-the-boxes sort of numerical approach), but the method could beredirected to encourage out-of-the-box thinking related to how a particular design might be morecomplex than originally assumed.What I am ultimately suggesting is that engineering education, and engineers in general, need tooperate from a post-modern paradigm in addition to the traditional approach. Or, perhaps moreappropriately according to Bruno Latour, we need to return to a pre-modern sensibility in whichthe natural connections in the ever expanding collective of non-human things and humans aremore explicit, in which “science does no produce itself scientifically, any more than technologyproduces itself technologically or economy economically.”xxxiiConclusionAn early reviewer
pursue a career in energy industry or to enroll ingraduate programs in the energy field. It is important to encourage students to learn to use suchkind of software packages that work with renewable energy systems. Because by taking theadvantage of such tools students can learn and adapt better solutions to fix the energy problemissues. It is is important to keep in mind that how we are using the energy today will shape theway how we live in the future.References1. Engineering Accreditation Commission, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,"http://www.abet.org/criteria.html. (2002).2. Petty, I.: Vision 2020 - Education in the next Millennium. In: Hagström, A. (Ed.), Engineering Education:Rediscovering the Centre (Proc. SEFI Annual Conf
numbering, from [1]: ∑ F = ma (13-4)∗ Equations are not numbered sequentially but have same numbers as in the reference textbook. Page 9.184.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education ∑ F = ma G (17-10) * ∑M G = I Gα (17-11
Paper ID #16360Classifying Dissatisfaction: Student Perspectives on Teammate PerformanceEmily Miller, Ohio State University Emily Miller is a recent graduate of the Industrial Systems Engineering program at Ohio State University. She has worked for the National Integrated Cyber Education and Research Center, as a teaching assistant for the Fundamentals of Engineering program at Ohio State, and as a researcher at Olin College of Engi- neering and Ohio State. She will begin her graduate studies in Systems and Information Engineering at the University of Virginia this fall.Dr. Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan
American studies course. Well we always went over how a place can be a center of multiple things. It can be a political center, or a population center, cultural center, economic center, I suppose that a place can be multiple things. (Student 4)In comparison with ECE 101, more students recalled big ideas in other general education coursesdifferent than ECE 101.ConclusionsUnderstanding the long-term impacts of general education courses in engineering can help usbetter design engineering courses for non-major students. This study investigated the experienceof twelve non-engineering students who took ECE 101 between the fall of 2007 and fall of 2010.The results suggest that the students improved their self-efficacy toward technical projects
. Jones, “Assessing ethics education: A survey of engineering programs.,” Teaching Ethics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 317–340, 2020.[16] J. Miller, “Assessing microethics and diversity perspectives in engineering ethics education,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2021.[17] H. Furey, S. Hill, and S. K. Bhatia, Beyond the Code: A Philosophical Guide to Engineering Ethics. Routledge, 2021.[18] S. Sundar Sethy, Contemporary ethical issues in engineering. IGI Global, 2015.[19] K. d’Entremont, Engineering Ethics and Design for Product Safety. McGraw Hill, 2020.[20] C. Murphy, P. Gardoni, H. Bashir, C. E. Harris, and E. Masad, Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World. Springer International
mathematics as well asenjoyment and appreciation, within the field of robotics as a result of the educationalmodule.2 Internal reports from UNIMINUTO.3 PCIS (acronyms of Social Innovation Science Park in Spanish Parque Científico de Innovación Social)4 Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics - STEM. 2Regarding the use of realistic problems in math education, the work of Shankar, Ploger,Nemeth, and Alan (2013) consisted on the design of a course dedicated to enhancingstudents interest in engineering and math while providing a social context of competitionand cooperation. Results showed that bringing engineering technology into the
Engineering Education Reform: Realizing the New Paradigm for Engineering Education, Proceedings of the Engineering Foundation Annual Conference, July 3-6, 1998, Baltimore, Maryland. pp. 28-30.[2] S. A. Sorby, G. Walker, M. Yano, V. Glozman, K. Kockersberger, J. Mathers, J. McKinney, J. Schulman, M. Young. "Modernization of the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum and Guidelines for Computer-Aided Engineering Instruction." Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 4, Feb. 2, 2000.[3] A. Kolmos, R. G. Hadgraft, and J. E. Holgaard. "Response Strategies for Curriculum Change in Engineering." International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 26, pp. 391-411, 2016.[4] National
