- All Fellowship Student SurveyIn addition to the data collected from the student in the fellowship who are enrolled in STEMmajors, an extensive survey was administered to all 23 fellows in the Spring of 2024 with 21responses evenly distributed among the 3 current cohorts. The survey contained both Likert stylequantitative responses as well as long form answers to qualitative questions. Students were askedto quantify how effective they found each of the fellowship activities (scale 1-10) in shaping theirentrepreneurial journey and furthering their educational goals. These activities included coaching,mentoring, workshops and networking opportunities, and team bonding sessions. The results areshown in Figure 9. For clarity, the vertical scale is
: TheVocabulary of Community Development as an Indicator of a Participatory Mind-set 2019 ASEE10.18260/1-2—32714[3] Hartman, E., Kiely, R., Boettcher, C., Friedrichs, J. 2018. Community-Based GlobalLearning: The Theory and Practice of Ethical Engagement at Home and Abroad. Sterling, VA:Stylus Press.[4] Doughty, Jeremy R. 2020. “A Narrative Study of South African Community Members’Experience With an International Service-Learning Program.”IJRSLCE[5] Dean, Jered H, and Douglas L Van Bossuyt. 2014. “Breaking the Tyranny of the Semester: APhase-Gate Sprint Approach to Teaching. IJSLEHE. December, 222–39.https://doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v0i0.5570.[6] Birzer, Cristian H., and Jaimee Hamilton. 2019. “Humanitarian Engineering EducationFieldwork and the Risk of
professor at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. His current research interests lie in network optimization and combinatorial optimization, along with their vast applications in modern socio-technical and biological systems. He is teaching an introductory probabilities and statistics class for the college of engineering, a simulation class for industrial engineers, and an analysis of network data class for the graduate program. At Illinois, he is serving as the faculty advisor of the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers, and was awarded the 2020, 2023, and 2024 Faculty Advisor award for the North-Central region of IISE. Dr. Vogiatzis was awarded ASEE IL/IN Teacher of the Year in 2023, and
interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Dr. Alyson G. Eggleston, Penn State University Alyson Eggleston is an Associate Professor in the Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Director of Evaluation for the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute. Her research and teaching background focuses on program assessment, STEM technical communication, industry-informed curricula, and educational outcomes veteran and active duty students.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms
through Autoethnography," in The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, Crystal City, 2019.[10] S. Farrell, R. Guerra, E. Cech, T. Waidzunas and A. Mineric, "The American Society for Engineering Education-Diversity and Inclusion Survey," ASEE, 2015.[11] K. Cooper and S. Brownell, "Coming Out in Class: Challenges and Benefits of Active Learning in a Biology Classroom for LGBTQIA Students," Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1-19, 2016.[12] E. Cech, B. Rubineau, S. Silbey and C. Seron, "Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering," American Sociological Review, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 641-807, 2011.[13] E. Cech, "Ideological Wage Inequalities; The Technical/Social Dualism
under- graduate courses related to environmental management, energy and fundamentals of industrial processes at the School of Engineering, UNAB. She currently is coordinating the Educational and Academic Inno- vation Unit at the School of Engineering (UNAB) that is engaged with the continuing teacher training in active learning methodologies at the three campuses of the School of Engineering (Santiago, Vi˜na del Mar and Concepci´on, Chile). She authored several manuscripts in the science education area, joined several research projects, participated in international conferences with oral presentations and key note lectures and serves as referee for journals, funding institutions and associations
designed to teach students how to effectively utilize ABB robots in VR environmentsusing ABB’s RobotStudio software. This research seeks to bridge the gap between theory andpractice, offering a practical curriculum informed by the latest educational research andtechnological advancements. To this end, this project provides an initial investigation into thefollowing questions: 1) To what extent does VR support acquiring the procedural knowledge andmotor skills expected in robotics programming? 2) To what extent does this curriculumcontribute to students' mastery of robotics programming principles and ability to apply theseskills in complex tasks? 3) To what extent does this curriculum influence students' intereststoward a future career in a related
: The moderating role of gender. Clinical psychology review, 32(3), 177- 188.Kumar, S. (2016). Parental influence on career choice traditionalism among college students in selected cities in Ethiopia. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 3(3), 23-30.Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.Richards, K. A. R., & Hemphill, M. A. (2018). A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical education, 37(2), 225-231. 13Richards, K. A. R., & Hemphill, M. A
