emergingtechnologies over the next decade has been clearly outlined.1,2,3,4 Engineering education ischanging with its focus shifting from the traditional theory-based curriculum to more team-basedlearning, problem solving with open-ended solutions, hands-on projects, and team-orientedcommunications.5,6,7 Addressing the need for skilled technology workers is a requiredcompetitive and survival strategy for most manufacturers.4 Page 14.36.3Four components of the development process will be addressed and tested in this project: Creating Learning Materials and Teaching Strategies. The project will revise and exchange existing educational materials and
“Manufacturing Education Plan: Phase I Report – Industry Identifies Competency Gaps Among Newly Hired Engineering Graduates,” Society of Manufacturing Engineers and SME Education Foundation, Dearborn, MI, 199710 Landis, R. B., "Introduction to Engineering for High School Teachers and Counselors," Success 101, Issue #4, Fall, 1997 (Available from R.B. Landis).11 Gibney, Kate, "So What Is Engineering?" PRISM, p, 14, American Society for Engineering Education, March, 1998.12 Siegel, David, "Dean Gives Engineering 101 Lesson To High School Teachers, Career Counselors," Engineering Times, National Society of Professional Engineers, Arlington, Virginia, November, 1998.RAYMOND B. LANDISRaymond B. Landis is currently Dean of
, Slovakia. After mygraduation I worked for four years as a senior engineer in the Tajuora Nuclear Research Center, Libya,North Africa. Responsibilities included planning, scheduling, and supervising of preventive,corrective, and overhaul maintenance of plant equipment, engineering systems, and radio-active wastemanagement. Duties included systems engineering design, modification, testing, plant operation, andemployee training. I completed my Ph. D. in mechanical engineering at North Dakota StateUniversity, Fargo, North Dakota. I did consulting for an aircraft company for six months and thenbegan teaching in a manufacturing engineering program. With my background education andexperience I am qualified to teach in engineering technology (ET) programs
. Overall I am pleased with the preparation for engineering practice that I received at UW-Platteville. ______ ______ ______ ______ ______Please answer the following questions.24. What do you consider to be the strengths of your engineering education?25. What do you consider to be the weaknesses of your engineering education?26. What improvements would you recommend for the engineering curriculum at UW-Platteville?27. Please indicate any other opportunities you have had since graduating from UW-Platteville. 9 Master’s Degree 9 Seminars/Workshops/Short courses/Conferences 9 MBA 9 Major Project Assignments 9 PhD 9 Patent
AC 2008-1468: THE TOOTHPICK FACTORY: A SIMULATION GAME FOR THESOFT SKILLSMarilyn Barger, University of South Florida MARILYN BARGER is the Principle Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Center for Manufacturing Education funded by NSF and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa Florida. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes Scott College, and both a B.S. in Engineering Science and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (Environmental) from the University of South Florida, where her research focused on membrane separations. She has over 20 years of experience in developing curriculum for engineering and engineering technology for elementary, middle, high
interviews.This new interdisciplinary course will better prepare undergraduates for employment focused ondesigning and manufacturing nano/microfluidic systems, lab-on-a-chip devices, electronicdevices, medical devices, and other micro and nano scale emerging technologies. The impact ofthis senior-level course will significantly enhance the “Nanomaterials Engineering Option” in theChemical Engineering Department undergraduate curriculum as well as the medical deviceindustry focus in the Plastics Engineering Department. It also can be used in the popularaccelerated BS-MS program in the College of Engineering. The course will be available to thechemical, mechanical, and plastics engineering seniors each year. The lab modules can beexported to freshman
. Page 22.392.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Creating a New 4-year Degree in Process & Systems Engineering TechnologyAbstract:The BS in Manufacturing Technology program at our university was originally started in 1999,and the name of the program was changed to the BS in Industrial Engineering Technology (IET)program in 2006. Recently, the state university system, that has our university along with 16other universities as its constituent universities, flagged the IET program as a low productivityprogram. The faculty and the Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) for the program were asked toprovide recommendations as to whether the program had the potential to
