Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 421 - 450 of 11907 in total
Collection
2007 North Midwest Section Meeting
Authors
Kurtis G. Paterson
of such files on the student’s information appliance (computer or iPod). Simply Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference.put, do they have the storage capacity? Additional, but infrequent, challenges could beplaced on the podcast server if the class was large. In practice the storage and server issueseem to be largely insignificant to most users, thanks to rapid increases in informationstorage and processor speeds. Should a visionary university or academic program embarkon a systematic adoption of PEL, these issues could be more pressing.4. Student AssessmentStudent assessment of the PEL Environmental Engineering class was unanimouslysupportive in both years. Students liked the portability and on-demand
Conference Session
FPD XI: Assessing First-Year Programs, Experiences, and Communities
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shannon Ciston, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, Ph.D., University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Cory Carr
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
, American, and other models of higher education. The trend of establishingLiving Learning Communities or other themed living groups at middle- to large-sizeduniversities is on the rise and recent findings from the National Survey of Student Engagementshow that participation in learning communities are correlated with high levels of studentengagement and satisfaction with college. How are Living Learning Communities different fromother learning communities, such as self-formed study groups or disciplinary clubs? How doLiving Learning Communities established in the freshman year impact student affiliation and theformation of student groups throughout the bachelor’s degree program? This study explores theimpacts of a Freshmen Engineering Living
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: Retention & Success
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Navid Yaghoubisharif, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Natasha Mallette P.E., Oregon State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
students. The Engineering+program at Oregon State University exemplifies this approach by combining traditional lectureswith small-group studios and socially relevant projects. Previous research indicates that students'engagement correlates directly with academic progress. This is especially relevant in theEngineering+ setting, where students are in the process of choosing their majors and planningtheir futures. Students take three courses on varying topics to explore their interests and practicefundamental engineering skills during their first year. Therefore, enhancing student engagementin these courses not only aids in a deeper understanding of the offered materials but alsofacilitates social interactions that can inform better decision-making
Conference Session
Pedagogical Approaches for Software Engineering
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kevin A. Gary, Arizona State University, Polytechnic; Yegeneswari Nagappan, Unicon, Inc.; Supreet Verma, Delasoft, Inc.; Russell J. Branaghan, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Software Engineering Constituent Committee
AC 2012-5188: ASSESSING EVOLVING CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGEIN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING STUDENTSProf. Kevin A. Gary, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Kevin Gary, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering within the College of Technology and Innovation at Arizona State University’s Polytechnic campus. At ASU, Kevin led the development of the new bachelor’s of software engineering program, and the revised design of the master’s of computing studies. Gary designed and implemented the Software Enterprise, an NSF-funded hybrid pedagogical method for conducting project-based courses. More than 40 industry projects have been conducted by the Software Enterprise over the past eight years, and the
Conference Session
Diversity Research - Session I
Collection
2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
Authors
Jacklin Stonewall, Iowa State University; Michael Dorneich, Iowa State University; Cassandra Dorius; Jane Rongerude PhD, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Diversity Research
, negatively impact the instructors [10]. Assessments can foster the development ofway people perceive members of disadvantaged groups. autonomy and maturity, as well as improve social andUnfortunately, biases often extend into the classroom professional skills [11]. The process also encourages self-environment [1], [2]. In one academic year, 38% of professors reflection and deeper understanding of the material, whichsurveyed perceived an act of bias in their classes [2]. In small may lead to improved retention and confidence [12]. Givengroup learning classrooms, these biases have been shown to the increasing prevalence of small group learning and amanifest in many ways
Conference Session
Engineering Education in Muslim Worlds: Introductory Workshop
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Sedki Riad; Mostafa Kamel
. They still depend to a large degree on faculty members thatare delegated on part-time bases from corresponding faculties in governmental universities.The claim of the new private universities in Egypt is that they can provide better qualityeducation in many ways than that available through the government institutions such as: Page 9.548.4 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for EngineeringPage 5 of 23‚ Small class sizes and hence better faculty-to-student ratio.‚ Flexibility in designing the
