state of our students’ abilities. In the spring of 2014 a survey was developed to explore current student strengths and weaknesses in open-‐ended problem solving and design. A survey was developed to track students progress through a newly developed curriculum with an emphasis on Open-‐Ended Problems and Design challenges. The following five questions were asked of students based on a 1-‐7 likert scale: All questions on a scale of 1-‐7(1 being Agree Strongly, 7 being Disagree Strongly): 1) I have confidence in approaching and solving open-‐ended design problems where there is no correct answer
the professional learning process by abalancing of teaching/experience, theory/practice, disciplinarily/interdisciplinary and bystrengthening the link between research, education and practice. This presentation draws onthe author’s experience since 1974 with the never ending development and implementation ofthe Aalborg experiment.Introduction: The Aalborg ExperimentAalborg University (AAU) was established in 1974 as an innovative experiment in highereducation with 900 students from four different schools, now with more than 13,000 students.The innovation was mainly to use the project-based educational approach to overcome someof the problems of the traditional course-based educational system. The curriculum inengineering as well as in the
sustain the new development in manufacturing processes and technologies, it iscritically important that there is skilled workforce to support the industry. Prior research haspointed to a talent gap in manufacturing industry (Javdekar et al., 2016). To that end, multipleinitiatives are taking place on different levels. For example, at the industry level, many initiativesare being taken by the companies to bridge this gap, such as upskilling the current workforcethrough continuing education (Nepal et al., 2019), or partnering with an academic institution indeveloping appropriate program or curriculum (Nepal et al., 2016; Seemakula et al., 2010). At theuniversity level, besides offering academic degree programs in manufacturing or similar
and separationprocess systems: plasma, microwave, photochemical, biochemical, supercritical, and cryogenic,reactive extraction and distillation, and membrane reactors [Gar94, Heg92]. A frequent question is often raised among engineering educators: how do we makeprocesses relevant for instruction of students? This and other topics are addressed in theworkshop by i) first presenting the important areas of modern processing as applied to variousengineering fields and ii) showing ways to creatively integrate them into the curriculum throughcourses and hands-on laboratory experience. A major thrust of the workshop is hands-on processexperiments that are conducted by the participants with brainstorming on new experiments andhow to integrate
developed with the assistance of industrialrepresentatives and faculty that are teaching and administrating the senior design courses.IntroductionDuring the late 1980s and early 1990s significant attention was being given to products producedand manufacturing processes used in the United States. Seminars, class sessions, andpresentations were being given on methods to improve US products and processes. Industry waslearning and adapting Dr. W. Edwards Deming’s1 statistical methods and principles. Notedspeakers such as Tom Peters were writing books and providing lectures on “In Search ofExcellence,” 2,3 “A Passion for Excellence,”3 and “A Passion for Customers.”3 Similarlyengineering educational institutions were working to improve their curriculum
university in the state of Tennessee. Currently, we have an enrollment ofapproximately 18,000 students and 700 full-time faculty members. The university hasfive colleges; Basic and Applied Sciences, Business, Education, Liberal Arts, and MassCommunication. Engineering Technology and Industrial Studies is one of the 10Departments under the college of Basic and Applied Sciences. We offer EngineeringTechnology, Industrial Technology and Pre-engineering programs. There are about 600undergraduate students in the department, of which 200 students are majors in Computer,Design, Electro-Mechanical, and Manufacturing Engineering Technology areas. Sunrayce - The Solar Car Race The objectives of Sunrayce are to stimulate
revised the program curriculum tofurther enhance program collaborations with industry. In this paper, the discussion will cover thephilosophy of the curriculum development, the offering of some Engineering Managementcourses with the involvement of companies, and the issues involved in building ties withindustries. The examples of course offerings with industry’s involvement include an advancedproject management course, an industrial and technology management seminar course, and alegal issues in engineering management course.IntroductionThe growth in the demand of Engineering and Technology Management education is evident bythe study done by Kocaoglu 1. Same trend occurred in the fast growing Charlotte area. Becauseof the demand in this area, UNCC
