the Office for Latin American Programs, Alves was also responsible for the opening of the Soltis Center in Costa Rica. She completed her undergraduate studies at Lynn University in Florida, where she graduated with honors in Business Administration in 2002. She is a graduate of the M.S. Marketing program at Texas A&M University, and in the Fall of 2009, Alves started the Ph.D. program in Higher Education Administration and is expected to finish in 2015.Ms. Meghan M. Alexander, Texas A&M University Meghan M. Alexander is the Assistant Director for Engineering International Programs at Texas A&M University. She has an M.Ed. in Counseling and more than 15 years’ experience in international education
President of the International Federation of Engineering Education Societies (IFEES), and Co-Chair of the IFEES Global Engineering Education Summit that will be held in Cape Town, South Africa October 19-20, 2008. She was a past President and an Executive Council member of the Upsilon Pi Epsilon International Honor Society for the Computing and Information Disciplines, and a past Education Board member of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Special Interest Group for Graphics (SIGGRAPH). Her current research interests are in the areas of Global Engineering Education, Complex Systems Modeling, and Secure Systems Development. She has written more than 150 refereed publications with over 100
international education strategies comparison, enterprise in engineering education and complex engineering problem-solving.Anqi Ma, Tsinghua University Anqi Ma is a second-year master student in the Institute of Education at Tsinghua University with the guidance of Dr. Yu. She has a bachelor’s degree in vehicle engineering and now focuses on engineering education. Her research tends to be at the micro-scale, focused on the individual level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive. Recently her works include engineering students’ identity and complex problem-solving skills. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Understanding and
highlights of a recent survey that was conducted to bettercharacterize the current state of international opportunities for engineering students, includingthe trends, general themes, and major exceptions.1 IntroductionThe value of an international cognizance, in the context of engineering education, has been thesubject of much research. A recent study, In Search of Global Engineering Excellence1,summarizes the large majority of these findings: The ability to live and work in a global community is — today — an important requirement for engineering graduates. They need to have broad engineering skills and know-how, and to be flexible and mobile, and able to work internationally.Regrettably, the fulfillment of this international
University of Puerto Rico, and course instructor (with Professor John Johanson) at Pratt University School of Architecture. Page 15.573.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Facilitating Collaboration of Engineering and Architecture Students via an International Travel-Study WorkshopAbstractThis paper presents an overview of a joint School of Engineering and School of Architectureinitiative at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute that facilitates collaboration between students,faculty, and practitioners from both disciplines. The program is presented with respect to itslearning objectives and is
positive effect on studentattitudes, behaviors, and performance while minimizing the risks to the clients, recipients of theservice learning effort.16, 17 An added benefit of humanitarian projects is that they attract a morediverse student population with wider interests.18Freshman class projectsImpacts of Engineering is a 3-credit required course for all incoming engineering freshmen andis also available as a general education elective to all university students. Course objectivesinclude several that are specifically directed at developing an understanding of engineeringdesign from a global perspective.19 These selected course objectives include: Demonstrate an understanding of the comprehensive nature of engineering design. Develop a
collectedquickly and seem somewhat detached from one another until one reads the last item.Table I: Statements Defining Global Engineering Education ‚ Prepare engineers for designing products for global deployment ‚ Provide engineering graduates with international experience virtually and personally ‚ Study abroad ‚ Degree programs ‚ Internship abroad ‚ Educating engineers globally ‚ Ability to communicate over time and distance ‚ Teach language ‚ Develop Common, global perspectives ‚ What you do/ How you do it ‚ Educating engineers with a global mindsetThe last item in the list is a good synopsis of the goals of all of the list items before it and wasconsidered a reasonable way to develop graduates with Global
