-HigherEducation Forum, affiliated with the American Council on Education. 2 This sentiment wasexpressed earlier in the halls of The American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) via the1995 National Science Foundation report Restructuring Engineering Education, as well as aPrism article on Pennsylvania State University. The university's Leonhard Center for theInnovation and Enhancement of Engineering Education has funded a new leadership minor,which Director Jack Matson described: "There are five basic things the world tells us we need todo to radically improve engineering education: . . . to enhance communication skills, increaseinternational outlook, broaden understanding of business, encourage creativity, and call attentionto ethical
classmate, an advisor, a team mate on a project, aninterviewer for your dream job, a venture capitalist, a board of a non profit. They alsowondered what Jon meant when he suggested he was not confident about his future. Wewill return to the story of Jon later in the Conversational Storytelling section of the paper.Overview While everyone is not a natural storyteller, the use of storytelling-based learning25(SBL) in classroom teaching is a great way to come up with innovative solutions, oftenparallel to entrepreneurial ventures. If this is sounding a bit ambiguous – it is ourintention to explore just that – the relationship between the ambiguity in conversationalstorytelling and engagement to maximize new creation with four concerns that
implications for integrating these tools into the classroom to betterprepare our students for their future careers.As with any new educational tool, GAI also poses new challenges to their implementations thatmay be deleterious to the overall learning experience. For example, new GAI tools may requiresignificant time and resources to develop and implement, constraining engineering educators withlimited resources. Moreover, there is a learning curve for both educators and students to learnhow to use GAI tools effectively in the classroom, which could initially impede the learningprocess. Furthermore, there are ethical issues, algorithmic bias, and data privacy that may need tobe resolved or addressed before using GAI in engineering policy, practice
workis important for engineering education.3 We were convinced, as were NSF panel reviewers, thatit was important to fill a visible gap in the research literature on the learning and work practicesof new engineers. And we found further motivation for the study from arguments in importantconsensus documents in engineering education. As stated in an authoritative consensus report onengineering education from the National Academy of Engineering, there is a clear “disconnectbetween engineers in practice and engineers in academe” and that “the great majority ofengineering faculty, for example, have no industry experience. Industry representatives point tothis disconnect as the reason that engineering students are not adequately prepared, in theirview
outcome.Observations in ABETThe transition from Conventional Criteria to EC2000 has caused some difficulties within ABET.The issue with lack of definitions for key terms has been discussed. There have also been somechallenges associated with implementation and maintenance of current documentation, a newweb format, new training, and new background processes within ABET. To the credit of thestaff at ABET headquarters, they have maintained an open-door policy with regards to questionsand concerns coming from the institutions and their volunteers. Accreditation visits areconducted with the same openness. This has certainly alleviated some of the concerns.The major issue recognized by ABET, its volunteers, and the institutions is one of consistency.Consistency
allowstudents to pursue applied biomedical engineering in practical, interdisciplinary settings.Students and faculty will be concerned with the design, analysis, integration and operation ofengineered materials and engineered systems in biological applications. Participants will also beconcerned with the development of techniques, theories and models which further theimplementation of new engineered systems and materials in industrial settings, with particularstrength in biomaterials / biomechanics and bioinformatics / modeling.To create the program, we used university/college resources and industrial partnership toaccomplish the following aims: 1) Establish the Bioengineering Program within theBioengineering Department, a fundamental organizational
mentors and the project assistant. The matter was also reported to theproject team, so they were aware of any immediate challenges.Implementation ChallengesBased on a review of mentor notes and documentation of the mentor process, several implementationchallenges were noted. For example, simple scheduling issues became a major concern almostimmediately. The project tried to create as many mentoring session time slots as possible so that menteeswould be able to find one that suits them. In some sessions there may only have been a single mentee oreven no mentees per time slot. A partial-explanation for this scheduling issue is the large proportion ofstudent that worked part-time and full-time. Table 2 illustrates the percentage of students in the