is designed to tutor students on how to use the PSPICE circuit simulation program toanalyze electric and electronic circuits. The information and data collected from survey andquestionnaires was analyzed and used for the evaluation of attitudes toward the use of this mediabased instructional tool. Students have responded favorably to and expressed their satisfactionwith the developed media based instructional tool.IntroductionIn recent years and due to the evolving technology and its attendant introduction of new materialinto the curriculum, most colleges face a demand to optimize their curriculum and increase thecontent of courses. This challenges educators to determine more efficient ways of designingtheir courses and presenting the
was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale [1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree] onthe following survey item for each research area: “I know how to translate research in thefollowing areas to improve high school STEM curriculum”.Table 2. Pre-Program and Post-Program Knowledge of Translating Research to High School Curriculum Knowledge of Knowledge of Knowledge of Knowledge of Knowledge of Artificial Quantum Advanced Communications Biotechnology Intelligence Information Manufacturing and IotF and and Machine Science and Sustainability Learning
cohortsAbstractThe capstone course sequence in an engineering or engineering technology program bringstogether all elements of the curriculum into a comprehensive learning experience. A team ofstudents works together, combining the topics learned during their undergraduate coursework tocomplete a substantial design project. Design courses can be uncomfortable for many studentsbecause of the open-ended nature of the requirement, leading to many questions such as “Are weon the right track? Do I have the right answer? Are we approaching this the right way?” Due totheir unique experiences, student veterans in engineering are well positioned to enable theircohorts to overcome these challenges. The military experience teaches veterans to becomeproblem-solvers
Paper ID #39786Board 265: Engaging Students in Exploring Computer Hardware Funda-mentalsUsing FPGA Board GamesAndrea Ramirez-Salgado, University of Florida Andrea is a doctoral student at the University of Florida specializing in Educational Technology within the Curriculum and Instruction program. She has a master’s degree in Education and ICT and a bachelor’s degree in Software Systems Engineering. Andrea has been teaching undergraduate and graduate courses for the past thirteen years covering topics such as algorithms, process engineering, instructional design, and applications of technology in education. Her research
implementation of an online resource to help facultydevelop technological literacy course for non-engineers. Faculty are more likely to teach thesegeneral education engineering courses if appropriate curriculum materials are readily available.This online resource is based on models for general education engineering courses that emergedfrom a workshop on the technological literacy of undergraduates that was sponsored by theNationals Science Foundation and held in March 2007 at the National Academy ofEngineering1,2.All Americans need to better understand the wide variety of technology used everyday. The needfor technological literacy has never been greater at both an individual and national level.Creating a population with a more empowered relationship
committee and stakeholders, it was obvious that the curriculumdeveloped should not only address the needs of the manufacturing industry but also meet the ABETstandards of high-quality education that prepares our graduates for the professional practice ofengineering. Since it is the Engineering Technology (ET) degree with a manufacturingconcentration, the focus of the curriculum is the foundational knowledge, skills and abilities (KSA)in manufacturing and mechanical processes, electrical and electronics, programming, industrialautomation, robotics, operational excellence and leadership and safety and security. Figure 1: Curriculum for the Engineering Technology ProgramStudents are required to complete 121 credits of undergraduate
hours of Math, 30 hours of Computer Science, 38hours of engineering requirements, and 3 hours of electives.Curriculum for the Computer Engineering Area of SpecializationStudents must earn a minimum of 123 semester credits to qualify for the Bachelor of Sciencedegree in computer science with an emphasis in computer engineering. The curriculum consistsof 36 hours of General Education and 13 hours of science requirements.Math requirements consist of 20 hours which are listed below: Page 24.306.5 • MATH 1210 Calculus I • MATH 1220 Calculus II • MATH 2040 Principles of Statistics • CS 2300
benefits of the application and methodologies inherent in the virtualapplication of manufacturing in PLM environments. This Certificate program has beendemonstrated successfully in one complete curriculum cycle and is now incorporating processimprovement for a successive offering.Adult Learning Strategies and the Online Delivery ModelDistance education has gone through a number of evolutionary stages since its inception,including online web-based delivery coupled with graphics and audio capability 1,2. According toKearsley 3, online instruction includes any form of learning or teaching that takes place via acomputer network. This definition fits much of what is available to educators and students today– high-speed networks, visual representations
