have been in the teaching arena for over a year in catalogues and brochures.Undoubtedly, if care, recognition, and fair treatment are accorded to adjuncts, their morale,loyalty to their department and the college, their teaching effectiveness would improve markedly.III. Reporting on the Experience:At one of the International Universities, a course, Foundation Engineering, introduces studentsto the fundamental concepts and applications of foundation analysis and design, with emphasison relevant methods and applications in the arid and semi-arid soils of the Country in contentionand the Region in general. The prerequisite course, Geotechnical Engineering I, exposesstudents to the basics of soil mechanics; from classifications of soils to
International Universities, a course, Foundation Engineering, introduces studentsto the fundamental concepts and applications of foundation analysis and design, with emphasison relevant methods and applications in the arid and semi-arid soils of the Country in contentionand the Region in general. The prerequisite, Geotechnical Engineering I, exposes students to thebasics of soil mechanics; from classifications of soils to consistency and the limits, on to soilwater/permeability/seepage and effective stress principle, leading to compressibility andconsolidation, and ending with shear strength (5). The author who happens to be the instructor forboth courses, has always been of the opinion that certain subjects, including FoundationEngineering, should be
communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for fac- ulty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transaction on Professional Communication, and Technical Communi- cation Quarterly, among others.Mrs. Shannon M. Sipes, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Shannon M. Sipes has served as the director of assessment at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology since 2004. She is a unique resource for faculty with her background in social science and education com- bined with experience applying it to STEM fields. Shannon holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in psychology and is currently finishing her Ph.D
radar and systems technologies, Dr. Povinelli has worked with leading aerospace companies, as well as collaborating with universities and government research labs. He brings over thirty years of experience in both technical and educational fields, blending scientific rigor with humanistic insight to promote holistic, transdisciplinary pedagogies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Love and Its Attributes as a Foundation for Student Learning in Engineering EducationMark J. Povinelli, College of Arts and Sciences, Syracuse UniversityIntroductionEngineering plays a critical role in shaping ecosystems, human behavior, communities, societies,and patterns of
Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: Glucose Analyzer Learning Module for the Classroom Fosbre, RJ, Dutta, P, Thiessen, DB, Van Wie, BJ Washington State University Violand School of Chemical Engineering and BioengineeringFosbre, RJ, Dutta, P, Thiessen, DB, Van Wie, BJ, Work in Progress: Glucose Analyzer LearningModule for the Classroom, American Society for Engineering Education, June 23-26, 2024,Portland, OR The goal of the greater project is to provide students with hands-on learning experienceswhile
Paper ID #45604Harnessing Generative AI for Educators: Case Study of Accurate WildfireLocation MappingProf. Asif Ahmed, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute Asif Ahmed is an Assistant Professor at College of Engineering at SUNY Polytechnic Institute, Utica, New York. Dr. Ahmed is a strong advocate of STEM education, inclusion of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in curriculum. Primarily trained as a Geotechnial Engineer, Dr. Ahmed’s current research also focuses on engineering education. Currently, his interest is modification of the civil engineering curriculum to accomodate the infrastructure monitoring
Christine Haas has worked for non-profits and higher education institutions for the past eight years. As the Director of Operations for Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) Engineering, she managed operations and strategic initiatives for the newly formed Office of the Dean of Engineering. As Director of Market- ing for Drexel College of Engineering, she oversaw an extensive communication portfolio and branding for seven departments and programs. Christine currently consults with engineering and science related institutions to advise on best practices in communication, from presentations to print. Haas received her M.B.A. in marketing and international business from Drexel University and her B.A. in English and Film