planning focuses on some common goal(e.g., profit) and include standard analyses (e.g., SWOT analysis), which eventually lead tovision and mission of the organization. The balanced scorecard methodology, however, focusesequally on four important perspectives3: • stakeholder perspective, • process perspective, • capacity building perspective, and Page 11.526.4 • financial perspective.Applying the balanced scorecard methodology, the Faculty of Engineering has developed itsstrategy map, displaying the relationships of these four perspectives as shown in Figure 1.The stakeholder here is defined as students who receive the education. The
International Senior Capstone Project willacquire following additional skills. Teamwork Working on an Industrial Project Working with a multi national corp. Familiarization with diverse design, manufacturing and testing environments Working with members of diverse cultural backgrounds Living in a foreign country Using Modern Technology for Distance CommunicationIt is envisioned that the initiative will be expanded to include more institutions and more countries fromother regions of the world. Page 7.731.7 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
recommendations canbe made to the university on how to better address those needs and, consequentially, recruit andretain more international students.International graduate students contribute significantly to US higher education institutions andeconomies by increasing cultural variety and introducing innovative perceptions. However,recruiting and retaining these students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) disciplines is difficult. From this point of view, this research evaluates the experiencesand satisfaction levels of international STEM graduate students at KSU, with an emphasis onconstruction management students. This research identifies essential needs that must be betteraddressed to improve recruiting and retention outcomes
, which is dedicated to increasing the cyber workforce in Iowa. Doug has given over 300 presentations in the area of computer security. He also created the cybersecurity ambassador program targeted at the public, K-12 students, post-secondary students, and employees and is leading an effort to create a series of short videos called Cyber House Rock that help teach cybersecurity and digital safety to the public. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 International Cybersecurity Exercise: A Model for Collaborative Cyber Defense EducationAbstractThis paper presents the International Cybersecurity Exercise (ICE), now named the InternationalCyber Defense Challenge
novel ways of connecting with relevantaudience. Our analysis demonstrates that diversity initiatives related to STEM attract voices fromvarious entities including individuals, large corporations, media outlets, and community interestgroups.IntroductionThe term “STEM education” refers to teaching and learning in the fields of science, technology,engineering, and mathematics. According to Sanders (2008), in the 1990s, the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) “SMET” was the shorthand for “science, mathematics, engineering, andtechnology” and an NSF program officer complained that “SMET” sounded too much like “smut,”that resulted in the new acronym “STEM” [1]. Although it took some time for STEM to catch on,and even as recently as 2003 few people know
] B. Taylor, “Cheating Lessons, Part 3”, The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 19, 2013.[7] S. Moaveni, Engineering Fundamentals – An Introduction to Engineering, Fifth Edition, pp. 35, Cengage Learning, 2014.[8] David A. Sousa, How the Brain Learns, Third Edition, pp. 95, Corwin Press, 2006.[9] C. L. Phillips, J. M. Parr, and E. A. Riskin, Signals, Systems, and Transforms, 4th Edition, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, 2008.[10] G. Hassoun, “The Engineering Education Assessment Process - A Signals and Systems Perspective”,123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 2016,https://peer.asee.org/26156.[11] Blackboard Inc., Blackboard Learn Help for Instructors, Washington DC
developed without students traveling abroad. For example, theattribute, “Engineering graduates are proficient working in or directing a team of ethnic andcultural diversity,” could be developed a number of ways, such as through a collaborativedesign experience, that would not have to involve travel. This is important since many studyabroad programs do not scale easily, and it is not yet clear for many institutions how toprovide an international experience for a large fraction of engineering students.SummaryThis paper has addressed two main questions related to global engineering education: “Whatdoes it mean for students to have global competence?” and, “What are the most importantattributes of global competence?” In answer to the first question, we
. Baker, L. E. Nordstrum, and L. M. Gomez, “Networked Improvement Communities: The Discipline of Improvement Science Meets the Power of Networks,” Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5–25, 2017.[12] D. J. Peurach, S. W. Lenhoff, and J. L. Glazer, “Large-Scale High School Reform through School Improvement Networks: Exploring Possibilities for ‘Developmental Evaluation,’” Teachers College Record, vol. 118, no. 13, 2016.[13] R. Lotan, “Group-worthy tasks,” Educational leadership: journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, N.E.A, vol. 60, pp. 72–75, Mar. 2003.[14] E. G. Cohen, “Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups
