Conference Session

Trends in ME Education Poster Session

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

M. Grant Norton; Charles Pezeshki

opposed to any particular geographic location. In fact, ifcurrent trends continue, U.S.-based multi-national corporations will become less and lessdependent on continental U.S. engineering services, and more reliant on offshoreproviders. Current corporations such as the Boeing Company are already moving to“24/7” engineering cycles for new aircraft, with engineers around the globe working onthe same shared parts and assemblies in their respective countries as the world turns. Aslarge corporations like Boeing, Daimler-Chrysler and Black and Decker implement truepaperless environments, with suppliers and manufacturers alike sharing information in acentralized digital model, corporations with engineers that are not educated in PLMmethods will be

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Jackson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Jiawei Zhang, Purdue University; Rebecca Kramer, Purdue University; Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Design-Based Research and Soft Robotics to Broaden the STEM Pipeline (Work In Progress)This report describes the intent, methods, and progress of the three-year NSF award “SoftRobotics to Broaden the STEM Pipeline,” which is a partnership between Purdue University,high-school

Conference Session

Student Teams, Groups, and Collaborations

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maya Rucks, Louisiana Tech University; Marisa K. Orr, Louisiana Tech University; David E. Hall, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #16789Social Consciousness in Engineering Students: An Analysis of Freshmen De-sign Project AbstractsMaya Rucks, Louisiana Tech University Maya Rucks is an engineering education doctoral student at Louisiana Tech University. She received her bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the University of Louisiana at Monroe. Her areas of interest include, minorities in engineering, K-12 engineering, and engineering curriculum development.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and Associate Director of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center (ISERC) at

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University; Anthony Radzins, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #9293From Idea to Prototyping A hands-on engaging undergraduate design expe-rienceDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic UniversityAnthony Radzins, Florida Atlantic University Page 24.631.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 From Idea to Prototyping: A Hands-On Engaging Undergraduate Design Experience Daniel Raviv and Anthony Radzins Department of Computer & Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Florida Atlantic University

Conference Session

Design Cognition II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shraddha Sangelkar, Texas A&M University, College Station; Daniel A. McAdams, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

impact on theuser-centric design.SummaryThe paper explains the procedure to create actionfunction diagrams for user centric design ofproducts. Some of the advantages of actionfunction diagrams are focusing closely on product anduser interaction, highlighting those functions of a product in which the user is involved, andallowing for analysis of user-product interaction in the early design stages.This method can be introduced in an engineering design curriculum for user-focused design. The Page 25.355.14aim of this paper is to educate the design community and engineering educators about theimportance of user modeling and the available methods to

Conference Session

New Models for Teaching and Learning

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Llewellyn Mann, University of Queensland; Gloria Dall'Alba, University of Queensland; David Radcliffe, University of Queensland

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Page 12.1559.3programs. Further, in current engineering education, the content is not only decontextualised, butfragmented into specific discipline and subject areas. So for instance mechanical engineeringstudents do not learn about the practice of mechanical engineering, but learn fragmented subjectssuch as mechanics, dynamics, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics and design, without anunderstanding of how they relate to each other or to practice.This process of decontextualisation and fragmentation is what Schön25 refers to as the ‘normativeprofessional curriculum’: first, teach students the relevant basic science, second, teach them therelevant applied science, and third, “give them a practicum in which they can learn to applyclassroom knowledge

Conference Session

ABET Criterion 4 and Liberal Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Heinz Luegenbiehl; Kathryn Neeley; Jerry Gravander

complicated than the neat, reductionist realm of scientists and engineers. . . .In the real world, disparate components interact in complex systems.” Erika Jonietz 3Abstract Criterion 4 of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)Engineering Criteria 2000 requires that engineering curricula culminate in a major designexperience that incorporates “engineering standards and constraints that include most of thefollowing considerations: economic; environmental; sustainability; manufacturability; ethical;health and safety; social; and political.” That is, Criterion 4 calls for an educational experiencethat integrates virtually everything students have learned, ranging from their technicalengineering knowledge to

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Describing the Engineering Student Learning Experience Based on CAEE Findings: Part 1

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mia Clark, Stanford University; Lorraine Fleming, Howard University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Cynthia Atman, University of Washington; Ronald Miller, Colorado School of Mines; Ruth Streveler, Purdue University; Reed Stevens, University of Washington; Karl Smith, University of Minnesota

