Education Innovation Center The Ohio State Univer- sity Columbus, OH 43210 Rogers.693@osu.edu Rogers joined the university in October, 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industrial experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing in robotics, electron- ics, sensors, and controls industries. Throughout his career, Rogers has developed products using an innovative process consisting of multidisciplinary teams focused on understanding customer needs and converting them to commercially viable products and services. He brings this experience to the university where he leads the effort in developing company-sponsored, product-oriented Capstone design programs. As part of the
course is one that all engineering students at The Ohio StateUniversity are required to take and focusses on engineering problem solving, program design,using computational tools such as Microsoft Excel and MATLAB, etc. Additionally, there arehands on laboratory sessions once a week, where students are exposed to different aspects ofengineering experimentation which typically involves setting up an experiment, collecting dataand making meaning from their dataset.In Fundamentals of Engineering – II, the course students are required to take after this course,they learn engineering graphics and visualization in addition to a semester long open-endeddesign project.Both classes meet three times a week with two 55-minute class periods and one 80
AC 2010-1781: CCLI: MODEL ELICITING ACTIVITIES: EXPERIMENTS ANDMIXED METHODS TO ASSESS STUDENT LEARNINGLarry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academics and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former senior editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Dr. Shuman is the founding editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in the engineering education literature, and is co-author of
-the-art course sequence in ICs that produces technically-competent circuit designers must include exposure to real-world design experience withindustry-standard software and laboratories, and instruction that equips students to address futureneeds for reduced device size, weight, and power as well as the capacity to design increasinglycomplex integrated circuitry and modern computing systems of interest to the computingindustry, aerospace, and defense, as discussed in Report on Technology Horizons, LayeredSensing, DOD STEM Education & Outreach Strategic Plan, A National Action Plan, Constableand Somerville, and Examination of the U.S. Air Force’s Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics Workforce Needs.6-11 Such a course sequence
additional component of the new format of the laboratory consistedof more hands-on opportunities being created for the students. Accordingly, in the problem-based module, the students were required to design and build a setup that allowed them toinvestigate experimentally a theoretical problem of their choice (upon approval by the labinstructor). For these experiments, the students were required to develop the laboratoryprocedure and the experiment handout such that a third party would be able to perform theexperiment without guidance. A set of measures was designed and implemented for eachlearning module. An assessment of student learning and development over time was performedusing these measures. The results of assessment are presented and
Session 1609 Design of a module for teaching/learning spectral analysis Natalie T. Smith, Julie E. Greenberg Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology/ Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAbstractThis work concerns the design of a module for teaching/learning spectral analysis with emphasison biomedical applications. The module design is based on the principles of the “How PeopleLearn” framework as embodied in the STAR Legacy model. This model
design process at TCU isbased on these criteria. A 3-semester, team-oriented, industry-funded, electrical/mechanical,interdisciplinary design sequence, beginning in the second semester of the TCU studentengineer’s junior year, is described.introductionEarly in their engineering educational process, students are typically forced to select a specificdiscipline (mechanical, electrical, civil, etc.). They then dutifully follow a program of studiesthat embraces the requisite technical courses (thermodynamics, solid mechanics, circuits, etc.) tosupport this discipline. While laboratory courses may provide an opportunity to stimulate groupinteraction, success in the majority of their engineering courses is typically assessed based uponindividual
Session 2632 A Novel Graphical Technique for Selection of a Robust Design Point José G. Colom*, R.R. Barton**, Lynn Carpenter**, Rafael Rodríguez Solís* *University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez/ **Penn State UniversityI. INTRODUCTIONThe concept of robust design was introduced by Genichi Taguchi, and popularized in the U.S.following his visit to Bell Laboratories in the mid-1980’s. Since this technique has becomeimportant in industry, the topic has been included in many undergraduate engineering statisticscurricula. Unfortunately, the experiment design and data analysis issues are complex
