informal networks outside of theclassroom and prefer those when seeking out support [7] [8].There are a number of academic, scholarship and social programs available to URM students thesummer prior to as well as during their first year on campus. The first-year experience programsand initiatives are generally successful with helping students adjust to their new surroundings[8]. With these programs, students are able to matriculate through the rigors of their first-yearcurriculum with success, as they develop a network of peers, faculty, staff and administratorswilling to mentor and support them. Oftentimes, first-year programs are just that and similarprograms are unavailable in years 2 and beyond.Co-curricular spaces and student support programs
architecture. Subsequentresearch beyond technical intricacies explored the practical applications of ChatGPT acrossvarious domains. Studies highlighted its role in facilitating human-computer interaction,improving customer service experiences, and supplement content generation tasks. Kung et al.(2023) examined the use of ChatGPT in customer service settings, specifically mentioning clinicaldecision-making, emphasizing its ability to streamline communication processes and enhance usersatisfaction. Furthermore, investigations into ChatGPT’s societal implication have raised ethicaland socio-cultural concerns. Scholars have scrutinized issues pertaining to bias, fairness, andprivacy in ChatGPT-generated content. Borji (2023) investigated the presence of
meeting with the design team before the second week of classes. (This is mandatory for all participants in the project) • Communicate any concerns about interacting with the team to the advisor. • Provide prompt feedback to student questions in order to avoid long pauses in the process. • At a minimum, meet in person with the teams at least three times in the fall semester and three times in the spring semester. • Participate in periodic project evaluation as requested by the instructor. Input from the external mentor will be extremely valuable in assessing student projects. • Commit to a final project meeting at the conclusion of the project. • Provide feedback to the faculty at the end of the project with regards to
were taught in English tofemale student sections via Audio-Video link. The language barrier and cultural norms were mymain concerns like any faculty visiting a foreign academic institution on a teaching assignment.The cultural norms of the country did not allow male faculty to teach female students face-to-facewhich is why classes were taught via the Audio-Video link. However, each male faculty teachingfemale students were assigned a female Teaching Assistant to help faculty proctor exams, conductlabs, and other related activities. Although I had prior experience teaching undergraduate studentsin the same region for four years, it was, at times, difficult to maintain rigor and quality andchallenge students to make them learn the new concepts
the following elements: (i) anagreement; (ii) between competent parties; (iii) based upon the genuine assent of the parties; (iv)supported by consideration; (v) made for a lawful objective; and (vi) in the form required bylaw.”6A contract may include several agreements such as non-disclosure agreements, non-competeagreements, intellectual property ownership including possibly new discoveries, publicationagreements, and many others. Item (iii) above can be a particular issue since all of the parties tothe agreement including those faculty and students who will work on the contract, must assent(usually separately) to the restrictions these agreements impose.One of the stickiest S3 Design Project problems involves passing on the restrictions of
, some might arguethat coverage is the enemy of deep conceptual understanding, the desired kind necessary forretention and future application. But undoubtedly, the biggest hurdle to making engineeringclassrooms more interdisciplinary is the paucity of models for doing this effectively and thenumerous questions that need to be addressed in the design of interdisciplinary learningenvironments. When do you start----early or late? What form should the classroom take? Doesinterdisciplinary learning need new pedagogies, new learning spaces that defy the large lecturehall, in short, new class configurations? What kinds of measurement can actually get atinterdisciplinary reasoning and problem solving? How do you help faculty get comfortable withthe idea
while recording the coordinate information.The faculty members and their graduate students would use the drone developed by the capstoneteam to conduct research that involves using AI to detect damages in the surveyed building.There are apparent similarities and differences between the course project and capstone project.As far as control is concerned, both projects require a sensor or sensors to detect the distancefrom the wall. The measured distance is used as a feedback signal to control some motors. In thisaspect, the concepts of control for these two cases are similar. However, a drone is more difficultto control because it needs to fly in the three dimensional space while a robot moves around theground.Overall, the integration of research