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

knowledge develop and/or change over time? 2. How does one's identity as an engineer evolve? 3. What elements of engineering education contribute to the students' skills/knowledge and identity? What elements contribute to students’ persistence in an engineering major and persistence in the engineering profession? 4. What skills do early career engineers need as they enter the workplace?The first of these questions addresses cognitive outcomes, the second deals with affectivelearning, and the third cluster of questions examines the interplay of outcomes andenvironmental factors critical to student success. Taken together, these questions align with thehighly durable and influential input-environment-outcome (I-E-O) model of college

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jeremy Straub, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education

. Mountrakis and D. Triantakonstantis, “Inquiry-based learning in remote sensing: A space balloon educational experiment,” J. Geogr. High. Educ., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 385– 401, 2012.[7] N. Mathers, A. Goktogen, J. Rankin, and M. Anderson, “Robotic Mission to Mars: Hands- on, minds-on, web-based learning,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 80, pp. 124–131, 2012.[8] R. Fevig, J. Casler, and J. Straub, “Blending Research and Teaching Through Near-Earth Asteroid Resource Assessment,” 2012.[9] S. R. Hall, I. Waitz, D. R. Brodeur, D. H. Soderholm, and R. Nasr, “Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002, vol. 1, pp. T2A-9-T2A-15

Conference Session

The Best of Design in Engineering

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael S. Trevisan, Washington State University; Denny C. Davis, Washington State University; Steven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho, Moscow; Jay Patrick McCormack, University of Idaho; Phillip L. Thompson, Seattle University; Paul R. Leiffer, LeTourneau University; Howard P. Davis, Washington State University; Susannah Howe, Smith College; Jennifer E. LeBeau, Washington State University; Robert E. Gerlick, Pittsburg State University; Patricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

AC 2012-4389: INTEGRATED DESIGN ENGINEERING ASSESSMENTAND LEARNING SYSTEM (IDEALS):Prof. Michael S. Trevisan, Washington State University Mike Trevisan is a professor of educational psychology at Washington State University and the Associate Dean for Research in the College of Education. For more than 17 years, he has worked with engineering educators across the country to develop engineering design curriculum and assessments for a variety of engineering disciplines. His key collaborator is Dr. Denny Davis, Washington State University.Dr. Denny C. Davis P.E., Washington State University Denny Davis is professor of bioengineering at Washington State University. He has led numerous educa- tional research projects

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sonia Travaglini, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Swetha Nittala, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

unanticipated learning outcomefrom the situation, the instructor stated: “So we saw on Piazza that was actually really nice. It was just kind of this natural evolution of the students helping each other with [TA] and I trying as much as we could with the experience that we had assessed as well.”The kit supplied to each of the students was sourced from a specialist aerospace supplierXinaBox, who manufacture both educational kits, and actual space-ready components used fornano-satellites currently in orbit. The kits contained a variety of electronic sensors, powermodules, small radio antennas, and connector components, as seen in Figure 3. Instructorsmentioned working with many staff, including departmental administrators and

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joe Muskin, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Jessica Perez, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Paper ID #37346Designing Effective Student-directed Research Experiencesfor High School Students (Work in Progress)Jessica Perez Jessica G Perez is the Associate Director of Education and Inclusivity for the Engineering Research Center for Power Optimization of Electro-thermal Systems (POETS). Dr. Perez earned a B.S. in Biological Engineering from MIT and a Ph.D. in Chemical and Biological Engineering from Northwestern University. Her professional interests include engineering education, inclusive teaching, and DEI best practices in higher ed.Joe Muskin Joe Muskin is the Education Coordinator for the Department of

Conference Session

Contextual Competencies

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hyun Kyoung Ro, Carnegie Mellon University; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan; Dan Merson, Pennsylvania State University; Patrick T. Terenzini, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2012-4880: MEASURING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ CONTEXTUALCOMPETENCEDr. Hyun Kyoung Ro, Carnegie Mellon University Hyun Kyoung Ro is a Research Designer and Analyst in the Institutional Research and Analysis at Carnegie Mellon University.Dr. Lisa R. Lattuca, University of MichiganDr. Dan Merson, Pennsylvania State University Dan Merson is a Postdoctoral Fellow for the Center for the Study of Higher Education and the College Student Affairs program at Penn State. He received his Ph.D. in higher education from Penn State in the summer of 2011. While at Penn State, he primarily worked on the NCAA-funded Student-Athlete Climate Study (SACS), a nation-wide project to assess student-athlete’s perceptions and experiences

