be operating smaller and lighter aircraft compared to those operated by the airlines.For an immediate radio PIREP to occur, the pertinent weather condition encountered is: 1)recognized by the pilot, 2) communicated via radio, 3) written by receivers, 4) encoded intoPIREP codes, and 5) disseminated.There are potential errors that may result in PIREPs that are untimely, misleading, erroneous, ornever get disseminated. Assuming that the weather information submitted by the pilot wascomplete and error-free, this study aims to identify the types of coding errors, frequency byPIREP text element indicators (TEIs. e.g., /SK, /TP, /IC), and their proportions. Statistical andgraphical analyses were used.In this study, PIREPs obtained from the Iowa
other upstream and downstream activities(scope 3) [2], [3]. Once the emissions have been quantified, firms report resulting GHGemissions through voluntary or mandatory data collection efforts like the CarbonDisclosure Project or EPA's GHGRP. Building on the foundation of these standards, WRIhas also developed standards for reporting GHG emissions at the product-specific level[4]. Finally, ISO has developed standards specific to carbon and water footprinting (ISO14067, ISO 14046).The aforementioned standards fundamentally depend on the definitions andcomprehensive environmental analysis contained in the ISO 14040 standards for lifecycle assessment (LCA). These standards, first formalized in the 1990s, provide asystematic quantified inventory and
advancements, creating newmethods, ideas, and skills for the improvement of society and human kind [1]. Although therehas been growing interest in teaching engineering in schools and implementing engineering-related activities in K-12 settings, there is a shortage of interest among students who are willingto build a career path in STEM areas [2, 3]. In this sense, it is critical to establish environmentsin K-12 settings to be able enhance students’ attitudes towards STEM fields. Research indicatesthat teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards the STEM fields are positively correlated withtheir students’ knowledge and attitudes towards the STEM fields [4, 5]. Due to teachers’ hugeimpact on students’ future career choices, the most important step to
who create and distribute AI technology, 3) producers: those who produce andcommercialize artistic works, 4) lawmakers: intending to create a level playing field ofsustainable and just involvement, and 5) consumers: those who partake of the commercializedart. The objective is to ensure that the resulting ecosystem is ethically fair, in which everyonereceives their just compensation, and is sustainable such that the systems can thrive over time.Causal loop diagrams (CLDs) are effective tools for visualizing and analyzing how socio-technical systems function [6]. In the realm of AI/ML in creative industries, CLDs help pinpointcrucial feedback loops and identify the best points for intervention. They are especially adept atexposing unintended
Paper ID #33299Innovating in the Time of National Emergency: Manufacturing PPE duringCovid-19, A Case StudyDr. Shuvra Das, University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Shuvra Das started working at University of Detroit Mercy in January 1994 and is currently Pro- fessor of Mechanical Engineering. Over this time, he served in a variety of administrative roles such as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair, Associate Dean for Research and Outreach, and Director of International Programs in the college of Engineering and Science. He has an undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, and
implement and study innovative approaches to engaging and retaining studentsfrom diverse backgrounds in biomedical research, potentially helping them on the pathway tobecome future contributors to the NIH-funded research enterprise.”3 The institutions involved inour grant have identified a number of barriers and opportunities to enhance the success of URMstudents at the undergraduate level within the biomedical pipeline. Chief among the challengesfaced are the integration of authentic research experiences within the undergraduate curriculum.Studies show that student participation in undergraduate research is correlated with the successof all students in STEM careers.4 In particular, the early introduction of mentored research thatcomplements
. Imbalances between the measurements indicate a potential heating elementfailure or a faulty temperature sensor. These faults are reported on the liquid crystal display(LCD). The control circuit also controls the two 50W AC heater elements through solid staterelays. Overall system control is maintained by an Atmel ATmega164. This processor is an 8-bit microcontroller equipped with 16k bytes of flash programmable memory. Figure 3. Concrete Curing Box (CCB) interface diagram.CCB LCD user interface. A close up view of the LCD user interface is provided in Figure 4.The CCB user interface displays the current CCB internal temperature, desired temperature, faultstatus and the amount of time the CCB has been in operation