work in teams to research, design and constructsolutions to engineering problems. Students apply principles developed in the four precedingcourses. Students present progress reports, submit a final written report and defend theirsolutions to a panel of outside reviewers at the end of the school year.Table 5 shows the distribution of courses in Indiana schools. Indiana’s Project Lead the Way(PLTW) program began with the following course sequence: 1. Introduction to Engineering Design (IED) 2. Digital Electronics (DE) 3. Principles of Engineering (POE) 4. Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) 5. Engineering Design and Development (EDD)IED, POE, and CIM were placed under the Technology Education umbrella while the remainingtwo
training facilitylocated at the Biomanufacturing Training and Education Center (BTEC), answers this questionwhile accomplishing the following objectives: Develop and integrate two 2-day BTEC short course laboratory experiences into the ECU’s bioprocess engineering curriculum. These short courses are a required and graded component of two bioprocess engineering courses. Develop companion web-based materials to provide students with prerequisite material, maximizing the time spent on hands-on laboratory activities on-site at BTEC, as well as providing an opportunity for students at other institutions to enroll. Enhance ECU engineering students’ competiveness in the workplace by providing hands- on
the NCCER Electrical Level I Helper IBCrequirements; and a description of a virtual, “flipped classroom” model professionaldevelopment workshop held jointly with the Louisiana Ag Teachers Association (LATA).Figure 1: Overview of project additions.The paper is specifically relevant to two-year colleges who are leading or who want to pursue afederally-funded project involving high school partners, dual enrollment programs, and/orcurricula around Arduino microcontrollers. The paper presents specific recruiting and marketingbarriers that were overcome in order to connect an innovative, hands-on curriculum with morehigh school partners.The outcomes of these efforts were assessed by an external evaluator, AROS Consulting, throughdata gathered from
carbonated polymer. He is currently the Director of the US Department of Energy-funded Energizing Minds through Advanced Clean Energy Education (EMACE) Inspires and Partnership programs and an Air Force Office of Scientific Research-funded project investigating rapid 3D antenna manufacturing. Additionally, he serves as a Co-PI on several grants including two multimillion-dollar NSF-funded projects. Within 5 years he has secured over $1.2 million in STEM grants. Prior to his professorship appointment, Dr. Dawan served as the Assistant Director of the NSF-funded NextGenC3 CREST Phase I project and further beyond this, he was a research associate in the Microfabrication Group at LSU’s J. Bennett Johnston’s Center for
. “Frontiers in Chemical Engineering Education,” CCR/NSF Workshops, see information at http://web.mit.edu/che-curriculum.2. Cussler, E. L. and Moggridge, G. D., Chemical Product Design, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001, Chapter 1.3. Turton, R., Bailie, R. C., Whiting, W. B. and Shaeiwitz, J. A., Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes (2nd ed.), Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003, Chapter 24.4. Skeist, I., Handbook of Adhesives (2nd ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1977.5. Shaeiwitz, J. A., Whiting, W. B., and Velegol, D., “A Large-Group Senior Design Experience: Teaching Responsibility and Life-Long Learning,” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 1, 1996, pp. 70-75.6. Shaeiwitz, J. A. and
graduate students and hidden curriculum in engineering.Dr. Diana Chen, University of San Diego Dr. Diana A. Chen is an Assistant Professor of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She joined the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering in 2016. Her research interests are in areas of sustainable design, including biomimicry and adaptability in structural, city, and regional applications. Additionally, her scholarship includes topics such as curriculum development, contextualization of fundamental engi- neering sciences and integrating social justice into engineering education. She earned her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University, and her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College
, CO and Hewlett Packard Laboratory inPalo Alto, CA. His research interests are in reliability physics and materials characterization of semiconductormaterials. Dr. Knowlton received his B.S in 1992., M.S. in 1995, and Ph.D. in 1998, in Materials Science andEngineering from the University of California at Berkeley.References1. 2000-2001 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs; Section II.P.3, Page 242. Ibid. Criterion 3. Page 32 and “Program Criteria for Materials ... Programs” Page 443. Society of Manufacturing Engineers; Manufacturing Education Plan: Phase I Report 1997 SME Education Foundation4. Dick, W. And Carey, L.; The Systematic Design of Instruction 4th edition 1996 Harper Collins5