Systems, FEA and other CAE applications in Multi-physics Problems and Engineering Education.Dr. Ronald Bonnstetter, Target Training International Dr. Ron Bonnstetter serves as the senior vice president of research and development for Target Training International. With a bachelor’s from Mankato State University, master’s and doctorate degrees from the University of Iowa and decades of award-winning teaching and research at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Bonnstetter has amassed an arsenal of recognition and research, including the first recipient of the National Senior Outstanding Science Educator of the Year Award and the only secondary science prepa- ration program recognized in the national Search for
AC 2004-17: EARLY REFLECTIONS ON ENGINEERING WEB-BASEDPORTFOLIOSKathy Schmidt, The University of Texas at AustinMatthew Campbell, University of Texas at Austin Page 9.490.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2004 Session 1520 Early Reflections on Engineering Web-Based Portfolios Matthew I. Campbell, Kathy J. Schmidt College of Engineering The University of Texas at AustinAbstract During a four or five year undergraduate education, engineering students producea variety of materials that are
environment," J. Manufacturing Systems, vol. 24, no. (3), pp. 175-177, 2003.[4] E. Fielding, J. McCardle, B. Eynard, N. Hartman and A. Fraser, "Product Lifecycle Management in design and engineering education," Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 123-134, 2014.[5] J. Krajcik and P. Blumenfeld, "Project-Based Learning," in The Cambridge Handbook of The Learning Sciences, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 317-334.[6] B. Kerr, "The flipped classroom in engineering education: A survey of the research," in 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 2015.[7] H. Cho, K. Zhao and C. Lee, "Active learning through flipped classroom in mechanical engineering: Improving
Engineering Education, 2024 Design Iterations as Material Culture Artifacts: A Qualitative Methodology for Design Education ResearchAbstractStudying design processes requires the researcher to move with the designer as they negotiate anaction-reflection cycle comprised of a multitude of relationships, including the designer’srelation to themselves, to human and more-than-human others, and to the beliefs, values, andassumptions that design us every day. This paper’s goal is to introduce a qualitative methodologyfor studying the complex relationality of design, particularly (but not exclusively) in anarchitectural design education context. This methodology has theoretical and methodologicalunderpinnings in Process Philosophy and
-technical coworkers and clients throughin-depth discussions on software requirements, design, and implementation. Clearly,communication skills are an important skill set to software engineers. Yet computerscience undergraduate students, many of whom will become software engineers after theygraduate, receive little training in teamwork and communication skills, especially in thecontext of computer science coursework and projects. As a result, many computerscience students do not recognize the importance of communication and do not possesssatisfactory communication skills. For example, in Spring Quarter 2004, on ananonymous comment card collected from CS456/556, a software engineering courseoffered at Ohio University, one student complained that: “I
, "Depoliticization and the Structure of Engineering Education," in International Perspectives on Engineering Education, S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham and B. Newberry, Eds., New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2015, pp. 203-216.[7] M. Nelson, G. D. Hoople, J. A. Mejia and S. M. Lord, "Work-in-Progress: What is Energy? Examining Engineering Students' Conceptions of Energy," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, QC, Canada, 22-26 June 2020.[8] G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, S. M. Lord, L. A. Gelles, F. Bilow and J. A. Mejia, "An Integrated Approach to Energy Education in Engineering," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, 2020.[9] R. Rincon, "SWE Research Update: Women in Engineering by
policy,higher education, and local standards while integrating disciplinary and industry goals fordesigners and engineers into a epistemic frame encompassing skills (s), knowledge (k), identity(i), values (v), and epistemology (e) [8-10] derived from policy documents and literature. Thesources used in the development and relationship between sub-codes and sources can be seen inFigure 1. In the first version of the EEFK12, these five SKIVE elements had 47 sub-codes thatallowed for a micro-analysis of interactions throughout the engineering design process. A pilotstudy was conducted with rising juniors during a college preparatory summer program to test theevidence of EEFK12 elements in the ideation, prototyping, testing, and final
