systems andradio environment maps, and machine learning techniques for use in cognitive radio.Tutorial concept, design, and development approachFigure 1 depicts how tutorials employ the infrastructure described above. Students or STEMprofessionals modify radio controller code or controller configurations and / or manually operateradios using the web-based visualization tool. The radios themselves are located on an Internet-accessible SDR testbed, and operate within a signal environment generated using other radios onthe testbed, controlled by CRTS. The radios report their adaptation decisions to the CRTSframework, which also measures and reports performance statistics of the radios to the student orother user via the CORNET3D web-based
the lack ofsystems engineering process and principles in their business administrative practices specific tothe Career and Technical department. The problems consisted of a lack of organization,understanding, and clarity of organizational processes. This department was not performing andoperated through disorganized, non-communicating people and systems. This was especiallyconcerning in light of the desire for the school district to be selected as one of Ford NextGeneration Learning’s (NGL) communities. The superintendent expressed a desire to see asystem engineering approach applied to the improvement of this department in preparation forFord’s arrival. This research sought to understand the whole system, expose lean six-sigma toolsto a new
studentscompleted the course with the group project accounting for 37% of the overall grade. For this,students were asked to imagine the entire class as a consulting firm with the Professor as thePrincipal, the TAs as directors, and each person’s interests and skillset critical to the success ofthe project.Figure 1. Main components and deliverables of an Environmental Engineering Laboratory group project focused ona wicked problem.Figure 1 visually presents the main components associated with the class project. Afterintroducing the wicked problem on the first day of class, three brainstorming sessions followedto get students to take ownership of their projects and to guide their research. These were heldduring three different weeks and lasted ~2.5 hours
1, students recalled many situations in which they felt similar andpositive (solidarity), distinct and positive (pride), and negative and distinct (shame/stigma). Theyrecalled few situations in which they felt similar and negative (non-uniqueness). In Study 2,students also recalled situations with these combined attributes, although a few situations alsoaligned with individual-level ODT predictions. Although preliminary, these results suggest thatODT has limitations when applied to individual identity.IntroductionAs engineering schools have become ethnically diverse, faculty have realized that diversity alonedoes not ensure inclusion. In our department, we sought to leverage theories from the disciplineof social psychology to enhance
within a traditional elective course [16]. The anonymous survey has beenadministered every term since Fall 2008. Table 1 presents a list of 24 questions that studentswere asked. For each question, students were asked to rate their response to generate a numericvalue between 1 and 5. The scale was bound by a rating of 1 representing ‘Not at all’ and a ratingof 5 representing ‘Very/Highly’. The means and standard deviations are tabulated for eachquestion across the four semesters. The participation was 100% for each term because everystudent was required to submit their responses as part of their assessment. Table 1. A comparison of the final survey of student perceptions of the course learningoutcomes. The Fall 2013 and Fall 2017 courses
Engineering and Computer Science Department atCleveland State University, and the Cleveland Foundation for their funding and support. Theauthors would also like to offer their personal thanks to Gary Johnson and John Gibbons for theirsupport and technical contributions in creating, supporting, and expanding this course.References[1] N. Eddy, “Gartner: 21 Billion IoT devices to invade by 2020,” InformationWeek Nov, vol. 10, 2015.[2] L. Laird and N. Bowen, “A new software engineering undergraduate program supporting the Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS),” in Proc. ASEE, 2016, pp. 26– 29.[3] G. Kortuem, A. K. Bandara, N. Smith, M. Richards, and M. Petre, “Educating the Internet- of-Things Generation,” Computer, vol
Education, 2018 A systematic literature review of analysis of success of undergraduate engineering women students in the USIntroduction Over the past three decades, women in the United States (US) have outpaced men inenrollment and degree obtainment in higher education1, but not in engineering education2,3.Figure 1 provides the percentage engineering bachelor's degrees awarded to female students ofall engineering bachelor's degrees awarded in the US from 2006 to 2014. While the earlierdownward trend is reversed, the significant underrepresentation of women in engineeringremains. The underrepresentation of women creates a lack of diversity in engineeringworkforce, which hampers development of innovative and