applicability has spanned many industrial segments for decades, andplays large roles in current initiatives, such as IoT, Industry 4.0 and others [2].For U.S. economy, and particularly for the state of Michigan, manufacturing is a criticalcomponent that has declined due to globalization and competition. Innovation is required inorder to have more efficient and higher productivity components and services [3, 4]. To regaintheir predominance in the field, the manufacturing sector needs better educated technicalgraduates trained in current technologies. These graduates are also expected to be equipped withgeneric engineering skills beyond their area of expertise [5]. Another aspect to be consideredwhen dealing with curriculum development is the constantly
semesterhours of course work. The current curriculum consists of 30 hours of General Education and 10hours of science requirements that must be taken by all the different areas of specialization.Math requirements consist of 17 hours which are listed below: • CNS 2300 Discrete Structures I • Math 1210 Calculus I • Math 1220 Calculus II • Math 2230 Principles of Statistics I & IIComputer science core requirements are 28 hours. Core requirements which are taken by all theareas of specialty are given below: • CNS 1250 Object-Oriented Programming I • CNS 1350 Object-Oriented Programming II
manufacturing-related programs by providinginstitutions, companies, and students a way to work together both onsite and online in a cost-effective, practical way. The distributed-hybrid instructional delivery method uses face-to-facemodular activity-based instructional materials, developed under previous NSF-ATE grantsincluding most recently the Completing the Curriculum: Modular Manufacturing EducationModel for Advanced Manufacturing Education DUE 0071079. The Completing theCurriculum grant focused on the development and testing of the curriculum for an AAS degreein Manufacturing Engineering Technology in nine subject matter clusters[1]. What is the urgentneed for this new approach to delivery? The Society of Manufacturing Engineers has
Page 6.1019.1engineering education. A significant part of the Integrated Learning Initiative will be the “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”construction of an Integrated Learning Center, however a significant overhaul of the overallengineering curriculum will be a necessary companion to this phase of this endeavour. Page 6.1019.2 “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society
Phase Faults and Shunt Faults. During the last five years, the hiring of power equipment manufacturers have changedwhile utilities needs have dropped off. Manufacturers have requested additional coursework inelectric drives, and digital communications. To address these concerns, we have revised our Page 7.1177.1power courses. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education2. New Course Descriptions The first power course is now, “EET 321 - Industrial Power and Sequential Automation”.This course
• Design • Manufacturing skills • Specialist engineering knowledge Page 10.1276.6 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education International Product Development – Group Work Case StudySheffield Hallam University, UK: postgraduate engineering studentsMercuria Business School, Helsinki, Finland: postgraduate business studentsProduct: Re-heatable thermos flask made out of bio-degradable polymersStudents communicated weekly through video conferencing, in order to develop the conceptdesign
Page 3.136.9 Laval, 1966. 9[4] Jaspers, K.: “Die Idee der Universitat.” 1954. Ed. Peter Owen, London, 1959.[5] Ferrell, J.: “A Lesson Plan”, Manufacturing Engineering, July 1996, pp.16.[6] Turski, W.M.: “Uczy• , nie uczy• ?”, PC Kurier, 1997, no.14, pp.133.[7] Haeck, L.V.J.: “Multi-disciplinary ou le Génie Plus”, Proceedings of ASEE Zone 1 Meeting, Apr.25-26, 1997, West Point, NY, pp.9A3.1-9A3.9.[8] Dudot, B.: “Les années turbo”, http://www.renaultF1.com/news/press_releases.html, 10/27/1997.[9] Incropera, F. P., Fox, R.W.: “Revising a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum: The Implementation Process”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol.85, no.3, July 1996, pp
• Alternative solutions • Written/Oral reports • FeasibilityDesignated classes within the ME curriculum have specific design components included. Thesedesign experiences either introduce or reinforce the Engineering design process, combining astructured approach to solving problems with an appreciation for the art of engineering.Freshmen are expected to create physical devices with minimal engineering science, developinga sense of the manufacturing skills required for realistic designs. Progressively more complexprojects are given to sophomores and juniors, requiring the use of engineering science gainedfrom the curriculum. The seniors must design and implement external industry-based