. Studies have discussed various aspects of the differences between, particularly, studentsand professionals in the solving of ill-structured problems. Differences have been found in the useand type of analogies and whether they were schema-driven or case-driven (e.g., [8], [18], 19]),time spent in the problem scoping and problem solution space (e.g., [8], [9], [20], [21]), and thebreadth of problem solving (e.g., [9]). These studies were all focused on students and professionals,but have not included faculty. Consequently, there is a lack of data on how faculty prefer to solveill-structured problems, the correlation between their preferences and their pedagogicalapproaches, and the impact on faculty approaches on a student’s development of problem
SBP freshmen interviews indicate that key program components affectingstudents’ experiences and success in the engineering transition program include communitybuilding, structured studying, field trips and real-world experience, residential life, and mentorship.In the interest of keeping things concise, I present each theme below with one supporting quotefrom a participant transcript. 1. Theme 1: Community building and establishing a sense of relatedness is integral to the SBP but can only happen if a student decides that some aspect of the program is valuable.Gavin (2022 SBP participant), when asked about the expected long-term impact of his SBPparticipation: And then I already have, I guess a group of supportive people, that like
, Harvard Business Review, Time, The Washington Post, The Guardian, Forbes, Chronicle of Higher Education and the news sections of Science and Nature. Cech's first book, The Trouble with Passion: How Searching for Fulfilment at Work Fosters Inequality (University of California Press) was published Nov 2021 Website: https://erinacech.comCynthia J. Finelli (Professor) Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director of Engineering Education Research at University of Michigan. In her research she focuses on increasing faculty adoption of evidence-based instruction, promoting students' sociotechnical skills and abilities, and supporting the success of
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Interdisciplinary International Senior Design: How Service Learning Projects in Developing Countries Support ABET AccreditationIntroductionResponding to shifts in society and industry toward a globalized economy, engineering schoolsare beginning to address the realities of engineering and design in developing communities. Aglobalized economy is defined here as one of international marketplaces and hybridizedcompanies that draw on a range of cultural and disciplinary perspectives. To prepare students forthis emerging workplace, engineering education must incorporate global, environmental,economic and societal issues as well as prepare students
assessment after an engineering-related learning unit [9].More recently, several studies have used growth mindset interventions on undergraduateengineering students; however, the studies have produced mixed to null effects. Rhee andJohnson’s [10] longitudinal study examining the impact of a growth mindset intervention foundno significant difference in academic performance or retention among women, minoritizedstudents, or Pell-eligible students. Frary [11], who implemented various growth mindset-relatedactivities throughout the semester in her Thermodynamics of Materials course, found that studentsdescribed their approach to learning through the lens of a growth mindset at the end of the semester,which was a shift from their beginning semester
STEM careers. Currently however, the number of high-quality STEM education resources andmaterials available to preschool educators and their students is quite sparse. This is particularlythe case in areas of high poverty in communities that have been under-resourcedlongitudinally.[1,2] This research addresses a gap in preschool teachers’ capacity to supportyoung children’s STEM content knowledge by determining what sorts of technology is presentin children’s home, and how such technological experiences impact children’s familiarizationwith and use of technology in preschool classrooms for children ages three-five.Review of relevant research on early childhood education in pre-engineering and computerscienceResearch on STEM education in early
CALSTEP curriculum, and assists faculty in implementing thecurriculum and developing alternative teaching and learning strategies to increase enrollment andimprove teaching effectiveness. This paper focuses on the results of CALSTEP curriculumdevelopment and the implementation of the Summer Engineering Teaching Institute, as well asfuture plans to maximize the impact of the program in increasing access to engineering educationamong thousands of community college engineering students and strengthening engineeringtransfer programs in the state.2. Developing the CALSTEP CurriculumFour core lower-division engineering courses were the focus of the CALSTEP curriculumdevelopment: Introduction to Engineering, Engineering Graphics, Materials Science
responses we received were highlyindividual and suggest that there is a communal need to recognize and support individuals toprevent the burnout and dehumanization that we — educators, researchers, leaders —collectively face. The second consideration is expanding research activities to includehumanizing questions so that we can continue to understand the impact of the political andcultural systems on those who are the focus of our research, including ourselves. There isincreased recognition that students are people, which has led to significant increases ininvestment on student well-being. We are calling for that same level of recognition thateducators, researchers and faculty, and policy leaders are also people, and are equally in need
