Performance,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 1990, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.[19] T. O. Ibirinde et al., “Work in Progress: Using Experiment-centric Learning Pedagogy to Increase Student Understanding of Chemical Principles and Concepts,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2023.[20] O. Lee and J. Krajcik, “Large‐scale interventions in science education for diverse student groups in varied educational settings,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 271–280, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1002/tea.21009.[21] C. A. George Mwangi, “Exploring Sense of Belonging among Black International Students at an HBCU,” J. Int. Students, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1015–1037, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.32674/jis.v6i4.332
Paper ID #43454The Use of Animated Visual Aids in the Education of Undergraduate EngineeringStudentsMr. Mohaned Samer Ahmed, Texas A&M Univeristy at QatarOsama Desouky, Texas A&M University at Qatar Osama Desouky is a Technical Laboratory coordinator at Texas A&M University in Qatar. Osama is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in interdisciplinary engineering from Texas A&M University at College Station. He is responsible for assisting with experimental method courses, 3D printing, mechanics of materials, material science, senior design projects, and advanced materials classes. Osama’s professional interests
1 2 2 details Recognizes ethical and professional 1 2 2 3 responsibilities Makes informed judgments in 1 2 2 3 engineering situations involving ethics Considers global, economic, 1 2 3 1 environmental, and societal impactsThe case studies generated using a simple prompt in GenAI were deficient, receiving the lowestscores in all categories (Table 3). Few facts and details were presented in the responses ofGenAI. The technical descriptions were underdeveloped and lacked depth, often containingvague and ambiguous statements (e.g., “levee system was
Paper ID #42212Specifications Grading in an Undergraduate Engineering Dynamics CourseDr. David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Arizona and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Prior to joining UCI, he was a Senior Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories and an adjunct faculty member in
the professor. 6. My preference depends strongly on both the class and the professor.Six students chose the option “My preference depends strongly on both the class and theprofessor.”, two chose “I prefer that the professor does not provide anything, and students preparetheir equation sheet.”, and one chose “My preference depends strongly on both the class and theprofessor.” Four students chose to elaborate on their answer, as given below. Student 2: I think the best is when a student needs to prepare their own equation sheet but the professor offers a review session which highlights any important topics/equations that should be included Student 3: Oftentimes creating my own equation sheet equates to study time
Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition, Session T223- Design Teamwork in the Design in Engineering EducationDivision, 2013.[23] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, "Implications for learning in school,"in How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures, Ch. 7. Washington, DC: The NationalAcademies Press, 2018, pp. 247-292.[24] R. N. Savage, K. C. Chen, and Vanasupa, "Integrating Project-based Learning throughout theUndergraduate Engineering Curriculum," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 3&4, 2007.[25] W. Heinrich and P. Green, "Remixing Approaches to Experiential Learning, Design, andAssessment," Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 205-223, Jun. 2020.[26] G
the authors’ examination ofprevious work that touched on aspects of the area of interest identified, what methodologies aretypically being used in the research literature relevant to engineering librarianship.Objective 1: To identify who is performing research in engineering librarianship.Associated Research Questions: What countries are authors from? What percentage of articlesinvolve international collaboration? How many authors typically collaborate on a single article?Where are most researchers employed? What are the primary journals where authors choose topublish?Objective 2: To identify the research methods used in engineering librarianship.Associated Research Questions: What is the most common research design, method, andanalysis
.” (translated with deepl) [1: p.74].In the general discussion, this requirement is reflected, for example, in the concept of the t-shaped engineer, whose strength is seen in the great variety of interdisciplinary skills, which,in addition to mastering foreign languages, include cultural and communicative skills. In addi-tion, young engineers are expected to think systemically and holistically, as well as to be ableto critically reflect on their own actions [2], [3]. A critical examination of the concept of the t-shaped engineer and a literature review in the context of the ASEE can be found in [4].The aim of these approaches is to lay a foundation for a technology and product developmentprocess that takes into account the non-technical and non-economic