One Machine”, 3D Printing Industry, available at http://3dprintingindustry.com/crowd-funding-2/ (accessed September 24, 2014).21. Fidan, I., Patton, K. (2004), “Enhancement of Design and Manufacturing Curriculum through Rapid Prototyping Practices”, Proceedings of IMECE04 2004 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 13-20, 2004, Anaheim, California USA.22. Flynn, E.P. (2011) “From Design to Prototype –Manufacturing STEM Integration in the Classroom and Laboratory”, 1st IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), April 2, 2011, Ewing, NJ, pp. 3B1- 3B423. Flynn, E.P. (2012) “Design to Manufacture –Integrating STEM Principles for Advanced Manufacturing Education”, 2nd IEEE Integrated STEM
for Manufacturing Enterprise Market Principles Concept Design-Problem Solving Strategic Leadership Industrial Health and Safety Project Management Material Flow - Industrial Society Budgeting - Intrapreneurial Engineering Manufacturing Process Design I and II Global Competition Manufacturing Process Simulation Project Phases in Design & Implementation Complex Communication Practices Writing about Engineering in a Societal Context Entrepreneurship Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
controller met thechallenges of these technological changes and became the leading controller in embeddedsystems.8-bit Microprocessor to 32-bit MicrocontrollerHistorically, engineering programs at the undergraduate level have included coverage of amicroprocessor related course in their syllabus, typically an 8-bit microprocessor such as the8085 (or 6800). The chip manufacturer (Intel or Motorola) helped effective delivery of suchcourses by creating and sharing information related to their microprocessor development kit(MCS85, MEK6800), which served to provide practical hands-on experience to the students.The stability and professional acceptance of a microprocessor family often decided thepopularity of their coverage in educational courses
. The new degree program was launched in the Autumn of 2020 at the OhioState University. Offered by the regional campuses which have traditionally been feeder campusesto the central campus, this employer-driven program will prepare graduates for high-demandmanufacturing occupations that require strong technical and management skills.The curriculum for the four-year degree program was based on industry needs that will allowgraduates of the program to help the state build the manufacturing workforce needed to competeand thrive. The curriculum is driven by a rigorous assessment process and foundational skills formathematics, physics, engineering, and management skills including the following: problem-solving, innovation, leadership, and change
responsibility”) as well as unacceptable courses (“courses that instill cultural values are acceptable while routine exercises of personal craft are not.”)In short, the old “Conventional Criteria” not only mandated how much H/SS course workstudents had to pass but specified in some detail the breadth and depth of acceptable course areasfor study.The “Conventional Criteria” are no longer in force. Beginning in 2001, all programs seekingABET accreditation must adhere to the new Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) which offermuch briefer guidance; the new Criterion 4c stipulates only “a general education component thatcomplements the technical content of the curriculum and is consistent with the program andinstitution objectives.”The change is
/Governance/Honors/1109.pdf.[36] Felder, R. and L. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles In Engineering Education,” Engr. Education, Vol. 78, No. 7, 1988, pp. 674-681.[37] Carlson, L. and J. Sullivan, “Hands-on Engineering: Learning by Doing in the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1999, pp. 20-31.[38] Muller, C. and M. Pavone, “Retaining Undergraduate Women in Science, Math, and Engineering: A Model Program,” Proc. Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997.[39] Lamancusa, J. S., J. E. Jorgensen and J. L. Zayas-Castro, "The Learning Factory--A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum," Journal of Engineering
of faculty in the engineering division as well as the College as a whole to teach the“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education” remaining courses in the curriculum. Recently, there have been approximately 20 to 30 BA Engineering students in each class. Students from other engineering departments routinely take BA Engineering courses as electives, particularly courses in engineering management and engineering policy. The curriculum has evolved over time and will be discussed in more detail later in this paper. Lafayette College is currently evaluating its BA Engineering degree program
instructional tool to enhance learning,” 2010 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2010-1898, American Society for Engineering Education.5. Wu, B., “Improving a manufacturing class by adding an experimental session,” 2009 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2009-1118, American Society for Engineering Education.6. Jaksie, N., and Spencer, D., “A manufacturing processes laboratory: what book-making and sheet- metal working have in common,” 2009 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2009-98, American Society for Engineering Education.7. Hossain, N.M., and Durfee, J., “Testing several composite materials in a material science course under the engineering technology curriculum,” 2010 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2010-133, American Society for