hinder critical thinking when problem solvers are faced with an authentic (real-world)problem. This lack of integration and problem-solving skills is further evidenced by the poorperformance of students in assessments that are not within the confines of the classroom, such asthe PISA and the TIMMS.The practice of an integrative science, technology, engineering and mathematics education (I-STEM ED) pedagogical approach is defined as: the application of technological/engineering design based pedagogical [T/E DBL] approaches to intentionally teach content and practices of science and mathematics education through the content and practices of technology/engineering education. Integrative STEM Education is equally applicable
Engineering and Technology, Pollachi, INDIA. Dr. Calvin Sophistus King, heads the Outcome Based Education division of Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology (MCET). The division implements Outcome Based Education model by building faculty teaching competencies, developing systems and frameworks and reviewing processes. He continues to teach courses in engineering and facilitate faculty competence development programmes. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Program Assessment through Product and System Based Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Programs in IndiaAbstractEngineering education is one of the key enablers for sustainable growth of a
Polytechnic Institute in 2000 and 2004, respectively. Page 24.1292.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Understanding Students’ Process for Solving Engineering Problems Using Eye Gaze DataAbstractIt is well known that engineering is considered one of the more demanding fields of study toembark on. In mechanical engineering, courses such as thermodynamics, statics, mechanics ofmaterials and others are perceived as challenging by students. Several factors impact students’ability to solve problems presented in these courses, including the ability to visualize the
implementing new technology. Besides economics, he has taught in the areas of management, finance, strategy & policy, and operations management. During the past few years, his teaching has focused on entrepreneurship. His work in curriculum and program development has been supported by the Michigan Economic Development Corporation through the Michigan Entrepreneurial Education Network, NCIIA, and NSF. He advises the local Entrepreneurs & Inventors Club which includes members from two universities and the community.Edward Lumsdaine, Michigan Technological University Dr. Edward Lumsdaine is currently Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Technological University and Special
AC 2007-3068: DEVELOPING ENGINEERING CURRICULUM IN ANINTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE ENVIRONMENTJosef Rojter, Victoria University of Tech. Page 12.495.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Developing Engineering Curriculum in an Integrated Knowledge EnvironmentAbstractUnlike curricula in professional courses such as medicine and law which are focused onspecific discourses such as health and justice respectively, engineering curricula at Australianuniversities lack, by and large, a unifying ideology. In general schools and faculties ofengineering at Australian universities have failed to address this issue and resisted calls forchange in professional engineering
professor and researcher at the School of Engineering at Universidad Andr´es Bello in Santiago, Chile, where she collaborates with the Educational and Academic Innovation Unit (UNIDA) as an instructor in active learning methodologies and mentors engineering faculty in educational research. She is the Secretary of the Women in Engineering Division (WIED) of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and an associate researcher in the STEM Latin America Network, specifically in the STEM + Gender group. Her research interests are diverse and focus on university education in STEM fields, faculty and professional development, research-based methodologies, and the use of evaluation tools and technology for education
“Professional Skills” — Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94 (1), 2005.4 ABET: Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Accessed May 8, 2005. .5 Greeno, J., Moore, J., et al. (1993). Transfer of Situated Learning. Transfer on Trial. Sternberg, NJ: Ablex.6 Hestenes, D., Wells, M., Swackhamer, G. (1992). “Force Concept Inventory,” The Physics Teacher, Vol. 30 (3), Page 11.1186.11 141-151.7 Hestenes, D., Halloun, I. (1995). “Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory,” The Physics Teacher, Vol. 33 (8), 1995.8 Hake, R. (1998). “Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods
