for continuous engineering education would be the creation of aseamless value chain in which a college of engineering would coordinate activities that benefitstudents from age 5 to 105. In such a value chain, alumni and other area technical professionalswould have access to non-credit opportunities for professional development that local, regionaland other employers actively support. Through such an inclusive ecosystem, we could deploy ametaphor of a system of systems of value-added activities that supports learning among K-12,college, graduate school, and engineering professionals. A university’s college of engineeringcan create a unique role for itself by brokering such activities. In this role, the need for marketfeedback for process
Paper ID #12430Promoting Metacognition through Writing Exercises in Chemical Engineer-ingDr. Mariajose Castellanos, University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyDr. Joshua A Enszer, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Page 26.1276.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Promoting Metacognition through Writing Exercises in Chemical EngineeringAbstractA high-level goal of all disciplines is for students to develop the capacity for lifelong learning. Todevelop the capacity of lifelong
Paper ID #29335Integrating Ethics into the Curriculum through Design CoursesProf. Scott A Civjan P.E., University of Massachusetts, Amherst Scott Civjan is a faculty member at UMass Amherst where he has taught a wide variety of undergraduate and graduate courses over the past 20+ years. He has 4 years of consulting experience between obtaining his BSCE from Washington University in St. Louis and his MS and PhD in Structural Engineering from the University of Texas Austin.Prof. Nicholas Tooker, University of Massachusetts Amherst Nick Tooker is a Professor of Practice at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. He teaches
Session 1148 Applying the Rigors of Internship Principles to a Successful Co-Op Design Virendra K. Varma, Ph.D., P.E. Missouri Western State CollegeAbstract: The major purpose of an internship is to develop an individual’s occupationalcompetence by application of theoretical knowledge attained through successful completion ofcourse work which is related to the individual’s profession. An internship provides a linkbetween theory and practice, and gives an individual a first-hand experience of involvement inreal jobs. Problem-solving skills are
follow to fullycomplete the course. Figure 3. Course Roadmap We were very parsimonious with the course content due to the limited course duration, butstudents were given the opportunity of additional support from a team of tutors, instructors, andsupplemental materials outside of regular class time in case they wanted to explore additionaltopics beyond what was taught in the classroom. As students proceeded through the designprocess with their specific products, they were advised by the course team on additionaltechnical questions and more advanced applications most relevant to their group’s particularissues. In this way, the content was further tailored to students’ interests and the problems theyidentified
Engineering Education, 2014 Viewing student engineering through the lens of "engineering moments":An interpretive case study of 7th grade students with language-based learning disabilities (Research-to-Practice, Engineering Across K-12 Curriculum)AbstractThough there is a growing consensus that engineering instruction should be incorporated intoUnited States K-12 classrooms,1,2,3,4 little research has focused on what student engineeringlooks like in these classroom setting. Topics for investigation include how students understandengineering tasks, which behaviors can be viewed as age-appropriate engineering, and howstudents may coordinate these behaviors to create a coherent engineering process. In
degree inengineering. Therefore, students who finished the pre-engineering program were highly likelyto persist to graduation. Although the results were encouraging, the analysis revealed that lessthan 1 in 4 FAMU students completed the pre-engineering program successfully. A deductioncan be made that completion of the pre-engineering program is a good predictor for persistenceto an engineering degree completion. Based on this information, it was determined that bysignificantly increasing the percentage of students who complete the pre-engineering program,there could be an increase in students that persist to graduation. The problem arose of how toincrease the number of black students that persist through the engineering curriculum.A recent
. LAs have the authority to address student questions and concerns independently, and arealso empowered by the instructor to use instructional tools as the need arises.As active learning strategies and group sensemaking activities in specific become increasinglypopular, the LA model has been deployed and studied at an increasing rate[2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Researchon LA programs demonstrate that students in LA-supported courses often exhibit higher learninggains on validated instruments than their non-supported cohorts [7], and LAs themselves willexhibit similar conceptual learning gains in courses with similar content [8]. In some programs,LAs report a deeper sense of discipline-based identity [9]. LAs who go on to become K-12teachers tend to be more