Success. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.2. Hart Research Associates. (2015). Falling Short? College Learning and Career Success. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.3. Nguyen, D.Q. (1998). The Essential Skills and Attributes of an Engineer: A Comparative Study of Academics, Industry Personnel and Engineering Students. Global Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, UICEE.4. Zaharim, A., Yusoff, Y.M., Omar, M.Z., Mohamad, A., & Muhamad, M. (2009). Engineering Employability Skills Required by Employers in Asia. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Engineering Education.5. Makres, I. (2006). A review of literature on employability skill needs
learning of technical skills and cultural skills, and improved methods of blended learning and others. He works in the open educational resources area. He is Leader of an Innovation Group in Education in the UPM. He is Executive Director of OCW UPM Office and member elected of the Board of Directors of the OpenCourseWare Consortium. He is the author of many papers in engineering education, and he is a member of the Steering Committee and Co-chair for Europe of Frontiers Education Conference (FIE) and member of IEEE RITA Editorial Committee. He is IEEE Senior Member, Past Chairman of the Spanish Chapter and, as member of the Board of Governors of the IEEE Education Society, he is currently Chair of the Distinguished
, Image Processing, and Bio- medical Signal Processing etc. He has published 40 papers in National/International Conferences/Journals and he has Co-authored two books. He is Member of IEEE and life member of ISTEMr. Suhas Pandit Shukla, R CPatel Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 “Ability grouping” led to an improvement in the academic success of first year students in an Indian collegeIntroduction The most difficult challenge for teachers is to ensure value-addition to all their students,despite variations in students’ cognitive abilities, emotional stabilities, and motivation levels.As the variations increase, difficulties of teachers
Geiger, Florida Gulf Coast University CHRISTOPHER GEIGER is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioengineering in the U.A. Whitaker School of Engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. He received his M.S and Ph.D. degrees in Biomedical Engineering from Northwestern University in 1999 and 2003, respectively, and his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Northwestern University in 1996. Page 12.1153.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Perspectives from New Faculty in a Non-traditional Engineering SettingAbstractFlorida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) is the newest public university in
Paper ID #8186Perspectives from internships and co-ops with industryDr. David Wanless, Michigan Technological University Dr. Wanless is an assistant professor at Michigan Technological University. His areas of interest include: hydraulics, product design and development, quality control and leadership. Page 23.964.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Three perspectives of co-op and internship programsAbstractThe practice of allowing students to enter the working world to gain
and improve a responsemechanism to meet the social goal of program accreditation. This response mechanism is aadjustment made by universities and programs on the basis of an accurate grasp of the qualityassurance mechanism, as a supplement to the traditional quality assurance mechanism. Toinvestigate the internal quality assurance in engineering education from the perspective ofconstructivism is to dynamically present the changes and reforms of internal mechanism.Similarly, Constructivism’s understanding of the mechanism also implies two logics. First,the mechanism itself can be designed to breed new mechanisms. When investigating theconnotation of the internal quality assurance mechanism of engineering education, it isnecessary to explain
-1315(99)00044-58. Sharples, M. (2002). Disruptive devices: Mobile technology for conversational learning. International Journal of Engineering Education and Life-long Learning, 12(5/6), 504-520.9. Ion, A., & Bentley, M. (2015). Mobile Technologies for Lifelong Learning. Informatica Economica, 19(2).10. Henschke, J. A. (2014). An International Perspective on Reorienting Traditional Higher Education Institutions toward Lifelong Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 36-46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.585.11. Bentley, T. (1998). Learning Beyond the Classroom. London, GBR: Routledge.12. Nordin, N., Embi, M. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2010). Mobile Learning Framework for Lifelong Learning
