project incorporatingcentering Indigenous ways of knowing and being within an engineering education context. Cal PolyHumboldt’s new master’s program in Engineering & Community Practice is among the first of its kind inthe United States as an Indigenous-centered graduate engineering program. This program is a one-year,project-based degree where STEM students will work through the relationship-building process with anIndigenous Nation to develop and complete an engineering project. As such, the potential impact of theprogram could be significant as we start to engage with the decolonization process as a field. Thisresearch attempts to capture and communicate that impact in a way that centers Indigenous ways of beingand storytelling. This will
Associate Professor of Computer and Information Technology at Purdue Univer- sity in West Lafayette, Indiana. His research interests include cyberinfrastructure systems, high perfor- mance computing, and the reliability of large-scale supercomputing systems. He holds a PhD in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. He is a member of IEEE, the ACM, and ASEE. Page 24.162.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Exploratory Survey on User Perceptions and Adoption of NEES.orgIntroductionScientific communities have developed new technologies
- generating biodegradable polymers, respectively, and has co-founded Automated Cell, Inc. In addition to being an inventor on 12 issued US patents, he has published the textbook General Chemistry for Engineers with Cognella Academic Pub- lishing. He currently is an adjunct faculty member focusing on improving content delivery and student engagement in remote learning in Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University and in Science at Clackamas Community College.Ms. Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University Rachelle Reisberg is Assistant Dean for Engineering Enrollment and Retention as well as Director of Women in Engineering at Northeastern University. Prior to joining Northeastern
features of teaching a junior level Design of MechanicalComponents course using a hands-on method, taught three times in the past three years with highreviews from students and engineers. Rubrics and grading criteria are presented. The coursecovers the analysis and design of mechanical components such as fasteners, springs, bearings,gears, shafts, clutches, brakes, etc. Prerequisites include a course on solid mechanics ormechanics of materials. Students coming into the course are expected to be fluent in performingfree-body-diagrams, static equilibrium analysis, stress-strain analysis, Mohr’s circle analysis,deflection analysis, etc. on structures with various loads (e.g., point forces, moments, distributiveloading) in axial, torsional, and
engineering b. ability to design and conduct experiments c. ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs d. ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e. ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. ability to communicate effectively h. broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in global and societal context i. recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j. knowledge of contemporary issues k. ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practiceIt should be noted that within these outcomes there is
such benefits at the introductory level is to integrate primary literaturesources into the course [5]. Separately, external evaluations of developments in the informalscience education space have correlated integration of outreach into general engineering courseswith undergraduate student self-reported gains in communication skills including communicatingcomplex science ideas to non-scientific audiences, understanding of teaching practices, andincreased knowledge of the community [6-10]. Here we report on the results of a small scalestudy of the impact of introducing outreach elements and primary literature sources into anundergraduate level introduction to nanotechnology course.Course Design and RationaleA 3-credit course with lecture as well
term bootstrapping is short for “pulling oneself up by the bootstraps” and has a specificmeaning within computing. “In computers, this term refers to … processes whereby a complexsystem emerges by starting simply and, bit by bit, developing more complex capabilities on topof the simpler ones.” 9In naming our project, we used the metaphor in three distinct senses, reflecting our goals toimpact three distinct, though interacting, levels: • bootstrapping the novice CSEd researcher by providing entry points into the theory and methods of carrying out CSEd research; • bootstrapping a community of practice of CSEd research practitioners with similar skills, practices, and language for engaging in shared research endeavours; and
currently has programs in all 50 states with programsimplemented in 3,500 schools impacting 300,000 students. PLTW works with AffiliateUniversity Partners to provide PD experiences for PLTW teachers in their region. The programoffers a hands-on, project-based approach to learning that better prepares students for the rigorsof college. The program incorporates math, science, English, and technology skills needed forsuccess and utilizes processes that encourage female and minority participation. Industry representatives are enthusiastic about the success of PLTW as a tool thatsuccessfully and realistically introduces students to the engineering field. The strength of PLTWis that it offers a better image of what engineering looks like, while