(VTECC). Her research focuses on communication, collaboration, and identity in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Understanding Ecosystems of Interdisciplinary Graduate Education through an Ecological Systems ApproachAbstract esponding to decades of calls for interdisciplinary scholars capable of addressing complexRsocietal challenges[1], [2], [3], this conference paper addresses persistent gaps in interdisciplinary graduate education reform. Despite extensive research on transformational interdisciplinary graduate education, little change has been made in reshaping governing funding, policies, and program structures as well as disciplinary
not onlysurviving being picked at little by little, but also later being asked to prove the scars are real. Theimpact of this can be adverse to the point of Black PhD students leaving a degree program, notbecause of technical difficulty, but in order to preserve their mental wellbeing in an act of self-preservation.The obstacle of navigating an unhealthy work environmentAutoethnographic Narrative 3 Many people believe that toxic experiences in graduate school can be avoided if students arewell prepared, and if that were the case, I would’ve been destined for a smooth sailing journey. Iwas more than prepared. Education provided a path to America for my parents, and they passedon this high regard for education to me. My parents both hold
Paper ID #38509University Library Makerspaces: Create, Connect, Collaborate!Paula C Johnson, Univeristy of Arizona Paula C Johnson is an Associate Librarian at the University of Arizona. She is the Liaison to the College of Engineering, and a member of the Learning & Student Success unit. In addition to this work, she enjoys leading outreach with international students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023University Library Makerspaces: Connect, Create, Collaborate!IntroductionThis paper examines the evolution of the University of Arizona Libraries’ CATalyst Studios,conceived as part of
and 2015, respectively. His primary areas of research are game-based learning, authentic process safety education, and membrane separations.Prof. Michael David Mau Barankin, Colorado School of Mines Michael D. M. Barankin is a Teaching Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Barankin received his B.S. and Ph.D. from the University of CA, Los Angeles in 2002 and 2009, respectively; and he received his M.S., graduating with honors, from the Technical University in Delft, the Netherlands (TU Delft) in 2004. After a post-doctoral appointment at TU Delft through 2011, Dr. Barankin was a lecturer at the Hanze University of Applied Sciences in Groningen, where he taught both in
essentially all chemical engineering departments. In themost recent survey of process control courses conducted through the Chemical EngineeringDivision of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), it was found that about44% of responding process control instructors assess students using some sort of laboratoryactivity [1]. While there is significant evidence to suggest student learning of process controlconcepts is enhanced through hands-on experiences [2], [3], the majority of process controlcourses do not integrate hands-on labs, perhaps due to limited access to process controlequipment. Indeed, the division process control survey concludes that “increasing enrollmentsare challenging the incorporation of physical laboratory exercises
Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev., vol. 2008, no. 120, pp. 81–95, 2008, doi: 10.1002/cd.217.[7] K. A. Holley, “Interdisciplinarity and Doctoral Education: Socialization, Process, and Outcomes,” Cham: Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 269–284. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33350-8_15.[8] S. K. Gardner, “’ A Jack-Of-All-Trades and a Master of Some of Them’: Successful Students in Interdisciplinary PhD Programs.,” Issues Integr. Stud., vol. 29, pp. 84–117, 2011.[9] S. K. Gardner, J. S. Jansujwicz, K. Hutchins, B. Cline, and V. Levesque, “Socialization to interdisciplinarity: faculty and student perspectives,” High. Educ., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 255–271, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9648-2.[10] A. Bandura, “Toward
theexpectations have been standardized for the course and are provided for most of the deliverables.Most recently, we transitioned to requiring students to submit a 30%, 60%, 90% report inaddition to the final project report. The trigger for this change was to offer project advisors morefeedback opportunities to help improve students’ technical writing and information literacy (IL)skills. Variations of a standardized rubric with several key components that assess writing and ILskills were used as shown in Appendix 3. A sample of the assessment data, shown in Figure 2,clearly indicates improvement for the Class of 2023 after adopting this change. 100.0 100.0 90.0