perspectives on engineering education: Engineering education and practice in context, vol. 1, C. S. H. Hyldgaard, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, and B. Newberry Eds. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015, ch. 19, pp. 393-414.[2] M. Borrego and J. Bernhard, "The Emergence of Engineering Education Research as an Internationally Connected Field of Inquiry," (in English), Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 14-47, January 2011.[3] W. Klafki, "Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation of instruction," in Teaching As A Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition, I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, and K. Riquarts Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2000, pp
Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(8), 769- 783.Broderick, A., & Lalvani, P. (2017). Dysconscious ableism: Toward a liberatory praxis in teacher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(9), 894-905.Bullock, E. C. (2017). Only STEM can save us? Examining race, place, and STEM education as property. Educational Studies, 53(6), 628-641.Carlone, H. B., Mercier, A. K., & Metzger, S. R. (2021). The production of epistemic culture and agency during a first-grade engineering design unit in an urban emergent school. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 11(1), 172-191. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1295Carter, D. F., Dueñas, J. E. R., Mendoza, R. (2019
Atienza for her contribution to developing the BEADLE curriculum. The authors alsothank Justine Bailey and Cinthya Rosales for thoroughly testing the curriculum.References[1] R. Hussein and D. Wilson, “Remote Versus In-hand Hardware Laboratory in Digital CircuitsCourses,” American Society for Engineering Education ASEE conference, Electrical andComputer Engineering Division, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37662[2] R. Hussein, B. Chap, M. Inonan, M. Guo, F. Monroy, R. Maloney, S. Alves, and S. Kalisi,“Remote Hub Lab – RHL: Broadly Accessible Technologies for Education and Telehealth”, 20thAnnual International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation REV 2023[3] R. Harper and H. Thiry, “Advising from
components, and 3D internal and external humanbody virtual tours, that the students can study. According to our reviewers, learners andassessors, this an effective method for problem solving and assessment in biomedicalengineering because it forces both the student as well as the tutor to focus, create new wealth,and encourage outcome-oriented educational practices. However, no formal assessmentexperiments are discussed.Geotechnical and environmental engineeringThe work in [52] studies the use of VR for teaching Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)technology. A scale model of an actual alternative energy research facility in Louisiana isdeveloped in the CAD software and imported into a VR game engine with interactiveeducational activities placed
Aref joined the COE as dean in April 2003. His leadership “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright @ 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”resulted in two changes: i) Computer Science (CS) Department became part of the COE and ii)More emphasis was placed on engineering education research activities in the COE. While thefirst change resulted in major changes in the introductory engineering courses in the GEprogram, the second change brought together a group of faculty members from engineering andeducation departments to build a collaborative group charged to develop research proposalstargeted at improving engineering pedagogy in the COE
, Page 8.905.10 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”discussion group leaders, and dorm counselors.Evaluation and AssessmentEvaluation of the impact of this type of activity is always a challenge, and we have been workingwith experts in the SMET assessment area (Dr. Edith Gummer) to develop tools for informal andformal short term and longitudinal assessment. These include 1) informal and ongoing programevaluation, 2) qualitative and quantitative internal evaluation, and 3) external evaluation. All threeapproaches will be used to make adjustments to the program as necessary, and to determine if
ScienceFoundation, Division of Undergraduate Education, grant number DUE 1065486.Bibliography1. Boeing Company Desired Attributes of an Engineer. http://www.boeing.com/educationrelations/attributes.html2. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2004.3. National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenges for Engineering. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/ Page 25.203.17 (November 15).4. Sheppard, S.; Colby, A.; Macatangay, K.; Sullivan, W., What is Engineering Practice? International Journal of Engineering Education 2006
methods for STEM education research. Dr. Menekse received four Seed-for-Success Awards (in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021) from Purdue University's Excellence in Research Awards programs in recognition of obtaining four external grants of $1 million or more during each year. His research has been generously funded by grants from the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), Purdue Research Foundation (PRF), and the National Science Foundation (NSF).© American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comRelationship between Course Engagement and Educational Application Engagement in the Context of First-year Engineering StudentsAbstractThis complete
