Scientific Self-Efficacy Scale[12-13] that assesses students’ ability to function as a scientist/engineer. Sample items include“use technical science skills”, “generate a research question”, and “use scientific literature and/orreports to guide research and develop theories.” Science/Engineering Identity: Scientific identity will be measured by the items from theScientific Identity Scale [12-13] that ask students to assess how much being a scientist/engineeris viewed as part of how they identify themselves. Sample items include “have a strong sense ofbelonging to the community of scientists/engineers”, “feel like I belong in the field ofscience/engineering”, and “have come to think of myself as a scientist/engineer.” Expectations and
use their technical skills for social good, the students also get the chance to learn aboutthe people, the culture and the history of the place that they are visiting. These trips usually involve an in-country partner who work with underserved populations trying to address an unmet need. While most ofthe trips are out of country trips, there are a few in-country or in-state. Table 1 shows the studentenrollment in these trips between 2015 and 2019. Of the students (N=88) who participated in servicelearning courses, 53.4% (47) were female. The number also show that in 5 of the 7 courses femalestudents outnumber male students. Male Female Summer 19 - Guatemala Service
group of female junior faculty and professional staff affiliated with STEM fields atSyracuse University attended an honorary lecture by Mimi Koehl, UC Berkeley, which coveredboth academic topics and a description of a peer mentoring group which she had been part of formany years. The attendees were inspired to convene a peer mentoring group as Koehl describedand as outlined in the book Every Other Thursday: Stories and Strategies from SuccessfulWomen Scientists by Ellen Daniell[1].The group has a stable membership of ten women in the fields of aerospace engineering,architecture, biology, chemical engineering, chemistry, civil engineering, library science,mechanical engineering, physics, and psychology. At the outset, the group’s members
Center and Mas- sachusetts General Hospital in Boston. Currently, she is an associate professor in Biomedical Engineer- ing Department in Wentworth Institute of Technology. Her research interest is in medical devices, data analysis and telemedicine.Dr. Lili Ma, New York City College of Technology Professor Ma received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Utah State University focusing on au- tonomous ground vehicles. After that she did three-year post-doctoral training at Virginia Tech working with autonomous aerial vehicles. Prior to joining the Computer Engineering Technology (CET) depart- ment at City Tech in fall 2016, she taught at Wentworth Institute of Technology for many years. Profes- sor Ma’s
]. Figure 1. Procedure of the LEED Lab ProgramA number of prior studies have addressed the importance of a collaborative project and studentinteraction to prepare for future career paths ([5], [9]-[11]). Dewey also introduced the concept of“learning by doing” that several higher educational institutions have actively adopted for theircourse curricula, along with project-based learning (PBL) and service-learning [12]. By taking a“learning by doing” course, students are able to acquire technical knowledge about the subject aswell as practical experience by demonstrating their knowledge and interacting with projectstakeholders such as other students, university staff, and people in their community. Thus, studentshave the opportunity to apply
, jigs, fixtures, and other mechanical devices used in manufacturingenvironments and being able to read and interpret manufacturing documentation such as blueprints, technical drawings and diagrams, production plans, tooling plans, quality plans, andsafety plans. One of the key outcomes of TEC333 is that students can apply appropriate datumreference frames to designs. Students are asked to demonstrate their understanding of the datumreference frame concepts in several ways throughout the course on a pretest, tests, onlinequizzes, modeling & drawing assignments, measuring assignments, and the final exam. Specificexamples include labeling a datum reference frame origin on a given drawing, sketching datumfeature symbols on a drawing given
Education, 2020 Enhancing Middle/High School Female Students Self-Confidence and Motivation in Pursuing STEM Careers through Increasing Diversity in Engineering And Labor-force (IDEAL) Outreach Summer ProgramIntroductionExperts anticipate that discoveries in engineering, science, and technology fields will drive hugeadvancements in human society in the coming decades. Researchers and economists predictaccelerating job-growth in these fields as well [1]. For example, the United States Department ofCommerce (USDC) has already found that in the first decade of the 21st century the number ofemployment opportunities in these areas grew at a rate three times faster than in other fields [2].These new