knowledge and instructional skills, using local, state and national research-based curriculum and instruction. The graduate coursework is designed for fulltime classroom teachers that will attend OLLU part time to enhance their content knowledge and instruction and, ultimately, improve student achievement. The teachers will become campus, district and area science and mathematics leaders by sharing what they have learned at workshops and conferences they have attended and through required individual research. The graduate programs will include a combination of lectures, laboratory experiences, speakers, and field trips. OLLU will continue to provide the following graduate programs for classroom teachers that are still active in the
drive circuits. The circuit wiring for the whole system has been designed and developed into a PCB design for compactness and ease of use. The students use graphical programming to control the motor and record its response utilizing the myDAQ as an interface between LabVIEW and the DC motor. Lab experiments that emphasize on design, simulation, and development of virtual instruments to implement motor control have been developed. These experiments train students in various topics of control system theory, such as identification, modeling, speed, and position control. The entire system is housed in a 12” X 12” polycarbonate case, for safety and laboratory desk organization purposes. To assess the level of
standards.As shown in Table 1, they felt more confident to state a hypotheses, design experiments, andchallenge scientific authority (i.e., challenge information found in journal articles).In terms of achievement, students met mastery of eachstandard. Mastery was set at a level of three on the five-point scale. When assessing SP18 and W19 studentreports against both the TRAD rubric and the SBG rubric,several findings arose. Regardless of the rubric usedduring the quarter, students scored higher with the SBGrubric than the TRAD rubric as shown in Figure 1,thereby, alleviating concerns that grades will decreasewith SBG implementation (p=0.01). A possibleexplanation for this observation is that the TRAD rubricpenalized students for mistakes that were not
importance of earthquake engineering and how structures respond todifferent ground motions. Through these hands-on experiments, students may easily use scaledmodels to test the theories and implement their own innovations to examine how structuresbehave. However, the opportunity to conduct such experiments may not always be available tostudents due to many restrictive factors such as the lack of equipment, room capacity, testingschedule, accessibility of the facility, and safety considerations. In attempts to resolve thisproblem, some educators and researchers developed virtual laboratories5,6,7, in which simulatedexperiments were realized through computer software to mimic the experience in the laboratory.Although virtual laboratory provides
opportunity for learning outside theclassroom. The interaction with industry, national laboratories, testing laboratories, anddepartment of energy was enriching and educational. I am able to bring the experience to studentdesign project course.This product has to be further evaluated for optimal lumen output, lamp and ballast life, andvarious lamp ballast combinations.Bibliography1). Raju Dandu (2000). A Proposal for Supply of Recessed CFL Downlight in response to RFP #406422, ofNovember 22, 2000.2). Residential New Construction Program, Market Research Summary Report, Prepared by Ecos Consulting, BenyaLighting Design, Rising Sun Enterprises, May 2002 from the World Wide Web:http://www.nwalliance.org/resources/reportdetail.asp?RID=903). Energy Star
Session 1526 THE FOUNDATION SERIES ON CORROSION: INTEGRATING SCIENCE, MATH, ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY IN A LAB SETTING Linda Vanasupa, Heather Smith, Blair London, Katherine Chen, David Niebuhr, Lanny Griffin California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 Jeff Jones Cuesta College, San Luis Obispo, CA 93406AbstractWe have developed a laboratory module focussing on the subject of corrosion. The module itselfis designed to be completed in one three-hour session. It consists of three parts: I. The Impact ofCorrosion Media, II. The Impact
Paper ID #47210The use of digital twins and AR for indoor environmental quality: classroomas a dynamic laboratory for hands-on and applied STEM-based teachingmodulesDr. Yumna Kurdi, University of Idaho Yumna Kurdi is an Assistant Professor of Virtual Technology and Design at the University of Idaho. She holds a Ph.D. in Architectural Engineering from Pennsylvania State University, an M.S. in Architecture from Carnegie Mellon University, and a B.S. in Architecture/Architectural Engineering from Jordan University of Science and Technology. Her research focuses on parametric and generative design, building energy efficiency