Conference Session
M1A: WIP - Learning experiences 1
Collection
2019 FYEE Conference
Authors
Olukemi Akintewe, University of South Florida; Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida; Schinnel Kylan Small, University of South Florida
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference - Paper Submission
management techniques and best teaching practices.Dr. Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida Jonathan E. Gaines is faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of South Florida. He is the Director of First Year Experiential Education and Learning. Through this position, he develops and implements the curriculum for USF’s Foundations of Engineering Lab course. He is also the Principle Investigator for Bulls Engineering Youth Experience (Bulls-EYE Mentoring) a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math based outreach program that uses undergraduate students to mentor middle school youth.Dr. Schinnel Kylan Small, University of South Florida Schinnel Small is an Instructor I and IT
Conference Session
Curriculum Development in Information Technology
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
C. Richard Helps; Michael Bailey
technical information to support their work. Some of the major sourcesof information included • Handbooks • Textbooks • Technical Journals • Technical books • Technical magazines • White papers • Application Notes • Data books, catalogs and sales literature • Mentors and colleaguesProfessionals would access books by having a small collection of their own, typically: onehandbook, a number of text and technical books, subscriptions to a few journals and magazines,annually updated collections of data books and catalogs, membership in a technical society, andso on. Colleagues in the same facility or reachable by phone were often consulted. The next layerof access was through a local or regional library. Large companies would
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics and Justice
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rodney W. Trice, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
AC 2011-71: TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF ”ETHICS IN ENGI-NEERING PRACTICE”Rodney W Trice, Purdue University, West Lafayette Rodney W. Trice joined the faculty of Purdue University as an Assistant Professor in August 2000 after completing a two-year postdoctoral research fellowship at Northwestern University. His research there focused on investigating the processingstructureproperty relationships of plasmasprayed coatings using mechanical testing and transmission electron microscopy. Prior to Northwestern, Rodney received his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan (1997) where he studied the high temperature properties of a ceramic composite made via ceramic-loaded polymer extrusion methods. From 1989 through 1995, he
Conference Session
Student Learning Assessment Methods
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Lisa Jo Elliott, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Faisal Aqlan, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Richard Zhao, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Morgan Scott Janney, Pennsylvania State University, Erie
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
of participants was 31 (SD = 17).There were 30 references that contributed to our understanding of problem-solving and 11 thatcontributed to our understanding of signal detection theory as it is related to analyzing the eyetracking data. Some of these studies used a large sample with an average of 115 participants (SD= 140). Other studies used a small sample size, average of 20 (SD = 12). Across all articles, themajority were published in psychology journals, books and conference proceedings with 75 frompsychology and 6 from engineering.In this study, there were two hypotheses. Hypothesis 1: Does the design and manufacturingsimulation activities affect students’ metacognition in terms of monitoring, awareness, planning,self-checking, or
Conference Session
Computers in Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University; Ferry Pramudianto, North Carolina State University ; Abhinav Medhekar, North Carolina State University; Chandrasekar Rajasekar, North Carolina State University; Zhongcan Xiao, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
taken at face value, but rather should be vetted in someway. This could be done manually, by having the course staff look at each review to assess itscredibility. But this would be time consuming, and defeats one of the major advantages of peerassessment—that a large class can receive just as much feedback as a small class, with no extrainvestment of staff time. So, we seek an automated way to assess reviews.Automated evaluation of reviews offers three distinct benefits.. 1. Determines which reviews are useful to the author. When peer assessment is used formatively, reviews are intended to help authors revise their work. The author may receive several reviews making disparate or conflicting comments about the work. Which
Conference Session
Teamwork and Assessment
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
James West; Dennis Miller; Daina Briedis