related to environmental management, energy and fundamentals of industrial processes at the School of Engineering, UNAB. She currently is coordinating the Educational and Academic Innovation Unit at the School of Engineering (UNAB) that is engaged with the continuing teacher training in active learning methodologies at the three campuses of the School of Engineering (Santiago, Viña del Mar and Concepción, Chile). She authored several manuscripts in the science education area, joined several research projects, participated in international conferences with oral presentations and key note lectures and serves as referee for journals, funding institutions and associations. © American Society for Engineering
Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery,” Big Data, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 85–99, Jun. 2013.[9] K. E. Arnold, B. Karcher, C. V. Wright, and J. McKay, “Student empowerment, awareness, and self-regulation through a quantified-self student tool,” in Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, 2017, pp. 526–527.[10] C. M. Steele and J. Aronson, “Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 69, no. 5, p. 797, 1995.[11] A. E. Bell, S. J. Spencer, E. Iserman, and C. E. R. Logel, “Stereotype Threat and Women’s Performance in Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 307–312, Oct. 2003.[12
Paper ID #37927How Actor-Network Theory Travels and Changes inEngineering Education: A Narrative Literature ReviewRenato Alan Bezerra RodriguesJillian Seniuk Cicek (Assistant Professor)Jeffrey Wayne Paul I am a Engineering Education Research PhD student with a passion for life-long learning. My current research is focused on how we can develop pedagogical content knowledge in instructors using nudge theory © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com How Actor-Network Theory Travels and Changes in Engineering Education: A
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Empowering Future Engineers: The Role of Advanced Technology in Construction Safety EducationAbstract:In the ever-evolving landscape of construction safety, integrating advanced technologies iscrucial for effectively preparing future engineers. This paper explores the incorporation ofcutting-edge technologies in construction safety education, highlighting a team project thatinvestigated various forms of smart personal protective equipment (PPE). More specifically, theteam project aimed to integrate smart sensing technologies with PPE such as smart helmet, smartvest, and smart wristband to provide critical physiological and environmental information thatcan significantly
it as a unique instructional strategy not very common inthe engineering education field. Table 1 lists the main characteristics and differences ofdifferent types of active learning including TBL. Some of the similarities include: (i)involvement of students in teams, (ii) a project is developed, and (iii) the instructor has akey role in the process. The main difference between TBL and other instructional strategiesis the focus on cohesiveness and development of teamwork skills. In PBL, for example, thefocus is in solving a problem and developing problem-solving skills, while in TBL the finaloutcome is not as important as the process [19]. In collaborative learning the focus is on theuse of complementary skills to solve a small activity, and
pedagogical methods in engineering education.Dr. Samuel Garcia Jr. , Texas State University Dr. Samuel Garc´ıa Jr. serves as an Educator Professional Development Specialist at Kennedy Space Center. Prior to his position at Kennedy Space Center, Dr. Garc´ıa worked at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA. As an education specialist, Dr. Garc´ıa is deeply committed to developing STEM educational mindsets, tools, and resources and facilitate educational experiences for educators and students. Prior to working as an education specialist, Dr. Garc´ıa served as secondary school educator in Rio Grande Valley in Texas for seven years. Dr. Garc´ıa, a first-generation college student, earned both his bachelor’s and
of practice for Mechanical Engineering faculty dedicated to continuous quality improvement in pedagogy; and leading and evaluating emerging educational technology innovations such as digital badges, adaptive learning, and learning analytics. She conducts research related to the scholarship of teaching and learning in Mechanical Engineering in order to improve practice in the department and con- tribute to the national and international Engineering Education research community through presentations and publications.Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Penn- sylvania State University and is the
2006-85: JUSTICE AND HUMILITY IN TECHNOLOGY DESIGNSteven VanderLeest, Calvin College Steven H. VanderLeest is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin College. He has an M.S.E.E. from Michigan Tech. U. (1992) and Ph.D. from the U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1995). He received a “Who’s Who Among America’s Teachers” Award in 2004 and 2005 and was director of a FIPSE grant “Building IT Fluency into a Liberal Arts Core Curriculum.” His research includes responsible technology and software partitioned OS. Page 11.851.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Justice and
