Paper ID #31625Work in Progress: An Exploratory Study of the Sustainability Mindsetthrough a Citizen Science Project in a Vulnerable Latinx CommunityDr. Azadeh Bolhari P.E., Angelo State University Dr. Bolhari is currently an Assistant Professor of Environmental Engineering at Angelo State University. Dr. Bolhari holds her PhD from Colorado State in Environmental Engineering. Her research interests include: sustainability mindset, resilient communities, citizen science, engineering identity, and retention of minorities in engineering.Dr. Daniel Ivan Castaneda, James Madison University Daniel I. Castaneda is an Assistant
Paper ID #41408How to Develop a Culture of Coding for the Future: A Case Study of themegaGEMS Coding AcademyGeorge Zaccheus Sikazwe, University of the Incarnate Word George Z. Sikazwe is an undergraduate electrical engineering student at the University of the Incarnate Word in San Antonio, Texas. Mr. Sikazwe is passionate about applying engineered solutions to real-world problems. As a student research assistant in the Autonomous Vehicle Systems Research Laboratories his focus is in computational intelligence, specifically applications of deep learning onto hardware. For the GEMS (Girls in Engineering, Math, and Science
Control and Earthquake Engineering. Dr. Pong has been the Director of the School of Engineering at SFSU with 20 full-time faculty and over 25 part-time faculty since 2009.Dr. Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University Zhaoshuo Jiang graduated from the University of Connecticut with a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering. Before joining San Francisco State University as an assistant professor, he worked as a structural engi- neering professional at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) LLP. As a licensed professional engineer in the states of Connecticut and California, Dr. Jiang has been involved in the design of a variety of low- rise and high-rise projects. His current research interests mainly focus on Smart
Paper ID #24889Targeted harassment of engineering education researchers: How to connectwith community and support your colleagues under attackDr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Alice L. Pawley is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate fac- ulty member in the Gender, Women’s and Sexuality Studies Program and the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. Prof. Pawley’s goal through her work at Purdue is to help people, including the engineering education profession, develop a vision of engineering
involvement in out-of-class activities(e.g., internships, clubs, sports, and research experiences). Research Experiences forUndergraduates (REUs) may provide students with a unique opportunity to develop leadership-enabling competencies that will prepare them for leadership in graduate school, the engineeringindustry, or academia.The goal of this research was to identify how students’ engagement in an engineering educationvirtual REU site contributed to their development of essential leadership-enabling competencies.The research question guiding this study was ‘What inclusive leadership-enabling competenciesand skills did engineering students learn and develop during an engineering education SummerREU program?’ Qualitative data was collected via
, 2014[27] Wenchong, et al. Computational Features of the Thinking and the Thinking Attributes of Computing: On Computational Thinking [J]. JSW, 2014, 9(10): 2507-2513[28] Wing J M. Computational Thinking [J]. Communications of the ACM,2006,49(3): 33-35[29] Wu S.M, Wang P.M. The reform direction of engineering graduate education in the 21st century [J]. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education, 1995(06): 10-13 (in Chinese)[30] Yin R K. Case study research: Design and methods [J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2010, 44(1):108-108.[31] Zhan D.C., Nie L.S. The path to computational thinking and university computing curriculum reform [J]. China University Teaching, 2013(2):56-60 (in Chinese)
. As of now, we have only had two teams of studentswho have graduated from high school, both from Sheridan, Arkansas. We did follow up on thesenior level teams by contacting the school counselor at Sheridan. She was able to give usinformation regarding their fields of study at their respective institutions of higher learning. Ofthe four students who have graduated from high school, two students did choose to major inengineering. One is currently enrolled at the University of Arkansas, and the other is attendingUALR.Proceedings of the 2011 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 4Bibliography1
. ConclusionsSuccess of the engineering research consortium program established through its long-standinghistory of 25 years indicates the possibility of not merely a peaceful cohabitation of arguablyextreme points of view represented by the behaviorist and constructivist models within theenvironment, but a thriving collaboration where the features of the best of both models arebrought out to be effective in realizing rich scholarship. Remarkably, the faculty members of Page 11.640.10WEMPEC have internalized this feature as a natural consequence of their personal educationalbeliefs, without particular pre-mediation through theoretical studies on