impact outreach can have.Lesson Plans The first lesson plan, Mining Coal, is drawn from the field of EnvironmentalEngineering. The second, Bridge Building, is from Civil Engineering. Both lessons requireapproximately one hour to complete and thus can fit in the time period allotted for most pre-college classes. Mining Coal—Environmental Engineering. This lesson, which focuses specifically oncoal, introduces students to the concept of environmental engineering. Thus far, more than 175students in grades kindergarten through eighth grade have completed this lesson in a classroomsetting or as part of a summer STEM camp. The lesson begins with a 15-minute introductionaddressing coal and environmental engineering. Approximately 45 minutes
unintendedconsequences. Scholars such as Sadler [5] and Torrance [6] suggest that providing explicitassessment criteria may inadvertently foster "criteria compliance" and instrumental learningamong students [6]. These concerns also extend to potential negative effects on teachers,teaching methods, or students. Such critiques have far-reaching implications for the use ofrubrics, given that they represent one of the most prevalent ways of communicating explicitassessment criteria to students.These critical perspectives coexist with accumulated empirical support for mainly positiveeffects of rubrics. The tension between the established benefits and emerging critiques forms thebackdrop of our exploration into the role of rubrics in senior-level engineering
Homework Corrections: Improving Learning by Encouraging Students to Reflect on Their Own Mistakes Wenli Guo and Vazgen Shekoyan Queensborough Community College, 222-05 56th Avenue, Bayside, NY 11364 Abstract. In spite of using active-engagement techniques in our classes, big percentage of students can not answer straightforward questions of the type we have covered in class and assigned as homework. We believe that students lack one of the essential components of meaningful learning: self-reflection. How do we engage students in a meaningful self-reflection and measure its implications? We hypothesize that we can achieve that by having students reflect on their
Homework Corrections: Improving Learning by Encouraging Students to Reflect on Their Own Mistakes Wenli Guo and Vazgen Shekoyan Queensborough Community College, 222-05 56th Avenue, Bayside, NY 11364 Abstract. In spite of using active-engagement techniques in our classes, big percentage of students can not answer straightforward questions of the type we have covered in class and assigned as homework. We believe that students lack one of the essential components of meaningful learning: self-reflection. How do we engage students in a meaningful self-reflection and measure its implications? We hypothesize that we can achieve that by having students reflect on their
food and beverage management at New York City College of Technology, CUNY. In addition to her joy of teaching she is often found advising students. Finding it important to continually increase her understanding of the teaching and learning practices that help students develop a joy for learning, she works as the faculty co-coordinator of the college’s first-year learning communities. Here she facilitates seminars for full and part-time faculty focused on incorporating the high-impact educational practice of learning communicates into the course work.Prof. Jennifer Sears, New York City College of Technology-City University of New York Jennifer Sears is Assistant Professor in the English Department at the New York City
AC 2007-1451: THE CLARKSON COMMON EXPERIENCE CURRICULUM:GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS BASED ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMESRobert Meyer, Clarkson University Robert Meyer is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Clarkson University. He received a B.A.(1970) in Electrical Engineering and Mathematics, M.E.E. (1970) and a Ph.D. (1974) in Electrical Engineering, all from Rice University. He has been employed by Texas Instruments, and Exxon, and since 1974, by Clarkson University. His research has been on applications of computing in communications network monitoring, including software design, development, and testing, and the application of distributed artificial intelligence to
time. During thedifferentiated online-hybrid facilitation, on-demand instructional lectures were provided toprovide the foundational knowledge needed before students engaged in active learning likeworkshops, paired reflections, or class discussions. With these asynchronous video lecturesalready developed, a flipped class model is utilized as a solution to free up more studio time forsessions that require movement and a higher degree of student engagement.Online discussion tools are also utilized to jumpstart community building and make the most ofin-person studio time. While many course activities made use of threaded discussion boardsduring the online-hybrid launch, most of these engagement opportunities were ultimatelyreturned to in-person