undergraduate world where engineersare often working in groups consisting of peers of different levels of age, knowledge andexperience [1]. Therefore, exposing students to a cross-cohort project would introduce them to anenvironment more similar to what they would experience in the future. This type of projects, hashad positive impact on students’ learning by providing the opportunity for them to see theapplication of theoretical course concepts through design and analysis of engineering systems [2].Literature Review: Current research has shown that multidisciplinary group projects inengineering education is beneficial to students since it better reflects the standard practice inindustry [3, 4]. Though this paper is discussing an interdisciplinary
researchin the area. They are 1). Student ratings are the most reliable and valid method of measuringteachers’ effectiveness. 2). The ratings are only one source of data and must be used incombination with multiple sources of information if one wishes to make a judgment aboutteaching. 4, 5Student PollThis section describes the method that we adopted for polling students. There probably aremore studies of student ratings than all of the other data used to evaluate college teachingcombined4. In general, student ratings tend to be statistically reliable, valid, and relativelyfree from bias or the need for control, perhaps more so than any other data used for facultyevaluation4. Benton and Cashin4 also quote McKeachie who argued that, when it comes
general method with broad applications toidentify the influences of various variations on the systems or processes. It is traditionally afundamental course offered to students in various ISE programs across the American universities.This paper presents a recent effort at a research university in the U.S. to integrate renewableenergy topics into the traditional DOE course to help ISE students update their knowledge baseand foster environmental responsibility and sustainability awareness in their future careers. Anew topic related to the manufacturing of a specific form of renewable energy, cellulosic biofuel,has been integrated into an eight-week course project session. The course-end evaluation andsurvey have shown a significant increase of
still allowed it to be interdisciplinary. During this process we discoveredthree truths that we did not set out to determine from the beginning. (1) We did not know how to define and therefore how to promote multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary thinking.b Due to this, these words, while they helped to gather people together no matter their discipline, became tiring to everyone due to their “buzzword” nature. We therefore stress their technical meaning. Interdisciplinary connotes the idea of integration of content from multiplea https://www.wtamu.edu/academics/college-engineering/water-working-groupb The distinction between multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary is important. As informed by Klein andSchneider
important. Moststudents praised the visualization approach for teaching FTOC. Even though we havenot used activities and exercises, students felt that more hands-on activities and in-class exercises could be very helpful. In general, they like traditional presentations,but not as excited as we thought about Powerpoint presentations. Surprisingly mostof them prefer not to read texbooks. Overall, we feel that visualizations were verywell-accepted and preferred by students as an additional way of learning. Refer toTable 1 for the percentage of very important and important activities as perceivedby students. For more details please refer to the Appendix. Percentage Activity 69.0% Understanding the concept of FTOC 75.9
Test AnxietyAbstract Test anxiety is a prevalent psychological issue among higher-education students,particularly those seeking degrees in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics) [1]. Test anxiety is an adverse emotional reaction when faced with a testingcircumstance or comparable evaluative atmosphere. Numerous studies on the impact of testanxiety on STEM students' academic performance have been undertaken. Understanding thecomplex link between test anxiety and academic achievement is critical for developing evidence-based solutions to help students succeed in STEM fields. Despite substantial research on collegestudents' test anxiety, there are major gaps in the literature, particularly in the context ofengineering
embedded project. Theseprojects give the students the chance to use their technical expertise and knowledge gainedduring years of study. Students work very hard to have a working project by the end of thesemester. These projects provide students many opportunities to engage in self-directedlearning. They develop the ability to debug, seek and find information they need, and the abilityto understand and reverse-engineer poorly written documentation. The students’ feedback andtheir final project presentation indicate that they have pride in their project accomplishments andhave gained confidence in their engineering abilities.References: 1. Annual Report on the State of Poverty in Utah, 2014, Community Action Partnership of Utah, http
with GTAs so that we can understand how their GTAidentity evolves over time. 5References[1] A. E. Austin, "Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization tothe academic career," Journal of Higher Education, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 94-122, 2002.[2] N. L. Buerkel-Rothfuss and P. L. Gray, "Models for Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA)Training: The 'Real,' the 'Necessary,' and the 'Ideal,'" Basic Communication Course Annual, vol.3, no. 1, p. 20, 1991.[3] N. Apkarian and C. Rasmussen, "Instructional leadership structures across five universitydepartments," Higher Education, vol. 81, pp. 865-887, 2021.[4] M. T. Hora and A. B