study.This (other category) paper complements previous research in explicitly describing Coomer6 andHultgren’s7 paradigm classification criteria and how new researchers can use the paradigmclassification criterion to identify and determine the quality of operationalization of paradigms inresearch studies. New researchers are often experts or graduate students in engineering orengineering education, who have primarily been trained in and are operating from the empirical-analytical paradigm, without formal education on different research paradigms. Hence, newresearchers may benefit from a description of the different paradigm classification criteria andthe process of using the paradigm classification criteria to determine the quality of
engaged in research col- laboration with NASA Goddard as a Science Collaborator and has been awarded grants by the U.S. Air Force, National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture to research Magnetic Mapping of Pico/Nano/Micro-Satellites and study the impact of magnetic field exposure on plant germination, growth. Dr. Asundi teaches courses in Space Systems Engineering and is actively engaged in collaboration with academic institutions in India. As part of invited visits, Dr. Asundi has conducted several short courses and workshops in Systems Engineering Based Design of PNMSats.Dr. Gregory C. Bernard, Tuskegee University Gregory C. Bernard, Ph.D., is a molecular biologist concentrating in the areas of plant
cultivate and evaluate supportive teaching and learning networks in engineering departments and colleges. He received his doctoral degree in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where he was a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. His dissertation studied the teaching practices of engineering instructors during game-based learning activities, and how these practices affected student motivation.Dr. Dominik May, University of Wuppertal Dr. May is a Professor at the University of Wuppertal. He researches online and intercultural engineering education. His primary research focuses on the development, introduction, practical use, and educational value of online laboratories (remote, virtual, and cross-reality
with the goals of their own departmentsmotivated professors to include the competition in their courses. There are related findings fromother research as well. In their paper investigating barriers to faculty pedagogical changeBrownell and Tanner (2012) hypothesize that in addition to lack of training, time, and incentive,faculty have a hard time identifying as educators because so much of their career preparationfocuses on the quality of research. Brownell and Tanner propose that integrating more teachinginto the professor discipline during graduate and postdoctoral education will shift the professor’sprofessional identity to one that includes teaching. In this study, we found that professors usedthe real-world problem-solving project to
, doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000090.[6] B. J. Barnes and J. Randall, “Doctoral Student Satisfaction: An Examination of Disciplinary,Enrollment, and Institutional Differences,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 47–75, Mar. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9225-4.[7] M. Greene, “Come Hell or High Water: Doctoral Students’ Perceptions on Support Servicesand Persistence,” International Journal of Doctoral Studies, vol. 10, pp. 501–518, 2015, doi:https://doi.org/10.28945/2327.[8] J. A Gilmore, A. M Wofford, and M. A Maher, “The Flip Side of the Attrition Coin: FacultyPerceptions of Factors Supporting Graduate Student Success,” International Journal of DoctoralStudies, vol. 11, pp. 419–439, 2016, doi: https://doi.org
Paper ID #43435Anti-racism, Inclusion, Diversity and Equity in Database Curriculum ThroughGroup Research Projects on Historical, Social and Ethical Database RelatedTopicsDr. Ioulia Rytikova, George Mason University Ioulia Rytikova is a Professor and an Associate Chair for Graduate Studies in the Department of Information Sciences and Technology at George Mason University. She received a B.S./M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Automated Control Systems Engineering and Information Processing. Her research interests lie at the intersection of Data Science and Big Data Analytics, Cognitive and Learning Sciences, Educational Data Mining
Paper ID #40960Effectiveness of Scrum in Enhancing Feedback Accessibility among UndergraduateResearch Students: Insights from Integrated Feedback Dynamics FrameworkSakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University Sakhi Aggrawal is a Graduate Research Fellow in Computer and Information Technology department at Purdue University. She completed her master’s degree in Business Analytics from Imperial College London and bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Technology and Organizational Leadership from Purdue University. She worked in industry for several years with her latest jobs being as project manager at Google and Microsoft. Her