technology students enrolled in the Principles ofMechanical Systems course participated in this study, and were tasked with the design of avehicle that would solve overcrowdedness in urban areas in the next century. Focus of theresearch was on innovative bio-inspired design that is backed by scientific evidence and the useof arts to convey the design. The students then expressed their opinions on their design projectusing a photovoice reflection of their learning. Student responses to the photovoice reflectionprompts related to the design were qualitatively categorized under three themes: 1)demonstrating the importance of entrepreneurial thinking from the end user’s perspective 2)stressing the importance of teamwork and communication and 3) using
scholarships. The grantprogram provides comprehensive support structures at critical junctures including: financialassistance; mandatory academic advisement per semester and end-of-the-semester guidancemeetings; exposure to undergraduate research opportunities in various STEM fields campuswide, within, and outside City Tech; personal one-to-one need-based communication; and STEMfield trips, seminars, and peer-led workshops. Through these interventions, we observe notableimprovement in student retention and an increase in undergraduate research activities.Additionally, we have been able to maintain a continuous cohort. By encouraging our currentand former scholars to engage in the wider professional and academic community (by openingand maintaining
. Williams, "Exploring the Impact of Virtual Reality on Student Engagement and Learning inHigher Education," Journal of Education for Business, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 325–331, 2019.[5] F. Ke, "Applying Virtual Reality in Education: A Systematic Review," Educational Technology Research andDevelopment, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1075–1107, 2021.[6] M. Coban, Y. I. Bolat, and I. Goksu, "The potential of immersive virtual reality to enhance learning: A meta-analysis," Educational Research Review, vol. 36, pp. 100452, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100452.[7] G. Makransky, T. S. Terkildsen, and R. E. Mayer, "Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulationcauses more presence but less learning," Learning and Instruction, vol. 60, pp. 225-236, 2019.[8
Aerospace ProgramAside from the inherent ‘coolness factor’ associated with offering a new local course in rocketrydesign, there are several identifiable and important benefits to UAF. These range from the immediatepositive impacts of the establishment of this course in satisfying student needs/desires; to supportingthe growth and maturity of the aerospace engineering program and research capabilities for ourstudents and faculty; and to the long-term reputation and opportunities for the UAF community.CEM Aerospace Engineering Program. The Rocket Systems Design course supports the growth andstability of UAF’s Aerospace Engineering Program in several ways: (1) Satisfying current studentdemand for a hands-on design experience within the field of
levels on entrepreneurship, including partnerships with business schoolsas well as the business and technology enterprise communities.” The newest of the fourdivisions, Engineering Leadership Development (LEAD), became a division in 2015 “to providea primary point of discussion [emphasis added] and dissemination on the value and impact ofengineering leadership education.” These divisions’ websites, calls for papers, and publications reveal several othercommonalities that are worthy of systematic investigation: • Connecting and communicating across boundaries, especially disciplinary boundaries • Amplifying the contribution of engineering expertise in a variety of domains • Providing engineers with a competitive advantage in the
problem in engineering courses. Pedagogy based on these tools has beenimplemented and studied in several institutions in the US and in other countries,impacting thousands of students each year. In all cases in which hands-on learning hasbeen studied, the pedagogy has been successfully implemented. This has occurredeven in traditionally theory-only courses, resulting in more engaged students andinstructors. Although the initial assessments of this new approach to STEM educationargue for broad application, the definitive case for its adoption has yet to bedocumented so that all STEM educators can fully appreciate its merit.GoalsThe Center for Mobile Hands-On STEM is pursuing activities that gather strongevidence of the effectiveness of Mobile Hands
constraint are key components ofart-making, but also that strong (although general) quantitative, causal connections have beendrawn by industry, government, and academic sources between arts engagement and success inengineering and the sciences. We then take the natural next step by proposing to test thehypothesis that problem-solving in design under constraint is a transferrable skill with thepotential to augment engineering students’ problem-solving ability if practiced in multipledomains rather than only (and seldom) in the engineering domain.The literature review presented here is intended to form the basis for a long-term pedagogicalstudy on the impact of substantive and progressive engagement in an art practice on students’problem-solving