Support Secondary SupportEssential to the redesign (as well as to ABET program improvement requirements,coincidentally) was the input of our major constituencies who are knowledgeable in the needsand trends of the advancement of the chemical engineering profession. It is in this aspect thatour approach differed from that of the Frontiers efforts. The participants in the Frontiersworkshops were largely academicians with specific research and other vested interests. In ourapproach, our alumni provided another source of input specific to their experiences in thepractice and to our program educational objectives. This type of approach was also one of the“path forward” strategies identified by the
Conference Session
Opportunities for Entrepreneurship Programs and Program Assessment
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Green, University of Maryland; Georgina Johnston, University of Maryland
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
EducationAbstractWhile the Hinman CEOs Program at the University of Maryland, College Park is committed topreparing students for entry into the entrepreneurial community by developing theirentrepreneurial mindsets and functional skill sets is a definitive objective, measuringperformance in these areas is a significant challenge.To meet this challenge, the Hinman CEOs Program has developed and implemented aperformance measurement system that assesses its entrepreneurship students’ progress in coursesand programs. Our performance measurement model is a picture of how the organization does itswork and links both short- and long-term outcomes with program activities and the theoreticalprinciples in play. The courses and activities managed by the University align
Conference Session
Opportunities for Entrepreneurship Programs and Program Assessment
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas Mason, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
the spread of the entrepreneurial mindset to more and more engineers.The actual impacts of activities to promote entrepreneurship need to be subjected toassessment metrics. Of course, participation alone is not likely to indicate whetherengineering graduates are likely to be effective entrepreneurs either in starting their ownventures or being change agents (or intrapreneurs) in existing organizations. Thisrequires that we go deeper into the attributes that are acquired in professional preparation.Most of the work on more rigorously measuring outcomes seems to be on the courselevel, rather than overall programs or centers. For example, Okudan, Kisenwether andRzaza have reported on the assessment of the courses in the entrepreneurship minor
Conference Session
Tablets, Mobile and Technology
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Frank V Kowalski, Colorado School of Mines; Susan E. Kowalski, Colorado School of Mines; Tracy Q Gardner, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
question,perhaps for enrichment or involving another application of the same concept, to continue toengage the faster students while other students continue to work on the original question. In thisway, an instructor can better meet the needs of different students, even in a large-class setting.Student EngagementConstructing a response with digital ink clearly requires a student to interact with the conceptsbeing presented in a much more active way than does simply sitting in a lecture. Designingclassroom experiences around such active learning strategies has widely accepted theoreticalunderpinnings. In a survey of 19 faculty members using Tablet PCs around the world to facilitatereal-time formative assessment, respondents strongly agreed that
Conference Session
Methods, Techniques, and New Programs in Graduate Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cyndi Lynch, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jiabin Zhu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
, and areas for further inquiry. Summative assessment occurs throughstudents’ final submission of portfolios (curriculum vitae, résumé, cover letter, researchstatement, and leadership philosophy) at the end of the semester.ParticipantsThirty-nine students took part of this course with one student auditing. Among the thirty-ninestudents, thirty of them were from Science or Engineering programs. Most student wereadvanced doctoral students with a few of them were in their pursuits of masters’ degrees. Byenrolling in PFP, students self-identified as interested in careers in industry, small business,government or non-profit organizations.Course FormatThe first two sessions of the course focused on developing career portfolios that included a
Conference Session
Curriculum Development in Two-Year Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College; Erik N Dunmire, College of Marin; Nicholas P. Langhoff, Skyline College; Thomas Rebold, Monterey Peninsula College; Eva Schiorring; Tracy Huang, Canada College
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Two Year College Division
in general, particularly for students in underrepresented populations. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Developing a Comprehensive Online Transfer Engineering Curriculum: Assessing the Effectiveness of an Online Engineering Graphics CourseAbstractCommunity colleges play an important role in educating future scientists and engineers,especially among students from groups that are traditionally underrepresented in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics. Community college transfer programs offer lower-division courses that students can take in preparation for transfer to a four-year program. Formany small community colleges, however, developing
Conference Session
Use of Summer Research Programs in Civil Engineering Education
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vinod Lohani, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Tamim Younos, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
