. Employment growth willbe driven by increasing demand for healthcare and social assistance because of an agingpopulation and longer life expectancies. Employment in administrative support and wastemanagement and remediation services is projected to grow by 31 percent and add 2.5million new jobs to the economy by 2014. Service industries have accounted for almostall U.S. job growth since the 1960’s. Wages in the service sector overall have risen fasterthan wages in most other sectors.The Bureau of Labor Statistics has the most complete information concerning IE and IETemployment. Analysis of their data is somewhat limited due to the lack of informationabout job titles or degree types. Another gap in the data concerns the other job titles thatIEs and
students found that “while students may recognize the existence of an energyproblem, they generally lack the knowledge and capabilities to effectively contribute toward asolution” (DeWaters and Powers 2008), and that energy literacy levels are “discouragingly low”among New York State middle and high school students (DeWaters and Powers 2011). Kandpal and Garg (1999) noted that while in the past an abundance of cheap energycaused society to view energy simply as a commodity and not worthy of its own educationaldiscipline, contemporary global issues beginning with the 1973 oil crisis and continuing withincreasing evidence for climate change have produced a need for the development of curriculafor energy education. DeWaters and Powers (2011
), were utilized to determine whether differences in behavior andattitudes among student population sub-groups (e.g., male vs. female, differences betweendifferent majors, high GPA students vs. low GPA students, etc.) were statistically significant at Page 14.153.3 =.05.Results and DiscussionSurvey results were analyzed relative to: (1) quantifying the amount of academic dishonesty thatoccurs among engineering students at the university where surveying was conducted; (2)understanding the attitudes of students concerning academic integrity issues and motives forthose who cheat; (3) describing the student perception of faculty efforts to prevent
programs as well as programs in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program. Her research interests include topics related to student persistence, STEM doctoral student experiences, faculty mentorship and development, modeling and analysis of complex manufacturing systems, and the development of new discrete event simulation methodologies. Bekki is the co-director of the interdisciplinary, National Science Foundation supported CareerWISE research program, which strives to: 1) understand the experiences of diverse women who are pursuing and leaving doctoral programs in science and engineering and 2) increase women’s persistence in science and engineering doctoral programs through the development and
presented the URF concept.There was initial resistance and opposition to the proposal. Some faculty and administrators,questioning the reason for a URF, objected to the proposal. Their concerns were focused in twoareas: (1) without the protection of the sovereign immunity afforded to State entities the URFwould be exposed to additional liability, and (2) the financial base from which the URF wouldoperate was uncertain. Within one year the majority of issues raised by the campus communitywere discussed and a consensus favoring establishment of the URF was achieved. A proposalfor the URF was presented to the Tennessee Board of Regents (TBR) by the Vice Provost forResearch and Sponsored Programs. The Office of the General Council of the TBR was
alternative majors.” The decision to switch was rooted in the students’ “concern aboutthe future,” as well as “structural or cultural” sources within the institution, and not solely theacademic rigors of the science and engineering majors. Furthermore, students who stayed andthose who switched out raised the same set of concerns about majoring in science andengineering.This overview gives a glimpse into the substantive corpus related to issues of persistence inengineering. For the most part, these studies rely on either cross-sectional data or longitudinaldata from national databases not necessarily targeted at engineering students. As Brainard’sfindings suggest, there is a need to conduct longitudinal research with engineering students inorder to
for a college campus is Cost Estimation; Campus Purdue the least costly and Campus safety concerns vs. Time Value of Money; Lighting University addresses the campus cost of new lighting Comparing Alternative Economics community’s safety Investments concerns? Cost Estimation; Time Value of Money
siteas it does not require additional infrastructure. This must be quoted and purchased to allow thechange does include some logistical planning. All composting to take place. A method of transportationstudents, faculty, and staff must be informed of the from the Student Center to the site must bechanges that will be occurring. This change will force established as well.those wanting a meal provided by university diningwithin the Student Center to alter their lives in a Table 3: Timeline of milestone goals for thesmall way. Information concerning the alterations implementation of composting.must be displayed for some time, to allow a great Week
