colleges and focused on Engineering Education. Her passions include but are not limited to Engineering Education, Energy Engineering and Conservation, and K-20 STEM Outreach. Prior to matriculating at NCSU, she worked at the North Carolina Solar Center developing a passion for wind and solar energy research while simultaneously learning renewable energy policy. She combined these passions with K-20 STEM Outreach while a National Science Foundation Fel- low with the GK-12 Outreach Program at NCSU where she began Energy Clubs, an out-of-school-time program for third, fourth and fifth graders to introduce them to renewable energy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Implementing
Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology at Eastern Washington University in Cheney, WA. His research interests include additive manufacturing, advanced CAD modeling, and engineering pedagogy. Before transitioning to academia, he worked for years as a design engineer, engineering director, and research scientist and holds MS and PhD degrees from University of CA, Irvine and a B.S. degree from Walla Walla University.Dr. Robert E. Gerlick, Eastern Washington University Dr. Gerlick is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology at Eastern Washington University. He teaches courses in the areas of Robotics, Mechanics, Thermodynam- ics, Fluids
for communities in developing countries via research grants, Engineers Without Borders, Rotary International, and the U.S. Peace Corps. He serves as faculty advisor to several student organizations, and currently serves as chair of ASEE’s International Education Division. He is currently working on two environmental engineering textbooks and is producer of an environmental engineering podcast series. Page 12.1160.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Podcast-Enhanced Learning in Environmental Engineering1. BackgroundIn Fall 2005 one in six college students took at least one course
Computer Aided Engineering, Solid Mechanics, Vehicle Dynamics and Traffic Crash Reconstruction.John R. Shadley, University of Tulsa John R. Shadley is Emeritus Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Tulsa. He taught solid mechanics courses and laboratory classes at the University of Tulsa, and was engaged in research projects involving solid mechanics and materials. Page 12.439.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Data Acquisition and Computer Simulation Integrated Experiment for an Undergraduate Machine Dynamics
2006-1728: ISSUES IN TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF COURSES INRAPIDLY CHANGING AREASJana Whittington, Purdue University-CalumetKim Nankivell, Purdue University-CalumetJoy Colwell, Purdue University-CalumetJames Higley, Purdue University-Calumet Page 11.848.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Issues in Teaching and Assessment of Courses in Rapidly Changing AreasAbstractThe past decade has shown an exponential growth in technology in all areas of the academiccurriculum, and especially in the technology based fields. This growth has put great pressure onthe academic community to preserve learning objectives and outcomes while still maintainingassessment criteria
Florida Institute of Technology. He has received a Master of Science (M.S.) degree in Computer Systems from University of Central Florida in 1985 and a second M.S. degree in Operations Research from the same university in 1997. His research interests include object-oriented methodologies, design patterns, software safety, and genetic and optimization algorithms. He teaches graduate courses in Computer Information Systems at Florida Institute of Technology’s University College. Mr. Shaykhian is a senior member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE) and is the Vice-Chair (2005-2007), Education Chair (2003-2007) and Awards Chair of the IEEE Canaveral section. He is a
, engineering project manager, and senior scientist responsi- ble for failure analysis of thin films materials. She also managed collaborations with national laboratories, Air Force and Navy research groups, and universities. She invented new quality control tools and super- vised interns from local universities and community colleges as part of a $5.0 million technical workforce development initiative funded by New York State. She has published diverse articles on topics ranging from engineering education to high temperature superconductors and has spoken at many national and international conferences. Her doctorate in materials science and engineering are from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and she has four patents
Paper ID #7725Differences by Student Gender in Engineering Service-LearningLinda Barrington, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Linda Barrington is the Francis College of Engineering service-learning coordinator.Dr. Emmanuelle Reynaud, University of Massachusetts, LowellElla Willard-Schmoe, University of Massachusetts Lowell Ella Willard-Schmoe is a graduate research assistant in Solar Energy Engineering. Page 23.435.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Differences by Student Gender