are reflected in numerous publications and presentations at prestigious IEEE; ASEE conferences, Wiley’s & Springer Journals. His research primarily revolves around understanding Cognitive Engagement Analysis, Assessing Methods in Engineering Education, and Facial Expressions (emotions) in the Learning process. He is a member of various technical committees, serving as a reviewer for esteemed journals and international conferences including ASEE, Springer (JAIHC) , JCEN, and IEEE Transaction on Education. His commitment to advancing education, paired with his extensive academic and professional experiences, positions him as a promising researcher in engineering education.Dr. Angela Minichiello, Utah State
that various forms of technology play in terms of student learning in physics and in engineering. She has been an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) for over 35 years. Dr. Larkin served on the Board of Directors for ASEE from 1997-1999 as Chair of Professional Interest Council (PIC) III and as Vice President of PICs. She has received numerous national and international awards including the ASEE Fellow Award in 2016 and the Distinguished Educator and Service Award from the Physics and Engineer- ing Physics Division in 1998. In January 2014 the Center for Teaching, Research and Learning at AU presented Dr. Larkin with the
Paper ID #44329Appreciative Inquiry as an Intervention for Equity-Centered EngineeringEducation Research and PraxisAnn Shivers-McNair, University of Arizona Ann Shivers-McNair is associate professor and director of professional and technical writing in the Department of English and affiliated faculty in the School of Information at the University of Arizona, on the lands of the Tohono O’odham and Pascua Yaqui.Gimantha N. Perera, North Carolina State University Gimantha Perera is a Sri Lankan born researcher and educator from NC State University. He was inspired to be an engineer by his maternal grandfather Anil, who
-technical-based process for questionnaire development in requirements elicitation via interviews,” Requir. Eng., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 295–315, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00766-019-00324-x.[19] G. Burleson, K. Toyama, and K. H. Sienko, “Characterizing the use of contextual factors in engineering design: An exploration of global health designer practice,” Rev..[20] G. Burleson, S. V. S. Herrera, K. Toyama, and K. H. Sienko, “Incorporating Contextual Factors Into Engineering Design Processes: An Analysis of Novice Practice,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 145, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1115/1.4055780.[21] “ABET Requirements,” Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org
. Gutiérrez and R. R. Gallegos, “Theoretical and Methodological Proposal on the Development of Critical Thinking through Mathematical Modeling in the Training of Engineers,” in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, León, Spain, Oct. 2019, pp. 941–948, doi: 10.1145/3362789.3362828.[3] A. McKenna and A. Carberry, “Characterizing the role of modeling in innovation,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 263–269, 2012.[4] M. Develaki, “Using Computer Simulations for Promoting Model-based Reasoning,” Sci. Educ., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1001–1027, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11191-017-9944-9.[5] A. J. Magana and T. de Jong, “Modeling and simulation practices
and engineering (CSE) students (4 under-graduate, 1 master, and 2 PhD students), 2 applied and computational mathematics and statistics (ACMS) students(1 undergraduate student and 1 PhD student), 3 non-degree students (1 visiting student, 1 exchange student, and 1University employee), and 1 aerospace and mechanical engineering (AME) PhD student. They all knew what graphswere before taking the course, and have learned about graph visualization within the class. Five of the students in thePhD group conduct research related to graphs and networks, while the other five do not. To facilitate the process, wedesigned a study guide to help the students explore GraphVisual. After an introduction session for the in-class groupstudents, they received
) Skills collaborative environment,Govern seeking continuous consultation (OV) with other analysts and experts—both internal and external to the organization—to leverage analytical and technical expertise.Oversee Training, Education, and Professional Oral
school and community context, (3) higher education context, and (4)the social, economic, and policy context. Figure 1. Perna’s Conceptual Model of Student College Choice [21]Habitus, the innermost layer of Perna’s model, refers to the internal system values and beliefsacquired from one’s immediate environment that guides future behaviors and choices [22].Through everyday experiences, perceptions of what is right and appropriate are internalized,ultimately defining what is achievable for an individual and bounding their college-relatedexpectations and aspirations. The habitus layer incorporates students’ demographiccharacteristics, cultural capital, and social capital. The next layer, the school and communitycontext, follows