. Byusing an actual technological product the question of likelihood is avoided. Thetechnological product, or engineering solution actually exists. A very new technology isused so that significant potential societal impacts have not yet occurred. The technologyexists, and is available but has not yet diffused into society to the point where socialimpacts have become evident.Actual news articles written for a general audience are used in describing the newengineering solution for several reasons. First, a description for the general audience ismost appropriate for beginning engineering students that are not likely to have developedin-depth engineering knowledge yet. Second, it helps to avoid faculty bias by usingdescriptions of technological issues
for the laboratory by investigating all aspects of theexperiment: theory, system operations, personnel assignments, safety concerns, workingequations and correlations, data acquisition, handling of measurement uncertainty, data analysis,and evaluation of experimental objectives. While all group members participate to some degree,the supervisor primarily interacts with the designated team leader, and the prelab grade isassigned to that individual.2.2 Experience: Hands-on Operation (Application)Upon completion of the prelab report, the student team commences its laboratory work,operating without input from faculty or teaching assistants (potential safety issues excepted).Student teams, as directed by their team leader, are in complete control
issues surrounding workforcedynamics for engineers, and provoked intense interest in those concerned with the overalleconomic future of the US. The question is no longer just whether engineers are being treatedas commodities, but how engineers and other highly educated technical people shape and areshaped by the emerging realities of a truly global workforce. Engineers as a professional groupare thus the canaries in the mineshaft of the new world economy. Whether engineers manage thetransition from local to international workplace environments will determine if the professionremains attractive. The ways in which engineers weather the transition will be significantindicators of the viability of the globalized workplace of the future and the
. Page 8.900.9 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ? 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationThere are also issues of the lack of clarity in some difficult topic presentations and the need formore tutorials dealing with those topics.The major thrust of the weaknesses feedback is that, with the modules in their current state, moststudents do not feel they can perform all the experiments without faculty assistance.Feedback Response For any new course, original pace estimations always need to be readjusted andsometimes drastically to reflect the true average student progress speed. This can only beascertained through the natural feedback process after
prepared toparticipate in online meetings with their counterparts from all engineering disciplines anduniversities because they had already shared their ideas, problems, concerns, etc., amongthemselves. This workshop series is a major step in testing out ideas developed within theorganization to more fully and productively engage joint PWI-MSI teams in the US educationand research enterprise; graduate more and better prepared minority engineers; increaseefficiency and productivity at MSIs; and develop a sustainable and effective infrastructure tosupport minority students, faculty and staff at all universities. In time, the group will grow andthe model being developed can be replicated and implemented for other disciplines.In addition to COVID, the
purposes, as well as examples of use in professional issues courses were describedby members of the research team [26-28].EPSA Rubric EvolutionA core tenet of rubric design and development is to refine and revise over time with input fromusers. The original EPSA Rubric learning outcomes were directly tied to six of the ABETEngineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) Criterion 3 Student Outcomes as published in theEC2000 in 1999. Three of the 5 faculty from the original 7 person NSF-sponsored research teamupdated the rubric to increase clarity, relevancy, and flexibility of use for faculty in engineeringprograms worldwide, no matter the programmatic accrediting body.Thus, the 2024 EPSA Rubric is accreditation organization agnostic and the learning
requirementsfrom The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) limit the businessschools’ ability to offer innovative courses with faculty from other disciplines. Many of thesecomplications can be overcome with a little creativity and extra resources.3Unfortunately the cultural differences between Engineering schools and Business schools areharder to overcome. The issues stem from the differing expectations of students, professors andadministrations. Business and engineering students often have differing expectations aboutgrading and workload requirements. Similarly business and engineering faculty often havediffering expectations about how much of the course should be devoted to project work. Finallythe administrations of the business
environment where friendships are already established.Recognizing the issues faced by students entering university, prior studies have shown theeffectiveness of “summer bridge programs” (SBP) at helping to alleviate some of theseissues [4, 5]. Many such programs have been targeted towards those transitioning from highschool to college. These programs typically are residential, last several weeks, and focus onimproving student academic performance, adapting to a new environment, and improvingretention in programs [4].As a part of the California State University System, one of the largest and most diverse Universitysystems, our primarily undergraduate institution has responded to a Statewide call to increasetransfer pathways to provide students
