, assessment methods, the students' backgrounds,and their feedback.IntroductionProject-based learning, particularly design-based projects, represents an extraordinarily effectivepedagogical method [1]. Similar to problem-based learning, design-based projects engagelearners actively in solving real-world challenges. This approach is widely acknowledged amongengineering educators as a means of shifting from passive to active learning paradigms withinthe classroom [2] [3] [4]. In this paper, I elucidate the integration of a design project into a bridgeexperiment within a Statics class, exemplifying the practical application and benefits of thiseducational approach.Class ProfileStatics, a fundamental branch of mechanics within engineering education, holds
AC 2011-1183: THE USE OF CONCEPT MAPPING TO STRUCTURE ACONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION FOR SECONDARY LEVEL ENGINEER-ING EDUCATIONJenny L. Daugherty, Purdue University Dr. Jenny Daugherty is an Assistant Professor in the Organizational Leadership & Supervision Depart- ment in the College of Technology at Purdue University. Her research focuses on the design of technology and engineering professional development and the associated learning outcomes.Rodney L Custer, Illinois State University Dr. Custer is Associate Vice-President for Research, Graduate Studies, and International Education at Illinois State University. His research focus is on engineering-oriented, secondary level professional development.Raymond A Dixon
also served on committees at state and national levels that developed P-12 engineering education standards. In recognition of his work, Dr. Love has received awards from professional organizations such as the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. Prior to Dr. Love’s employment at Penn State University’s Capital Campus he was a tenured associate professor and program coordinator of T&E education at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Accident Occurrences and Safety Issues Reported by Mid-Atlantic P-12 Engineering Educators
. Sivaloganathan, Engineering Design Process. Cengage Learning, 2010.[16] A. Elgafy, “Education: Multidisciplinary Undergraduate Engineering Program,” in Encyclopedia of Energy Engineering and Technology, Second Edition, S. Anwar, Ed. CRC Press, 2014, pp. 428–432.[17] B. Sripala and G. V. Praveen, “Soft Skills in Engineering Education: Industry Perspective,” Language in India, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 277–283, Oct. 2011.[18] D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, “Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team based, first-year design projects,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, 2007.[19] M. P. Frank, K. E. Amin, O. I. Okoli, S. Jung, R. A. Van Engelen, and C
STEAM content areas, he focuses his investigations on enhancing creativity and innovation, supporting better documentation, and encouraging collaborative learning.Miss Mehek Kunal Vora, Tufts University Mehek Vora is a rising sophomore at Tufts University, originally from Mumbai, India. She is pursuing a Bachelor’s degree in Psychology and Economics, maintaining a place on the Dean’s Honour List. She is currently a summer research intern at the Tufts Institute for Research on Learning and Instruction and student researcher at the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. She has recently developed a deep appreciation for the potential and capacity of generative AI in the learning environment and is
satelliteconstellations and their accompanying frequency bands and signal structures. This will require Page 26.819.9an even broader scope of training involving large, international engineering systems. Teachingprograms will need to expand to take into account the new GNSS constellations and theapplications associated with the expanded services. The new opportunities and teachingrequirements will encompass K12 education as well as education and training at the universitylevel. In summary, just as GNSS has revolutionized our society through technological advancesover the past few decades, the future is bright for instructors and students to transform educationand
reach faculty and administrators outside of engineering fields, such asuniversity-wide student affairs practitioners or Latinx scholarly and professional communities.For a detailed breakdown, please refer to Table 2.Table 2Journals Identified in the Final Dataset (N = 37) STEM Education Journals (n = 23) Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (17) ACM Transactions on Computing Education Advances in Engineering Education Computer Applications in Engineering Education IEEE Transactions on Education International Journal of Engineering Education Journal of Mechanical Design General Education
