-conceived, designed, and implemented short-term studyabroad program can overcome most of these concerns for engineering students, improve theparticipation of engineering students in study abroad experiences, contribute to globalcompetency, and eventually generate scholarship revenue to address the cost issue for studentswith financial need.Learning ObjectivesSince the popularization of the term “sustainable development” through the 1987 BrundtlandReport, there has been a continuous effort to clearly define what it means and how it can beachieved. Over the last two decades, a consensus has been reached that the major developmentalchallenges can only be addressed by interdisciplinary cooperation and new approaches to riskassessment and management [6
final section outlines theresources required and presents the implementation plan.II. Definitions of each criterionThis section of the paper provides a brief definition of each criterion and thenfollows with more details for satisfying the criterion.1. Undergraduate Research: Undergraduate research has been consideredimportant for retention and for graduating productive engineers. A study byZydney, et al. [6] reported that undergraduates who work with a faculty memberin research are more likely to continue to graduate school as well as have betterABET “soft skills.” The same group completed a follow on study [7] of facultyperceptions concerning undergraduate research and found that faculty were ableto mentor students to deeper understanding of
found in a study of 38public institutions and 28 private institutions that 89% of faculty thought critical thinking wasimportant, but only 19% could identify an operational definition for critical thinking.5 To get a betterhandle on how to measure and assess critical thinking, the American Association of Colleges andUniversities (AAC&U) has identified critical thinking as “habit (s) of mind characterized by thecomprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before accepting or formulating anopinion or conclusion” as a part of its Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate EducationInitiative.1 Being able to evaluate evidence and use that evidence to make decisions or solveproblems seems to be the common thread that
presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.24. Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74-84.25. Sahin, M. and Kurban, C. F. (2016). The Flipped Approach to Higher Education: Designing Universities for Today's Knowledge Economies and Societies. UK: Emerald. ISBN 978- 1786357441.26. Sharma, N., Lau, C.S., Doherty, I., and Harbutt, D. (April 2015). "How we flipped the medical classroom". Medical Teacher. 37: 327–330.27. Uzunboylu H. and Karagozlu, D., Flipped classroom: A review of recent literature, World Journal on Educational Technology, Vol 7, Issue 2, 2015
foundation for long-term success [4], [5]. Based on our work with RED teams, we recommend that the project team revisit theproject’s vision (often a part of the original NSF proposal) and facilitate a conversation thatencourages all team members and the new leadership to share their thoughts, ideas, and perspectiveson the change initiative. Having a unified voice will help rally the team and provide a sense ofmission for the team to follow. This is reflected in the quote from a RED team member below: When the [RED] proposal was funded, I had already stepped down from my leadership position… We had new faculty, new leadership, and that really forced us to sit back and think about what we wanted to do now that all the players
collegeshave laboratories that are highly underutilized despite being adequate for undergraduateinstruction. Following this reasoning Eastern Washington University (EWU) extended itsestablished Electrical Engineering (EE) program into the Seattle metro area by partnering withNorth Seattle Community College (NSCC). Upon finishing their two-year degree at thecommunity college, students start taking classes imparted by EWU faculty both through two-wayinteractive TV broadcasting and in the internet through Webex. This paper documents thevarious lessons learned through the first year of class delivery, including lecture delivery throughTV broadcasting, dual-site laboratory management, advising issues, etc. Furthermore, it presentsa model for a successful
consultants, university inventors,and business, engineering, and law school faculty mentors.The ITV program has been in operation since fall 2003. Since that time nine Page 12.853.2virtual companies have been formed and over 70 students have participated. Afterthe pilot offering, it was recognized that several issues were limiting the overall “Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2007, American Society for Engineering Education”success of the ITV program and diminishing the educational value for the studentstakeholders. Chief among these issues were the following: 1. The
classroom and to the ever expandingtechnological advancements of a global community. Diversity, as used in this paper refers toURM students that have been historically under-represented in the STEM disciplines.Specifically, African American, Hispanic/Mexican American, and Native American students arereferred to as “URM’s”There is increasing interest in impacting the academic pipeline from Kindergarten throughtwelfth grade to provide the nation with technically competent URM STEM students to sustaincurrent and create new technologies for generations to come. Corporations, universities, andSTEM focused organizations have placed significant emphasis on supporting retention andrecruitment efforts. For more than 30 years, these issues have loomed over