2023 Summer Cohort, twenty studentsenrolled in an I-Corps site program experience that involved training and 6 weeks of customerdiscovery and answered to a pre- and post-surveys that included questions in the dimensions of:(1) interest in entrepreneurship, (2) confidence in value proposition, (3) self-efficacy inentrepreneurship, (4) self-efficacy in marketing/business planning, (5) self-efficacy in customerinterview skills, and (6) current status of technology and business model. Preliminaryquantitative analyses showed similar results to prior research about significant changes in studentperceptions of confidence in value proposition, customer interview skills, and current status oftechnology and business model. However, in qualitative terms
questions 3. Special Topics – single page lessons for nine topics with readings, videos, websites to explore, and reflection questions 4. Additional Resources – bibliographies of additional resources organized by topic for faculty to draw from in adapting or expanding the lessons in modules 2 and 3 5. Finding and Using Inclusive Resources – guidance on finding inclusive materials for use in teaching and researchRIS introduces faculty to the topics of representation, systemic bias, and inequality in STEM andprovides participants with statistics, resources, and opportunities to reflect. This open course fillsa critical need in the discussion on representation in STEM as it equips librarians, faculty, andgraduate students with the
most effective aspects of the course are the application to engineering. ” “This course was the best English class I have ever taken. I think you did a wonderful job giving us real-world applications and I feel like you prepared me and my fellow classmates for our writing in our future.” “I enjoyed the explanations of the assignments in relation to the real world. The assignments felt meaningful and felt very important to learn for my future career as an engineer. This course is well developed and was beneficial to me.” “The paper 3 Design report was very helpful because it is something I will most likely use in my career.” “This class was really helpful with learning the different types of technical
course (2022-2023 academic year) to more intentionally incorporateengineering ethics into the project-based portion of the course. Research indicates project-basedcourses and embedment of transferable or professional skills within technical context areadvantageous [3, 4, 5]. It was expected that this change would improve student learning andaffinity for engineering ethics, which is not often a highlight in students’ minds.The specific approaches are described and a comparison of the self-reported achievement ofcourse-level student outcomes related to engineering ethics is provided to demonstrate that moreclosely coupling ethics content with the project component of the course yielded an improvedlevel of engagement and appreciation for
in Figure 8 and 9, is used toaddress those technical competencies. Students are graded on their post-lab worksheets/reportsand on direct observation of their skills during the laboratory sessions. Table 2 shows the labactivities used to assess the technical laboratory skills. Table 2: Laboratory number and related skill. Lab Number Lab Skill Lab 3; Lab 5 Circuit Simulations Lab 2; Lab 4 Circuit Measurements Lab 6; Lab 8 Benchtop Equipment Lab 7 Soldering Lab 9; Lab 10
MindsetIntroduction(Full Research Paper). Much of the history of engineering education has revolved around mathand science so deeply that students expect they must excel at both if pursuing engineering as acareer [1]. However, at the onset of the century, the National Academy of Engineering publisheda study stressing the need to prepare for the future of engineering and called for a transformationto our engineering education landscape [2]. While math and science are vital to understandingand applying foundational concepts in engineering, the field has grown beyond this limiteddefinition and requires engineers become involved with design activities to adequately identifyproblems and create solutions [3], [4]. An element of empathy and considering human
and cut-off points are illustrated in Figure 2below. Figure 2. Pre-test distribution and cut-off points for high, medium, and low groups2.3.2 Spatial Visualization CoachingEach section of the EN course had a teaching assistant (TA) who facilitated the computer labportion of the course. Three of the lab sessions were dedicated to spatial visualization coaching.TAs explained topics such as isometric views or rotations of objects and used snap cubes asvisual aids to demonstrate complex 3D rotations (Figure 3). Since Spatial Vis™ automaticallygrades student submissions and provides feedback, the TAs could focus more on coaching thethinking process