faculty, are less likely toengage students, spend less time preparing for courses, are less likely to use active and engaging teachingtechniques, had lower academic expectations for their students, and were less productive in both teachingand research [4][5]. At that time, it was not clear whether the effects were caused by the non-tenure-trackfaculty themselves or the structure in which the non-tenure-track faculty operate.Kezar and Sam [6] suggested that new theoretical models are necessary to understand non-tenure-trackfaculty and proposed that some earlier studies had used theoretical models that did not fit non-tenure-trackfaculty and were derived from a deficit model based on the preconceived notions of the researchers [6]. Forexample, in a
prompts, where students were asked to state anddefend a position on a relatively contentious engineering project or idea (e.g., the Keystone XL Page 26.1382.12Pipeline project). The “success” for this prompt was that students were very engaged with theexercise, and it seemed effective in convincing students of the relevance of what they werelearning (e.g., pipe flow). This type of prompt was not found in any of the texts examined, butcould easily be included with additional, stand-alone writing questions (with or withoutcalculations to support the students’ positions).Support resources for writing problemsIt is unfortunately only marginally helpful
benefit and college students are Page 23.1248.4engaged and retained in challenging classroom environments with complex STEM course work. Quality Managers. In previous research conducted at Northeastern University and published inthe paper, “ATLAS - Academic Teaching and Learning Assistants Study: The Use of Peers as‘Quality Managers’ in Engineering Class Instruction,” the role of undergraduate peer teachingassistants was introduced, explored and formally developed.1 This foundational work outlinedthe impact that these Quality Managers have on classroom learning experiences as well as on thequality of written materials used for coursework. The QM
-being.Findings from this research can facilitate targeted infrastructure planning and investment, bettermobility, and ultimately improve the quality of life in urban areas. Future research shouldconsider a wider range of environmental and social factors and how different factors interactover time to influence stress levels.Keywords: Sensor-based modeling, empathic design, walkability, human stress, machine learning.1. IntroductionWalkability is a key element in urban design that profoundly impacts quality of life and fosterscommunity engagement. By promoting physical activity, walkable streetscapes contribute tobetter physical health while reducing air pollution and supporting environmental sustainabilitythrough decreased reliance on motorized transport
determine which factors of high-quality and/or equity-enabling research were included.Research that is equity-enabling is defined as research that enables impactful education that leadsto equitable outcomes [17].Figure 1: Papers focusing on high school students as a percentage of all papers that specified gradelevel3 Results3.1 MetadataAs Figure 2 shows, there is a substantive increase in the number of studies each year, and an evengreater increase in the number of unique authors per year. Figure 2: Count of papers and authors by yearTable 2 shows the paper count for the 9 venues with the most articles related to high schoolcomputing education. The top two venues, the Association of Computing Machinery (ACM)SIGCSE Technical
Energy International and led the inception of Madison College’s STEM Educator Solar Institute for high school and community college teachers. Shoemaker will spearhead the design and construction of a model energy storage lab facility at Madison College that will be integrated into the existing solar energy installation lab and used for teaching about the interaction of these complimentary technologies.Ms. Ashley Jordan Scholes, Madison Area Technical College Ashley Scholes is a Madison College student working towards a transfer degree in mechanical engineering as well as the renewable energy certificate. Her interest in renewable energies came from an opportunity to become involved with a photo-voltaic system on
and appreciation of one’s self in the world and of world issues), and • Global civic engagement (active engagement with local, regional, national and global community issues).2Instruction in engineering ethics contains elements of all three dimensions in globalcitizenship. Ladd3 subdivided engineering ethics into microethics and macroethics.Microethics considers individuals and internal relations of the engineering profession.Macroethics pays more attention to larger societal problems and values the collective socialresponsibility of the profession in making decisions about technology relevant to the good ofsociety.4 Most of the current teaching in engineering ethics has focused on microethics.5 Asa result, this educational focus
. Studentsclearly identified the importance of communication for effective results, and the need for strategyto reach goals on time, as the top lessons. Close to that rank were the convenience for leadership(including the impact of various styles, the impact on delaying immediate results, and the benefitof elected leaders based on grounded criteria for selection) and collaborative work. Somestudents also referred to the need for a balanced distribution of work, the impact ofcommunication (or lack of) on feelings and morale, and as contributor to provide an overallunderstanding of the project. Only one student disapproved of the training value of this exercise.Table 6. Student outcomes as derived from students’ assessments.Outcome