), students discussed their views on the pair programming model of the course in relation to the team model of their co-op assignment. After the session, students documented the last section of the rubric (reflection). The following are some excerpts from reflection: “All of my experience has been in very small teams and it was interesting to hear about teams that were 25+ people …and about teams that were international and the benefits and difficulties of having people working at different time zones across the world.” “It [the course team model] is different from my internship, where I was stuck alone for a long time with frequent unclear instructions.” “It was interesting to see how their [fellow students'] co-ops were
Description 1 Receiving Actively taking in information and being aware of one’s feelings and emotions 2 Responding Actively participating or interacting with the information and others 3 Valuing Being able to find worth in something and being able to express that importance 4 Organization Prioritizing certain values over another value to create a personal value system or hierarchy 5 Characterization Internalizing the value system -- from the organization level
co-lead designer of Hands- on Standards STEM in ActionTM —a set of learning modules for preK-5th grades - in use in 35 countries and selected as finalist for two international awards. Dr. Strobel received the 2018 Science Educator of the Year Award from the Academy of Science - St. Louis and the 2018 STEM Excellence Award from the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), and served as an Invited Member on the National Academy of Engineering Committee for Implementing Engineering in K-12. Dr. Strobel founded the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), has served on the board of IEEE Transactions in Education, and currently serves as Associate Editor for the Australasian
] attention on problematic areas and subsystems when troubleshooting devicesand proposing ways to fix them,” and (2) the novice designer “use[s] an unfocused, nonanalyticalway to view prototypes during testing and troubleshooting of ideas” [7, p. 749].Research on Failure and Diagnostic Troubleshooting in Elementary SchoolAt the upper elementary level (i.e., US grades 3 through 5; ages 9-11) and through a combinationof qualitative classroom observations and analyses of teacher surveys, the first author’s previouswork has identified a range of both resilient, productive actions and non-resilient, non-productiveactions in response to design failures [11, 12]. See Table 1.Table 1. Summary of upper elementary students’ responses to design failure [11, 12
ConferenceContent Access, June 2020.[17] S. Maller et al., "Normative typologies of EPICS students on ABET EC Criterion 3: Amultistage cluster analysis," in 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2007.[18] K. M. Ehlert et al., "Utilizing cluster analysis of close-ended survey responses to selectparticipants for qualitative data collection," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,June 2017.[19] Q. Liu and G. Evans, "Unleashing the Power of Data Analytics to Examine EngineeringStudents’ Experiences and Outcomes," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference ContentAccess, June 2020.[20] N. O. Ozaltin et al., "Understanding the technical entrepreneurship landscape in engineeringeducation," in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2011
, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research Methods Faculty Apprentice Award in 2014 and the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effec- tiveness and Educational Scholarship presented by American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chemical Engineering Division in 2017. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021AbstractDevelopment of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) has been a focus that has gained traction withinengineering over the last decade
studentsto not neglect the portions of the project focusing on technical communication skills. Finally,following up with students later in their studies can also help assess how well this projectprepared them to take their upper-division courses.4. ConclusionsOverall, students found the Pokémon Challenge to be a rewarding experience and recognizedthat student learning outcomes were met. They were grateful at the ability to join remotely ifthey had to quarantine or were sick, which allowed them to participate effectively in their teamproject. Teams had to adjust to changes in personnel, a skill required in the practical world.While some teams struggled with team dynamics and many students complained about theworkload, for the most part students
psychology, 18(3), 328-352.Broo, D. G., Kaynak, O., & Sait, S. M. (2022). Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 25, 100311.Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 20(1), 38.Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect (p. 287). Taylor & Francis.Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43
