time away from existing course material.The use of Excel to create automated project management tools, therefore, is a naturalchoice as Excel is available on virtually every college campus. In addition, studentsalready have a basic level of proficiency in its use allowing easy implementation. Theremainder of this article demonstrates how students can use Excel to create ProjectManagement Workbooks (PMWs) to incorporate the “textbook” project managementmethods to their design experience
Empty-Handed Demonstr ations for Engineer s: Think Inside the Box Maurice F. Aburdene*, Beverly JaegerŒ, Susan FreemanŒ *Bucknell University, ŒNortheastern UniversityAbstractRecently there has been much emphasis on the inclusion of technology to improve student learning inengineering and this has proven to be very effective in a variety of engineering courses. The objective ofthis paper is to supplement technology-based education by teaching fundamental concepts using "empty-handed" demonstrations. This instructive technique is defined as one that is accomplished by usingwhatever is typically available in or near traditional classrooms and by simulating concepts with studentsand/or
Tilt-rotor for Information Gathering Operations (Vertigo) Page 10.1149.8 o Vertical take-off and landing airplane with cameras o Team spans ECE and MAE departmentsProceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education • Wake-Up Word (WUW) o Voice recognition and artificial intelligence for homeland security applications o A funded undergraduate research project spanning engineering departments, two universities and a community collegeSenior Design Execution for Conventional
. DARRELL GIBSON is a Professor of M.E. at Rose-Hulman Inst of Tech where he teaches design, noise control, andstructural mechanics. His BS and MS are from Purdue in Aero Engineering and his Ph.D. is from the University ofNew Mexico in ME. He has also been an Associate Professor at the University of Wyoming and a Visiting Professor atColorado State Univ. His industrial experience includes General Dynamics Corp, J.I Case Co, Sandia Labs,NASA/Langley Research Center, and NASA/Jet Propulsion Lab. He is a registered PE. Page 7.855.14 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education7.0 addresses the semester-long individual course project. Student outcomes and feedback arediscussed in Sections 8.0 and 9.0, respectively, and a summary is presented in Section 10.0.2.0 Course BackgroundCreativity, Innovation and Change was originally developed as an elective for all students at thePenn State Great Valley School for Graduate Professional Studies. Penn State Great Valley is aspecial-mission campus in the Penn State University system, tasked with serving the adultlearning community in the Philadelphia region. Since its introduction in 1997, Creativity,Innovation and
informationinternally. The second category gives information on how a person processesinformation. Those who prefer to use their five senses to process the information(sensors) are contrasted with those who view the intake of information in light of eitherits place in an overarching theory or its future use (intuitors). This sensor vs. intuitorcategory is seen by most researchers to be the most important of the four categories interms of implications for education [Myers, Lawrence].The third category for MBTI preference attempts to describe the manner in which aperson evaluates information. Those who tend to use a logical “cause and effect”strategy (thinkers) are contrasted with those who use a hierarchy based on values or onthe manner in which an idea is