Properties of Materials. These significant teaching changes at theundergraduate level of engineering education have garnered the attention of internal educationresearchers, including our research team. Many published (e.g. [24] and [25]) and ongoing workshave been developed to better understand the student perspectives of the new teaching stylesoutlined prior.While the curriculum was designed with active and experiential learning opportunities in mind,we noted that some sections of teaching still relied on traditional lecture styles to conveytheoretical knowledge rather than using more interactive approaches. The implementation of thePivot was impacted by the COVID-19 global pandemic, requiring educators and learners to adaptto an online landscape
disparities, can be traced to past engineering solutions.Although somewhat simplistic, it can be surmised that current approaches to engineering education arebased on a negative feedback model which assumes that “engineering solution space”—the conceptualspace within which engineers operate—is dynamic, and that engineering solutions to emergent challengesarise sufficiently rapidly to damp down and ultimately reduce to the point of insignificance the long-termadverse consequences of actions taken. This is a model that has worked well in the past. But it is onewhich depends on three factors in particular to succeed: (i) engineering innovation time scales beingsubstantially shorter than those associated with emergent consequences; (ii) loose coupling
Paper ID #19946The Role of Trust in Collaborative Research Settings: Opportunities for Fu-ture Research in Graduate Engineering EducationCarey WhitehairDr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Catherine G.P. Berdanier is a Research Associate in the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engi- neering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including
Expectations: Exploring Contextual and Cognitive Factors,” Journal of Career Development, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 91–104, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0894845319827650.[2] M. Strutz and M. Ohland, “Low-SES First-generation Students’ Decision to Pursue Engineering,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2012, p. 25.907.1-25.907.15. doi: 10.18260/1-2--21664.[3] J. McKay and M. Devlin, “‘Low income doesn’t mean stupid and destined for failure’: challenging the deficit discourse around students from low SES backgrounds in higher education,” International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 347–363, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2015.1079273.[4] J. Engle
, pp. 487–511, 2018.[10] C. H. Foster and S. S. Jordan, “A philosophy of learning engineering and a Native American philosophy of learning; An analysis for congruency,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–84.[11] F. Swimmer and K. Jarratt-Ziemski, “Intersections between science and engineering education, and recruitment of female and native American students,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2007, pp. 12–956.[12] I. Anderson and S. S. Jordan, “Engineering connections in a Native American community and culture,” 2018.[13] D. Z. Frank, C. D. Crane, and E. P. Douglas, “Participatory Action Research as an Approach to Performing Research in Engineering Education with
HYDOXDWLRQRIZHEVLWHV´LQInternational Jour. of Electronic CommerceYROQR SS>@ % @ 0$8SSDO6$OLDQG65*XOOLYHU³)DFWRUVGHWHUPLQLQJHဨOHDUQLQJVHUYLFHTXDOLW\´LQ British Jour. of Educational TechnologyYROQRSS>@ = + .KDQ DQG 0 , $ELG ³'LVWDQFHOHDUQLQJLQHQJLQHHULQJHGXFDWLRQ&KDOOHQJHVDQG RSSRUWXQLWLHV GXULQJ &29,' SDQGHPLF FULVLV LQ 3DNLVWDQ´ LQ International Jour. of Electrical Engineering & EducationYROQRSS>@ 3&:DVRQ³2QWKHIDLOXUHWRHOLPLQDWHK\SRWKHVHVLQDFRQFHSWXDOWDVN´LQQuarterly Jour. of Experimental PsychologyYROQRSS>@ &6FKZLQG-%XGHU8&UHVVDQG):+HVVH³3UHIHUHQFHLQFRQVLVWHQWUHFRPPHQGDWLRQV $QHIIHFWLYHDSSURDFKIRUUHGXFLQJFRQILUPDWLRQELDVDQGVWLPXODWLQJGLYHUJHQWWKLQNLQJ"´ LQComputers & EducationYROQRSS
Paper ID #38322The use of 3D printed media to improve the accessibility of engineeringeducational materialsDr. Gergely Sirokman, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand Gergely (Greg) Sirokman is an engineering content developer at zyBooks, a Wiley brand. He earned a BS in chemistry from Brandeis University, and a Ph.D. in Inorganic Chemistry from MIT. He was a Professor at Wentworth Institute of Technology for 14 years, with particular interests in renewable energy and gamification of education. He now works on creating and improving statistics and engineering content for zyBooks’ online interactive textbooks, and has developed a keen
international conferences and other journals. Schilling is the recipient of the Ohio Space Grant Consortium Doctoral Fellowship, and is a member of IEEE, IEEE Computer Society, IEEE Reliability Society, ACM, and ASEE. Page 13.816.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Issues Affecting Doctoral Students Returning to Engineering Education Following Extensive Industrial ExperienceAbstractIt can be said that the best time for an engineer who desires to enter academia to earntheir Doctoral Degree is after a four to five year period working in industry. During thistime period, a practicing engineering