undergraduate peer mentor leading the hands-ontool workshops with them each week. Students were surveyed before, at the mid-point, andfollowing the 7 weeks of workshops to examine the impact of participation on their self-confidence and interest in the hands-on aspects of engineering studies. Both qualitative (openedended questions) and quantitative (likert questions) about impressions are included in this work.Additionally, outlines of the tools, build space, and individual workshop projects are included forpeer universities interested in developing their own hand & power tool build groups.Student DemographicsThe Building Women in Engineering and Building Skills in Engineering groups were advertisedvia email to the general undergraduate
, Frankfurt, Hamburg, andVenice, and then spread throughout Europe, and ultimately to the United States via England.1-3These publications, referred to as price-currents, listed market prices for various goods thatincluded many agricultural products and a limited number of chemicals, such as potash,saltpeter, sulfur, etc.3,4 One of the first price-currents published in colonial America was theSouth Carolina Price-Current and it included chemicals such as indigo, turpentine, and variousanimal/plant oils.1,5 Price-currents continued into the early 1800s and then developed into, orwere displaced by, specialized financial newspapers or trade magazines that often includedpricing.1 Some of the earliest trade magazines focusing on chemistry and chemical
Note: Minimum = 1, Maximum = 5 Student Background Variables The independent variables related to student background for this study include: gender,race, high school GPA, and advanced coursework in math or science taken in high school.Gender is measured dichotomously (0 = male, 1= female), as is race (0 = Person of Color, 1 =White). In this study, a Person of Color refers to African Americans, American Indians or NativeAmericans, Asian Americans or Pacific Islanders, Latino/as, and any non-White race specifiedby the respondents. As mentioned previously, students who are invited to participate in the M-Engin program are of lower socioeconomic status, first generation, and/or traditionallyunderrepresented in STEM by race or gender 30. The
Digital Design), Communications, Controls, andAdvanced Microscale and Nanoscale Fabrication. The current paper will outline the experiencesand lessons learned from the perspective of the two authors who, either collaboratively orindependently, have supervised over 20 capstone projects in the last eight years. The methodsemployed to lead these teams to a successful conclusion of their projects are consistent withgood design practices as well as robust team management principles.The projectsDepending on the origin of the project, capstone projects fall under three general categories.They can be defined (1) through an external agency – a non-profit or an industry partner, (2) bythe faculty advisor or (3) by the students themselves. Partnering with
. The chemistry grade and personal statement are assigned 50 and 150 points respectively.Student personal statements are reviewed by three faculty and are subjectively assigned ratings.Table 1 lists the weights assigned to admission requirements. Applicants are ranked according toadmission scores and an appropriate number of students are admitted in the EE program. Table 1: Admission score weights Subject Score Weight Calculus GPA 450 45% Physics GPA 200 20% Chemistry GPA 50 5% Overall GPA
General Chair of the 2005 International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP-05), Philadelphia PA, and is General Co-Chair of the 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), to be held in Kalamata Greece in June 2018. She is recipient of the 2005 IEEE Signal Processing Magazine Best Paper Award, and the 2012 IEEE Signal Processing Society Meritorious Service Award for ”exemplary service in technical leadership capacities”. She is IEEE Distinguished Lecturer for the Signal Processing Society for 2017-2018. More info on her work can be found at www.ece.rutgers.edu/˜cspl c American Society for Engineering Education
and generated almost $82Billion in revenue in 2016 [3]. There are companies founded every day. Not all of them willbe “the next Google”, but also smaller companies create jobs and increase the gross domesticproduct [4]. Knowing who and how many people decide to become Entrepreneurs is crucialfor society as a whole due to the described economic impact of such activities.In particular, entrepreneurs who found tech companies have the potential to influence thelives of many individuals as well as disrupt various industry sectors [5]. Research has shownthat the individuals’ personality has an impact on the likelihood of founding a company [6].Due to their technical knowledge engineers hold a key role in tech start-ups. However, less isknown about
EEPs – entrepreneurial self-efficacy, desirability, entrepreneurial intent, life transitions,information and resources, opportunities and barriers. Recommendations for engineeringeducation researchers and implications for entrepreneurship education research are offered.IntroductionWith the advent of a technology-driven global economy, institutions of higher educations areincreasingly investing in providing undergraduate engineering students with learningenvironments that assist in their professional formation. In addition to technical skills, academiahas recognized the importance of developing domain-general skills needed to solve futureproblems [1]. Engineering entrepreneurship education has been noted as a platform fordeveloping 21st century