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University; Nirangkush Das, Arizona State University; Brent Wallace, Arizona State University; Phil Blake McBride, Eastern Arizona College; Clark Vangilder, Central Arizona College; Tim S. Frank, Glendale Community College; John W. Griffith, Mesa Community College; Russell Cox, Mohave Community College; Eddie W. Ong, Phoenix College; Ernest Moulinet Villicana, Phoenix College Engineering; Celia . Jenkins, Cochise College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27039 Prior to obtaining a BS in Mathematics in 1995, I served in the US Navy as a Submarine Nuclear Propul- sion Plant Operator from 1985 – 1991. Subsequent to the BS degree, I obtained employment with DeVry University from 1998 – 2008; during which, I completed a Master’s degree in Physics, with an emphasis on Physics Education. Since 2008, I have been the Professor of Physics at Central Arizona College. In February of 2016, I completed a PhD program in General Psychology with an emphasis in Cognition & Instruction.Dr. Tim S. Frank, Glendale Community College Dr. Tim Frank grew up on

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Engineering Design and First-Year Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Marie Starkey, Pennsylvania State University; Nicolas F. Soria Zurita, Pennsylvania State University; Sarah C. Ritter, Pennsylvania State University; Matthew B. Parkinson, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

, 2020.[5] J. S. Lamancusa, J. E. Jorgensen, and J. L. Zayas-Castro, “The Learning Factory—A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 103–112, 1997, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1997.tb00272.x.[6] J. S. Lamancusa, P. State, L. Bldg, T. W. Simpson, P. State, and L. Bldg, “The Learning Factory – 10 Years of Impact at Penn State,” International Conference on Engineering Education, 2004.[7] K. Carley, “Content analysis,” 1990.[8] E. Hilton, M. Tomko, A. Murphy, R. Nagal, and J. Linsey, “Impacts on design self-efficacy for students choosing to participate in a university makerspace,” presented at the DS 89: Proceedings of The Fifth

Conference Session

Collaborative & New Efforts in Engineering Education

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Bramhall, Sheffield Hallam University; Keith Radley, Sheffield Hallam University

Tagged Divisions

International

AC 2007-1015: PROMOTING LEARNER AUTONOMY IN ENGINEERINGMichael Bramhall, Sheffield Hallam University Mike is Head of Learning, Teaching and Assessment at Sheffield Hallam University's Faculty of Arts, Computing, Engineering and Sciences. He is the Associate Director of the Centre for Promoting Learner Autonomy at Sheffield Hallam. He is also the Associate Director of the UK Centre for Materials Education at Liverpool University, which is part of the UK Higher Education Academy.Keith Radley, Sheffield Hallam University Keith is a Lecturer in Curriculum Innovation at Sheffield Hallam University,(specialising in media and resources)in the Learning and Teaching Institute. Keith has 25

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Radha Balamuralikrishna; Clifford Mirman

graphics educators on this subject in terms of curriculum and instructionalphilosophy, there are still a large number of course transfers between programs and acrossinstitutions3. The Illinois Articulation Initiative (IAI) provides a potential national model forseamless transfer of college credit within and between 2-year and 4-year institutions, andtechnical graphics features prominently on the list of articulated courses. We discuss theprevailing IAI briefly and how it applies to technology degree programs. Our studies indicate aneed for further research on best practices for a freshman technical graphics course and ensurethat certain basic standards are met wherever the course may be offered.Technical or Engineering Graphics – An Aerial SurveyA

Conference Session

Issues in Engineering Technology Education II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

. Jovanovic is currently serving as Assistant Professor of Engineering Technology, Frank Batten College of Engineering and Technology at ODU. She is teaching classes in the area of mechatronics and computer aided engi- neering. Her research Interests are: mechatronics, digital manufacturing, manufacturing systems, and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Introducing Writing Assignments in Engineering Technology Courses to Enhance Technical Writing Skills and Critical ThinkingAbstractThis study was prompted by the university wide initiative to improve students’ technical writingskills across-the-curriculum by introducing low stakes writing assignments as