the development of remote laboratories is the use of apersonal computer (PC) that needs to be connected with an experiment. This increases theimplementation costs of the remote laboratory facility when only a limited part of the processingpower of a PC is needed for this development. In addition there needs to be a server to facilitateclient access to the remote experiments. All these make the sustainability issue of remotelaboratories more pressing.6 To address this issue, this paper will report the design anddevelopment of a remote laboratory system in which a commercially available Arduino systemwill replace a PC. This will reduce the implementation costs as well as the physical size of thesystem. An Arduino system comes with a web server
Minnesota. Dr. Mowry spent 25 years in corporate America as an inventor, team builder, R&D scientist, and engineer. His work focused on Nano-technology (both design and processing), materials engineering, micromagnetics, laser optics, and biomedical engineering. Dr. Mowry is also an entrepreneur with experience in several techni- cal startups. He is named on 40 patents along with multiple publications in four different technical fields. In 2003 Dr. Mowry joined the School of Engineering at the University of St. Thomas. He teaches ME, EE, and Physics courses at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. He is the Director of the MSEE program, which has a power emphasis, and the Director of REAL – the Renewable Energy
Operations experiments, and incorporating Design throughout the ChemicalEngineering curriculum. She currently works as a freelance Engineering Education Consultant andChemical Engineer. She is the Project Manager for NSF grant #1623105, IUSE/PFE:RED:FACETS: Formation of Accomplished Chemical Engineers for Transforming Society, for which sheis advising and coordinating assessment.VANESSA SVIHLADr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico inthe Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical & BiologicalEngineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, andis currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and
Engineering Education AnnualConference and Exposition, Session 13333 URL: http://www.msoe.edu/eecs/, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science homepage4 URL: http://www.msoe.edu/ae/program/bsae.shtml, B.S. Architectural Engineering Description5 Skvarenina, T.L., “Development of a Laboratory Experiment to Demonstrate Power Quality Issues,” Proceedingsof the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 23336 Hess, H.L., “Practical Classroom Demonstrations of Power Quality Issues,” Proceedings of the 1998 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 1333GLENN WRATEGlenn Wrate is an associate professor of electrical engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering
" as an example of using mathematical tools (MathCad) in the design of analogintegrated circuit blocks. The resulting MathCad file became a design automation tool for CMOSOpAmp Design. It is shown that all opamp specs targeted are met or exceeded by the sample opampdesigned and fabricated using Fairchild Semiconductor's CS80C CMOS process with the W/L ratiospredicted by this tool. 1. IntroductionIn the design of electronic circuits, in particular, those falling within the classification "Analog"lack of design automation tools results in over reliance on engineering intuition and experience,and time consuming trial and error method to make the circuit "work". The more complex thecircuit, and the less
mechanical, electrical, and software levels. Their focus is not just on physicalmanufacturing systems; also includes the enablement (sensing and acquisition) and use of data(analytics) around manufacturing systems to drive increases in productivity, product quality, andbusiness feedback.” That echoes the “Report to the President Accelerating US AdvancedManufacturing”, which states two emerging technologies of national importance [3]: 1) advancedsensing, control and platform for manufacturing, and 2) visualization, information, and digitalmanufacturing. The ABET proficiencies also require Manufacturing Engineering programs to havecurricular content covering “manufacturing laboratory or facility experience: measurement ofmanufacturing process
primary benefits of having students work on these multidisciplinary projects is thatthey must learn how to communicate well in order to be successful on a large team, which isvirtually impossible to teach without some form of experiential learning opportunity. This istruly a “real world” experience, because undergraduates who excel at designing a complexelectrical subsystem capable must also learn how it can be integrated into a larger system withother electrical, software, and mechanical components. Testing becomes critically important inthe overall system development process, and students learn very quickly that clearly writteninterface control documents can alleviate a great deal of redesign. From a managerial
Paper ID #12496Test Bed for a Cyber-Physical System (CPS) Based on Integration of Ad-vanced Power Laboratory and eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol(XMPP)Dr. Ilya Y. Grinberg, Buffalo State College llya Grinberg graduated from the Lviv Polytechnic Institute (Lviv, Ukraine) with an M.S in E.E. and earned a Ph.D. degree from the Moscow Institute of Civil Engineering (Moscow, Russia). He has over 40 years of experience in design and consulting in the field of power distribution systems and design automation. He has over 40 published papers. Currently he is professor of engineering technology at SUNY Buffalo State. His