Paper ID #42359Does the French Engineering Education Approach to Internships Work inChina? Perception of Chinese Students Enrolled in a Sino-French EngineeringProgram in ChinaDr. Ying Lyu, Beihang University Ying Lyu is an associate professor at Beihang University in Beijing, China, where she is based at the Institute of Higher Education, part of the university’s School of Humanities and Social Sciences. She holds a Ph.D degree in higher education from Beihang University. Her research interests include engineering education and international and comparative higher education.Prof. Chuantao Yin, Beihang University Dr
-writing, hiring and supervising staff and student workers as well as coordinating program evaluation.Dr. Adam K. Fontecchio, Drexel University Dr. Adam Fontecchio is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Associate Dean for Un- dergraduate Affairs in the College of Engineering, Co- Director of the A. J. Drexel Nanotechnology Institute, an affiliated member of the Materials Engineering Department, and a member of the Center for Educational Research. He is the recipient of a NASA New Investigator Award, the Drexel Gradu- ate Student Association Outstanding Mentor Award, the Drexel University ECE Outstanding Research Achievement Award and the International Liquid Crystal Society Multimedia Prize. In 2003, he
Deleted: Fromwell as firms recognize the high quality of German engineering degrees as given andindisputable. The brand “German engineer” (especially the “Diplom-Ingenieur”) is an indication Deleted: Germany onlyfor the quality of the education delivered by the engineering programs. Deleted: I Deleted: MAs a result of these two factors, neither the academic community nor the Association of German Deleted: are mentionedEngineers (VDI) seems inclined to challenge established curricula and their
’ readiness to learncalculus.” International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(2),209-233, 2015.[5] S. P. Gordon. “Where do we go from here? Creating a national initiative to refocus thecourses below calculus.” MAA NOTES, 69, 274.[6] D. M. Bressoud. Attracting and retaining students to complete two-and four-yearundergraduate degrees in STEM: the role of undergraduate mathematics education. NationalAcademy of Sciences, 2014.[7] D. Olsen, A. Beth, M. Burd, C. Latulippe, and J. Latulippe. “Promoting success ofundergraduate engineering students through curricular improvements in first-year mathematicscourses.” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, July 2021.[8] INTRAC. “Process tracing.” Retrieved
Mechanical Engineers. These faculty represent a broad range of disciplines and unitsacross the university enterprise: Office of International Affairs; Office of Diversity and Inclusion;Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering; Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering;Engineering Education; and Anthropology.Vance and Sours presented at the College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences’Teaching and Learning Symposium. The audience was comprised primarily of non-engineeringfaculty and students. Sours presented at the 2023 International Virtual Exchange Conference inSao Paulo, Brazil, where he had conversations with several non-engineering faculty. Vancepresented about convergence research at the American Society of Agricultural and
Page 8.278.4 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education(h) Broad education necessary to Projects selected by instructors have large environmental impactsunderstand impact of engineering solutions Hin a global & societal context - evaluations of impact and how to mitigate problems(i) Recognize need for & ability to engage inlife-long learning L(j) Knowledge of contemporary issues H Overall regulatory and economic issues in project(k) Ability
colleges and universities, and international issues in higher education.Mr. Cory Brozina, Virginia Tech Cory Brozina is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He has his B.S. and M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering also from Virginia Tech. His research interests are in Learning Analytics, Engineering Education Assessment, and Educational Technology.Eric M Stauffer, Virginia TechChris Frisina, VT PHD Student at VTDr. Troy D Abel, Virginia Tech Dr. Troy Abel received his PhD in Human Computer Interaction and MFA in Graphic Design from Iowa State University. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Visual Communication Design at Virginia Tech and is also the director of the new Eye Tracking
skills. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 135(3), pp.102-108.12. Sorby, S.A., 2009. Educational research in developing 3‐D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), pp.459-480.13. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J. and Lee, C.B., 2006. Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), pp.139-151.14. Gill, D.D. and Newcomer, J.L., 2017, November. “To the Boards”: Team-Based Design for Student-Centered Learning. In ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.