. Saffih has published various pa- pers in Imaging and suggesting AI application in pedagogy and education starting with his paper at 142nd ASEE International Conference, Columbus, OH, USA, on June 2017. To disseminate his re- search and teaching activities and findings, Dr. Saffih has launched his channel that can be accessed here: https://www.youtube.com/user/fsaffih c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Artificially-Intelligent Method (AIM) for STEM based Electrical Engineering Education and Pedagogy. Case study: MicroelectronicsABSTRACT:The teaching of microelectronic requires a multidisciplinary approach. This includes solid-statephysics, microelectronics fabrication
, India, and takes active role in conducting workshops, designing course contents as well as various other Mission10X projects in addition to several research activities in various aspects of engineering education. As a technical faculty of Mission10X, she is a certified master trainer for the various training modules of Mission10X for engineering college faculty in INDIA. In addition, she is qualified with the ”Cambridge International Certificate for Teachers and Trainers (CICTT),” Cambridge University, U.K.Dr. Rajshri Jobanputra Rajshri Jobanputra brings with her more than 15 years of experience of teaching, training, and research. Academically qualified with a Ph.D. in philosophy, from Indian Institute of Technology
Session 1526 Current Directions in Earthquake Engineering Education: The University Consortium on Instructional Shake Tables S.J. Dyke, K.Z. Truman, and P.L. Gould Washington University in St. LouisAbstractAlthough considering the dynamic behavior of buildings and bridges is of fundamental impor-tance in modern structural design, undergraduate civil engineering students seldom develop anunderstanding of the way that these structures respond when acted upon by time-varying loads.Because this topic is of great social and economical importance, there is a need in current
. Haleem, R. P. Singh, S. Khan, and I. H. Khan, “Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system,” BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 100115, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115.[6] D. Eke, «ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: threat to academic integrity?», Journal of Responsible Technology, vol. 13, p. 100060, abr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060.[7] S. Nikolic et al., “ChatGPT versus engineering education assessment: a multidisciplinary and multi-institutional benchmarking and analysis of this generative artificial intelligence tool to investigate assessment integrity,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 48
IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference(EDUCON), IEEE, 2018, pp. 217–222. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363231.[12] L. Hickman and M. Akdere, “Exploring virtual reality for developing soft-skills in STEMeducation,” in 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF), New York: IEEE, 2017,pp. 461–465. Accessed: Jul. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available:https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000447623800078[13] A. Abdelouahab, “Virtual Reality–enhanced soft and hard skills development environmentfor higher education,” in Innovations in Smart Cities Applications Volume 4, vol. 183, M. BenAhmed, İ. Rakıp Karaș, D. Santos, O. Sergeyeva, and A. A. Boudhir, Eds., Cham: SpringerInternational Publishing, 2021, pp. 255–267. doi: 10.1007/978-3
of theirprofession.” 2 For the nuclear engineer, this might mean finance, politics, law, communications, andmarketing to name but a few.For graduating nuclear engineers of the United States Military Academy, this holds particularly true eventhough seldom does one get the opportunity to directly apply the context of their engineering degree intheir first job. Graduates from the U.S. Military Academy commission as lieutenants into the U.S. Army,regardless of their academic major. Cadets receive a broad, liberal arts education whereby even theengineers receive classes in history, international relations, law, and English. Those majoring in thehumanities, too, must take extensive courses in math and sciences to round-off their education
, Linda C. Strauss, and J. Fredericks Volkwein. “Getting in Sync: Faculty and Employer Perceptions from the National Study of EC2000”. English. In: International Journal of Engineering Education 22.3 (June 2006), pp. 460–469. [2] National Academy of Engineering NAE. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, May 2004. [3] Educate to Innovate: Factors That Influence Innovation: Based on Input from Innovators and Stakeholders. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, Apr. 2015. [4] Mirka Koro-Ljungberg et al. “Reconceptualizing and decentering think-aloud methodology in qualitative research”. en. In: Qualitative Research 13.6 (Dec. 2013), pp