grounding in the learning sciences andextensive success and research base in K-12 education, this on-line approach to extendingdiscourse beyond the classroom remains largely unexplored in undergraduate engineeringeducation.Knowledge Building TheoryThe solutions to many of the most important problems facing future engineers will require theproduction of new knowledge—i.e. new conceptual artifacts (such as theories) that arise fromhuman thought. Examples include developing new sources of energy and reverse-engineeringthe brain. Future engineers will need to be able to combine their technical expertise with anability to collaborate and produce innovative solutions to complex problems. Introducinglearners to these types of knowledge age problems is a
] Ghassan Issa, Shakir M. Hussain, and Hussein Al-Bahadili. Competition-based learning: A model for the integration of competitions with project-based learning using open source lms. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 10(1): 1–11, 2014. ISSN 1550-1876. doi: 10.4018/ijicte.2014010101.[14] Ignacio Cantador and Jos´e M. Conde. A simple e-learning system based on classroom competition. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 6383, pages 488–493. Springer, 2010.[15] Fu-Yun Yu, Liang-Jen Chang, Yi-Hsuan Liu, and Tak-Wai Chan. Learning preferences towards computerized competitive modes. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 18(3): 341–350, 2002. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00238
, developstudy strategies for deeper understanding, and take on and persist through challenging tasks [5, Chapter 3]. Internships provide students with real-world tasks, demonstrate the relevance of students’ coursework to their future careers, and create opportunities for students to see the value of their efforts. Inprevious work, studies indicate students value internships for the opportunity to develop technical skills,expand professional networks, and complete a product that others will find useful [6]. When studentsperceive that an activity will help them satisfy more than one goal, their motivation will be higher [5,Chapter 3]. Furthermore, students who expect to succeed and believe they have influence within theirlearning environment will be
Gamification in a Software Development Lifecycle”. In: June 2022. [2] Michael Bossetta. “Gamification in Politics”. In: Nov. 2022. [3] KDV PRASAD, Mangipudi Mruthyanjaya Rao, and Rajesh Vaidya. “Gamification Frame- work With Reference to Business Perspective”. In: International Journal of Professional Business Review 7 (Dec. 2022), e0702. DOI: 10.26668/businessreview/2022. v7i5.702. [4] Sebastian Deterding et al. “Gamification: Toward a definition”. In: Jan. 2011, pp. 12–15. [5] Marko Urh et al. “The Model for Introduction of Gamification into E-learning in Higher Education”. In: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 (July 2015), pp. 388–397. DOI : 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.154. [6] Karl Kapp. The gamification of
Paper ID #21969MEERCat: A Case Study of How Faculty-led Research Initiatives Gave Riseto a Cross-departmental Research Center with Potential to Inform Local Pol-icyMr. Rohit Kandakatla, Purdue University, West Lafayette Rohit Kandakatla is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity. He has his bachelors and masters in Electrical Engineering from India. He currently serves as the Chair-elect of the ASEE Student Division as has been an active member of the international engineering education community while serving as the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education De
ESL classes Personal finance management classes Access to food stamps Cooking healthy classes Eating better classes Rehab services Mental health services Prescription assistance Immunization clinics Job training sessions Computer literacy classes Other topics of interest: _____________________________________________Q6. Any additional comments about how the pantry can serve you better: Appendix 3 Survey Questions for Clients (Spanish)Nombre del proveedor de Servicio de Alimentos: _______________________P1: Preguntas acerca de usted y su familia 1. Edad
Design Project in Freshman Engineering Physics Course Abstract Published literature clearly agrees that one of the key factors contributing to goodstudents leaving engineering in their freshman year is that the students get bogged down intechnical courses and fail to see the application of engineering in a real-world context. Studentsoften fail to see the relevance of the technical skills they are learning in their basic math andscience courses because they are presented with very few opportunities to apply these skills inactual engineering problems. In addition, many schools have included hands-on projects in firstyear engineering courses that concentrate on developing project management and teamworkskills. While these projects are