resources currently used, what topics are of interest to faculty, howfaculty might use new content.Teaching tools: instructional methods currently used, what online features are of greatestinterest to faculty.ResultsOne of the major findings of this survey is the domain of challenges faced by educators. Thesechallenges can be organized into two categories: teaching and administrative. Results from theneeds survey indicate that entrepreneurship educators are focusing on experiential learning, theywant to provide real-world experiences for their students, and are looking for quality materialsthat can be customized to fit classroom and community contexts, rather than entirely predefinedcourses. Teaching challenges include issues of content development
Session #734 Building Industrial Partnerships and Business Relationships: Early Career Interventions for Professional Growth and Learning-Centered Classrooms Beverly Davis Purdue UniversityAbstractAt Purdue University, a new president has redirected an entire university and this transformation will alterthe way most non-tenured faculty progress through the tenure process. The new triad of Learning,Engagement, and Discovery has replaced the historical Teaching, Service, and Research pyramid that somany of us have come to recognize as the all in all
energy resources are under harsh criticism over issues such asglobal warming, public health, air pollution, waste disposal, and ecological damage4. Because ofthe increase in energy demand, the depletion of fossil fuel resources, and the cleaner nature ofrenewable energy compared to fossil fuel resources, renewable energy has gained massiveattention during the last twenty years. Due to these concerns, the U.S. government is attemptingto replace conventional energy resources with renewable energy resources. The production ofrenewable energy production is experiencing rapid growth, thanks to supportive policies andattractive incentives provided by the U.S. government. With government and private initiatives,renewable energy generation has increased
with the ethical issues surrounding those matters (much as Longenecker describes inhis findings on entrepreneurs’ concerns 2). He wants to secure the opportunity to consult with astart-up company, and he wants to impress the company’s CEO by finding a lower price on chipmanufacturing. This situation also involves personal relationships, which may come under strainbecause of the initiative that the entrepreneurial engineer has undertaken in his quest to savemoney for the start-up. Cases which reveal the ethical dilemmas involving hiring one’s friends,often without advertising a job opening or interviewing others, are especially suited toilluminating the ethical dilemmas of entrepreneurs. On the other hand, more engineeringoriented cases may
workforce.14 It is whythe present investigation focuses on both the racial/ethnic and gender dimensions of identity. Thegood news is that, with the appropriate policies and practices in place to encourage minoritysuccess in STEM fields, this is a solvable issue.16,18 Those challenges and barriers that inhibit thesuccess of underrepresented minority students in engineering and other STEM fields, as well asfactors contributing to success, must be identified to address the virtual absence of minorities in Page 23.132.3STEM fields and to increase their academic success.16,19Both academic and social factors influence the success of underrepresented
ofcommunity engaged research within STEM (e.g., [7]).CER is often conducted to aid marginalized communities. There are significant public health andpublic education disparities among minoritized communities that could perhaps be partiallyaddressed through research partnerships with academia. Federal funding has been directed tohelp address these issues from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [8],[9], US EnvironmentalProtection Agency [10], and the National Science Foundation [11]. Funding opportunities maybe drawing in researchers new to conducting and/or evaluating high quality CER. This isparticularly concerning as these communities are the least able to endure the additional burdensof research participation without realizing optimal benefits
topics, and many programs are under pressure toreduce the number of courses and credits required for graduation. For these reasons, the civilengineering faculty at Oregon Institute of Technology decided to introduce the topic ofsustainability at the senior-level in the capstone design course.Senior Design at Oregon TechIn order to address concerns related to insufficient team skills, lack of multidisciplinaryexperience, and poor communication abilities, a unique capstone design course was developed atOregon Tech8. This year-long, three term course sequence was designed to allow students toparticipate in the complete design and development process of a civil engineering project, frominitial conceptual plans to final engineering designs. The