served as a primerto begin thinking about veteran issues and areas where ASEE can add support. After the affinitymapping exercise, a brain-writing [30] exercise was conducted, followed by a group discussion.In attendance during the sessions were a total of four session “scribes” that took detailed notes tocapture the conversation that occurred during the session. Three of those four people are co-authors of this paper.Centering the participants on veteran engineering educationThe workshop attendees, including the authors, participated in a modified affinity mappingexercise as a centering tool for veteran engineering education. As part of this effort, we co-constructed different ideas, policies, and concerns surrounding student veteran engineer
diversity of ideas. A diverse engineering team equates to more creativity and abetter product”.[38] Having cross-disciplinary faculty teams will enable students to gain asystemic view of the complexity of issues facing engineers. According to a National Academy ofEngineering report, “Indisputably, engineers of today and tomorrow must conceive and directprojects of enormous complexity that require a new, highly integrative view of engineeringsystems”.[41, p. 165]Diversity in faculty is a trend that is recognized as instrumental in increasing diversity in thestudent body and is backed by the themes in the literature. Themes reviewed in the educationalliterature show that there is a lack of female faculty in STEM departments.[6,13] It has beenshown
programs.Meanwhile, there are many lower ranked institutions for whom ABET accreditation isconsidered important, especially to their image and recruiting initiatives. While many admit thatparents rarely ask about accreditation, engineering accreditation is generally viewed as necessaryat all state institutions, and this regardless of rank. Minimum standards also serve a purpose atlower ranked institutions, since they often need to work to meet ABET’s requirements. In thiscontext, a shortcoming—ideally a concern, or at most an initial report of a weakness that can beaddressed before the final decision—can be instrumental for deans and department heads togarnering resources, such as faculty lines and better laboratory facilities, needed to
hierarchical.Influenced by the Confucian culture, the instructor has more power and thus “dominates” thewhole class. Learning means starting with finding a “good teacher” and then imitating his/herwords and deeds. Engineering education in China today remains more of a “(teaching) art”rather than a kind of “(learning) science” and it is more interested in “how teachers teach” than“how students learn” [13]. Perception of education is not only an epistemological issue but alsoan ethical or political issue. In most Chinese universities, newly hired faculty (many of them areengineering faculty) who are recent PhD graduates need to take educational courses and obtain ateacher certificate [14]. In 2003, the Chinese Ministry of Education launched an online program
these important issues, is the belief that spatial visualization contributes to success inengineering 5. Thus, the idea of a field journal exercise covering progress at a nearbyconstruction site was considered as an assignment for use by engineering students studying landdevelopment, so that these students could observe construction activities and learn to translatetheir visual observations at a construction site into a written and/or sketched format.There has also been much discussion about a New Paradigm for Engineering Education inengineering journals. Some of the attributes include inquiry-based learning and preparation forlife-long learning, a stress on systems thinking, communication skills, and a focus on such issuesas sustainable
others.The critical need for reform-minded courses involving faculty, not only from Education but fromScience and Engineering as well, is seen in light of a recent initiative begun jointly by the stateof Louisiana’s Board of Regents and Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. In May2000, endorsing a report by a Blue Ribbon Commission on Teacher Quality(http://blackboard.lcet.state.la.us/courses/ScienceConsortium/; user name: Blueribbon; password:blueribbon), the two boards instituted new guidelines for teacher preparation. Noting that“teacher preparation is the responsibility of the entire college/university, not just the educationprogram unit, these guidelines shall consider issues which pertain to the college/university atlarge”. As in many
amore pungent wake-up call?The messages sentAs part of the Renewal Plan, several hundred faculty members lost their positions.63 In 2007, theAmerican Association of University Professors (AAUP) censured several New Orleansuniversities, including Tulane, University of New Orleans, Southern University at New Orleans,and Loyola University New Orleans for faculty treatment following Katrina.64 The AAUP reporthighlighted discrepancies in the way decisions were made, along with the reasons behind them(p. 104).65 Providing one such example, in another moment of candor concerning the austeritymeasures, President Cowen said, “We basically cut the programs that were not thestrongest...Under the current way universities operate, you can’t make those