in the program provedpositive which, as one student wrote, “Only furthers and deepens the desire of education.” Page 12.1508.8One undergrad was given the opportunity to accompany her PhD mentor and professor to asymposium in South Korea. On this trip she was indulged with information from a design worldthat she would have never known existed. She notes, “I am now much more interested inresearch mainly because I know what is out there and have heard about many of the issues theydeal with first hand. It is important for students to know about all sorts of research that is goingon in their field of study before entering graduate school. This
States”, Washington International Education Conference, Presentation, 2005.3 Grebski, W., “Engineering Technology Programs: Challenges and Opportunities”, Report of Engineering Technology, ASEE, 20044 ECU Ad hoc Strategic Planning Committee for International Affairs, “Internationalization Goals for 2009 and a Plan for Achieving Them”, East Carolina University, 2005.5 Council of Graduate Schools, “Findings from 2005 CGS international Graduate Admissions Survey:Admission and Enrollment”, CGS, November 2005.6 Peyton, J., “Factors Contributing to the Desire to Study in the U.S.”, GMAC Research Reports, GraduateManagement Admission Council, October 2005
physical sciences each require different skills andknowledge. In other words, this finding shows strongly that each group tend to distinguish thedisciplinary differences rather than the similarities between engineering and the physicalsciences. We recognize that the limited size of our sample data collected at a single university isa constraint on the strength of our arguments. Thus, we recommend that more qualitative as wellas quantitative research be conducted to progress this area of study. This suggests directions forfurther work to refine our understanding of student perceptions to provide foundations forimproved materials and processes to support the decision making of high-school graduates aboutwhat they will study in university. As
Paper ID #23694Learning in Academic Makerspaces: Preliminary Case Studies of How Aca-demic Makerspaces Afford Learning for Female StudentsMs. Megan Tomko, Georgia Institute of Technology Megan E. Tomko is a Ph.D. graduate student in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineer- ing at the Georgia Institute of Technology under the guidance of Dr. Julie Linsey. She completed one semester in her graduate studies at James Madison University with Dr. Robert Nagel as her advisor. Her B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering is from the University of Pittsburgh where she also worked as a Field Telecommunications Intern for
of Toledo. His research focus is concerned with understanding the ways in which culture and climate impact student’s cognition, attitudes, behaviors, and outcomes. His population of interest is racial/ethnic minorities, with African American student experiences as a focal point.Dr. Aaron Lee Adams, Alabama A&M University Aaron Adams is an assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering at Alabama A & M University. Before pursuing graduate studies, he worked at the National Academy of Engineering & Ford Motor Company as a product design engineer focusing on Minority STEM education and envi- ronmental policies. His research interests include nuclear radiation detection and thermal
Paper ID #6085Preferential Learning of Students in a Post-Secondary Introductory Engi-neering Graphics Course: A Preliminary Study Focused on Students At-RiskDr. Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech Dr. Jeremy V. Ernst is an assistant professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning at Virginia Tech. He currently teaches graduate courses in STEM education foundations and contemporary issues in Integrative STEM Education. Dr. Ernst specializes in research focused on dynamic intervention means for STEM education students categorized as at-risk of dropping out of school. He also has curriculum research and development
Paper ID #39818Board 215: Applying Research Results in Instructor Development to ReduceStudent Resistance to Active Learning: Project UpdateMs. Lea K. Marlor, University of Michigan Lea Marlor is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Michigan, studying Engineering Education Research. She joined the University of Michigan in Sept 2019. Previously, she was the Associate Director for Education for the Center for Energy Efficient ElecDr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for
student cohort meetings, not having adedicated program coordinator, not offering group meetings to discuss resumes, careers,graduate school, or offer a poster conference. While it is typical at other NSF-funded REUprograms to have a program coordinator, each student in the AFIT Summer Research Programis directed through his or her own AFIT Faculty Advisor and has a unique experience. Anotherunique aspect of the AFIT summer program is that all students are required to work the samecore hours between 0900 and 1500 each day.The new paradigm that we present in this paper is novel and unique because we were able tofigure out a way forward to assess students’ experiences in 2012 and use this information to gainsupport and resources to upgrade future