engineering faculty participants whocompleted the SoTL Accelerator program. Program details can be found here:https://www.sotlaccelerator.com/Methods Intervention: SoTL Accelerator - Professional Development OverviewTo receive the full program stipend ($1,750) engineering faculty participants were expected to:(1) Complete eight hours of asynchronous preparatory work using an online learning management system,(2) Attend all required virtual meeting sessions (see Figure 1),(3) Design and implement their new curriculum within an engineering class with at least four students,(4) Upload their newly developed curriculum and implementation notes as a card on EngineeringUnleashed.com,(5) Upload a minimum of four un-identified student
social and personality psychology from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2007. Prior to his career in psychology, he spent six years as a teacher, coach, and social worker. Chris is a second generation educator whose grandparents were tenant farmers in Iowa and Nebraska. He tries to emulate their hard work and persistence in the pursuit of social justice. One of his favorite childhood memories is eating his paternal grandmother’s homemade fruit pies with plenty of ice cream.Dr. Dustin B. Thoman, San Diego State University Dr. Dustin Thoman is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education at San Diego State University. He also serves as California
Ceramics, Solvay, Novelis) in addition to battery testing company (ElementAssurance). The lectures offered direct insights into various facets of MSE, such as aluminummanufacturing to battery testing, ceramic production, and polymer processing. In addition, acollaborative effort with one company has resulted in the creation of technical videos that serveas supplemental resources for students. These pedagogical endeavors have been thoughtfullyaligned with the MSE paradigm, focusing on materials processing, properties, and performance.The goal of the initiative is to demonstrate the practical significance of the theoretical conceptsand processes taught in the classroom, rendering academic knowledge tangible and relevant.This work in progress paper
) 88.41 (6.78) 83.70 (10.16) *P<0.050Figure 1 illustrates the performance disparities between IE students and ME students. While MEstudents generally outperformed IE students in all three learning modules, no statisticallysignificant difference was found for any individual module. Overall Student Performance 90 85 80 75 70 Linear Algebra & Linear Basic solutions, Simplex & Integer Programming Programming Duality IE ME Figure 1. Student Overall Performance Evaluation IE vs. ME (95% C.I.)To delve deeper into the
exposed to formal studies in leadership which they aren’t[1]. Satisfying the societaldemand of engineering leadership education is, regrettably, commonly limited to introductory-level coursework in technical communication in most engineering curricula[1]. The purpose ofthis paper is to revisit the state of engineering leadership education in academia and to introducePurdue University's College of Engineering’s recently endorsed Engineering Leadership Minor.A potential model to address the shortfall of experiential engineering leadership education withintraditional engineering curricula, this minor, which is one element of a larger engineeringleadership program, will involve the use of coursework, discussions, one-on-one mentoring bydistinguished
modules to teach professionallearners?” We expect to use our findings to inform the general practice of using and designingonline modules in the context of professional education, while also providing a more specificinsight into specific challenges that MBSE instructors might face.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with four instructors who taught our modules toprofessional learners. Our suite of modules includes the following units: “1: Introduction toSystems Engineering (SE) and MBSE for Production Systems”. “2A: Engineering a System withSystems Modeling Language (SysML)”, “2B: SysML Implementation and Applications”, “3:Quantitative Methods Supporting MBSE”, “4: Production engineering and MBSE”, “5: DigitalEngineering and the Model
difficult to keep up with the changesnecessary to prepare qualified college graduates [1, 4-5]. Contemporary workforce requirements change the old stereotype of an engineer as a highlyknowledgeable and technically qualified but introverted specialist. Professional skills that aretransferable to any workplace are displacing technical knowledge at the top of the list of employers’requirements for engineers. Today, engineers are expected to work in multidisciplinary teams,effectively communicate with diverse audiences and stakeholders, and understand the societal impactof engineering decisions [6-7]. However, national reports indicate that less than 50% of employersconsider college graduates proficient in competencies such as professionalism
., [6]) are coupled with aspects of food andnutrition security and safety (i.e., food systems, nutrition, food borne illness, food loss and waste,and climate change) to create modules that combine design and food. When reviewing AppendixB, the reader will note that broad, general principles of engineering design are included, such as:problem identification, requirements, analysis and synthesis, generating multiple solutions,evaluating solutions against requirements – all while considering the public health, safety, andwelfare as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economics factors (i.e., [6]). Thereader is encouraged to contact the author for additional discussion of the details included inAppendices A and B.Critical Element 1