. Page 8.219.11 The project is sponsored by National Science Foundation under ILI grant #9850660. 1 A. INTRODUCTION Innovative solutions to the embedded machine vision applications are critical to theprofitability of many manufacturing industries. Responding to this need, the National ScienceFoundation has actively supported a number of projects involving Machine Vision labdevelopment for undergraduate education. Samples of such projects can be found in [1-4].Some of the successful endeavors in mentoring undergraduates in computer vision research arereported in [5,6] and resulted in the design of extensive software packages for image processingand machine
researchers in engineering education,both technical knowledge and metaskills (such as critical thinking and problem solving skills, theability to innovate, the ability to work in a team, and the ability to communicate effectively), areof great importance in today‟s workplace. In order to graduate engineers with such skills,instruction must take all aspects of learning into consideration1,2,3. Consequently, instructors facechallenges such as How to engage students in deep learning? How to strengthen the link between theory and practice? Page 25.750.2 How to encourage critical thinking, problem solving and teamwork skills within the
andthe time limitations of the semester, selected areas of the plans were bid and scheduled. Biddingrequired each team to create a bid book that documented all assumptions and presented the costsas per required in the contract. The bid was awarded and the teams then prepared a resourceloaded construction schedule. Scenarios were created for litigation and the teams outlined howthey would defend against the litigation. Guest speakers came to class sessions to discussbusiness plans, business research, construction project management, and QC/QA control.Students were graded as teams and were judged on the separate four phases.IntroductionThe Construction Management Technology (CMT) Program at the University of Maine offersstudents a combination of
AC 2012-2977: SCIENCE FOR NON-SCIENCE MAJORSDr. Robert M. Brooks, Temple University Robert Brooks is an Associate Professor of civil engineering at Temple University. He is a fellow of ASCE. His research interests are engineering education, civil engineering materials, and transportation engineering.Jyothsna K. S., Jyothsna K. S., Department of English, St.Joseph’s College, Bangalore, eecured a gold medal for the high- est aggregate marks in the Post Graduate English Literature course at St.Joseph’s College (autonomous). K. S. has been working for the Department of English, St.Joseph’s College for almost two years now, teaching both undergraduate and postgraduate courses in English. K. S. has published papers in
classroom arepresented. An important aspect of the work is to simulate development of similar materials. Theinstructional units provide necessary resources for instructors in the form of source code andsuggestions for adaptation and incorporation into courses. Evaluation of the educationaleffectiveness of the units is also discussed.IntroductionMany educators have realized the value of computer-based tools for enhancing engineeringeducation. The capability of the computer to interact with its user, to compute and then display theconsequences of that interaction in a dynamic form provides an avenue for learning that is simplynot available in the classroom or textbook. Educators have exploited this capability by developingeducational software to
collaborative learning models with the organizationaldevelopment and group dynamics research in industry, yields an educational concept readilyaccepted by students. This observation is based upon several years of positive studentevaluations and feedback very supportive of the team building experience gained whilefunctioning as a member of a SLT.Team based production models are rapidly gaining popularity in the corporate world and are thekey to improving performance in all kinds of organizations.12 The synergistic results associatedwith functioning as an empowered team to produce a quality product are abundantly availablefrom numerous sources. Educating students to this reality needs to be done concurrently whilethey are acquiring university level
Interest: U.S. National Security Export Controls and Global Economic Competition, Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 1987.6. Quality Education for Minorities in Mathematics, Science, and Engineering Network, Together We Can Make It Work, Washington, D.C., 1992.Biographical InformationMOHAMMED M. “MIKE” ASOODEH is an Assistant Professor of Industrial Technology. He earned his Ph.D.at Texas A&M University. His research interests are in telecommunications, systems engineering, and robotics withcurrent emphasis on multimedia development to support his teaching in these areas.CARL STEIDLEY is a Professor of Computer Science. He earned his Ph.D. at the University of Oregon. Hisinterests are in the applications of