Analysis: Descriptive and/or inferentialFrequency of Analysis and Interpretation: Every semester.Responsibility for Analysis, Interpretation and Implementation resulting inContinuous Improvement: Concerned faculty and the Quality Improvement committee intheir respective discipline.Faculty Responsible: Professor XAssessment Goal: Each assessed item would have a score of 70% or better. Facultywould take corrective action to any item having a score of less than 70%.2. PO Assessment Tool: Student Course Satisfaction Exit Survey ProtocolMeasurable: Realization of course learning objectives and a – k ABET/DepartmentalOutcomesConstituency: Students and FacultyMethodology of Data Gathering: Survey form completed at the conclusion of each classData
storage engineers and technicians. Thispaper presents the collaboration between university and community colleges to create anadvanced energy storage curriculum; setup an industrial-based energy storage laboratory;develop and deliver a short course for on-site training of engineers, technologists, and collegeinstructors working in the alternative energy and advanced automotive propulsion fields; developand deliver a series of workshops and seminars for K-12 science teachers, corporate partners,energy and automotive professionals; and provide transfer student advising by university faculty.1. IntroductionThe growing demand for energy and the increasing concerns about man-made climate changeshave called for clean and sustainable energy development
. Instead, through this qualitative thematicanalysis, we attend to the different ways students take up and respond to social, political, andeconomic dimensions that have to do with the environment.How do students take up notions of environmental racism in an engineering computingcourse?IntroductionIn engineering education, environmental issues are often discussed without an understanding ofenvironmental racism and environmental justice. Engineering programs are adapting to theincreasing concerns about the environment–from cluster hires regarding climate change andsustainability to an increased number of engineering classes within these disciplines. However,while the added attention to environmental concerns is welcome, they do not always
by Froyd et al. [9], these new engineers weretrained in the science and theory of engineering but lacked the experience and know-how thatcomes from actually working on the roads. Part of this on-the-job practical training was also theprofessional socialization of civil engineers to focus on the technical aspects of building thehighway while ignoring or minimizing the social and political aspects of building the roads [18].Previous issues of access to education had been dramatically reduced after the many decades ofcreating engineering programs at universities, but it was replaced with an incongruity betweenwhat was taught to attain their degree versus the practical skills needed to perform the job.Lessons to be learnedFrom the first two
collectively threatens our survival?Coercion, Groupthink, Bias and Inherent DiscriminationRecently, at a high research university, there was one-day symposium on faculty hiring of femalesand underrepresented minorities. The focus was on the built-in prejudice of current faculty search-and-screen committees. All associate deans, department heads, dean leadership teams, and deansthemselves were invited to participate. During the workshop, Dr. Daryl Smith of ClaremontGraduate University spoke [14] extensively about national issues of the built-in prejudice ofsearch-and-screen committees. She discussed the manifestation of this today. This, she explained,is seen in ratios of females and underrepresented minorities on tenure track or as tenured faculty.Dr
realizing these multicultural dimensions, we are also urging faculty to bring a criticalconsciousness and a pedagogy of hope into the classroom to better achieve this goal. Below weoutline these approaches and their relationship to these critical dimensions of multiculturaleducation.Growing a Critical Conscience One pathway toward a multicultural and inclusive classroom climate comes through whatFreire [15] describes as conscientizacao or critical consciousness. Freire defines criticalconsciousness as “the process of developing knowledge and “personal concern” for social justiceleading to action” [5, p. 276]. Through critical awareness, individuals expand their ability torebuff the instruction of others and progress toward dissembling the
these codes are new, emergent from our data throughthe abductive coding process; the only addition to the larger categories is extending the definition of“Faculty behaviors” to also include departmental behaviors, since many new Master’s students did not yethave a research advisor. Throughout the data, students took a very agentic view of their own development,often attributing their issues to things they “could have done differently” or things they “wished they wouldhave known” rather than more directly articulating which entity could have provided that needed support.As such, as data were analyzed, students were not accusing their faculty members or departments ofanything, and through this qualitative coding process, the research team was