% Course 1 50.0% Course 2 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Strogly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strogly Not Disagree applicableFigure 4. Responses to Survey Question 4. “I believe it is important for me to participate in NRC activities focused on recruitment of new students”Question #5: In Course 1, when students were asked about how they learned about the NRCScholarship project, 2 responses (scholarship recipients), indicated their ‘faculty adviser/mentor’and 1 other response was ‘email’ and/or ‘flyer’. In Course 2, the
– women should not be excluded from the advantages and privileges which accrue to the professional engineer [5, 6] · recognition that diversity in the labour force is to the advantage of the industry – it brings in new talents and provides access to wider markets [3, 5, 7] · to relieve labour shortages in the profession [8].It is therefore a matter of concern that women are still severely underrepresented in theengineering profession and that the proportion is growing so very slowly. In Australia, forexample, the proportion of women in the engineering workforce has increased from 5% in 1991to 6.8% in 1996 (the date of the last census) [2]. Women are more strongly represented in theAustralian engineering student
ability to take on new, unfamiliar tasks and responsibilities. Student growthand well-being are stunted if they are not internally prepared or lack the necessary externalfactors needed to succeed. A challenge is any event or stimulus beyond the student's ability totake on, requiring them to grow and adapt to overcome. However, challenge in excess may causethe student to regress in their development or give up altogether. Support refers to anymechanism designed to assist the student in coping with whatever challenge is present. Students'ability to overcome challenges is dependent on the quality of support provided by their peers,faculty, and institution [19].This work seeks to use Sanford's Challenge and Support Theory as a lens to investigate
provides studentswith an opportunity to visit faculty and all of the student organizations within the college. Theseevents are well-attended and well-received, and foster identification within our College andUniversity community, as well as with the community beyond campus.Psycho-social SupportOur College utilizes a holistic approach to advising students with an emphasis on academic,personal and career development. Our College employs two academic advisors trained toaddress social and psychological wellness issues, one with a Master’s degree in Social Work, andone with a Master’s degree in Mental Health Counseling. Both are highly trained in theprovision of interventions intended to support student well-being and growth, and are qualified
companion courses. Proc. Frontiers in Educ. Conf. 3a6.8 - 3a6.12.12. Mann, K.B. 2000. You can herd CATs. Assessing learning in the humanities. College Teaching 48(3): 82-89.13. James, L. D. 1992. Existentialism, engineering, and the liberal arts. J. Prof. Issues in Engineering Educ. Pract. 118(3): 308-316. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Page 7.618.12Biographical informationWILLIAM E. LEE III is a member of the chemical engineering faculty at the University of South
to achieve SOs• Program Criteria • Specificity of curriculum to differentiate the discipline 41Program Criteria• ETAC has revised Program Criteria template for societies.• Template includes sections for Associate and Baccalaureate degree requirements.• Under each of these sections, societies may differentiate the discipline by specifying requirements for: • Curriculum • Faculty• Discipline-specific requirements are not intended to place additional burden on programs. 42What’s New in theApplied and NaturalScience AccreditationCommissionETLI ConferenceWashington, D.C.October 2018Name Change Reflecting
issues. She developed and ran for 8 years a faculty-led international program to Brazil focused on Sustainable Energy and Brazilian Culture. This program educates students on the effects of various energy systems and the challenges of social and environmental justice in developing countries. In 2017, Dr. Pfluger moved into the ChE department where she implemented improvements in the Transport 2 Lab and Capstone courses. She assists Capstone students to develop dynamic design projects that address and help solve real-world, global challenges. Dr. Pfluger has served as the AIChE Student Chapter Faculty Advisor for 10 years and will become chair of the AIChE Student Chapter Committee in November 2021. She is a Mathworks
EFFICIENCY STUDY OF A METROPOLITAN BUS TRANSIT SYSTEMAbstractThis paper describes a multidisciplinary, collaborative service learning project.The focus of the project was an efficiency study of a public transportation systemlocated in a mid-sized city. A team comprised of faculty and students from thePolitical Science, Engineering, English, and Computer Science Departments wasassembled to develop and conduct the study. The study team recommendedseveral short term efficiencies that could be easily and quickly implemented. Thestudy team also proposed a massive realignment of the current transportationsystem. The proposed new transportation network system is based on a multi-hubapproach and cross docking principles.This project was an excellent