Paper ID #43031Assessing ABET Student Outcomes Through International Virtual ExchangeBradley J. Putman, Bucknell University Brad Putman is the Richard E. Garman Dean of the College of Engineering at Bucknell University and a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering. His research and teaching have focused in the broad areas of construction materials and pavements. Dr. Putman has also been engaged in engineering education related research, most recently related to international virtual exchange (IVE). Prior to Bucknell, Dr. Putman was at Clemson University where he was a Professor in the Glenn Department of Civil
consistency of a specificmeasure of the construct (i.e., items or subscales) by examining the relationships amongobserved variables using intercorrelations and factor analysis. During the external stage ofconstruct validation, researchers investigate whether the items or subscales of interest are relatedto other constructs as theorized. While the Benson model is often employed with thedevelopment of tests measures, the model also is relevant for the development of otherperformance measures, such as rubrics [4]. We have made slight modifications to the methodsused in the Benson model to work through the substantive, structural, and external stages in aniterative process that is on-going.Sustainable Design RubricOur methods for developing the rubric
Paper ID #35327Changing the Mindset of Engineering Education through BiomimicryDr. Ross A. Lee, Villanova University ROSS LEE Dr. Ross A. Lee, Villanova University Ross Lee is a Professor of Practice in Sustainable Engineering at Villanova University where he teaches Biomimicry, Sustainable Materials and Design, and Engineering Entrepreneurship. In addition to his academic experience (joined Villanova in 2008), Dr. Lee has over 36 years of industrial experience with the DuPont company (retired July 2009) spanning a wide variety of technology, product and new business developments including films, resins
environments,promote such embodied learning by getting the student physically involved with their learningexperience [7].Beyond the knowledge that is acquired in the classroom, when students enter the workforce,therein also lies challenges associated with “institutional knowledge” or “rules of thumb”:knowledge passed down through generations of workers [8]. Much of this institutionalknowledge is undocumented [9]. AR has been proven to play a promising role in the efficientarchiving and dissemination of knowledge in manufacturing firms and is a potential solution toissues created by inconsistencies in the availability and communication of institutionalknowledge [10]. AR can digitize information capture processes that can then be confirmed andpassed
individual student considerations shouldalso influence program design [4]. Prior studies on individual student experiences haveemployed relatively similar methodologies: interviewing small samples of students withsupplemented insight from student journals and instructor observations. The current study seeksto complement this previous work by introducing a different method for exploring studentpathways through global programs.Mixed Methods: A Pragmatic Form of InquiryAs a distinct methodology [11], mixed methods approaches enable researchers to drawinferences beyond what a single paradigm (e.g., quantitative or qualitative) can offer. Eachparadigm has unique strengths; the qualitative paradigm emphasizes inductive inquiry andexploration, while
Paper ID #16706Instilling an Entrepreneurial Engineering Mindset through a Freshman De-sign CourseProf. Nassif E. Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy Nassif Rayess is an associate professor at University of Detroit Mercy (UDM), He teaches design, in- novation and entrepreneurship. He received his Ph.D. from Wayne State University and joined UDM in 2001. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Instilling an Entrepreneurial Engineering Mindset through a Freshman Design CourseAbstractThe course “Fundamentals of Engineering Design” was developed at University of
Editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal. Page 11.711.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Idea Development and Communication through StoryboardsAbstractStoryboard creation can be an alternative way of teaching visual problem solving. Expressing aconcept or idea showing action, or thinking a problem through from start to finish can be donethrough storyboards. The very name ‘storyboard’ implies the ability to tell a story orcommunicate an idea. The story can be abstract or concrete, however, it requires the student tothink through the process and figure out how to present the idea. It can be serious or it