2006-1297: DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE, SUSTAINABLE, MUTUALLYBENEFICIAL INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIONS IN ENGINEERING ANDTECHNOLOGYMichael Dyrenfurth, Purdue University Dr. Michael Dyrenfurth is responsible for International Programs involving the College of Technology at Purdue University.Michael Murphy, Dublin Institute of Technology Page 11.438.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Developing Effective, Sustainable, Mutually Beneficial International Collaborations in Engineering and TechnologyThis paper shares the experience and effective practices involved in building a systematic set
couldpotentially lead to misinformation conveyed to the online learners. This paperreviews and compares the current platforms and technologies available in theonline engineering education arena, proposes a model for combining MOOCswith live university courses, lays the groundwork for open standards forengineering education, summarizes the international challenges ahead, anddiscusses the implications for future educators and students. The impact of thisstudy will help educators manage the vast content in order to integrate onlineeducation in their own curriculum, and provide guidelines on how to best utilizethe MOOCs in the future. Page 23.1232.21. IntroductionThe open
Paper ID #37362US-Sweden Bioinformatics IRES: Investigating EngineeringStudents’ Attitudes and Perspectives Throughout a 10-weekInternational Research ProgramMark A Chapman (Assistant Professor) Mark Chapman is an assistant professor at the University of San Diego in the Department of Integrated Engineering. His interests lie in the fields of skeletal muscle mechanics, muscle disease, exercise physiology, international education and engineering education. He earned his MS and PhD in bioengineering from the University of California, San Diego and a B.S. in biomedical engineering from the University of
degree programs,global simulation projects, international internships and team projects, study abroad and globalcourses provide valuable information on different educational models currently in place ininstitutions.International leadership whether it be in academia, industry or government calls for motivationof a workforce coming from diverse academic, linguistic and cultural backgrounds. “Making of aglobal engineer,” is a valuable tool for the global technical enterprise. It explores the twinquestions of “why?” cross-cultural education is vital for the global engineer and shows “how?”to attain this education through an educational process. It tries to provide a direction to follow.IntroductionThe interfacing of culture and technology
higher engineering education, and has led to theformation of two accreditation networks of engineering educations: the Washington Accord(WA) and the European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education (ENAEE).Global engineering education accreditation shows the future development trend ofresult-oriented, international connection, continuous improvement, and industry-academiacooperation [1].Program accreditation of engineering education has become an internationally acceptedquality assurance system for engineering education. The program accreditation ofengineering education takes quality assurance and quality improvement as the basic guidingideology and starting point. The education evaluation of engineering education program inChina
. Prior research shows that engineering ethics generated in each countrywith diverse backgrounds, and engineering ethics education was also conducted with its owndiverse characteristics. However, with the growing multinational cooperation in engineering,the international mobility of engineering students and engineers, and climate change andecological challenges, engineering ethics has become a global issue. Faced with internationalengineering ethics problems, taking a global perspective in engineering ethics education willhelp ensure that engineers can make a more substantial contribution to developmentthroughout the world.Engineering ethics consciousness is not inherent to engineers, but is gradually cultivatedthrough systematic learning and
engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE).Jeremi S. London, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jeremi was the Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) student working on the NSF EEP Re- search Project during the 2007-2008 academic year. Jeremi interned at the headquarters of Anheuser- Busch Companies, beginning in their Research Pilot Brewery during the summer of 2004, returning as an Analyst to their Corporate Quality Assurance Department in 2005, and working as a Product Sup- ply
successful practices in educating global engineers that haveworked in other parts of the world, the consortium established a task force to identify specificareas in need of immediate attention in Latin America and the Caribbean to foster international Page 12.754.8collaboration and enhance the engineering education on this hemisphere. The first discovery andrecommendation of this working group was the necessity of establishing an accreditation systemwhich provides quality assurance for the engineering programs. This accreditation process willguarantee the excellence in education, promoting the mutual recognition among the differentengineering programs