from the University of Illi-nois at Urbana-Champaign and an M.S. and PhD in physics from the University of Chicago. He came toUC Santa Cruz in 2003 from Cornell University where he was a professor of Applied and EngineeringPhysics, director of the Keck Foundation Program in Nanobiotechnology and Associate Dean of Research,Graduate Studies and Professional Education in the College of Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 From Peripheral to Full Participation: Implications of Learning Theory for Educational Design and Learning Assessment in STEM ApprenticeshipsAbstract This paper reports on a set of assessment methods and instruments being developed aspart of a larger agenda
readinginstruction on learners’ reading and vocabulary use competence. The result showed thatreading multimedia e-book significantly reinforces reading and vocabulary use competence11 . In addition, Korat treated learners of different ages as subjects. By e-book based learning,the said researcher tried to recognize the change of learners’ vocabulary understanding,reading comprehension and article reading competence. The results indicated that vocabularyuse, reading comprehension and article reading of learners of different ages improvedthrough e-book assisted reading 10.Based on the advantages of e-books reported in related literature, in this study, we introducedcharacteristics and advantages of an e-book system used for an embedded system course. Thee
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Work-In-Progress: Can We Create a Model Program: Insights into the Effectiveness of a Research Experience for Undergraduates La’Tonia Stiner-Jones* The Ohio State University stiner-jones.1@osu.eduAbstractThis study expands on our prior work of the Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)SITE program to provide data on participant preparation for success in graduate school and theirperceptions of the program. In the first two studies from our initial cohort, we summarized thatwe effectively provided an independent research experience, increased
engineering tasks forcollaborative problem solving, we have developed a method that is based on the presence andproportion of Ge’s four processes. This paper identifies the processes implemented by groups ofstudents as they solved an ill-structured task, and determines which aspects of the task designpromoted those processes. Based on the findings, we will make suggestions to further improvethe design of the task and comment on the overall takeaways for the design of any collaborative,ill-structured task. This study seeks to answer the following research questions:1) What aspects of the task enabled students to effectively implement the processes necessary forsolving ill-structured problems?2) How can the task be improved to further promote the
pursuing a Masters degree in Electrical Engineering, with emphasis in Power Systems, at the University of Minnesota. She received her Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering at the University of Minnesota in December 2007. She has been a member of the B.R.I.D.G.E (Building Resources and Innovative Designs for Global Energy) Project since it began in 2006. She learned about B.R.I.D.G.E through Professor Imbertson, one of the pioneers of the project, who also serves as her graduate school advisor. Having grown up in a developing country, Tanzania, where the quality of education is still poor and electricity a scarce resource, she immediately related to the project’s mission of education and
resources system problem. In the intervening years, he continued work on large scale system based problems. He has expertise in model- ing architectures for complex engineering systems such as transportation, infrastructure, water resources, and energy distribution using computational intelligence techniques He is the Founder of the Missouri S&T’s system engineering graduate program. Dagli is the Director of the Smart Engineering Systems Laboratory and a Senior Investigator in the DoD Systems Engineering Research Center-URAC. He is an INCOSE Fellow 2008 and IIE Fellow 2009. He has been the PI, Co-PI, or Director of 46 research projects and grants totaling more than $29 million from federal, state, and industrial
were shared among all: overall recommendation andcomments to the author. They recommend that a set of guidelines should be created to mitigate“potential gaps [that] exist in the review process.” In this search for quality reviews/form, thesolution is usually pursued in two areas: the grading algorithm itself (fairness) and the qualityand interpretation of comments (helpfulness). Most study the helpfulness of peer reviews withthe understanding that more helpful reviews contribute to more feedback being implemented infuture revisions (of an essay, for example). Rather than research the review form itself, most workattempts to teach the student how to review, tweaks the software to fix comments, or assigns abest-fit reviewer to provide quality
Paper ID #15573The Engineering Education Assessment Process - A Signals and Systems Per-spectiveDr. George E. Hassoun, Notre Dame University - Louaize, Lebanon G. Hassoun received the Licence en Physique degree from the Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon, in 1982, the Mast`ere en Avionique diploma from ENSAE, Toulouse, France, in 1984, the M.S. degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, in 1989, and the Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Adelaide, South Australia, in 1996. In 1997, he worked as a Senior Research Assistant at the
/repositories.Introduction—Educational Research Using LabsLaboratory projects can be strategically used to improve the Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE) curriculum across all four years, according to National Science Foundation(NSF) research done by Chu [1]. The aim is to enhance student learning and better preparegraduates for new challenges. Chu’s viewpoint is that a good engineer must not only becomeknowledgeable in certain content areas (components, learned in individual courses), but also beable to apply and integrate that content to solve complex, real-world problems.Motivation for Chu’s work came from an earlier 5-year study of engineering education [2]. Thatstudy found a deficiency in the curricula—subjects were taught in isolation, did not have