Academics – How to approach college classes What does it mean to be a STEM professional? Clifton Strengths: Top 5 Strengths and your STEM Identity Time Management Discussion of Diversity and Cultural Competency topics and exercises Finding your Fall Classrooms on a large urban campusFor targeted bridge sections, including the Urban STEM Collaboratory, after the summer Bridge,students continued to meet weekly throughout the Fall semester via a 1 credit hour First YearSeminar class to build and reinforce the student networking and community beyond the summerexperience.Unique AspectsThe summer bridge week was designed to engage the Urban STEM Collaboratory cohortstudents in ice breaker activities that
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Improving Health Outcomes in Local Medical Developing Nations DoctorWe assessed the impact of the experience using a nationally normed survey for CUREs in STEM[2]. We chose this survey because there is benchmark data available to compare how studentresponses to the CURE compares to results from other types of undergraduate researchexperiences (UREs). We collected survey data over five course offerings: spring 2018, fall 2018,spring 2019, fall 2019, and fall 2023. We found statistically significant pre-post gains on two-thirds of the survey items relating to students’ understanding of the research process andconfidence in their STEM abilities
with digital savvy, new skills in innovating and collaborating, problemframing expertise, and horizontal leadership skills, while putting emphasis on the impacts in theeconomic development of rural regions.In the initial stages, 1990’s–2000’s, the program’s faculty spent time innovating in courses andcurricula trying to shift towards the recently released ABET 2000 student outcome criteria in arural community college setting. The mid-2000’s brought the development of a multi-disciplinary upper division university satellite program that embraced the Aalborg (DK) modelof PBL. The new multi-disciplinary program had ABET outcomes at its core, focusing on thedevelopment of a whole new engineer, especially developing innovative strategies
AC 2012-3761: CAPSTONE DESIGN FACULTY MOTIVATION: MOTIVA-TIONAL FACTORS FOR TEACHING THE CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEAND MOTIVATIONAL INFLUENCES ON TEACHING APPROACHESCory A. Hixson, Virginia Tech Cory A. Hixson is a graduate student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. Previous experience is in audio/visual engineering and K-12 math/science education. His research interests are in faculty motiva- tion, entrepreneurship, design education, K-12 engineering/STEM education, and research to practice in engineering educationDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center
compare learning outcomes between the onsite, hands-on instructional deliveryvs. the online simulation delivery method. One outcome will be the identification of what aspectsof the online simulation make it effective or not effective; what aspects of the on-site, hands-onmake it effective or not effective. The research will analyze the impact on student learning of thesequence of instruction in the three modes of operations: demonstration, practice, and test.Questions include: What is the impact of the online simulation on the future career aspirations of students? What is the cost differential for implementation? What is the student motivation level comparison?In addition to data concerning student learning, data will be gathered from
Paper ID #44612Design of a Smart Alert System Based on Electroencephalography SignalAnalysisMarina Almeida, Eastern Michigan University I am Marina Almeida, a dedicated Electrical and Computer Engineering student currently enrolled at East- ern Michigan University. Outside the classroom, I actively engage in organizations such as the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). As a member of the Honors College, I’ve also had the great opportunity to participate in community service events and take on leadership roles such as guiding younger generations.Dr. Qin Hu
Paper ID #41797Appraising the Impact of Dialogical Pedagogy and Curriculum Co-Design: AConversation Between the Humanities and EngineeringDr. Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University Brainerd Prince is the Associate Professor and the Director of the Center for Thinking, Language and Communication at Plaksha University. He teaches courses such as Reimagining Technology and Society, Ethics of Technological Innovation, Technology and the Anthropocene, and Art of Thinking along with communication courses for undergraduate engineering students and Research Design for PhD scholars. He completed his PhD on Sri Aurobindo’s Integral