approaches to deadlines. The workpresented below seeks to answer these questions: 1) Are students who turn in assignments lategetting an unfair advantage? 2) Are there any correlations between late assignments andperformance on other coursework? and 3) Were there any discernible trends over time as flexibledeadline policies were clarified?Course BackgroundThe course in question is ME4505, Measurements and Analysis with Thermal ScienceApplication. This is a required 4 credit lecture course with a 1 credit lab course students must co-register for. The course teaches design of experiments, sensor use and selection, statistical dataanalysis, and uncertainty analysis with a focus on thermofluids topics. Students attend threelectures and one lab session
. Etter, S. L. Burmeister, and R. J. Elder, “Improving student performance and retention via supplemental instruction,” Journal of Accounting Education, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 355–368, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-5751(01)00006-9.[7] The International center for supplemental Instruction, “ACCREDITATION INFORMATION.” Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://info.umkc.edu/si/accreditation-overview/[8] J. Malm, L. Bryngfors, and L.-L. Mörner, “Supplemental Instruction: Whom Does it Serve?,” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 282–291, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/[9] Z. Miller, S. Walker, and R. Chai, “Supplemental Instruction
management and entrepreneurship development. Journalof Business Research, 119, 245-258.Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., & Bilro, R. G. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in co-creationprocesses for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study. Journal of BusinessResearch, 119, 388-409.Patzer, M., Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2018). The normative justification of integrativestakeholder engagement: A Habermasian view on responsible leadership. Business EthicsQuarterly, 28(3), 325-354.Sell, K., Hommes, F., Fischer, F., & Arnold, L. (2022). Multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinaritywithin the public health workforce: a scoping review to assess definitions and applications ofconcepts. International Journal of Environmental Research
the University of South Florida (USF) she leads the project coordination for the National Science Foundation Florida Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (FL-AGEP), a $2.4M award to Florida A&M University (with a subaward to USF and Virginia Tech), Bethune-Cookman University, Florida International, and Florida Memorial University. Also, Dr. Johnson Austin is the project coor- dinator and Co-Principal Investigator for the USF Project Racism In School Exclusionary Suspensions (RISES), a $30k grant awarded to explore the suspensions of African American middle and high school students in Hillsborough and Pinellas County Florida. Dr. Johnson Austin held positions as: math faculty at Academy Prep
literature around the hazards of being overburdened with service and the importance ofmentoring are reinforced. The importance of first-generation status or low-income upbringing forwomen in STEM fields deserves further attention in engineering education.IntroductionThe underrepresentation of female faculty of color in STEM programs has been welldocumented, including challenges related to cultural issues, adversarial individuals, andstructures in education and academia [1], [2]. An intersecting challenge is that many women ofcolor are drawn to community engaged research (CER). CER is a research methodology thatholds the promise of addressing critical environmental and public health challenges. However,some claim that CER lacks evidentiary rigor [3
senior challenging project, which are designed drawingon key topics around leading-edge technologies.Regarding the internal interaction of “STEP”, the four elements intertwine with each other andcontribute to not only educational collaboration but also the innovation of university-industryrelations (Fig. 2). Around the node of level 1 technology, distinguished industry supervisorplays an overall coordination role in identifying cutting-edge scientific and technical problems,and are responsible for selecting industry supervisors; then they provide joint supervision interms of the design of study plans, the innovation of pedagogies and curricula, as well as theevaluation of student outcomes. At the same time, university cooperates with
key steps: Chatbot development, educational intervention,and assessment design and survey development. Each step was critical in ensuring the successfulapplication of the chatbot as both a technical resource and an educational tool aimed at fosteringcritical thinking and ethical awareness in engineering students. Below the framework wasoutlined for the methodology and illustrated in Figure 1: 1. Chatbot Development 2. Educational Intervention - Ethical Training - Technical Training 3. Assessment Design - Likert and Open-ended Questions
. What Ansys tools do you use? 2. How has Ansys helped you succeed in the competition? 3. Did you learn to use Ansys software in any of your university courses or on your own or both? 4. How suitable did you find the following resources for your learning and design needs? 1. Ansys Innovation Courses (AICs) 2. Ansys Learning Hub (ALH) 3. Ansys Learning Forum 4. Any live (or recorded) training sessions 5. Direct support from Ansys reps 5. How and why is the experience you received from FSAE and/or Ansys important? 6. Have you seen companies intentionally seeking out your students because of their real- world experience? 7. Was that