newinsights into how to effectively disseminate research results to increase the likelihood that theassociated teaching interventions are adopted.IntroductionComputing education research constantly develops more efficient, effective, and inclusiveteaching pedagogies, curriculums, and tools. With all of this research, Ni and colleagues notedthat for this effort to “have real impact on teaching practices, we eventually need computinginstructors to adopt those innovations and integrate them into their own classrooms” [1, p. 544].Recent efforts, such as the Evidence-Based Teaching Practices in CS SIGCSE Workshop [2],have tried to bridge this gap between published innovations and their adoption in the classroom.Morrison et al. [2] conducted a workshop
implementation. The with a slight grade point were spring is used to complete the included. The spring was for the implementation and testing and design and possible present the results. implementationTable 1: A comparison between the critical elements of the old and new capstone experiences.(continued) Criterion Old Capstone Sequence New Capstone Sequence Idea generation The ideas were generated by the The ideas are generated by the end time end of the fall. of spring before the project kickoff in the fall. Project The project didn't start
local industries in which alumniare the main means of engaging these partnerships, the development of unique competencymanagement that involves the entire university, and the need for innovation in the educationenvironment in engineering so that the university can be increasingly inserted in the contextof open innovation with a focus on attracting new students, economic and geographic growthand local social impact with a focus on community development.Keywords: International Benchmarking; Active Learning; Industrial Engineering. 1. IntroductionEngineering education in developed countries is a benchmark for all others [1]. In theseuniversities, different ways of teaching students are used to make learning more realistic andattractive. North
net generation came from wind power [1]. Thepace of technological change embodied in this rapid growth drives the need to educatesubstantially more highly-trained engineers and scientists. According to the U.S. Energy andEmployment Report [2], there were nearly 115,000 people working in the U.S. wind energyindustry, and consequently this sector has the third-largest share of electric power generationemployment. The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Wind Vision report sets forth plausiblescenarios in which 20% of the U.S. electrical energy requirement in 2030 is served by windenergy, and 35% by 2050 [3]. The estimated number of jobs in these scenarios, both direct andindirect, necessary to achieve the proposed levels of wind energy
calculated for all fourdisciplinary groupings and their totality. The gender distribution in a specific occupationgroup was compared with the total gender distribution in the respective disciplinary groupand with the gender distribution of all the disciplinary groupings combined. The statisticalsignificance of the over- or underrepresentation of women in an occupational group in thedisciplines combined was evaluated using Pearson’s Chi-square test on a 95% confidencelevel (p<0.05).To study the leaky pipeline phenomenon, the occupation groupings at level 2 were dividedinto technical and nontechnical occupations. This was done in agreement with the threeauthors. The allocation is presented in Appendix 1. The gender distribution in technical
project, we identified potential sources oferror that could have contributed to a low number of applications for REEFE. An exhaustive listof these error sources can be found in our full fishbone diagram, shown in the appendix, and isorganized to show potential sources of error mapped to the information stream where the errorwas identified. All aspects of the program’s system are represented. The themes generated fromthe appendix fishbone diagram are summarized in Figure 1. We discuss these themes further inthe following sections. The order of reporting of these themes is the same as presented in Table2. Failure analysis like the one we accomplished does not result in a ranked list of contributingfactors. The goal is to identify what aspects of
/0095798414543014.[27] E. Wong, R. Collins, J. Cerully, R. Seelam, and E. Roth, Racial and Ethnic Differences in Mental Illness Stigma and Discrimination Among Californians Experiencing Mental Health Challenges, vol. 6, no. 2. RAND Corporation, 2016.[28] D. F. Polit and C. T. Beck, “Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies,” Int. J. Nurs. Stud., vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1451–1458, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004.[29] B. Smith, “Generalizability in qualitative research: misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences,” Qual. Res. Sport. Exerc. Heal., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 137–149, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221.[30] H