Conference Session

The Best of Design in Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Robert W. Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

connected.1 There are many books and paperswritten on creating PBLs, their effectiveness, the pros and cons, etc. In fact there is even ajournal dedicated to PBL: The International Journal of Problem-based Learning.Many engineering colleges use PBL in Introduction to Engineering courses, but not necessarilyformally (i.e., do not use all the PBL elements listed above). The typical learning objectives ofan Intro to Engineering course, such as team-work, problem solving, and design, cater well to themethod. Also because PBL is an interactive and engaging educational experience, its use iscrucial in the first year of an engineering curriculum that is otherwise filled with non-engineering-specific courses (i.e., PBL aids in retention). Lawrence

Conference Session

Engineering Entrepreneurship and K-12 Education

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David M Feinauer, University of Kentucky; Bruce Walcott, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

addition to the inspiring support from all of the program staff, faculty and student volunteersare depended upon for hands-on engineering education. In order to give the students the bestexposure to engineering and its many areas, students investigate the disciplines with facultymembers in that field. They tour research laboratories and complete undergraduate-levelexperiments with the faculty members and their student assistants. As a result, the college and itsfacilities are considered as a perpetual “open house” to the students of the program. Somestudents have even used the college’s rapid prototyping facilities and manufacturing center forcomponents of their project prototypes. However, ESP also has dedicated classroom facilities,lab equipment

Conference Session

Assessment

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanne Mathews, Illinois Institute of Technology; Daniel Ferguson, Illinois Institute of Technology; Margaret Huyck, Illinois Institute of Technology; Abhinav Pamulaparthy, Illinois Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

beginning and ending LO knowledge varies by background and other demographicfactors. Our final research goals are to isolate the gains made in declarative LO knowledge orother values received in a second IPRO course as opposed to a first IPRO course and to evaluatevarious techniques for improving the declarative knowledge [test scores] of our students.Many engineering programs have project based courses with similar learning objectives and theimplications for engineering educators supporting these curriculum are related to measuring theacquisition of knowledge obtained directly from a course versus other courses or, for example,prerequisites. It is also beneficial to evaluate methods to measure the knowledge acquisitionrelated to specific skills

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Lawrence Carlson

) Page 10.1052.12. Modeling an existing part (testing comprehension)3. Creating a new part from scratch (application) Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationIn this paper, I discuss how these steps are implemented in a large-size, required first-yearengineering graphics course in the mechanical engineering curriculum. The third step isemphasized and illustrated through a unique rapid prototyping project in which students design anew body for a radio-controlled model car that is subsequently fabricated through the generouscontribution of

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design II / Design for Special Services

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Conry, Clarkson University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

AC 2007-1889: ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR HUMAN NEEDS: EXPANDING THESCOPE OF ENGINEERING SENIOR DESIGNSusan Conry, Clarkson University Dr. Conry is a faculty member in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Clarkson University. She obtained her B.A., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees at Rice University. Her interests include engineering education, multiagent systems, and parallel and distributed systems. Dr. Conry teaches in a variety of areas in computer engineering and software engineering. Page 12.622.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Engineering Design for

Conference Session

Professional Formation and Career Experiences

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Andrea Chan, University of Toronto; Milan Maljkovic, University of Toronto; Dimpho Radebe, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

the same, paying specific attention toan individual’s period of employment.45 Between March and December 2018, weconducted 29 interviews with senior engineers working in seven different industries:chemical processing, manufacturing, higher education, public service, consulting,financial services, and software. All participants had a minimum of 25 years’ workplaceexperience, 93% were licensed Professional Engineers, and all but one worked inCanada. All 29 participants were identified by key informants as engineering leaders.Despite a deliberate attempt to demographically diversify our sample, the final group was72% male and 79% white. Our sample is older (mean age, 59), more female, and slightlymore racially minoritized than the population of

Conference Session

Robotics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S.M. Mizanoor Rahman, New York University; Veena Jayasree Krishnan, New York University; Vikram Kapila, New York University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