toengineering educators looking to continuously improve their assessment and evaluation to whichstudent outcomes are being obtained within the capstone course. This paper is a work-in-progressthat presents a literature review, a proposed research methodology, and hypothesized resultsregarding the andragogical value of using employee appraisal forms to assess attainment ofstudent outcomes within engineering capstone courses.IntroductionPerformance appraisals are defined as “a process involving deliberate stock taking of the success,which an individual or organization has achieved in performing assigned tasks or meeting setgoals over a period of time” [1]. A performance appraisal can be used for various reasons toinclude communicating employee strengths
). Scholars of Excellence inEngineering and Computer Science Program, An NSF S-STEM Grant: Assessment and Lessons Learned- First Award. Proceedings of ICEER2014-McMaster International Conference on EngineeringEducation and Research, August 24-26, Hamilton, Canada.[3] Steinbrink, S., Vernaza, K. M., Brinkman, B. J., Zhao, L. and Nogaj, A. (2018). A Rolling Stone:Analysis of one NSF-STEM Program Through Successive Grant Periods. Proceedings of the 2018American Society of Engineering Education National Conference, June 24-27, Salt Lake City, UT.[4] Vernaza, K. M., Vitolo, T. M., Steinbrink, S., Brinkman, B. J. (2012). Seeking Relevancy, BuildingExcellence: Service Learning in the SEECS Program, an NSF S-STEM Sponsored Project. Proceedingsof the 2012
inherentlyinefficient. Consideration needs to be given to more effective dissemination strategies, alongwith the selection of a platform for posting the open-source materials. This platform should beaccessible to instructors internationally, while also fostering a collaborative environment whereinstructors can comment, edit, and contribute to the continuous improvement of the materials.5. AcknowledgementsThanks are extended to the UBC Open Educational Resource Fund for supporting thedevelopment and dissemination of this work through an OER Implementation Grant.As confirmed by the UBC Behavioural Research Ethics Board (BREB) office, the work isconsidered “Quality Improvement and Assurance and Program Evaluation”, which under Article2.5 of the Tri Council Policy
CollegeStation. This paper discusses the development of a minor to prepare the current license-optionstudents in the program for the ETO endorsement.3. The InstitutionTexas A&M University at Galveston, an ocean-focused branch campus of Texas A&MUniversity, educates early 2,300 undergraduate and graduate students in a diverse range ofmarine and maritime programs, including majors in science, business, engineering, liberal arts,and transportation. With almost $10 million in research expenditures, it is an essential part ofTexas A&M’s unusual land-, sea-, and space-grant mission and is promoting the growth of theblue economy in the Gulf Coast Region.The Texas A&M Marine Academy, one of seven in the nation and the only academyincorporated
miscellaneous projects. Finding an appropriate solution for the problemsrelated to a project starts with the analysis and design of the respective problem and after that choosingthe approach to solve it (Fig. 1). Presently, information technology (IT) is widely applied in all areas ofthe human life and especially in the engineering area because it offers significant advantages.Software Engineering (SE) as one of the major computing sciences emerged from the traditionalengineering practices by introducing IT to them. Today, it includes highly advanced methods that allowthe development of software systems applied in different engineering-related cases. Not only the SEtheoretical aspects have been researched, but SE-related standards have been established
havegrown up with access to computers, the Internet and many other electronics for daily use. Themen and women who make up this demographic are designated as digital natives or the NetGeneration. Numerous studies on the positives and negatives of the technology savvy studentsin education and the work force have been published [1-6]. YouTube Fridays (YTF) began as away to encourage attendance at 8am on Friday mornings during the Fall 2008 semester. The firstfive minutes of class was dedicated to videos related to the professor’s research at the beginningof the semester and the course, namely thermodynamics, for the remainder of the semester. Aftershowing the videos, a short discussion on the videos relationship to the course topics followed.The
AC 2011-338: FRESHMEN’S FREEHAND DRAWING ABILITIES WITHMULTI-MEDIA: AN ANALYSIS OF PORTFOLIOS WITH GRADING RUBRICSSuining Ding, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne SUINING DING is an Associate Professor at Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne. Her research interests include digital 3D modeling, cross-cultural comparison of architecture, cognitive per- ceptions of interior space and relationships of human behavior and environment. Page 22.728.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Freshmen’s Freehand Drawing Abilities with Multi-media: an Analysis of