methods typically involve student group informationgathering and problem solving and have been shown to promote improved investigatory and criticalthinking skills and to prepare students for the more team-based interdisciplinary nature of the workenvironment2,3,4.Upon obtaining support from the federal Fund for the Improvement of Post-Secondary Education (FIPSE),a three-year research program was mapped out. The specific research objectives, the results from Year 1and some lessons learned are described below.Research ObjectivesThe research objectives were to: 1. Use the combined expertise of education, biology, and engineering faculty and graduate students to implement open-ended inquiry through problem-based learning (PBL) as the
Fortenberry assertthat while researchers and educators have developed a number of classroom and college-wideassessments – oftentimes in preparation for an ABET accreditation visit – no national assessmentexist to measure engineering student learning outcomes and the instructional practices thatsupport those outcomes[2].In response, CASEE has developed two surveys to assess the extent to which engineeringstudents are engaging in identified “best instructional practices” and are achieving certainlearning outcomes desired of engineering graduates. This paper describes the validation processof the E-FSSE survey and provides some preliminary analysis of that validation process.RationaleThe CASEE questionnaires were developed in a systematic and rigorous
AC 2011-1954: PREPARING COUNSELORS TO ADVOCATE STEM CA-REERS: A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MODEL FOR K-12 COUN-SELORSMeagan C Ross, Purdue University, West Lafayette Meagan Ross is a Ph.D. student in the College of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a B.S. in Computer Science from Texas Woman’s University, and a M.S. in Electrical Engineer- ing from Texas Tech University. Prior to beginning her doctoral studies, she worked as a micro-opto- electromechanical systems engineer for Texas Instruments. Meagan began working for Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE) in the area of teacher professional development in 2009. Meagan is passionate about providing awareness of
approximately 500reference citations listed by Duit in 2004 (from a larger list of over 6000 misconception papers inphysics chemistry, and biology). [6] Most studies have focused on the presence ofmisconceptions formed by common sense observations of the world by elementary andsecondary school children. However, work we have reported previously based on interviewswith engineering students indicates that these misconceptions are carried forward into collegeand that some of our best students (as measured by grade point average) still possess significantheat transfer misconceptions when they graduate. [3] Page 10.335.5 Proceedings
the research outcometo individual students and each student felt equal responsibility to his/her part of the research.Combinations of those results were compiled as the overall research output.Research ProjectsDue to the involvement of community college students for a short duration, i.e. 10 weeks,students were involved in a part of some major research projects mentored by the author. Theseprojects and the results of 10-week long study are summarized below.Intelligent Mapping ProjectAs a part of the author’s main goal to develop a risk management map of the university, twocommunity college students from the Cypress College were grouped with a freshman and asenior student at CSU Fullerton in summer 2009. These students were led by a graduate
task of developing andbringing together materials to supplement the modules and tailor the information to the studentsat their respective institutions. BSC prepares many non-traditional students for challengingcareers, graduate study, informed citizenship, community involvement, and public service in anevolving global society. The college offers undergraduate liberal arts and professional programsin applied sciences, business, education, humanities, social sciences, engineering technologies,and allied health sciences. Central to the course is a project-centric teaching paradigm to engagestudents in applying the concepts of CI by integrating the disciplines of biology, computerscience, mathematics, and statistics through bioinformatics. An
studyundergraduate researchers (N=10) participating in a REU program at a large research university.A key finding from the qualitative data was the role that graduate mentors played as “copingmodels” in developing undergraduate participants’ self efficacy, and consequently, theiracademic and career plans involving doctoral-level work. This study has implications for betterunderstanding the advantages of summer undergraduate research experiences such in recruitingand retaining qualified students for graduate studies and research careers. In particular, these datamake the case for fostering formal and informal interactions between graduate students andundergraduate researchers and for including specific opportunities for participants to learnvicariously
several multi-million dollar federally funded projects. Previously she taught graduate level courses for the College of Education at The University of Toledo in Statistics, Testing and Grading, Research Design, and Program Evaluation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23170T. Ryan Duckett, Acumen Research and Evaluation c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Developing problem solving skills using student-generated problems that reverse engineerYouTube videosAbstractHomework problems from many textbooks have solutions manuals on the Internet. Students findsolutions
Paper ID #12035Going Globally as a Russian Engineering UniversityDr. Julia Ziyatdinova, Kazan National Research Technological University Julia Ziyatdinova graduated from Kazan State Pedagogical University in 1999. Her major areas of study were foreign languages and she finished her University course with honors and qualification of teacher of English and Turkish. She continued her training and obtained PhD in Education degree in 2002. The topic of her PhD study was titled ”System of Character Education in the US Schools: Current State and Trends for the Development”. She also received additional minor degrees
and ASU, she is leading enhancement of Life and Environmental Science ethics education materials for the Online Ethics Center as part of a National Science Foundation sponsored project to improve the site. In the School of Life Sciences, she teaches core graduate courses in Respon- sible Conduct of Research. Ellison also fosters graduate education at ASU through her positions as director of the Masters in Applied Page 26.1560.1 Ethics and the Professions, Biomedical and Health Ethics, executive director for the Biology and Society graduate programs, and a founding member of the university’s