References Cohen & Bailey 1997 2004 Meyer 2006 Mathieu et al. 2008 Weeks 2001 The outcomes we present in this paper have emerged from our work with six groups of partici-pants on MACH content (in two full-length workshops and four multi-part, targeted sessions).These participants represent a wide range of institutions and roles within their institutions. Forexample, participants’ home institutions include University of Illinois (R1 flagship campus),Utah State University (R1 regional), Michigan Tech University (technical university), UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia (R1 international), and Canterbury School (college
leaking into the room, and thisinformation was passed on to the college’s facilities department for possible mitigation.Also for the Heat Transfer design your own lab, the students were required to use the templatefor technical papers submitted to ASME conferences. This would help students achieve ABETStudent Outcome #3 which calls for students to demonstrate “an ability to communicateeffectively with a range of audiences” [17]. By showing that they were able to write aprofessional quality technical paper, students would partially attain Student Outcome #3.However, the initial time this assignment was given, the author was disappointed in the quality ofthe technical papers. With a few exceptions, they were very thin on details.Consequently, the
engineering leaders who deliver world-changing solutions,the new engineer needs competencies beyond the core engineering skills. They needcompetencies to: 1) Produce good technical solutions (engineer) 2) Generate creative ideas (create) 3) Convert ideas to value (innovate) 4) Succeed in the corporate environment (collaborate) 5) Delivery solutions (solution delivery).Table 2 provides a more detailed list of the characteristics associated with these fivecompetencies. In addition to the competencies, the student needs to have the attitude to be aleader. The student needs to have the desire and confidence to be proactive, take risks, and be acontributing member of the team. The student needs to bring passion to the game of
Paper ID #42050Exploring Intervention Research in Statics Courses: A Systematic Review ofASEE Publications from 2013 to 2023Mr. Ibrahim Nihad Awartani, University of Cincinnati Ibrahim Awartani is a fresh first-year international doctoral student pursuing Engineering Education in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education at the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences at University of Cincinnati. His bachelors background is a Mechanical Engineering degree from Philadelphia University in Jordan. His masters background is a Master’s of Sciences in Engineering Management from Eastern Michigan University. He
stakeholders understand and grow its global impact andreputation. Like most institutions, Virginia Tech increasingly needs data-driven reports to bemore effective and competitive. The department’s main priorities center on developingbibliometrics and altmetrics based impact reports for individuals and departments, curating thescholarly record via the Virginia Tech’s Research Information Management System, andenhancing reputational support through scholarly profiles. Additionally, the team delivers data-driven competitive research intelligence reports aimed at understanding internal and externalresearch strengths and identifying potential academic, corporate, and government partners. Forthis purpose, the department employs a variety of tools including
concept maps for “equitable infrastructure” at the end of the semester. The concept mapsrevealed differences in student ideas that reflect the different approaches taken in the courses.Analysis of these concept maps yields insight into student learning on equitable infrastructureand can provide guidance for others wishing to incorporate equity into first-year and/or civilengineering coursework.IntroductionCivil engineering education has long recognized the need for the curriculum to blend a broadarray of technical and professional skills to meet the needs of the profession (see, for example,the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge [1]). The ways in which infrastructure has bothpositively and negatively affected equity in our social systems have
. Morales-Menendez, “Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 909–922, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1007/S12008-019-00557- 8/METRICS.[2] M. Christie and E. de Graaff, “The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5–16, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1254160.[3] D. R. Krathwohl, “A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview,” Theory Pract, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 212–218, 2002, doi: 10.1207/S15430421TIP4104_2/ASSET//CMS/ASSET/7509A7CF- 7CF8-44B0-A92E