of WPI in 1977. At WPI Dr. Orr’s research interests span several aspects of digital signal processing. Recent work is in the area of tracking and positioning systems, particularly indoors. His other professional interest is in the area of engineering education where he has led the development of several innovative programs. Dr. Orr is a member of the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. He is a Fellow of the IEEE and of the American Society for Engineering Education.Fred J. Looft, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Prof. Looft earned his BS, MS and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering at the University of Michigan. After a brief period on industry, he joined the faculty of WPI where he is currently a
included. Other forms of electrical energyconversion need to be included. The course should be tailored to students who will use thetechnology as opposed to those who will design it. Some of our specific thoughts on how this canbe accomplished have been presented. We will further the development of this course with thehelp of a joint National Science Foundation (NSF) and Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)initiative, the Innovative Power Engineering Education in a Changing Environment program.These two agencies are spending over $1.1 million on five, three year projects to revitalize powerengineering education. Since this is a work in progress, we encourage your comments on thisproposal. Please e-mail them to us at 'ljbohman@mtu.edu
communicationskills, teamwork, and hands-on experiences while retaining a strong core of engineeringscience instruction. The motivations for these changes are presented and the status of theprogram is discussed.IntroductionEngineering education has evolved considerably during the last few decades. But thefundamental premise that engineering education should provide students with the abilityto solve engineering problems as an exercise in applied sciences has not changed. Thisnotion has, however, come under increasing scrutiny in the last several years, and anumber of educators, employers and government officials have called for extensivechanges in the undergraduate engineering curriculum (1). Indeed, society at large isdemanding that universities evaluate and
Session 2413 Chemical Engineering Principles in a Freshman Engineering Course using a Cogeneration Facility Robert P. Hesketh and C. Stewart Slater Hesketh@Rowan.edu Slater@Rowan.edu Chemical Engineering Rowan University Glassboro, NJ 08028-1701 Session 2413 Experimental Education in Ch.E. Paper No. 5 1998 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education
), pp. Paper No. DETC- 2008-50015.4. A. Rynne, W.F. Gaughran, and B. McNamara, "Ttite," in 17th International Conference on Production Research (Blacksburg, VA, 2003).5. R. Toogood, Pro Engineer Wildfire 2.0 Tutorial and Multimedia CD. (SDC Publications, Edmonton, 2004).6. L.G. Lamit, Pro/Engineer wildfire 4.0. (Cengage Learning, Mason, OH, 2008).7. R. F. Hamade, H. A. Artail, and M. Y. Jaber, "Evaluating the Learning Process of Mechanical CAD Students," Computers & Education 49 (3), 640-661 (2007).8. Z. Ye, W. Peng, Z. Chen, and Y-Y. Cai, "Today’s Students, Tomorrow’s Engineers: an Industrial Perspective on CAD Education," Computer-Aided Design 36 (14), 1451-1460 (2004).9. I. Chester, "Teaching for CAD Expertise
INCULCATING AND FOSTERING LEADERSHIP SKILLS FOR TODAY’S ENGINEERS – THE GORDON ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP PROGRAM AT NORTHESTERN UNIVERSITY Faculty Paper Industrial/ Academic Collaboration Steve Klosterman, Simon Pitts, Steven McGonagle, and Carey Rappaport Gordon Engineering Leadership Program College of Engineering, Northeastern University s.klosterman@neu.edu AbstractGaps in engineering education, perception of career tracks, and demographics associated withcyclical hiring practices have insufficiently educated the
. Wang, Critical values of guessing on true-false and multiple-choice tests, Education 116 (1) 2001,p. 153-158.[7] F. Reid, An alternative scoring formula for multiple-choice and true-false tests, The Journal ofEducational Research, , 2001, p. 335-339.[8] L.W. Lackey and W. J. Lackey, Influence of true/false tests and first language on engineeringstudents’ test scores. Journal of Engineering Education, January, 2002, p. 25-32.
Paper ID #45709Work In Progress: Remote FPGA Lab - An Interactive Online Environmentfor Teaching FPGA Development FundamentalsMr. Ze Yang, University Of Toronto A master of engineering student at University of Toronto.Dr. Hamid S Timorabadi P.Eng., University of Toronto Hamid Timorabadi received his B.Sc, M.A.Sc, and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto. He has worked as a project, design, and test engineer as well as a consultant to industry. His research interests include the application of digital signal processing in power systems. ©American Society for