; engineering; language learning; mathematics; etc. [3-7]. A robotics-focusededucational framework offers myriad advantages, for example: i) engaging participants in active learning;ii) providing kinesthetic experiences in teaching and learning; iii) permitting students to visualize andcomprehend abstract content knowledge in a concrete and tangible manner; iv) motivating learnersintrinsically and extrinsically; and v) improving the overall learning environment, learning satisfaction,learning of disciplinary content, and learning/teaching outcomes [8,9]. Considering these advantages ofrobotics-aided teaching and learning, application of robotics in STEM education has gained intense interestfrom educators, policy makers, and teaching administrators

Conference Session

Research on Design Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jackson Lyall Autrey, University of Oklahoma; Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

possibly inaccurate? His quest for answers to the key question are anchored in three projects, namely, Integrated Realization of Robust, Resilient and Flexible Networks Integrated Realization of Engineered Materials and Products Managing Organized and Disorganized Complexity: Exploration of the Solution Space His current education focus is on creating and implementing, in partnership with industry, a curriculum for educating strategic engineers—those who have developed the competencies to create value through the realization of complex engineered systems. Email URL http://www.ou.edu/content/coe/ame/people/amefaculty/mistree.html LinkedIN http://www.linkedin.com/pub/farrokh-mistree/9/838/8baProf. Zahed Siddique

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Methodology

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Aditya Vora, Pennsylvania State University; Daniel Allen Henderson, Pennsylvania State University; Jennifer Bracken, Pennsylvania State University; Neeraj Sonalkar, Stanford University; Stephen Harris, Community College of the Air Force

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

guitar.Mr. Daniel Allen Henderson, Pennsylvania State University While a student at Penn State, Daniel Henderson earned both his M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction (Secondary Science Education) and his B.S. in Engineering Science (with Honors). Currently, he works as a research assistant and will later pursue a full-time high school physics teaching position.Ms. Jennifer Bracken, Pennsylvania State University Jennifer is a mechanical engineering graduate student at Penn State. She is interested in design, prototyp- ing, teams, and advanced manufacturing. Currently she is studying design teams for her PhD work. Her MS work involved designing and prototyping a robotic inspection system for nuclear waste storage cylin

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching Methods in IE Education

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Durward Sobek, Montana State University; Susan Freeman, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

Department for 15 years. Page 11.252.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Assessment of Hands-On Introductions to Industrial EngineeringAbstractThis paper focuses on two Introduction to Industrial Engineering courses offered at differentinstitutions. The instructors of these courses have independently developed and incorporatednumerous hands-on and experiential learning exercises to convey core topics in the field ofIndustrial Engineering. While it is evident that the courses are more entertaining with theseexercises, it is less clear that they affect student learning in positive ways. Thus, this paperdescribes similarities

Conference Session

Computers in Education 7 - Modulus 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Afrin Naz, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Gay Stewart, West Virginia University

ResearchScientist for Secure and Upgrade Computer Science in Classrooms through an Ecosystem with Scalability& Sustainability. She is evaluator for the National Science Foundation GP-IMPACT: ImprovingGeoscience Education for Rural and First-Generation College Students, RII Track 2 FEC: Enabling Factoryto Factory (F2F) Networking for Future Manufacturing, and Department of Education Title IIIStrengthening Potomac State College.Dr. Gay Stewart, professor of physics and Eberly Professor of STEM Education in the West VirginiaUniversity Department of Physics and Astronomy, is director of the WVU Center for Excellence in STEMEducation. She is a former president of the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT). In additionto her leadership role in the

Conference Session

Preparing Engineering Students for Their Professional Practice

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jia Zhu, Florida International University; Ellen Zerbe, Pennsylvania State University; Monique S. Ross, Florida International University; Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Mining Society, 2018.[22] A. Fortino, Q. Zhong, W. C. Huang, and R. Lowrance, “Application of text data mining to stem curriculum selection and development,” in 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). IEEE, 2019, p. 354––361.[23] S. Lunn, J. Zhu, and M. Ross, “Utilizing web scraping and natural language processing to better inform pedagogical practice,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2020, p. 1––9.[24] B. Rybarczyk, L. Lerea, P. K. Lund, D. Whittington, and L. Dykstra, “Postdoctoral training aligned with the academic professoriate,” Bioscience, vol. 61, no. 9, p. 699–705, 2011.[25] X. Su, “Postdoctoral training, departmental prestige and scientists’ research productivity,” J