piloting new non-traditional assessments andraising student awareness that DEI should be central in engineering practice. One main premisewas not to teach the topics overtly, but rather raise DEI issues via activities. These in and out ofclass learning activities included things like role playing, self-assessments, case studies andimpromptu polls.From the teaching perspective, preliminary results show that students are aware of issues relatedto DEI, however, it is unclear whether or not there was an increase in student comprehension ofits implications and the need for taking a more holistic approach to engineering. What didbecome apparent however, was the need for an increase in faculty training, a general awarenessand acceptance of the validity
paper presents a combined student-faculty appraisal of analternative approach that covers these issues within the context of systems projects as the core ofa 3-credit freshman class. The outcomes affirmed that a freshman group could analyze complexsystems and that it is a good way to stimulate interest in electronics as a career.A new approach to electronic systemsIt is all too easy to take the steady evolution of electronics technology for granted. The 43-year-old rhythm of Moore’s Law 1 continues to provide products with greater functionality at vastlylower cost and better reliability. It is the drumbeat of technology development that leads to morecomplex systems at affordable cost and thus to increased productivity and wider applications
-destructive testing, and health monitoring of concrete structures. He has authored more than 100 refereed publications in journal and conference proceedings.Dr. Ma’moun Abu-Ayyad, Penn State Harrisburg Dr. Mamoun Abu-Ayyad received his B.ScE. in Mechanical Engineering from Al-Mustansiryia Uni- versity in 1995, his M.ScE. in Mechanical Engineering from Jordan University of Science and Tech- nology in 1998. He obtained his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of New Brunswick/Canada in April 2006. Dr. Abu-Ayyad joined the department of mechanical engineering at Penn State Harrisburg as an assistant professor in August 2008.Prof. AB Shafaye, Penn State Harrisburg AB Shafaye has been a faculty member
Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: A Course in ProgressAbstractDue to a Summer 2012 conversion from quarters to semesters, the Department of Mechanicaland Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University has embarked on an effort to revampand enhance its design sequence. This began in the Spring and Summer of 2010 with graduatingstudent exit interviews, alumni focus groups, and faculty retreats culminating in a modificationof the current design sequence at the university. This paper focuses on a new design course forsecond year students admitted to Mechanical Engineering. The objectives are two-fold: (i) toenhance student’s foundational knowledge, skills, and associated intuition, and (ii) to introducethe students to open–ended design problems
United States of America is creating opportunities to increase thenumber of professionals in the fields of engineering and technology [2-7]. Power and energyindustries are the cornerstone of a prosperous society; all critical and crucial socio-economicfunctions depend on secure, sustainable and reliable energy and power infrastructures. Growing concerns for the environment and increased demand for sustainable energy generation,requiring new approaches in the power and energy industries, which are receiving significantattention from educators, professionals, public and governmental officials. As penetration of newenergy technologies, renewable energy systems, distributed generation, and energy storagetechnologies keep increasing there will be
Session Number 2004-1543 Curricular Integration of Computational Tools by Evolutionary Steps Mark Urban-Lurain, Marilyn Amey, Jon Sticklen, Timothy Hinds, Taner Eskil Michigan State UniversityAbstractCalls for new paradigms for engineering education are widespread.1, 2, 3 Yet, major curricularchange is difficult to accomplish for many reasons, including having the necessary faculty buy-in.4 Generally, efforts can be classified as either topdown/ structural, in which faculty assess anentire program of study and address needs in each component before implementation begins; orbottom-up/individual, a more
schedule hours and monthlyworkshops; monthly advisement sessions; documenting advisement meetings and reportingany issues/concerns to the coordinator; and developing activities which promote social,academic and professional growth. Participants in the peer advisement program were responsible for meeting with theirpeer advisor to create a resume to assist with internship placement. Discussing academic andcareer issues with peers was associated with higher professional outcome expectations, andthe chances of achieving career success and combining a professional career with having abalanced personal life. Each participant was matched with a peer advisor, primarily based onclass schedules. The peer advisors were available to all participants