assign two end-of-sectionproblems for each class session (typically covering 1-3 sections in the book). Multiple attempts areallowed, hints are available, late submission is allowed (a 2%/hr penalty), and adaptive learning isavailable for extra credit (those scoring 90% or above are given the adaptive learning extra credit). Thestudent is required to write out structured solutions to each of the two required online problems and thestructured solutions are occasionally collected for credit. Since this problem has already been graded viathe online system, the structured solution is graded for completeness and the goal is to motivate thestudents to use structured solutions when preparing for the tests. Finally, for each chapter, two sets ofextra
merely on a qualitative, but also a quantitative level in furtherdetail, e.g. by investigating the frequency and durations of turn-taking, the integration ofstandardised items from validated scales on technical affinity and communication, and thecommunicative structures that show during the collaborative process.References[1] Kaufmann, H., Steinbügl, K., Dünser, A. and Glück, J. (2005). “General Training of Spatial Abilities by Geometry Education in Augmented Reality”. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine 3, pp.65-76.[2] Schnier, C., Pitsch, K., Dierker, A and Hermann, T. (2012). “Collaboration in Augmented Reality: How to Establish Coordination and Joint Attention?”, Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on
conducted in Fall 2018.Related WorksNumerous related works have examined the effectiveness of research activities for retention andpersistence of URM students in STEM degrees [1] [2] [4] [5]. In [1], the summer researchexperience had a positive impact on URM students’ attitudes towards learning. In [2], previousworks were surveyed, which showed that research and faculty mentorship was an effectivestrategy to increase the number of URM students who pursue STEM degrees.Further, students who participate in undergraduate research have better attitudes towards theiracademic careers in general and are more likely to pursue graduate degrees [6] [7] [8]. In [8],they also found that the students participating in such programs tended to be upper
engineering education literature also revealed that reported U.S.-based university-industrycollaborations where students produced prototypes for industry partners were often seeded bysignificant external grants that either directly or indirectly supported the program [10-12]. Theseprograms and others like them erroneously lead engineering educators to believe an externalgrant must first be secured to conduct successful classroom-based product developmentinitiatives.Our previously published preliminary results contradict the prevailing conceptions that 1)university-industry collaborations generating products from courses must be externally fundedand 2) product development cannot happen in the timeframe of a one-semester course withoutproblems. Instead
: Generalized procreative non-maleficence,” Bioethics, 2017. 31:552–558, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.[4] D. Johnson, “Educating Sociotechnical Analysts for the Global Workforce: The UVAApproach” (unpublished)[5] L. David, "Actor-Network Theory (ANT)," Learning Theories, March 23, 2007. Retrieved from https://www.learning-theories.com/actor-network-theory-ant.html.[6] B. Williams-Jones & J. Graham, “Actor-Network Theory: a tool to support ethical analysis of commercial genetic testing,” New Genetics and Society, 22:3, 271- 296, 2010. DOI: 10.1080/1463677032000147225.[7] C. Crawford, “Actor network theory" in Ritzer, G., Ed., Encyclopedia of social theory, vol. 1., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Reference, 2005. DOI
rate each scenario on a scaleranging from “serious violation” to “no violation”. Each scenario was meant to present varyingshades of ethical gray area among what behaviors are considered academic violations. The firstyear’s results generally indicated that faculty members perceived academic integrity violations asmore severe than students did. Among the students, freshmen rated the academic integrityviolations as somewhat more severe than upperclassmen, indicating a shift in student perceptionfrom the first year of college to the last year of college [1]. The goals of the second year ofresearch were to compare the results of three institutions: one public university and two religiousprivate institutions, one of which has a formal honor code
print, the event was publicized through the newsletter of the MilitaryEngineering and Veterans Division as well as in several posters. From these, word continued tospread verbally, including through talks at technical sessions and recruitment of note takers. Inone case, a non-military associated graduate student was specifically recruited for note taking bythe hosting university (the University of Utah, Salt Lake City UT).The eleven roundtable attendees self-organized into two different tables. The meeting began withintroductions, including each person’s background and connection to the military. An aggregatedsummary of the attendees is presented in Table 1. Table 1: Summary of Leadership Session Attendees