, faculty, and employers alike see passing the FE exam as animportant first step in a Civil Engineering career. Historically, FE pass rates at our Universityhave slightly trailed both national averages and those for our Carnegie classification-basedcomparator group for those students taking the Civil Engineering specific afternoon exam. Therelative difference in pass rates, however, has been quite variable over the years. Recently,department faculty have responded to this situation by conducting an analysis of curriculumissues related to student preparation for the FE exam and by implementing new measuresdesigned to improve student preparation and FE exam pass rates. An analysis of the most recenttest performance found that there was a
development of new STEM majors, particularly in emerging fields such asengineering, computer science, and information technology, emerges as imperative for fosteringSTEM growth at Keiser University. Addressing these challenges head-on is paramount tocultivating a more inclusive and supportive environment that empowers all students to pursue andpersist in STEM disciplines.As it is clear from tables 3 and 4, the major drawback are the retention and graduation rates forboth STEM and non-STEM majors. . In order to address the issue, a comprehensive mentoringplan will be the developed in the coming year.The proposed mentoring plan utilizes the mentors (a) To serve in an academic support role inwhich they will provide one-to-one or very small group
Page 13.1300.4approaches span the Schuylkill River, I-76 (the Schuylkill Expressway) and AMTRAK’snortheast corridor tracks and is crossed overhead by a major north-south rail freight line. WhileWalnut Street was closed to traffic during construction, access to buildings along and at the levelbeneath the viaduct had to be maintained; also AMTRAK and I-76 traffic could not beinterrupted. Subsequent lectures by faculty dealt with transportation issues and the constraintsimposed by building within an existing right of way and how only limited improvements intraffic flow could be attained. Faculty lectures also addressed the structural aspects of the bridgeand its approaches including moment diagrams for the three-span continuous portion over
Grant. She has also been recognized for the synergy of research and teaching as an invited participant of the 2016 National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Symposium and 2016 New Faculty Fellow for the Frontiers in Engineering Education Annual Conference. She also was an NSF Graduate Research Fellow for her work on female empowerment in engineering which won the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 2015 Outstanding Doctoral Research Award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22910Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam
and mustdesignate either UT-Arlington or UT-Dallas as their home institution. Students receive thedegree from the home institution but take courses from both. The program was conceived in thespring of 1999, and course development began in the fall of that year. The first courses wereavailable online in fall 2000 with the full complement of 24 courses planned for the 2002academic year. US News and World Report 1 recently selected CS/EE Online as one of the bestonline graduate programs in engineering.The following two sections will provide the context in which the program was conceived anddeveloped and program details, respectively. Course development related issues are thendiscussed. The final two sections of the paper describe administrative
position is to be headed by an internal faculty with halftime teaching load. This person reports directly to the Provost.To sustain Kettering University’s study abroad programs and to have them continue to grow anddevelop, we will need to examine our International Programs to see what needs improvement,what lessons have we learned in running study abroad programs and examine if there are otherways of cultural exchange for faculty besides the students. Part of what we know lies in theliterature in the field of International Education. An ever increasing body of literature suggeststhat evaluation and assessment of study abroad programs and faculty exchange will becomeincreasingly important as we try to acquire funding from new sources and garner
, Organizing, Staffing, Motivating, Communicating, Measuring and Correcting. A key tool designed to help implement CARR management strategies is illustrated at Figure 2 – CARR Task Sheet.Educational BenefitsThe educational benefits extend to students, faculty and the university. The multi-disciplinaryresearch and engineering integrate various disciplines for students and faculty to explore as asystem or environment. The CARR influenced several new initiatives, which are now newcomponents within the university academic inventory.• Two new classes were developed – “Space Science” and “Intro to Nuclear Engineering.”• Faculty of various disciplines team together and pursue more diverse research ventures.• Students are involved real world