Computer Systemsand Networking Curriculum in NJIT’s I-TOWER Sponsored Wireless Laboratories, ASEE West PointConference, May 2002, In the proceedings.[2] Ranky, P G., Golgen Bengu and Gale Tenen Spak: The Development and Application ofSynchronous and Asynchronous Technology Based Learning Aids for Undergraduate EngineeringEducation, The NSF Engineering Education Inn ovators’ Conference, NSF sponsored participation, April7-8, 1997, Arlington, VA, USA, Proceedings[3] Ranky, P G.: An Object Oriented Virtual Concurrent Engineering Model and Product DemonstratorCase Study, Japan-USA International Symposium on Flexible Automation, ASME (American Society ofMechanical Engineers), July, 2000, Ann Arbor, MI, Conference Proceedings.[4] Ranky, P.G, One-Jeng
STEM education related to engineering education. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Countries where he has worked include Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand. In addition, he has taught undergraduate and graduate courses in engineering education for the department.Young Min Kim, The Ohio State UniversityDr. Mohammad Al Mestiraihi, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Mohammad Al Mestiraihi got his Ph.D. degree from the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University (USU) in
well as students' self-perception of their capabilities “aspowerful thinkers and doers in a specific field of study” [12]. Women and students that belong toan ethnic minority often feel that they do not academically or socially belong in engineering,which impacts formation of engineering identity [7]. These feelings can come from differencesin ethnic/cultural values and socialization, internalization of negative stereotypes, ethnic isolationor perceptions of racism, or a lack of faculty role models and mentors [13].This work particularly relies on the framework of identity-trajectory, which was applied toengineering education research by Thomas [14]. Identity-trajectory focuses on three conceptsthat help explain the evolution of engineering
stress in mechanics of materials. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.21 Brown, S. A., Montfort, D., & Hildreth, K. (2008). An investigation of student understanding of shear and bending moment diagrams. In W. Aung, J. Mecsi, J. Moscinski, I. Rouse, & P. Willmot (Eds.), Innovations 2008: World Innovations in Engineering Education and Research (pp. 81-101): Begell House Publishing.22 Montfort, D., & Brown, S. A. (2011). Building fundamental engineering knowledge: Identification and classification of engineering students' preconceptions in mechanics of materials. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research
Paper ID #46811Faculty Espoused versus Enacted Beliefs on Teamwork in Engineering Education:Results from a National Faculty SurveyDr. Campbell James McColley, Cornell University Dr. Campbell McColley is a Postdoctoral Associate in the Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at Cornell University in the Biomedical Engineering Education Assessment and Research (BEEAR) Group. He received his Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Oregon State University, where he investigated microplastics transformations and behavior in aquatic environments. His work focuses on faculty and student perspectives and experiences with
Acquisitions Officer, qualified in the AH- 64D Apache Longbow and fixed-wing aircraft. Major Jeremy Paquin currently serves as the Thermal- Fluids System I course director and has previously taught thermodynamics and fluid mechanics classes. His areas of interest include aircraft test and evaluation, hypersonic vehicles, and engineering education.Major Matthew Louis Miller, United States Military Academy MAJ Miller is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He holds an advanced degree in Aerospace Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology.Major Jes Barron, U.S. Military Academy Jes Barron is an Assistant Professor in the
. Buckley, T. N. Barnes, J. Enszer, S. Rooney, and R. Davidson, “Adjusting the Lens: Comparison of Focus Group and Cross-Sectional Survey Data in Identifying and Addressing Issues of Diversity and Inclusion in Undergraduate Engineering Programs,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[5] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group:’ Achieving individual diversity,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x.[6] M. Paretti, R. Layton, S. Laguette, and G. Speegle, “Managing and mentoring capstone design teams: Considerations and practices for faculty,” Int. J. Eng. Educ
, Calif: Sage Publications, 2003.[20] L. Hamilton y C. Corbett-Whittier, «Using Case Study in Education Research», London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2024. doi: 10.4135/9781473913851.[21] I. Hilliger, G. Astudillo, y J. Baier, «Lacking time: a case study of student and faculty perceptions of academic workload in the covid‐19 pandemic», J. Eng. Educ., 2023.[22] A. C. Johnston, M. Akarsu, T. J. Moore, y S. S. Guzey, «Engineering as the integrator: A case study of one middle school science teacher’s talk», J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, n.o 3, pp. 418-440, 2019.[23] K. Schoch, «Case study research», en Research design and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner, G. J. Burkholder, K. A. Cox, L. M. Crawford, y J. H. Hitchcock