/REU site (2007-10) onwatershed sciences and engineering at Virginia Tech, a large research university, arediscussed. Research mentors representing civil engineering, environmental engineering,geology, biology, crop and environmental sciences, water resources, environmentalchemistry, engineering education, and academic assessment disciplines made asignificant contribution in the success of the site. The site received funding in authors’3rd attempt. A summary of reviewers’ comments during unsuccessful attempts andauthors’ proposal modifications are presented to demonstrate strategies that led tosuccessful funding of the site. The goal of the site is to provide a diverse group ofundergraduate students a stimulating interdisciplinary environment
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Equity, Inclusion, and Access
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Hicks, Texas A&M University, Kingsville ; Michael Preuss, Exquiri Consulting, LLC; Matthew Lucian Alexander P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Rajashekar Reddy Mogiligidda, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Mahesh Hosur, Texas A&M University, Kingsville
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
(1996). His area of research includes engineering education, advanced composite materials, and nondestructive evaluation. He is a fellow of American Society of Mechanical Engineers. His work has been funded by NSF, NASA, DoD, ONR, ARO and AFRL. He has over 350 peer reviewed publications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Augmenting Introductory Engineering Courses to Include a Collaborative Learning by Design Project: Assessment of OutcomesIntroductionThis Complete Research paper examines the efficacy of a new introductory level course added todegree programs in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a HispanicServing Institution (HSI). The new course
Conference Session
Broadening Participation of Minority Students in and with K-12 Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katherine C. Chen, California Polytechnic State University; Lizabeth T. Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University; Heather Scott Smith, California Polytechnic State University; Teana Fredeen, California Polytechnic State University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Minorities in Engineering
, only 15 of the 157 (less than 10%) were not sureabout engineering as a field of study, the same results as the interest level question.Consistent with earlier findings, many of the camp participants at least already have someinterest in engineering, and thus we may be missing students that haven’t even considered orknow enough about engineering. The results also indicate the importance to outreach to youngerstudents (e.g., middle school) for our program. By high school, many students have alreadydecided on a certain path and may be too late to have a large impact on inspiring students tostudy engineering. Page 22.658.5Figure 3. Distribution
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 8: Skill Building
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Samantha Yanosko; Grant Valentine; Matthew W. Liberatore, The University of Toledo
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
Paper ID #37368Reading participation and assessment of spreadsheet skills acrossmultiple cohorts when using an interactive textbookSamantha YanoskoGrant ValentineProf. Matthew W. Liberatore, The University of Toledo Matthew W. Liberatore is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. From 2005 to 2015, he served on the faculty at the Colorado School of Mines. In 2018, he served as an Erskine Fellow at the Uni
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs; Bryan John Hubbard P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
Paper ID #29625Faculty Experience in Team Teaching in Construction Management HigherEducationDr. Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Manage- ment Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus. Her previous degrees include a MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development companies in Brazil
Conference Session
Assessment of Student Learning 1
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joe C. Guarino, Boise State University; James R Ferguson P.E., Boise State University; V Krishna C Pakala, Boise State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
] (questionable) causes concern and requires a focuseddepartmental discussion. Other metrics are recalled when necessary to provide perspective.Remedies associated with an FE metric score of [4] may include small changes in the content ofone or two courses associated with the subject score. An FE metric score of [5] (Unsatisfactory)indicates to us that the associated outcome is not being met. Remedies associated with an FEmetric score of [5] are often systemic, and may involve changes in our curriculum.We are fortunate that a very large percentage of our students take the FE exam before theygraduate. Over our last ABET assessment period (Spring 2004 through Fall 2009), 155 of our189 students (83%) took the FE exam before they graduated. However, due to
Conference Session
Assessment Issues
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Malgorzata Zywno