Paper ID #43738Enhancing Teaching Evaluation in Engineering Education: An Explorationof the Theory of RatingMayar Madboly, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Mayar Madboly is currently a PhD student in the department of Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and University. Her research focuses on the issues in teaching evaluation, teaching effectiveness, and teamwork dynamics in engineering student and practitioner teams. She received her Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Electrical Energy Engineering from the faculty of Engineering in Cairo University in Egypt.Dr. Nicole P
interests are focused on improving construction management education.Sondra M Miller, Boise State UniversityRoss A. Perkins, Boise State University Dr. Perkins teaches course in instructional design, evaluation, and international perspectives in BSU’s Department of Educational Technology, where he has been an assistant professor since 2008. His research interests include STEM education, diffusion of innovation studies, and distance learning. Perkins received his doctorate in instructional systems design at Virginia Tech. Page 22.295.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011
-edge research for today and developing future lab scientists and engineers for tomorrow.The NDEP is configured to support defense-related STEM (science, technology, engineering,and mathematics) learning and teaching across three broad phases of the educational spectrum:pre-college, undergraduate/graduate, and post-graduate/faculty. What follows is a summary ofthe current NDEP portfolio components. NDEP has been designed to accommodate additionalprogram components as demonstrated needs arise. I. Pre-Engineering Program(PEP) initiative The Pre-Engineering Program(PEP) initiative of the NDEP covers the pre-college years, primarily middle school and high school when children explore and lay the groundwork for their future
spend their junior and senior years in Idaho Falls, attending classes atUniversity Place (a joint campus of ISU and UI) while working as interns at the Department ofEnergy's Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and using INL facilities for coursework. Scholarshipfunds are provided by the AREVA Group and the DOE.How did it start?In 2003, the Idaho State Board of Education approved the establishment of ISU's Institute forNuclear Science and Engineering (INSE). The Institute, directed by Dr. Michael Lineberry, wascreated to encompass all things nuclear at ISU and to promote and facilitate collaboration withthe INL. The Institute was designed to go beyond the traditional limitations of a college, becausethere are things happening in the Physics
engineering will greatly empower the two by sharing their individual,respective expertise in teaching methods and in the engineering design process. We also believethat the Fulton Engineering student will greatly benefit by engaging in and practicing a greatnumber of those “soft skills” that they will need to succeed as future engineers.FundingAn initiative of this scope requires significant funding to implement. The Mary Lou FultonTeachers’ College has funding from a number of sources to conduct the iTeach initiative butnone to assist with the implementation of the Engineers Serving Education efforts, nor does theFulton Engineering Schools have the internal resources to fund the effort other than to supply thestaff member to coordinate the
teaching was moreteacher-oriented, the discussion seemed to be more focused on delivery of content and gravitatedtowards information transmission. This category appeared to reinforce the ‘what I know’ aspectof the conceptualization of this tension.Figure 5: Engineering educators’ conceptualizations of the tension of their role of instructor versusfacilitator.Process advocate: This category was different than the previous one in that the focus movedbeyond instructor content knowledge and delivery being a requirement and now includedpedagogical knowledge as a critical aspect of the role. At the classroom level, educatorscontinued to inform, coach, and support students in the PBL process, but also helped the studentsto build transitioning skills (for
& Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationthe internal forces in the member of a pinned truss. The method of joints is used to analyze this.The students are required to then identify tension and compression members in a truss structure.All of the concepts introduced in the course culminate in a bridge design exercise where thestudents are asked to select I-beams that can satisfy the tension and compression constraints inbridge structures. Figure 1 Level System Used for Euler Buckling ExperimentThe engineering content is delivered using WebCT (Web Course Tools) over the Internet.WebCT is a set of educational tools for facilitating learning, communicating, and