threads, throughout the undergraduate program that impact a student’sability to thrive as an engineer. Led by thread champions and integration specialists (describedlater in Table 1), faculty work together to embed creativity, foundations, and professionalismthreads – defined in section I – in the LSMs and KI activities. Besides being tied to deeplytechnical content in the middle two years, these threads extend beyond the technical core to stitchtogether and reinforce relevant subjects from the freshman to senior years3.F. Pedagogical and organizational assessmentsPrior to the launch of the RED initiative, the department collected baseline data at pre-determined points in the program to serve as a yardstick for measuring success. A mixed method
, and race and gender in engineering. In general, she is always excited to learn new things and work with motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds to improve the experiences of people at any level in engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Intelligence and Smartness in Engineering: Gatekeepers to Diversity and Inclusion Turhan K. Carroll, Amy Kramer, Emily Dringenberg The Ohio State University, Engineering Education DepartmentAbstractThe ideas of intelligence and smartness are woven into all levels of engineering education. Theindividuals who are 1) accepted to study engineering, and 2) persist to practice engineering
Questions (5 = Strongly Agree, 3= Neutral, 1 = Strongly Disagree)The average survey results indicate that students in the relatively large, lower-division lecturecourse found Bluebeam feedback on PDF files of assignments/ assessments to be more clear andconsistent than hand-grading. There appears to be support for utilizing Bluebeam as a gradingand markup tool for other courses with frequent calculation assignments. This is likely becausethe instructor or grader was able to: ▪ Develop a standardized custom toolbox for each assignment to use on all student submissions, resulting in consistent technical content in text comments and visual appearance of graphical markup; ▪ Utilize a digital font in a bright
who learn technical aspects ofmaking such as basic electronics, 3D printing, and assembly, as well as learning criticalmanufacturing skills such as production scheduling, inventory management, and supply-chainmanagement.The schools in which these students learn are located in economically distressed communities thathave under-resourced schools. They are physically distant from large concentrations of STEMexperts, located in deeply rural areas at the southern border of Texas. These classes are notexpected to have in-house STEM experts to provide technical expertise. The distance of theseschool from larger population centers in general, and from STEM experts in particular, precludesthe feasibility of in-person instruction. Therefore, a
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Fostering Entrepreneurship in Project-Based Software Engineering CoursesIntroduction.The 2013 ASEE report on Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education identifiedentrepreneurship and intrapreneurship as in-demand skills that require additional attention inengineering curricula for “expanding on business and economics acumen and enabling studentsto learn more than economic capitalization, but also the process of starting a business from anidea” [1]. Meanwhile, the technology sector is growing, led largely by software companies likeApple, Microsoft, Alphabet (parent of Google), and Facebook. Accordingly, many of the leadingsoftware companies emerged from a “tech startup” culture and
for engineering and science.9. Rumann, C. and F. Hamrick (2009) Supporting student veterans in transition. New Directions for Student Services. 2009(126): p. 25-34.10. Branker, C. (2009) Deserving design: The new generation of student veterans. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 22(1): p. 59-66.11. DiRamio, D., R. Ackerman, and R.L. Mitchell (2008) From combat to campus: Voices of student-veterans. NASPA Journal. 45(1): p. 73-102.12. Steele, J.L., N. Salcedo, and J. Coley (2010), Service members in school, New York: American Council On Education.13. Brookfield, S.D., Andragogy: Alternative interpretations and application. in Understanding and facilitating adult learning, Open University
stated by McCracken et al., the average studentperformance witnessed in their study was even lower than they expected.1 This issue is Page 24.455.2exacerbated within the context of the Engineering Models courses due to the additional subjectmatter intended to provide context within engineering, mathematics, and the sciences included inthe course. In addition, the Engineering Models I and II courses are predominately taken byfirst-year students so they are also dealing with the sudden change in school environment.Therefore, methods need to be developed to help students develop an understanding ofcomputing concepts to allow them to focus on the
senior level managers in a variety of industrial sectors (transportation, retail,manufacturing, etc.). The program is designed to equip students with leadership and managementskills, as well as analytical and problem solving skills that are aimed at making them bettermanagers of both work processes and people.Putting students first ensures all students of any ethnicity and gender have equal chances foreducational success. Online, live and hybrid classroom options allow students the flexibility tolearn at their convenience and in their own setting. The OM student body is one of the mostdiverse on campus. Table 1 highlights the race/ethnicity breakdown of our students by year foracademic years 2009-2011. High minority and female percentages are