the then Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) in themid-1980’s. At that time, ABET began to specify a “culminating design experience” for allaccredited engineering curricula.For many schools, the shift of accreditation criteria to assessment and evaluation processes hasimpacted senior design courses. Student outcomes are often assessed in the senior designcourse(s). Integration of student outcome assessment in design course(s) has met with varyingdegrees of success.Senior design has presented an opportunity to increase interaction with external constituents thathave an interest in projects and in hiring graduates. While these interactions often strengthenoverall student experience, in some cases they present unanticipated
conferences) Conference Proceedings 2 published, 1 accepted Awards 1 (Best undergraduate technical paper in EWRI 2024) Fig 8: Pictures of students presenting at various regional and international conferences.Conclusions and next stepsThe living laboratory provides hands-on learning experiences, bridging theory and practice.Students will tackle local challenges, design and build lab-scale models, and implementsolutions, enhancing critical thinking and engineering design skills. Students will gain adeeper understanding of the interconnectedness between society, environmental issues, andsustainable development, fostering community engagement and empowering futureenvironmental leaders. These projects will
described. Page 26.317.11Bibliography1. Kolb, D. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984.2. Jaksic, N., “Novel Experiential Learning Practices in Engineering Education Based on Inexpensive 3D Printers,” Computers in Education Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 2-17, October-December 2014.3. Planchard, D. C., Engineering Design with SolidWorks 2015 and Video Instruction, SDC Publications, Mission, KS, 2015.4. Jaksic, N., “What to do when 3D Printers go wrong: Laboratory Experiences,” 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, WA, June 14-17, 2015
experience is that students have a more integrated approachto design and a much better understanding of the hardware, software, and instrumentation used inelectrical engineering practice.I. Structure of the laboratory sequenceAn overview of the curriculum revision and the details of the new laboratory sequence have beenpresented previously1. In brief, the Electrical Engineering undergraduate core curriculum modelincludes a total of six 1-quarter hour (3 contact hours/week) laboratory courses during thesophomore and junior years. These courses are designated Lab I (1st quarter sophomore) throughLab VI (3rd quarter junior). The laboratory courses are not tied to a specific lecture course; ratherthey incorporate material from several topic areas within
Tampa, which is currently beautifying three of its stormwater ponds.The Environmental Engineering Laboratory at USF is a required 1 unit course offered in the Falland Spring semester each year with a total enrollment of 60 students each semester. Studentswork in teams of 3 to conduct experiments and write reports for a series of labs that explorewater quality measurements (e.g. pH, turbidity, DO, hardness, phosphorous) and treatmentprocesses (e.g. chemical precipitation, flocculation and settling, sorption, photocatalyticoxidation). Class lectures not only cover experimental approaches, but also used online videosthat addressed issues of sustainability. After the videos, students brainstormed on sustainabilityas it applies to the laboratory
of a new product or engineering system. The Thermodynamics and Heat TransferLaboratory course is designed for students that have limited prior exposure to fluid mechanicssuch as gained through a Fluid Power laboratory course, and a formal prerequisite of the first ofThermodynamics. The unique character of this course consists in being the only opportunity toengage students in a heat and mass transfer laboratory based course. Laboratory activitiesaccount for two thirds of the course, while the classroom-lecture part, only for one third. Thematerial is being conveyed primarily using hands-on approaches.During this course students will experimentally explore basic thermodynamic relations; they willconduct experiments related to flow of
mechanicalexperiences, such as fixing cars or tractors at home. The “feel” for mechanical things is alreadythere; you push it, and it moves. This is not always so with electrical things.In order to present electrical concepts to students unfamiliar with electricity, analogies arehelpful. Some thought experiments and analogies are presented to help communicate electricalconcepts to lay people, and have recently been used to successfully explain basic electricalconcepts to children 10 to 14 years of age. Actual laboratory experiments, using water resistors,water capacitors, water ammeters, water voltmeters, and balloons, have been used in laboratoryexperiments in our curriculum for several years, and these experiments have become eagerlyanticipated in the basic