engineering graduation, followinga model first introduced by Tinto in 19934. Results of these studies allow better targeting ofadmissions to particular student achievement characteristics and may maximize educationalresources and improve retention rates. However, such research does not provide guidance inwhy high-achieving students, particularly women and racial/ethnic minorities enroll in but thenleave engineering education, or how such influences might be changing over time. A second category of studies has considered the learning and interpersonal environmentof engineering and the interaction with student characteristics that might influence students’decisions to remain in or leave engineering education. Some studies have described the
authors examined datafrom student Longitudinal Assessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy (LAESE)surveys. Despitethe shrinking number of women engineering students at San José State University , the self-efficacy levels of the women engineering students were high. The authors can surmise thatwomen who choose to study engineering at SJSU feel confident in their abilities to succeed inengineering and or project such confidence given the male-dominated terrain of Engineering.A. Theoretical basis for the researchThere is little empirical research on the specific impact of cultural attitudes about gender roles ongirls’ interest and career choice in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)fields, particularly about STEM interest and career
Paper ID #9779The Influence of Summer Research Experiences on Community College Stu-dents’ Efficacy and Pursuit of a Bachelor’s Degree in Science and EngineeringDr. Sharnnia Artis, University of California, BerkeleyDr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech Dr. Catherine Amelink is Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering, Virginia Tech. Page 24.1227.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The Influence of Summer Research Experiences on Community
information. Specifically, the research questions motivating this study include 1)What WE2NG RET program elements have the greatest control on teacher experience and is teacherlearning affected by those elements? And 2) How does teachers’ confidence (in their understandingof STEM curriculum) change due to their participation in the WE2NG RET program?General Program Logistics The WE2NG program supports teacher participants to attend a full-time (40 hours/week) paidsix-week summer training at CSM where they engage in research under the direction of faculty andgraduate student mentors. Participants are paired with a research group on campus (including afaculty advisor and graduate research assistants) based on their STEM content interests and thescope
Sensitivity VignetteDr. Xiao has a rather heavy accent. When Dr. Xiao was a fellow university colleague ofDr. Willard, Dr. Willard would continually ridicule Dr. Xiao's English, joking with othersabout how difficult it was to understand him. As a result many graduate students wouldavoid taking Dr. Xiao's classes or having him on their committees. Partly because of this,Dr. Xiao eventually left to take a job at another university. Several years later, Dr. Xiaofinds himself on a NSF review panel that is reviewing one of Dr. Willard's grantproposals. Of all of the members of the review panel, Dr. Xiao is the most knowledgeablein the area of research that Dr. Willard is proposing to study and, consequently, the othermembers of the panel look to him as
influence their teaching practices? This research was designed to understand theinfluence that accreditation, as an external force, has on ethics education via the educators taskedwith teaching it. This study employed an exploratory qualitative approach and drew on semi-structured interviews that probed participants’ ethics teaching practices and perspectives,including the influences and motivations related to their instruction. Interviews were completedwith 20 engineering ethics educators who represented a range of engineering disciplines across17 institutions in the United States. Inductive analysis of the transcripts indicated a bifurcatedresponse to accreditation in the context of ethics and societal impacts education. On one hand,accreditation
analysis. Overall, he aims to situate his research on emerging technologies within the present-day educational context, with Taiwan as a starting point and a comparative approach as a guiding methodology.Dr. Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Zhu is Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Affiliate Faculty in the Department of Science, Technology & Society and the Center for Human-Computer Interaction at Virginia Tech. Dr. Zhu is also an Affiliate Researcher at the Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Zhu is Editor for International Perspectives at the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, Associate Editor for Engineering Studies, and Executive Committee