technicians. In September 1952, theawarding of associate degrees was approved by USG Regents. In 1954, the Technical Institutewas voted into the American Society for Engineering Education. Unlike other technical5 In response to recommendations of a reviewer of the paper, the researcher made contact with severalengineering faculty members about the low response rate from the engineering faculty. The consistentresponse from these inquiries was that the engineering faculty saw this issue (dropping ET enrollment) asan ET issue and not an issue for the engineering faculty.6 See the 1944 “Report of the Sub-Committee on Technical Institutes of the Engineer’s Council for Professional
(and the team learning process) were evaluated by faculty teams in order to test the hypothesis thatheterogeneous teams as a whole will have better problem-solving outcomes even when the homogeneous studentteams have been taught about thinking preferences and their implications for group dynamics andcommunications. This is an important issue: can the cost and labor involved in using the HBDI (especially at thefreshman level) be justified by its contribution to improved team outcomes? This paper reports the preliminary findings of the first phase of a longitudinal study at UNC Charlotteexamining the relationships between the make-up of thinking style profiles of teams and the outcomes theyproduce. The current study attempts to validate
classrooms. Since there were only two participantsfor the first year of the program, the data analysis of the surveys collected from the participants isinconclusive because of the small sample size.Even with the small sample size, based on the responses of the collected surveys, the participantsfound ethical issue exposure, case study learning, and faculty collaboration to be extremely helpfulaspects of the program. In terms of confidence in teaching ethics, although the participants werevery confident in delivering lectures, addressing questions, and designing curriculum on ethicsbefore the program, the level of confidence slightly decreased among the teachers after attendingthe program in the aspects of teaching and answering questions. The
study7.Participants also discover the increased reliability of rating by pairs of faculty if they desire touse the results of the Design Team Readiness Assessment in pedagogical research. Facultyadopters are encouraged to score several of the test cases before they score work by a new classof students to verify that they have not lost their scoring acumen.CONCLUSIONSReliable instruments for measuring and improving design team performance are in high de mandbecause of the new ABET EC 2000 requirements. This paper outlines how TIDEE’s DesignTeam Readiness Assessment has been designed and implemented to support efficient, highquality assessment of design process, teamwork, and design communication proficiencies atearly and mid-program points in
integrate other disciplines or concerns in the design process simulations, themanner in which those disciplines are included depends upon many factors including the faculty Page 7.175.1experiences, time, facilities and financial resources. It is well recognized that the engineering Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for Engineering Educationdesign process is a complex, multidisciplinary, collaborative activity and providing students withthat perspective is an important learning objective.For the past 5 years at Notre
suited for collecting and analyzing this data? What data do these devices share witheach other? Are there any privacy concerns when using these devices? Are there any securityvulnerabilities when using these devices? Finding answers to these questions will considerablyreduce the amount of time investigators spend collecting evidence during a case. New IoT devicesare always becoming available and the research into each cannot keep up. As such, there is a gapin the literature regarding both the privacy and security of these devices and the most efficientmethods to investigate them. Therefore, in this study, we aim to address this need by first buildingour own IoT forensics laboratory at Purdue University. Several students (undergraduate
/engineering-criteria-2012-2013/ Accessed: January 2012. 4. National Science Foundation, Arlington VA, NSF Awards page: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=1022927 Accessed: January 2012 5. Jarvis, P., Adult education and lifelong learning: theory and practice, London ; New York: Routledge, 2010. 4th ed. (also described in his book Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Human Learning). 6. Butin, D.W. “Focusing our Aim; Strengthening Faculty Commitment to Community Engagement”, Change, November/December 2007, p. 34. 7. Worchester Polytechnic Institute, Projects Program, http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects/ , 2012a 8. Worchester Polytechnic Institute, Global Perspective Program, http