, the PtD idea has gradually gained acceptance in the U.S. [3]. However,the traditional curriculum offered by civil engineering programs in the United States does notintegrate PtD concepts [4]. It has been suggested that the engineering community will notincorporate PtD into the curriculum until the accrediting body, ABET, includes it in either aGeneral Criteria or the Program Critera. The majority of civil engineering programs in theUnited States are accredited by ABET. Recently, ASCE’s Civil Engineering Program CriteriaTask Committee (CEPCTC) added a requirement for the curriculum to include an explanationof safety, effective for the 2024-2025 accreditation cycle. Specifically, CEPCTC suggests ninelecture topics that can be used to comply
JohnsonFoundation Qualitative Research Guidelines Project [3]: • Objectivity/Confirmability Relative neutrality, freedom from unacknowledged researcher bias, explicitness about inevitable bias • Reliability/Dependability/Auditability Is the process of the study consistent and reasonably stable over time and across researchers and methods? • Internal Validity/Credibility/Authenticity Truth value. Do the findings of the study make sense? Are they credible to the people studied, members of the research community, and others? • External Validity/Transferability/Fittingness Do the conclusions of a study have any larger import? Are they transferable to other contexts? Do they fit with what we
and leadership that argue perhaps for acontinuum approach to their distinction. Within the domain of management, some observe a spectrumthat distinguishes between successful managers at one end and effective managers at the other:successful managers receive quick promotions, while effective managers care for people, cultivateloyalty, and achieve high team performance.11 The behaviors associated with effective managementsound a great deal like the behaviors Bass (1990) associated with leadership. Further supporting thiscontinuum concept, the total work of engineering management is seen by some to be comprised of (1)technical work, (2) conceptual work, (3) human work (i.e. leadership);9 within this framework,engineering leadership exists as an
exerciseengineering skills toward positive “do-ing”, and creating these opportunities within theundergraduate experience. The implementations are necessarily multi-disciplinary andaddress the intention of de-siloing engineering approaches in the context of broadersocio-technical solutions. Assessment of programmatic goals is another necessary andchallenging aspect, and is also being considered [3].Curriculum development and curriculum modification have comprised significantportions of the approach. A goal of the team is the meaningful implementation ofsustainability considerations in all required undergraduate courses. Although theimportance of these aspects is widely acknowledged by faculty in the authors’departments, as gleaned through conversations and
Historical Technologies And Their Impact On Society Into Today's Engineering Curriculum”, Proceeding of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2009.[2] B.E. Niemi, “STEMstory: integrating history of technology in science & engineering education”, Proceeding of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 24~27, 2018.[3] S.R. Barley, “What can we learn from the history of Technology”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Volume 15, Issue. 4, pp 237-255, 1998.[4] A. Gaynor and G. Crebbin, “How Can Engineers Learn from The Past? A Potential Role for History in Engineering Education”, International
Resources Board.533 http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/policies/hwycapacity/highway_capacity_brief.pdf.534 Koschmann, Matthew A., and Tajshen G. Campbell. 2019. “A Critical Review of How535 Communication Scholarship Is Represented in Textbooks: The Case of Organizational536 Communication and CCO Theory.” Annals of the International Communication537 Association 43 (2): 173–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1590785.538 Ladd, Brian. 2012. “‘You Can’t Build Your Way out of Congestion.’ – Or Can You?” DisP - The539 Planning Review 48 (3): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2012.759342.540 Lee, Christine S., Nathan J. McNeill, Elliot P. Douglas, Mirka E. Koro‐Ljungberg, and
Chem- ical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Journal of Civil Engineering Education Best Technical Paper, the 2021 Chemical Engineering Education William H. Corcoran Award, and the 2022 American Educational Research Association Education in the Professions (Division I) 2021-2022 Outstanding Research Publication Award.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of Texas, Austin Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a
seeking toapply from international schools also must provide a Test of English as a Foreign Language(TOEFL) score, as the vast majority US colleges require a minimum score of 100 out of 120.This is considered a “strong score,” but some colleges will accept lower.12 Many schools havealso started to implement a holistic review to not fall victim to bias with greater success toinclude historically underrepresented minorities. 13Table 1. Required courses for students. Those that fall under the cafeteria criteria havethe option to choose these as a part of their core courses. 2002a 2022Courses Required "Cafeteria" Total Required "Cafeteria" Total