. 2023, doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives- XLVIII-M-2-2023-19-2023.[18] A. Nimunkar, S. Courter, and G. Ebert, “Integrating Courses Through Design Projects In A High School Engineering Summer Program,” presented at the 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2006, p. 11.782.1-11.782.23. Accessed: Mar. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/integrating-courses-through-design-projects-in-a-high- school-engineering-summer-program[19] K. M. Leonard and E. R. Blevins, “Gearing up for transportation engineering: A summer institute for under-represented middle school students,” 2007 37th annual frontiers in education conference - global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports
Paper ID #38596Making Meaning through Mentorship: A Student-Led Layered Peer Men-torshipProgramMiriam Howland Cummings Ph.D., University of Colorado Denver Miriam Howland Cummings is a mixed methods social science researcher. She earned a BA from Rice University and recently completed a PhD from the University of Colorado Denver while serving as a graduate research assistant for the Urban STEM Collaboratory. Dr. Howland Cummings’ research focuses on engineering education, K-12 education, and the measurement of latent constructs.William Taylor SchupbachProf. Tom Altman Tom Altman received his B.S. degrees in Computer Science
Paper ID #44743Enhancing Engineering Education through MentorshipMrs. Helen Elizabeth Geller, University of Texas at El Paso Helen Geller is the Program Manager for the Center for Research in Engineering and Technology Educa- tion (CREaTE) and the STEMFUERTE grant, funded by the Department of Education at the University of Texas at El Paso. Helen is also a Biology instructor at El Paso Community College.Dr. Peter Golding P.E., University of Texas at El Paso Professor in the Department of Engineering and Leadership at UTEP.Mr. Alejandro GonzalezAnnalisa Perez, University of Texas at El Paso ©American
Paper ID #45006Teaching Engineering Economics through Role Play in a Senior Design ClassDr. Gautom Kumar Das, University of Maryland Baltimore County https://cbee.umbc.edu/gautom-das/ ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work-in-progress: Teaching Engineering Economics through Role-Play in aSenior Design ClassABSTRACTThis work-in-progress study analyzes students' performance on a carefully chosen test questionover two years, revealing concerning results regarding key learning objectives. The traditionalchemical engineering curriculum exposes students to the concepts of engineering economicsonly during their final
Students: A Two Year Study”, 2010 ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition, paper AC2010-12195. N. Healy, A. Berenstein, “Using Summer Programs to Excite Secondary Students about Nanoscale Science andEngineering”, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, paper AC2013-62696. M. Ayar, B. Yalvac, F. Ugurdag, A.Sahin, “A Robotics Summer Camp for High School Students: PipelinesActivities Promoting Careers in Engineering Fields”, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, paperAC2013-60487. R. Stansbury, F. Behi, “Inspiring Interest in STEM through Summer Robotics Camp”, 2012 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, paper AC2012-43048. M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer, J. Coleman, “Hands-On Summer Camp to Attract K-12 Students to EngineeringFields”, IEEE Trans
approaches to commercial product development,” Des. Stud., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 614–631, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2014.06.001.[32] L. Voigt, “Linking Academic Excellence and Social Justice through Community-Based Participatory Research,” J. Natl. Coll. Honor. Counc., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 63–83, 2018.[33] M. Jacobson and C. Rugeley, “Community-Based Participatory Research: Group Work for Social Justice and Community Change,” Soc. Work Groups, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 21–39, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1300/J009v30n04_03.[34] K. A. S. Howard and V. S. H. Solberg, “School-Based Social Justice: The Achieving Success Identity Pathways Program,” Prof. Sch. Couns., vol. 9, no. 4, p. 2156759X0500900, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1177
community where they openly share projects, process andlearning. Fun is an essential aspect of making that, ideally, is inclusive of all skill levels, agesand interests [8],[9].Founder of Make magazine and creator of Maker Faire, Dale Dougherty, has talked about therevival of tinkering through making, once a normal part of everyday life when people fixed cars,made clothes and had backyard gardens. With the advent of low-cost open-source digitaltechnologies (e.g., Arduinos, Raspberry Pi, etc.), rapid prototyping tools (e.g., 3d printers, lasercutters, etc.) and internet access, a new generation of Makers is now able to innovate.Research in K-12 education has shown enhanced student learning of engineering principles,circuitry, design and coding