coincided with the University ofKentucky’s Spring Break. While the transition was quick, it was not an overnight change. Thestudents were able to step away from classwork for the first week of the imposed isolation. Thistiming also provided the instructors with a modicum of breathing room in making decisionsabout projects and making some preparations for the adjustment.Meaningful and productive design review sessions were still possible. Meeting with teamsindividually to discuss issues, concerns, or questions relating to their projects on a weekly basiswas standard practice for this course pre-COVID-19. Of course, this practice continued virtuallypost-COVID-19 with the objective being to bridge the gap for the two weeks initially expectednecessary
, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) graduate programs typically provideinsufficient instruction for doctoral students electing to pursue a career in higher educationinstruction. Often, doctoral students who teach classes are required to offer lectures or even fullcourses without any formal training1, 2. Therefore, a doctoral student’s transition to a facultyposition may raise concerns from a university administration concerned with maintaining thequality of its course delivery. This paper documents the account of three doctoral students andtwo engineering faculty members while co-teaching/teaching a project-centered first-yearintroductory engineering course. The implementation of a preparatory teaching program fordoctoral students in the
immovable and must be included in the redesign.Design Criteria: The design criteria pose the basis of evaluating competing designs that meet all of the design requirements. The design criteria for the office redesign are as follows: 1. In addition to the design requirement that the new suite possess three faculty offices, gaining faculty or graduate student offices in addition to these is highly desirable. 2. The structural columns must remain part of the space. Integration of the columns into new walls should minimize their intrusion into office spaces. 3. Each faculty office should have an exterior window. 4. The suite should be designed in the most environmentally conscious manner possible. Specific areas of concern are lighting and
, creating the final 7 teams each with three students.There were interesting results observable in comparing summaries of reviews and rankings byfaculty with those of the roughly equally sized group of industry reviewers.The comments on proposals tended to have different qualities depending upon whether they weremade by faculty and industry representatives. With faculty, the comments were usually veryshort and were concerned with how appropriate technical aspects were for a capstone project inthat discipline of engineering, including how well students had planned and understood theinvolved tasks. With industry, comments on marketability and comparisons to commerciallyavailable items and the need for more detailed specifications, analysis, and tests
sustainable and developmental goals of our planet. Inthe past, elective courses in the humanities have been offered as part of the engineeringcurriculum, however, even these attempts do not solve the problem as the humanities andengineering courses continue to be siloed and there is no conversation between theengineering and the humanities faculty. To have a synergy between the humanities andengineering, there is a need for joint curriculum design and adopting collective pedagogicalapproaches.This work-in-progress paper showcases a pedagogical innovation that was employed in acourse for engineering students. It introduces a new transdisciplinary course which has beenco-designed by faculty belonging to the humanities and technology domains
Session 1532 Teaching the Theory of Signals and Systems A Proposal for a Curriculum Francisco Vaz, Ana Maria Tomé, Paulo J. S. G. Ferreira Departamento de Electrónica e Telecomunicações/ INESC Universidade Aveiro, 3800 Aveiro, Portugal email:fvaz@inesca.pt Introduction In the University of Aveiro, a new Portuguese University (only twenty years old), theteaching of the Theory of Signals and Systems is done within the Department of Electronics andTelecommunications
in a way limited by physical constraints, the otherlimited only by imagination.VisionThe vision for developing this new program was twofold, and grew from the challenges facingengineering education outlined above. There was a need perceived for educating a newgeneration of students whose educational preparation was unlike that of existing disciplines. Itwould vary from existing engineering programs, science programs and liberal arts programs, andprovide a hybrid that integrates ethics, societal issues, humanities and policy with science andengineering in a broader context. This was seen as a vehicle to address the issues of recruitment, Page
using a multi-disciplinary leadership teamcomprised of faculty and staff members from six different disciplines as applied to theadministration of a National Science Foundation CSEMS grant (DUE-0122950). TheNSF/CSEMS program supports financially disadvantaged students in computer science,math, technology, and engineering with goals including increasing retention rates anddecreasing the amount of time required to complete an undergraduate degree. At TheUniversity of Memphis, we have also included the goal of increasing female and minoritygraduates. Through a process of trial and error based on the findings of similar programs,we present the lessons learned in our study as each faculty and staff member hasresponded to changes based on feedback