experience beyond summer jobs, nostudents with differing majors, and no graduate students. The course represented an introductionto a subject area (control systems) to which none of the students were exposed before in theirstudies. The failure rate in the course has been traditionally close to zero, and as a result therewere virtually no individuals who repeated the course, thus having a significant previousknowledge of the subject. All students functioned in a networked computing environment, usedsimulation software in design projects, digital signal processing-based data acquisition systems inthe lab, and email. Gender differences were not studied, due to a very small number of femalestudents in the program (less than 10%). Demographic background
Conference Session
Advisory Boards & Program Assessment
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Michael Cutlip
and have a capacity to make major contributions to the general institution.A logical step for some of the departmental Board members would be the progression to theDean's Advisory Board and possibly to the Board of Trustees for the institution.Board SizeMy suggestion is the Board should consist of about 10 members with the assumption that 2-3will not be able to make the meetings. It might be helpful to suggest that some of the membersprovide alternates should the member not be able to attend a particular meeting. This optionshould be given to those members who are serving as representatives of their company orgovernmental agency. Too large a board can discourage active participation while too small aboard can place too much work on the
Conference Session
Assessment of Engineering Technology Programs
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carmine Balascio, University of Delaware; LOUISE WEHRLE, NICET; Rudolph Henry, NICET; Chip Hollis, NICET
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
locations, the FE exam is typically notadministered outside the United States. Since most of the signatories to the SydneyAccord have accreditation agencies that employ some type of outcomes assessment,there is potentially a large international market for an internationally normed exam,perhaps administered through computer-based testing, that could be used as a directmeasure of outcomes for engineering technology programs. Internationally normed Page 13.918.12exams that play a role in certification of Engineering Technicians might also find aninternational market. 11 For maximum program assessment utility, the
Conference Session
Assessment of Graphics Programs
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Richard Devon
University, Ukraine) is an Instructor in Engineering Design at Penn State inthe School for Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs. His interests include applications ofCAD tools in the conceptual phases of engineering design process. He was previously active in designing andmanufacturing sensors for biomedical applications.HIEN NGUYEN graduated in computer science from Texas A&M. She is presently a doctoral student inInstructional Systems at Penn State with a Research Assistantship in the Engineering Design Program at Penn State.She specializes in the human computer interface, learning systems, problem solving methods, assessment methods,and the nature and performance of globally distributed teams
Conference Session
TC2K Issues and Assessment
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
David Cottrell
each program toformal seminars.1, 2, 3 These seminars were hosted or supported by the TechnologyAccreditation Committee (TAC) from ABET or by the Teaching and LearningConsortium from the Pennsylvania State University. The seminars typically lasted severaldays and featured both large lecture-type instruction and small group interactive sessions.The seminars proved highly effective in presenting the overall concepts encompassed byTC2K. However, the value of the seminars was found not in the theoretical discussions ofcontinuous improvement but rather in the “hands on” training that served to equip thefaculty with tools to implement the tenets of the TC2K. Seminar participants examinedand simulated various methodologies for developing appropriate
Conference Session
Curricular Issues in Computing
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University; Russell Feldhausen, Kansas State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
infuses CT, as well as reliable methods for assessing CT, remain open problems. In this paper, we describe a 5th-9th grade STEM outreach program. Classes on micro controllers and computer programming are presented. Data collected through a newly designed self-efficacy instrument is used to determine effectiveness of these curricula at improving confidence in CT and problem solving skills.IntroductionThis paper describes a STEM outreach program where the Manhattan-Ogden Unified SchoolDistrict 383 has partnered with Kansas State University. This program lasts four weeks and isdesigned to expose 5th-9th grade students to STEM careers and subjects through hands-onactivities. The program covers a large range of areas
Conference Session
Assessment of Graphics Programs
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Julie Petlick; Alice Scales; Aaron Clark
total of 350 surveys were mailed to members of EDGD in May of 2004, with a return rateof 51 or 14.5%. A total of 480 instruments were mailed during the 1998 survey, with a returnrate of 23%.The descriptive findings from the 2004 survey respondents are presented below,along with a comparison of the findings for the 2004 and 1998 surveys for categoriesincluded on both instruments. All percentages presented in this paper were rounded to thenearest whole number for simplicity of reading.Course OfferingsIn this first category of the survey, participants were asked to indicate the subject areas taughtby their instructional programs, the number of courses that teach a particular subject area,and whether that subject is taught as a separate course or