productand the underlying methodologies [9].The structure and implementation of capstone courses vary widely among institutions, and evenwithin the same institution [10], [11], [12], reflecting diverse educational goals and resources.Some courses span one semester, while others extend over two semesters, incorporating bothproject-based and lecture components. Project sources also differ, ranging from faculty researchand industry partnerships to design competitions. Team composition and formation strategiesvary, with some institutions allowing self-selection and others assigning teams systematically toenhance dynamics. The focus of capstone projects may emphasize technical proficiency,professional skills, or a combination of both. Additionally, some
rather than text, and then the committee repeatedly practiced withassistance from both the engineering student who explained technical issues, and the CDAEstudent who structured the training program based on knowledge of cultural practices andapplying group facilitation skills. CDAE faculty oversaw the training and assisted both studentswhere and when they needed assistance. Page 15.295.8A new local health committee was formed to work with CDAE students to disseminateinformation about the importance of clean water and to conduct water quality testing. Initialtests taken above and below the filter that showed a marked decrease in e. coli
productive and student-centered peer-to-peer interactions, and (3) advance student abilities in the analysis, design, and testing of electronic circuits. This paper discusses the implementation of the pedagogy with examples of specific projects, faculty experiences and challenges, and student feedback with the new approach.I. Introduction Benjamin Franklin once said [1], “Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.” As instructors, in addition to providing the technical knowledge, it is our responsibility to foster independent, critical, and creative thinking as well as encourage effective collaboration among students. To this end, we are presenting an updated pedagogy for the two- course electronics sequence at
consultations where educators get advice on individualchallenges, creation of websites and books with teaching information, and development ofcommunities of practice around teaching. But what do we know about practices such as these?Answers to this question, and strategies for answering this question, can be of interest to thosefaculty developers, instructional consultants, and others who are interested in helping educatorsadvance their teaching.Any approach to advance teaching will likely need to address two issues. First, the approach willneed to be a learning event in that teachers are succeeding in learning something (e.g., newteaching techniques, new ways to think about students) that will help them improve theirteaching. This might be considered
UAB faculty and students $0 d. Comprehensive Plan, Framework Provided by City and RPCGB $0 Plans, Shape Bham etc e. CANVAS Software - Collect 60 Students of the School of Public Health TBD indicators regarding the built collect built environment data environment 2 IDENTIFY KEY CORRIDORS a. Focus on corridors that connect Analysis performed by UAB facilities and $0 and strengthen the community UAB SSCRC and add safety to routes for school 3 Install new sidewalks and repair existing SIDEWALKS
Technology and her Ph.D. in Bacteriology from the University of Wisconsin Madison. In addi- tion to research at the intersection of microbiology and environmental engineering, she teaches biological principles of environmental engineering and a graduate level scientific writing class. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Examining engineering writing instruction at a large research university through the lens of writing studiesAbstractRecognizing challenges to developing undergraduate engineering students’ writing, theUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Engineering invited instructionalinnovation proposals to tackle this issue. Bringing together faculty
funding for K-12 science and mathematics; B. increase federal fundingon research; C. recruit the best and brightest scientists and engineers to work in the U.S.; and D.improve the U.S. infrastructure for new technology and innovation, including tax credits. Thesignificance of the report is the detailed recommendations for U.S. investment to ensure theseaccomplishments over the next ten years (see Table 2).Business Roundtable ReportA group of 15 leading business organizations [5] joined together to issue a deep concern aboutthe U.S. ability to sustain its scientific and technological superiority in the world. Theirexpressed goal is to double the number of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) degrees in the U.S. by the year 2015
ofenvironmental issues to the point that they now affect national strategy decisions.Transboundary conflict over air and water pollution, solid and hazardous waste (bothmilitary and non-military), deforestation and desertification have already begun to tear atthe fabric of international cohesiveness. Because of its overarching significance, theconcept of environmental security can no longer be considered in the context of ‘otherminor concerns.’ Environmental security, just as computer science did over the last thirtyyears, has grown to a point that it is now, and always will be, a major player on the stageof international politics.In its mission to serve ‘The Common Defense’ of our country, the United States Armymust have strong leadership and a vision