-2269.8 The Learning Factory of the Manufacturing Engineering Education Partnership , E. DeMeter, J. Jorgensen, A.Rullan, Proceedings of SME conference on Manufacturing Education for the 21st Century, San Diego CA,March 13-15, 1996.9 Mechanical Dissection: an experience in how things work , S.D. Shepard, Proceedings of the EngineeringEducation Conference on Curriculum Innovation and Integration, Jan.6-10, 1992, Santa Barbara, CA.10 ME99 Mechanical Dissection - course notes , by Sheri Shepard, Stanford University.11 Teams in Engineering Education , L. Bellamy, D. Evans, D. Linder, B. McNeill, G. Raupp, Report to NSF ofGrant Number USE9156176, March 1994.Biographical Information on AuthorsJOHN S. LAMANCUSA, P.E. is an associate professor in
Paper ID #22171Engineering Habits of Mind: How EE Majors Talk About Their Knowledgeof CircuitsDr. Nicole P. Pitterson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Nicole is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Prior to joining the faculty at VT she worked as a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She holds a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University and other degrees in Manufacturing Engineering from Western Illinois University and a B.Sc. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Technology, Jamaica. Her research
existing product, material or process. Students were askedto describe their idea in a business letter and forward it to industry for evaluation. Insome instances a response from industry was actually received by the students concerningthe feasibility of their ideas. We feel this contact with industry so early in theireducational career was very exciting for the students and may aide in student retention inthe major.The paper also briefly describes an instructional module entitled Design for Manufacturethat was also used in ED&G 100. This module was used in teaching studentsfundamentals of engineering design and design for manufacture. The module wasdeveloped by The New York State Curriculum for Advanced Technology Education(NYSCATE). In this
and curriculum reform to ensure that the students are academically prepared to entera quality engineering program when they graduate from high school. The goal of CARE I is to enhance academic preparation in college algebra, engineeringlearning tools, and technical writing of pre-11th grade high school students. For this pilot year,twenty (20) pre-11th grade students were selected from the Pittsburgh area public schools. Theobjectives are for more than 50% of the participants to advance in mathematics, generalquantitative literacy, basic writing and technical communication skills, as well as to increaseearly awareness of and interest in SMET education. The goal of CARE II is to integrate problemsolving and critical thinking skills
%202007Full359.pdf[4] I. Fidan, "Integrating RP Technology into the Tennessee Tech’s Manufacturing Curriculum,"Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition,http://www.asee.org/acPapers/2004-359_Final.pdf[5] http://www.localendar.com/public/rrpl Page 13.260.12
Education, January 1999.2. Burton, L., Parker, L., and LeBold, W.K., “US Engineering Career Trends,” ASEE Prism, May-June 1998.3. Morgan, R.P., Reid, P.P, and Wulf, W.A., “The Changing Nature of Engineering” ASEE Prism, May-Hune 1998.4. Engineering Criteria 2000, Criteria for Accrediting Engineeering Programs: Effective for Evaluations during the 1999-2000 Accreditation Cycle: Engineering Accreditation Commission. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology; http://www.abet.org/download.htm, 30th November 1999.5. Curricula 2002; Manufacturing Education for the 21st Century; Volume I: David L. Wells, Editor, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1995.6. Panitz, Beth, “The Integrated Curriculum,” ASEE Prism, September 1997.7
) EGR345: Dynamic System Modeling and Control* C (AVR), MATLAB EGR450: Manufacturing Control Systems PLC EGR474: Systems Integration C * Discussed as part of the mechanical engineering courses.Evolution of Pr ogr amming Instr uctionIn this section we describe the evolution of programming instruction for our undergraduateengineering students over the last 6 years.The Curriculum in 1999With our common course thread in place in 1999, all engineering students were exposed toprogramming. All freshman engineering students were required to take CS162 (ComputerScience I), an introductory programming course. This course assumed
transfer of training in advanced human-machine systems, usability evaluation of everyday products and services, and research in multimodal systems and virtual environments. His current research interests include virtual reality applications in manufacturing, multimodal interaction design, audio interfaces, advanced usability evaluation techniques, simulating complex human-machine systems, and advanced application of statistical techniques. Dr. Ahmad is a Certified Simulation Analyst and a Certified Six Sigma Black Belt. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Industry Certification Program in Project ManagementAbstractEngineering Technology curricula generally provide