shift and is in the same major as you. You ask for advice on the classes you are about to take in the following semester. In response, they laugh and say, “you are so screwed, those classes made me want to kill myself!” They proceed to give discouraging remarks about your upcoming semester.The UGTAs were asked to consider these scenarios with the following prompts in mind: 1. How are you feeling after reading the case study? 2. What internal biases, preconceived notions, and/or barriers may be coming up for you when navigating this scenario? 3. What strategies might you use to approach this scenario and offer support to the affected party or parties involved?Discussions first took place in small, randomly
Engaging and supportive learning environments are vital for student success inengineering, particularly in foundational courses like Engineering Design Graphics. Suchfoundational courses develop critical skills, such as spatial visualization and problem-solvingcollaboration, which contribute to academic performance and self-efficacy in applying content[2]. Research has shown that student-centered learning environments, where students activelyengage with course materials and apply concepts to real-world problems, positively impactretention and persistence [3, 4]. This is especially important for first-year engineering andfirst-generation college students, who can greatly benefit from early experiences in theiracademic journey. Traditional
Rehabilitation Act Independence ◦ Familial support networks ◦ Self-advocacy Institutional barriers ◦ Inaccessible material ◦ Under-trained instructors ◦ Lack of staff/dedicated personnel ◦ Poor representationTo begin our project, we reviewed the literature to understand the problem better. A 2020survey conducted by the Office of Special Education Programs in the Department of Educationfound 23% of responding students with disabilities reported planned enrollment in highereducation [2] compared to a study conducted in 2021 which found that 38% of the generalpopulation of 18–24-year-olds were enrolled [3
participant’s everydaylived experiences for research inquiry [30]. Pláticas involve a two- directional approach, basedon reciprocity, vulnerability, and reflexivity. That is, it positions the researchers and participantsin an equal field of knowledge production [28].We conducted weekly pláticas over a period of 3 months. The topics discussed ranged fromcommon practices related to language, communication, and social interactions that contribute tobiased beliefs about what constitutes engineering knowledge, who is considered a suitableengineer, and who is recognized as a legitimate engineer [31]. To initiate the pláticas, our firsttwo sessions, which were moderated by the first two authors, only asked students about howtheir experiences in engineering
catch my attention, not quite enough to satisfy my curiosity. The assignments gave meaning to parallel computing courses, instead of them being just other options from the list.”In aggregate, these sentiments offer insight into how the presence of assignments that serve as anintroduction to more advanced topics can: 1) motivate interest in those topics, 2) contextualize thefundamentals students are currently learning, and 3) give insight into future coursework that willallow students to guide their decision-making when choosing upper-division electives. Byincluding these assignments as extra credit, access to these topics can be made available withoutadding to what are often already difficult and time consuming courses.Conclusion and
Relevance), 2)discuss the impact on how they see and interact with the world around them (“Seeing”Mechanics), and 3) reflect on a variety of societal implications and impacts of engineering work(Sociotechnical Dimensions). Taken together, our findings suggest that students can makediverse connections to engineering mechanics concepts and their personal lives in ways that cangenerate motivation and interest. While it is perhaps unsurprising that students were able to makeconnections between engineering in general and personal usefulness, it is noteworthy thatstudents made these connections with technical mechanics concepts in particular (e.g., impulsemomentum, work-energy, equilibrium). That is, prior motivational research has examined whystudents
. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 344-351.Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation abilitymeasured by the Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R).Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 69-94. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9215-xSorby, S. A. (2009). Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineeringstudents. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459-480.doi:10.1080/09500690802595839Study, N.E. (2011). Long-term impact of improving visualization abilities of minority engineeringand technology students: preliminary results. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 75 (2),2-8.