industry” of “non-computerfirms such as banks and investment service providers, law practices, entertainmentconglomerates, and many others whose mission is to sell content and supporting services directlyto the general public.”5 This shift entails “cross-functional” requirements of computer scienceprofessionals who must now expand their abilities to deal with not only technical problems, butalso issues of user concerns and communication.Regarding communication skills, publications have indicated that engineers in the workplace areincreasingly required to possess solid writing and oral presentation skills. In a 1993 survey of Page 10.786.2
teachingtechnical communication content using five distinct approaches. The first four are variations onthe conventional technical communication course. The final approach represents a significantdeparture from the standard course as content was developed into a new summer course team-taught by communication and engineering faculty. As we develop these approaches, we remaindedicated to sharing the work we do with others in the field of communication, particularlyfaculty who teach communication in engineering contexts.Context for the Projects—A Brief Review of the LiteratureBringing technical communication instruction and engineering instruction into alignment is not anew idea, and research over the past decade has reflected a growing trend toward
Proceedings of 2014 Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE Zone 1) Improving Retention by Mentoring and Tutoring Freshmen Students Ashwin Satyanarayana, Hong Li, and Josephine Braneky {asatyanarayana, hli, jbraneky}@citytech.cuny.edu Department of Computer Systems Technology New York City College of Technology, 300 Jay St, N-914, Brooklyn, NY 11201. The issue is twofold: attracting students to
well. UC Clermont College relies upon thefacilities and expertise of Sporty's to provide the pilot flight training. In turn Sporty'smanagement leaves non-flight instructional issues and responsibilities to UC Clermont. There areareas of mutual concern. Insuring instructional quality, program promotion, faculty selection,student development, financial aid, and graduate placement are a few of these mutual concerns.The leaders of both Sporty's and UC Clermont College have a six-year history of successfulcollaboration in the development and implementation of this program. BIBLIOGRAPHY1. "Aircraft Pilots." Occupational Outlook Handbook. 1996-1997ed., pp 215-18
first submit totheir advisor a Revision 0.9. After review and feedback, the revision changes to 0.95 and it issent to the industry representative. During the approval meeting, the document is furthercritiqued and suggestions for changes discussed. When the final modifications are completed, thedocument moves to Revision 1.0 and, thereafter, requires a change request for significantalterations. As the year progresses, a change to one document may result in a ripple of changes toearlier documents.Each month, the teams prepare a Program Review describing their accomplishments, plans fornext month, any issues, and questions-answers. On a rotating basis, one student presents thereview to the class (faculty in attendance). Usually, the Program Review
in partnership with the University’s Department ofMathematics and coordinated by first-year math, course-specific specialists. This team suggesteda just-in-time instruction model which utilizes extended instructional time to integrateintroduction of new on-level topics with remediation of shortfalls in students’ prerequisiteknowledge and skills to address any remaining concerns about students’ preparedness to enter anaccelerated college-level course. Such courses were piloted in recent years with a focus oncalculus instruction. Additional offerings for lower-level math courses were in development atthe time and have been implemented in the academic year following the online Summer BridgeProgram. This model of extended instruction and just-in
guaranteed$100/person/semester in the senior year. Students needed a faculty advisor to sign up on theirpurchase request, but otherwise, they did not go through a formal process to have their projectbudget approved.As part of the continuous improvement process in the program, the faculty identified severalareas to improve the quality of student projects and provide a more entrepreneurially mindedexperience. These areas for improvement included the following:When teams were advised by only one advisor, each faculty member had slightly differentexpectations, leading to issues with inconsistent grading across project teams. Additionally,while projects aligned with the assigned faculty member's expertise in some instances, thiswould not always be the
iteration involves documentstorage in a Canvas webpage (similar to a course webpage). I am the “instructor” for the courseand I change the “student” participants yearly as new officers are elected.The university recently re-organized all student organizations based on a risk assessment modelinto three categories based on risk and mission. The student chapter was defined as level 2 basedon “Level 2 Student Organizations is the designation given to a Student Organization that hasdemonstrated its purpose to be both aligned with to the mission and culture of the University andthe benefit of the members internal to the organization.”[13] In addition, the group needs todesignate a full-time faculty/staff member as an advisor (who then undergoes training