In someinstitutions, this service involvement has fueled the creation of courses and programs thatoffer Learning Through Service (LTS) which seems to attract a wider range of students toengineering. A growing body of evidence advocates that LTS may provide significantadvantages to engineering students, but studies to date are quite limited.11-15 Asuniversities play catch-up to these trends, a fundamental question remains unexplored:What motivates engineering students to be engaged in service?2. ObjectivesThis paper presents findings to the above question of student motivation from two LTSprograms at Michigan Technological University: (1) iDesign, an international senior-level capstone design program, and (2) Peace Corp Master s International
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Creating Value for Entrepreneurs through Transdisciplinary Experiential ProgramAbstractNew entrepreneurs and startup companies typically have genuine needs but sometimes needmore resources to execute them promptly. This could delay a product or service launch, leadingto a missed opportunity to gain market share. Some of the needs are beyond their expertise andmay require multidisciplinary teams to help them reach the next level. To help the startupcompanies and entrepreneurs in Dayton, the Stitt Scholars Program (SSP) at the University ofDayton was instituted to provide opportunities for multidisciplinary teams to work withentrepreneurs, startup companies, and
in their degree, so these efforts may contribute to student retention.At the start of the semester, they had a perception of community and teamwork connected totheir context, and some of them went through a learning curve before they felt comfortableworking in teams. By the end of the semester, many students valued the in-person activities thatallowed them to expand their network and build friendships that may last beyond this classroom.Students reflected on the benefit of working with students that were from different programswithin Biological Systems Engineering and learned how different perspectives could worktogether to solve real-world problems.This study reveals that students in this class valued in-person interactions over technology
Paper ID #18928Institutional Mentoring to Incite a Revolution through NSF’s RED ProgramDr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teach- ing and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord
Paper ID #42608Empowering Engineers: Enhancing Communication Skills through a TechnicalCommunication LabAmanda Dawn Hilliard, The Johns Hopkins University Amanda Hilliard received her MA in Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language and PhD in Applied Linguistics from the University of Birmingham in the UK. She has taught writing and communication courses abroad in South Korea, Vietnam, and Ecuador, and in the U.S. in Georgia, Texas, Arizona, and Maryland. She currently teaches in the Center for Leadership Education at the Johns Hopkins University.Ryan Hearty, The Johns Hopkins University Ryan Hearty teaches in the
. Learning styles: Link between individual differences and effective instruction. North Carolina Educational Leadership, 2(1), 4 – 22.25. Price, G., Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. 1990 Productivity Environmental Preference Survey: An Inventory for the Identification of Individual Adult Preferences in a Working or Learning Environment. Price Systems, Inc., Lawrence, KS.26. Research Based on the Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model. (Annotated bibliography). 1990. New York: St. John’s University.27. Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. 1992. Teaching Secondary Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.28. Dunn, R., Griggs, S. A., Olson, J., Beasley, M., & Gorman, B. S. 1995. A meta-analytic validation
the desire to provide students with more authentic learningexperiences in the classroom that allow students opportunities to develop science and STEMidentities [68]. Given how identities are “produced through practices, relationships andinteractions within specific sites and spaces” [68, p. 619], there is a need to increase the diversityof those persisting in STEM fields through college and beyond to include historicallyunderrepresented students. A Framework for K-12 Science Education notes that not all studentswill choose to pursue STEM careers, but that, “a science education based on the framework willmotivate and inspire a greater number of people - and a better representation of the broaddiversity of the American population - to follow
Paper ID #15735Improving Student Retention Through a Redesigned First-Year EngineeringClassDr. Jonathan Backens, Christopher Newport University Jonathan Backens is an assistant professor of electrical engineering at Christopher Newport University (CNU). He received his Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering from Old Dominion University in 2014 and his B.S. in computer engineering from CNU in 2004.Dr. Anton Riedl, Christopher Newport University Dr. Anton Riedl is an Associate Professor of computer engineering at Christopher Newport University and currently the Chair of the Department of Physics, Computer Science and