engaged withinstructional materials. Reisman and Carr1 concluded that students learn 20% of thematerial taught by hearing, 40% by seeing and hearing, and 75% by seeing, hearing, anddoing. Furthermore, people learn concepts and skills better when sharing in teams thanworking in isolation. Thus, most of newer educational approaches emphasize activelearning by students, in which instructors move from being lecturers to coaches. Thelaboratory is an ideal setting to introduce such hands-on activities where students can learnby experiencing. The physical devices and simulations used in the laboratory provideactive experiences for the students, allowing them to make parametric adjustments,observe the effects in related thermodynamics variables, and
Paper ID #241732018 ASEE Zone IV Conference: Boulder, Colorado Mar 25Inspiring Community College Students in Electrical and Computer Engineer-ing Research through Live Digit Recognition using Nvidia’s Jetson Tx1Mr. Jayson Paul Mercurio, Canada College Jayson Mercurio studies computer science at UC Santa Barbara. He is a recent transfer student from Canada College in Redwood City and interned at SFSU over the summer of 2017, working on image recognition with neural networks.Kevin YamadaMr. Jose L. Guzman, Canada College Jose L. Guzman is currently an undergraduate at Canada College. He participated in a research program
Grand Challenges for Engineering,fourteen challenges facing modern society that reinforce the message that engineers use theircreative problem-solving skills to improve our world and shape the future. [17] [18] See Table 1for a list of the Grand Challenges. Each of these challenges impact people around the world andusing these challenges as framing for engineering projects and lessons can engage students whoare interested in having a career that helps others or solves problems they observe in theireveryday life.Most of the work evaluating the impact of the Grand Challenges has focused on undergraduateengineering majors and their perceptions of lessons based on Grand Challenges. [19] Forexample, Corneal found that students responded positively
Paper ID #41362Redefining Engineering Literacy with Generative AI: Impacts and Implicationsfor Diverse Languages and Expertise in Engineering EducationDr. Clay Walker, University of Michigan Dr. Walker is a Lecturer III in the University of Michigan’s College of Engineering Technical Communication Program. He regularly teaches first-year, intermediate, and senior writing courses for students in all engineering disciplines, but especially Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science Engineering. His research focuses on the interplay between identity, experience, and agency in language and literacy practices in technical and
115: Intro to STEM Teaching) and one designed as a service-learningcourse for engineering undergraduate students (EF 327: Engineering Design in K-12 Education),are taught together by a team of instructors from both the Engineering Fundamentals (EF)division and the department of theory and practice in teacher education (TPTE).In this combined course, students learn about the field of engineering and how it can beincorporated into K-12 STEM teaching, as well as learning about how to teach effectively andhow to create instructional materials. They complete a series of service-learning projects thatinclude working directly with K-12 students and families at community outreach events anddeveloping videos and lesson plans that can be used to teach
equipment [1, 9-11]. The outcomes of these capstoneprojects can lead to tangible enhancements in laboratory equipment, improving functionality,accuracy, and overall effectiveness. Consequently, this contributes to the continuousimprovement of educational resources within engineering programs, fostering a more robust andmodern teaching environment, and providing engineering students with cutting-edge resources.Through the integration of capstone projects centered on equipment improvements, and guidedby faculty teaching respective courses, students engage in a comprehensive learning experiencethat goes beyond theoretical understanding. They are required to conduct in-depth research of theexisting laboratory setup(s) identifying inefficiencies
international aspect of the community building effort, d) Steering Committeeformation involving robotics industry members and university faculty, e) several student projectson social aspects of the RICC, f) setting the format and schedule for the conference, g) refiningthe competition format and scoring rubric, h) holding the First Annual 2009 RICC, i) conductinga survey of RICC attendees and assessing the results.We report on the extent to which the competition and conference achieved four major goals: (1)stimulating students to imagine new robotics applications and encourage them to develop theirideas into working prototypes; (2) bringing student work to the attention of industry leaders whomay see opportunities to further develop the students’ ideas
of UND’s Center for Engineering Education Research. Her research explores strategies for broadening access and participation in STEM, focusing on culturally relevant pedagogy in science and engineering. She also investigates strategies for increasing access and participation in STEM through teacher professional learning opportunities and by exploring the impact of group gender composition on girls’ motivation and engagement. Dr. Robinson is a PI and Co-PI on several NSF sponsored grant projects which focus on teacher professional learning and self-efficacy with implementing culturally relevant engineering education, connecting to place and community, and centering culture and Indigeneity within STEM education