Twitter between May 31 and June 17?’ The findings will provide insightinto engineering departments’ utilization of messaging in social-political matters that impact thestudents they serve.KeywordsBlack Lives Matter, Movement Framing, Sociopolitical Issues Introduction There is a historical tradition of Black students expressing their concerns forsociopolitical issues in higher education within the US. For instance, in the 1950s, the CivilRights Movement called for mass mobilizations and non-violent direct action. In response,federal legislation was designed to address a significant number of disadvantages in Blackcommunities. This legislation included, but is not limited to, the Civil Rights Acts of
project ideas both within a faculty’sresearch area or with new project ideas. The greatest benefit of graduate student support is infaculty involvement. No matter the level of the undergraduate, some training must be done toprepare them for the research area. If this training can be offloaded from the faculty mentor tosupporting graduate students, the faculty mentors are free to focus efforts in other areas.Conclusions:The IREECE REU program has successfully run for the past six years. In this paper, we haveoutlined the efforts made in recruitment, student activity, mentoring, and assessment.Suggestions were shared in the lessons learned section concerning recruitment, project selection,faculty involvement, and graduate student support. We hope
/retaining walls concerns are outside scope to shoreline of project ● Consider utilities & appurtenances for tent ● Wings were drawn back structures from waterline ● Consider an alternative roof system for housing structures ● Consider alternative roofing system for the marketplace Nov 16 ● Consider using roof trusses as support to ● Architecture faculty fabric roof strongly encourages the ● Implement shear walls to frame development of a fabric
ongoing or planned projects – Including recruiting campaigns 29 30 Enabling student-driven entrepreneurship• In most institutions, research initiatives and entrepreneurship were the domain of faculty and graduate students – New research initiatives often required high-level institutional support• The maker culture and availability of Makerspaces encourage initiation of research by student groups – A bottom-up approach sometimes coupled with availability of nearby incubators 303131
technological innovation hasled to different approaches that feature customer involvement in new product development. Thetransition from an old model with no or little customer involvement to a customer-based approachthat values customer feedback on innovations requires more attention to competitors in the fieldas their products are based on similar concepts. Innovation based on the customers’ needs is a morecommercially beneficial and interactive approach to fulfill the market need. Importantly, involvingcustomers in the innovation process requires a new set of concerns, concepts, and decision-making:customers have a lot of options, and companies have to compete for business ever more intensely.When preparing a survey for market research, the main
Management DirectionsCertification Requirements: The lack of consistency in EM programs, combined with growingEM popularity, motivated ASEM to focus on defining the discipline. ASEM has takensignificant ownership for the future direction of EM through a certification process thatstandardizes a quality EM program. Currently, the purpose is different from an undergraduateABET accreditation in that this certification intends to direct the development of new andexisting programs, in addition to recognizing quality programs. The certification processconsists of four requirement areas: faculty, curriculum, student admission and support, andadministrative support.Of the four areas, only the curriculum requirements are reviewed here because we are
, andinstitutes, each with distinct disciplinary backgrounds. In the case of the Human Rights andSustainability specialization, the collaboration was extended to thirteen cross-listed courses intotal.Administration and Advising.The Dean and Assistant Deans who helped create these specializations monitor the advances ofthese four areas of study and have given the faculty involved the chance to present their uniqueofferings under a new MDE banner that is introduced twice in the Fall semester during OpenHouse events. These open sessions with the public, faculty, administrators, and advisors havebeen welcomed by students and their families, who arrive at our university seeking knowledgeand academic opportunities for developing their unique interests. Our
enrolled in the courses in the first effort.During the summer of 2000 we received a second grant from the Coleman Foundationto research the interest at the university level in entrepreneurship education and todevelop a cross-disciplinary platform where interest was expressed. Invitations tobecome involved in the Entrepreneurship Forums were issued to all Deans at VanderbiltUniversity and selected Department Chairs and other Faculty Members. The Schoolsexpressing the most interest included the School of Engineering, the School of Nursingand the School of Law. All three Schools identified faculty members who may beinterested in working with us on this endeavor. However, the first and strongestresponse came from the School of Engineering. During the