teaching (and learning) about how the PLC works and how toapply the PLC be conducted? Should it be accomplished through customer training by the PLCsystem supplier and/or systems integrator or through the end user’s own training department—asis usually the case with new system installations? Or should this teaching and learning beimplemented through a formal course as part of a university or college curriculum in engineeringor engineering technology? Page 6.782.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society of Engineering
Session 2455 Industry Supported Dual-Master’s Degree Program Frederick S. Brown, Mel I. Mendelson Loyola Marymount University, College of Science & Engineering Los Angeles, CA 90045Abstract:In the fall 2003, Loyola Marymount University (LMU) will initiate a new, dual-degreeSystems Engineering Leadership Program (SELP) to fulfill the graduate educational needs ofindustry and government in Southern California. The SELP is based on the collaborativedevelopment of an integrated curriculum among LMU’s college of engineering, business andlocal industry. It is
, collaborating on curriculum development, mentoringstudents, serving as invited guest speakers in the classroom, and hosting virtual and site tours oftheir manufacturing facilities. To ensure the industry partners remained engaged, project leadersprovided clear and consistent communication through written updates and virtual meetings,offered multiple opportunities for participation, and solicited feedback designed to help improvethe project.IntroductionPartnerships between educators and industry leaders have grown in an effort to motivate andinspire students to explore and understand opportunities in STEM. School curricula have adaptedmore hands-on activities and emphasized STEM learning in the classroom. Given the rightecosystem, often these result in
off the original Enterprise curricular framework. After completing the first year of theprogram it appears that a more efficient way to administer the participation of engineeringstudents in the Enterprise Program is also through the use of the ‘Minor’ framework.The Enterprise Curriculum is a 3-year experience. The curriculum is two-pronged and consists of1) participation in the operation of a business (project work) and 2) completion of concentratedcourse material (instructional modules) designed to provide key information, processes and skillsrequired for effective management of a viable business. The requirements for completion of theEnterprise Minor are 20 semester credits. Table I outlines the curriculum associated with therecently
languages early in the curriculum since the fluid power course has only physics asa prerequisite. He, et al6 have pointed out the usefulness of teaching students multiple IEC61131-3 languages. The pneumatics projects provide a foundation for interfacing componentsinto program projects like the one described by Kadir7. This first exposure to automation lays agood foundation for more advanced courses that will help qualify graduates to fill some of theestimated two million manufacturing jobs that are estimated will go unfilled due to a lack skillsout of the three and a half million new jobs that manufacturing will need to fill over the next tenyears8. Nine out of ten manufacturers are having difficulty finding skilled workers and they saythis is
Automated Controls, Electro-Mechanical,Powerhouse Operator, Polymer Operator, and Development Assistant.III. The ProgramDupont’s leadership team created a vision of how they wanted to integrate education into theiroperations. Their goals included the following5: o Create a “Learning Organization” that facilitates ongoing self-development by employees. o Establish and fully support a progression system that rewards people for certified skills acquired. o Provide employees with an opportunity to have more impact on their own future and the business. o Create and support multi-functional teams that engender flexibility of resources in a manufacturing environment. o Facilitate involvement of all employees in meaningful work
structures to illustrate the kinematics and geometry of MEMS devices.Additionally, the students are exposed to science and engineering in the ways that it ispracticed—in groups, with collaboration, using software as a design aid, and focusing oncommunication.This project also address nine of the sixteen standards in science for grades 5-12 as publishedby the New Mexico State Department of Education. In particular, the curriculum will reinforcemany of the content standards in the physical sciences as well as technology and the history ofscience6. For example, Content Standard 2 Section C for grades 5-8 says the student will C. Design and Develop Models. 1. Develop an understanding that models take many forms and have