increasing the number of underrepresented engineering students is the lackof a sense of belonging those students may feel while enrolled as a student. Previous researchshows that a lack of strong sense of belonging in higher education is a common reason for theearly withdrawal of ethnic minority students [8]. In fact, students who find few peers in theirclass—often underrepresented ethnic groups and women—“tend to feel much more strongly thatthey don’t belong” [9] so a lack of community can deter underrepresented students frompursuing engineering in the first place.The CAR Strategy is one pedagogy that intends to contribute to eradicating underrepresentationof racial/ethnic minorities in engineering. It aims to provide a framework for driving outnon
(MHOS) learning platforms (e.g., mobile personal instrumentation and control devices likemyRIO, myDAQ, Analog Discovery and ADALM1000 and processors/microcontrollers likeArduino, Raspberry Pi, PSoC, ARMmbed, LaunchPad … ) provide almost unlimitedopportunities to solve this remaining problem in engineering courses. Pedagogy based on thesetools has been implemented and studied in many institutions in the US and in other countries,impacting thousands of students each year. In all cases in which hands-on learning has beenstudied, the pedagogy has been successfully implemented. This has occurred even intraditionally theory-only courses, resulting in more engaged students and instructors. Althoughthe initial assessments of this new approach to STEM
presentations - We use the Solidworks professor platform, that has a certification path from beginning to end.Additional Lessons LearnedThough there were convergent and divergent themes from interviews, there were also reflectivelessons from instructors.Two out of four instructors explained that they communicated their transition plan to the studentsand polled students to get their input on the plan. Both reported that the students responded wellto their suggestions and engaged in the proposed activities. One instructor reported that ‘almostone hundred percent of those students said: we wanted to
AC 2011-2296: EXPLORING COLLABORATIONS WITH NON-METROPOLITANCOMMUNITY COLLEGES TO GRADUATE MORE ENGINEERING ANDCOMPUTER SCIENCE STUDENTS WITH BACHELOR’S AND GRADU-ATE DEGREESMary R. Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University MARY R.ANDERSON-ROWLAND is the PI of an NSF STEP grant to work with five non-metropolitan community colleges to produce more engineers, especially female and underrepresented minority engi- neers. She also directs three academic scholarship programs, including one for transfer students. An Associate Professor in Computing, Informatics, and Systems Design Engineering, she was the Associate Dean of Student affairs in the Ira a. Fulton School of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. She was named a
past years, she has taught several thousands of students of diverse backgrounds. She has a strong passion for teaching innovations, in particular, active learning strategies, engagement pedagogies, and open education. Dr. Yan strives to make sustained contributions to support holistic student success and wellbeing through her teaching practices and scholarship of teaching and learning. She is an active contributor to UBC, professional societies, and the broader communities through her K-12 outreach program and committee work within and beyond UBC. Dr. Yan is a registered P.Eng. with EGBC (Engineers and Geoscientists BC), and a member of CEEA (Canadian Engineering Education Association) and ASEE (American Society for
. Studies have discussed various aspects of the differences between, particularly, studentsand professionals in the solving of ill-structured problems. Differences have been found in the useand type of analogies and whether they were schema-driven or case-driven (e.g., [8], [18], 19]),time spent in the problem scoping and problem solution space (e.g., [8], [9], [20], [21]), and thebreadth of problem solving (e.g., [9]). These studies were all focused on students and professionals,but have not included faculty. Consequently, there is a lack of data on how faculty prefer to solveill-structured problems, the correlation between their preferences and their pedagogicalapproaches, and the impact on faculty approaches on a student’s development of problem
engineering job market. The second primary issue was that nearly 30% of thenon-retained students had been put on academic probation due to low grades.FORCES activities were designed to improve retention by bolstering academic performancebeginning with improved calculus readiness before the first semester. This involved two keycomponents - community building through cohorts and improved calculus readiness andperformance. The strategies and some of the impacts of those strategies are presented in thesections that follow. Additional details can be found in the article “Mathematics Performanceand First Year Retention of Students in Engineering Learning Communities.”23Improved Calculus Readiness and Performance. FORCES scholars that were not ready toenter