Page 13.207.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Apples and Oranges? A Proposed Research Design to Examine the Correspondence Between Two Measures of Engineering LearningAbstractIn 2004, ABET commissioned Engineering Change, a study of the impact of EngineeringCriteria 2000 (EC2000) on the preparation of undergraduates for careers in engineering. Onelegacy of that study is a database of EC2000-specific self-reported student learning outcomes at40 institutions, including precollege characteristics and engineering program outcomes for morethan 4,300 graduates of the class of 2004. A second dataset, the Multiple-Institution Database forInvestigating Engineering Longitudinal
-M in 2003, she was the Richard L. Terrell Professor of Excellence in Teaching, founding director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, and associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. In her current role, she coordinates faculty and TA professional development in the College of Engineering, conducts rigorous engineering education research, and promotes the growth of engineering education both locally at UM and nationally. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include evaluating methods to improve teaching, studying faculty motivation to change classroom practices, and exploring ethical decision-making in engineering students. She also has established a national
Key Findings Several studies support Overall short history and limited measurement and highlight its use usage compared to Kolb for differentiating students Tendency to classify students as Lack of research about balanced (lacking strong combinations of style differences preference on any scale) and individual differencesMethods This work examined the learning styles and experiential learning activities of students intwo courses. These courses were in the Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technologyprogram at Texas A&M University. One couse was a manufacturing course
ofempirical educational research with theory-driven research to provide a deeper understanding ofthe phenomenon that is being studied (The Design-Based Research Collective, 2003;Gravemeijer & Cobb, 2006). As such, this method is providing the researchers a framework foriteratively testing and refining the educational model to address the identified institutionalbarriers and achieve close alignment to the anticipated student learning outcomes (i.e.,integrative learning abilities, collaborative problem solving, innovation success, and teamworkcapabilities in diverse teams). Through the DBR approach, the researchers are seeking togenerate knowledge about how the resulting model can be broadly disseminated to the STEMeducation community and beyond
University, University Park Dr. Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development. Page 23.1038.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Report on the Learning Experiences of Undergraduate Students in a Novel Aerospace Engineering Course Integrating Teaching and Research AbstractThis study concerns the learning experiences of undergraduate students
ASEE and represents ASEE on the Engineering Accreditation Commission. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. He was inducted into the ASEE Hall of Fame in 2023. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A novel research design: Using multilevel discrete-time survival analysis to investigate the effect of Calculus I on engineering student persistenceAbstractThe persistence of engineering students through graduation continues to be a concern in highereducation. Previous studies have highlighted a link between students’ performance inintroductory mathematics courses and graduation rates. Focusing on a crucial foundationalcourse within the
of technology in the classroom and improving student outcomes through hands-on and interactive experiences.Debra Mascaro, University of Utah Debra J. Mascaro is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. She holds a B.A. in Physics from Gustavus Adolphus College in St. Peter, MN and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She teaches freshman design and senior-/graduate-level classes in microscale engineering and organic electronics.Robert Roemer, University of Utah Robert B. Roemer is currently a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. He received his B.S. degree
Rankings (ongoing) Peer mentoring 3.21 LSAMP Pre-college program 3.64 Bridge to the Doctorate program 4.1 LSAMP campus Activity Coordinator 4.22 Graduate Research assistantship 4.25 Study Abroad/International Research 4.28 Undergraduate Research Assistantship/Senior 4.78 college A small sample of the sentiment expressed by survey respondents is shown below andrepresents the key features of the program, mentoring, research, and professional development. • Research experience and mentoring were essential for a successful time in graduate studies. Participation in the events even
Session 2793 Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation and Retention: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study Guili Zhang, Tim Anderson, Matthew Ohland, Rufus Carter and Brian Thorndyke Educational Psychology Department, University of Florida / Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida / Department of General Engineering, Clemson University / Educational Psychology Department, University of Florida / Department of Physics, University of FloridaAbstractIn this study, pre-existing factors are quantitatively evaluated as to
University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. His current research involves the rheology of complex fluids as well as active learning, reverse engineering online videos, and interactive textbooks. His website is: http://www.utoledo.edu/engineering/chemical-engineering/liberatore/Uchenna Asogwa, University of Toledo Uchenna Asogwa is a graduate student of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Benin, Nigeria in chemical engineering. His current research involves the reverse engineering online videos as well as rheology of complex fluids.Dr. Gale A. Mentzer, Acumen Research
previousresearch findings,5,6,7 it seems reasonable to assume that these students benefited from the“critical mass” of Black peers with whom they likely socialized, studied, and consulted abouttheir projects.That higher graduate degree aspirations were associated with enhanced research self-efficacymay be explained in at least two ways. First, an obvious explanation may be a form of selectionbias. In other words, students who hold higher graduate degree aspirations may be more likely toenroll in the summer research component of the McNair Scholars Program. This seemsreasonable as the McNair Scholars Program is designed to encourage students’ preparation for